Russia Investigation Heating Up [Archive] - Page 40

View Full Version : Russia Investigation Heating Up

Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 [40] 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48

Androidpk

01-26-2019, 11:19 AM

Isn’t Mueller a republican?

Yes, staunch Republican, a very much by the books boy scout. IIRC he has been confirmed by the Senate on 3 occasions and is widely respected by both parties. Fox News used to praise him until he became special prosecutor, now suddenly he's "very biased" and " crooked".

Parkbandit

01-26-2019, 11:21 AM

When did I say that? And no I didn’t mean it either. It was a simple question with no hidden meaning.

Ah, sorry. That line of reasoning has been used plenty of times by our resident retards. I forgot you are a communist Russian double agent.

Parkbandit

01-26-2019, 11:21 AM

Yes, staunch Republican, a very much by the books boy scout. IIRC he has been confirmed by the Senate on 3 occasions and is widely respected by both parties. Fox News used to praise him until he became special prosecutor, now suddenly he's "very biased" and " crooked".

See Solkern?

Right on queue.

Fortybox

01-26-2019, 11:22 AM

Oh shit, you are right. I keep saying 2016.. but you really did call the 2018 Democrat win the House when no one else did. You were the one single voice here that said they would.

AND YOU WERE RIGHT!

https://media1.tenor.com/images/a81c1a0802ff33f8e4b781a833d4b8b1/tenor.gif?itemid=4384529

If you were PK you would have denied you ever said it and would have scrubbed your post.

Then when someone quoted the post you scrubbed, you'd still deny it.

Lrn2PK

Androidpk

01-26-2019, 11:23 AM

Oh shit, you are right. I keep saying 2016.. but you really did call the 2018 Democrat win the House when no one else did. You were the one single voice here that said they would.

AND YOU WERE RIGHT!

https://media1.tenor.com/images/a81c1a0802ff33f8e4b781a833d4b8b1/tenor.gif?itemid=4384529

Wrong again, other people called it as well. More lame trolling. Shocker.

Solkern

01-26-2019, 11:26 AM

Ah, sorry. That line of reasoning has been used plenty of times by our resident retards. I forgot you are a communist Russian double agent.

And a damn good one! I haven’t really been caught up on what’s been happening, trying to figure it out and I don’t really pay attention to US media anymore, I have trouble finding unbiased reporting.

Parkbandit

01-26-2019, 11:27 AM

I'm sorry but stupid comments like this piss me off.

What's it like living with yourself? Geeze..

Yeah, buddy, all those agents, and all the people working on this are secretly collaborating and just doing it for republican tears. You casually dismiss hundreds of good people and their heroic hard work for your weird little shadow reality because you can't handle the actual truth that these corrupt politicians who are doing harm to our country, system, our way of life are getting caught and busted like they fucking should be.

You should be ashamed of yourself trying to pretend you are some great American patriot seeking justice when you're just complicit with the buttfucking these people are getting away with and trying to justify it with your trifling petty ass semantic bullshit.

Ok. Then explain the need to use 29 agents to surround the home of Stone to arrest him, with CNN rolling a camera?

Do you believe that Stone was a threat? Like he would come out, guns a blazing?

Do you believe that Stone was a flight risk?

Why don't you tell us all why 29 FBI agents, in front of cameras, were needed to arrest a 66 year old man with no history of violence?

Do you believe maybe 4 FBI agents were able to do the same job? Maybe 8? 10? 15? 20? Or do you believe we needed all 29 trained FBI agents to arrest him?

Stop being so god damn stupid every single post. I get it.. you're back to being the champ and you want to show why. I'll give you kudos.. you nailed it and reminded all those in line that you are not a man to trifle with.

Parkbandit

01-26-2019, 11:28 AM

And a damn good one! I haven’t really been caught up on what’s been happening, trying to figure it out and I don’t really pay attention to US media anymore, I have trouble finding unbiased reporting.

State run media in Russia is probably less biased than some of the state run "news" operations here.

Parkbandit

01-26-2019, 11:28 AM

Wrong again, other people called it as well. More lame trolling. Shocker.

Wait.. leading up to the election.. let's say a week or two out.. who here claimed that the Republicans would keep the House?

Parkbandit

01-26-2019, 11:29 AM

If you were PK you would have denied you ever said it and would have scrubbed your post.

Then when someone quoted the post you scrubbed, you'd still deny it.

Lrn2PK

I'm not a sociopath. I have no problem saying when I was wrong.

I was wrong. I kept putting 2016 instead of 2018.

Solkern

01-26-2019, 11:31 AM

State run media in Russia is probably less biased than some of the state run "news" operations here.

State run media here is quite entertaining actually!
When they do mention the states, it’s just about the corruption, the witch hunt of Mueller, and how Russian vodka would solve all the problems in the States

Back

01-26-2019, 11:33 AM

What's it like living with yourself? Geeze..

Ok. Then explain the need to use 29 agents to surround the home of Stone to arrest him, with CNN rolling a camera?

Do you believe that Stone was a threat? Like he would come out, guns a blazing?

Do you believe that Stone was a flight risk?

Why don't you tell us all why 29 FBI agents, in front of cameras, were needed to arrest a 66 year old man with no history of violence?

Do you believe maybe 4 FBI agents were able to do the same job? Maybe 8? 10? 15? 20? Or do you believe we needed all 29 trained FBI agents to arrest him?

Stop being so god damn stupid every single post. I get it.. you're back to being the champ and you want to show why. I'll give you kudos.. you nailed it and reminded all those in line that you are not a man to trifle with.

Because he fucked with the livelyhood of the motherfucking USA itself. Lucky he wasn't black. He'd have been shot in the back with his hands in the air. But we all know that does not hold up because he actually DID break the law.

Astray

01-26-2019, 11:34 AM

I really gotta photoshop that MAGA hat onto Pikachu.

Edit - I can be lazy. Thanks Google.

https://archive-media-1.nyafuu.org/vp/image/1476/80/1476800075744.png

Back

01-26-2019, 11:37 AM

State run media in Russia is probably less biased than some of the state run "news" operations here.

Did, you, actually, post, this... holy fuck.

Androidpk

01-26-2019, 11:37 AM

Who cares how many agents were there. Some were there to arrest Stone, others were there to carry out a search warrant on his house to collect evidence. And yes they had guns. That's standard operating procedure for carrying out a warrant, especially someone with a documented history of having firearms in his house. Stop being a giant pussy because the big mean scary FBI agents had scary looking firearms. Or not, and continue to be the raving mad, unhinged lunatic that everyone has you pegged as.

Parkbandit

01-26-2019, 11:40 AM

Because he fucked with the livelyhood of the motherfucking USA itself. Lucky he wasn't black. He'd have been shot in the back with his hands in the air. But we all know that does not hold up because he actually DID break the law.

So, you can't answer it. I'm shocked. Really.

Maybe you should take a break from proving why you are champion. We know.

Save your strength. I see a title defense in the very near future.

Androidpk

01-26-2019, 11:41 AM

Did, you, actually, post, this... holy fuck.

How far the party of Reagan has fallen. From tear down that wall to build the wall! From fighting Russian influence to welcoming it with open arms. It's the saddest decline for a political party in modern history.

Parkbandit

01-26-2019, 11:42 AM

Androidpk

01-26-2019, 11:44 AM

It was a political stunt for the cameras.

Nothing more.

Cite your sources. Show evidence. Oh wait, you can't. Your precious feelings, the same ones telling you Hillary is all behind this vast conspiracy, are telling you the FBI carried out this raid just to score political points against Trump.

Stop, dude. You've become so unhinged at this point and it's really sad.

Parkbandit

01-26-2019, 11:45 AM

How far the party of Reagan has fallen. From tear down that wall to build the wall! From fighting Russian influence to welcoming it with open arms. It's the saddest decline for a political party in modern history.

Who, specifically, is welcoming Russian influence?

Just because many have said that you bought into this Russian hoax to explain the election results you didn't like doesn't mean it's actually true.

Androidpk

01-26-2019, 11:47 AM

Solkern

01-26-2019, 11:48 AM

Who, specifically, is welcoming Russian influence?

Just because many have said that you bought into this Russian hoax to explain the election results you didn't like doesn't mean it's actually true.

Well to be fair, every Russian I know, or my friends know here, all say that they know Putin interfered with the elections.
They just shrug and say it’s no big deal, who cares

Fortybox

01-26-2019, 11:51 AM

Only unhinged lunatics such as yourself think it's all a hoax. It's why you can't over even the tiniest shred of evidence pointing to a hoax or conspiracy against Trump without resorting to shit being spread by Infowars and Russian propaganda.

PK said the word evidence...

HAHAHAHA

This guy.

RichardCranium

01-26-2019, 12:25 PM

Methais

01-26-2019, 12:32 PM

https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/000/428/313/2e5.jpg

I agree that ClydeR, being the OP of this thread and all, is an expert on faggotry.

Androidpk

01-26-2019, 12:43 PM

I won't lie, I lol'd. It didn't get the bites it deserved.

I sincerely hope the rational conservatives take back their party. Trumpism is going nowhere fast.

RichardCranium

01-26-2019, 12:47 PM

I sincerely hope the rational conservatives take back their party. Trumpism is going nowhere fast.

The two party system is not the answer.

Parkbandit

01-26-2019, 12:50 PM

Well to be fair, every Russian I know, or my friends know here, all say that they know Putin interfered with the elections.
They just shrug and say it’s no big deal, who cares

I don't think anyone is doubting that they did or at least attempted to.

What has always been in doubt is that Trump colluded with Russia to win the election.. because some people here can't quite cope with the fact that Trump beat Hillary.. so it ZOMGMUSTBERUSSIANS!

Parkbandit

01-26-2019, 12:53 PM

Androidpk

01-26-2019, 12:57 PM

The two party system is not the answer.

How many should there be?

Androidpk

01-26-2019, 12:58 PM

What evidence?

Lying to Congress isn't evidence of this grand conspiracy how the "CIA and FBI believe Trump is a Russian agent".

Crossfire Hurricane.

Fortybox

01-26-2019, 01:04 PM

How many should there be?

I don't know...you tell us? Your multiple personalities could give us a clue.

Methais

01-26-2019, 01:04 PM

I think removing him from office is a bad call before the investigation is complete. If he's simply incompetent, then I think removing him from office does more harm to the country than keeping him in office.

Clearly you're an alt-right Nazi now who wants all minorities to die.

RichardCranium

01-26-2019, 01:06 PM

How many should there be?

I say go to an approval voting system.

Methais

01-26-2019, 01:12 PM

Says the retard who believes scrubbing his own posts and then saying those things didn't happen would work. Oh wait that's me. Damn I'm stupid as fuck.

This is correct.

Methais

01-26-2019, 01:21 PM

Not surprising since he's a 400lb hacker living in his mom's basement

It's always entertaining when pk of all people here tries to accuse someone else of being a mooch. :lol:

who dreams of one day being allowed to join the Proud Boys.

Remember when you threatened to dox me to Antifa because of your hurt fee fees? Good times.

Dumbass.

Serious level of bias.. :lol2:

Mueller is one of the straightest shooters in law enforcement. I swear the level of idiocy shown by you, tgo and PB is beyond absurd. Stop watching infowars and fox news and get some real sources for once and maybe you'll stop looking like the raging zealot/fanatic everyone thinks you are.

Remember when you fell for Buzzfeed's fake news like a week ago because you're stupid?

Methais

01-26-2019, 01:28 PM

President Trump's campaign has been directly implicated in the indictment against Roger Stone. According to Special Counsel Mueller's indictments after July 22nd 2016 a senior Trump Campaign official was directed to contact Roger Stone for more information about Wikileaks releasing additional damaging information regarding the Clinton Campaign. Roger Stone thereafter told the Trump Campaign about potential future releases. On July 27th candidate Trump looked directly at the camera and publicly asked Russia for their help in finding Hillary Clinton's 30,000 missing emails.[1] Special Counsel Mueller's indictment against 12 Russian Intelligence Officers found that on or around July 27 2016 Russian hackers known as Guccifer 2.0 hacked the Clinton campaign.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ROGER JASON STONE, JR.[2]

4. ROGER JASON STONE, JR. was a political consultant who worked for decades in U.S. politics and on U.S. political campaigns. STONE was an official on the U.S. presidential campaign of Donald J. Trump (“Trump Campaign”) until in or around August 2015, and maintained regular contact with and publicly supported the Trump Campaign through the 2016 election. 5.

5. During the summer of 2016, STONE spoke to senior Trump Campaign officials about Organization 1 and information it might have had that would be damaging to the Clinton Campaign. STONE was contacted by senior Trump Campaign officials to inquire about future releases by Organization 1.

11. By in or around June and July 2016, STONE informed senior Trump Campaign officials that he had information indicating Organization 1 had documents whose release would be damaging to the Clinton Campaign. The head of Organization 1 was located at all relevant times at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London, United Kingdom.

12. After the July 22, 2016 release of stolen DNC emails by Organization 1, a senior Trump Campaign official was directed to contact STONE about any additional releases and what other damaging information Organization 1 had regarding the Clinton Campaign. STONE thereafter told the Trump Campaign about potential future releases of damaging material by Organization 1.

17. On or about October 7, 2016, Organization 1 released the first set of emails stolen from the Clinton Campaign chairman. Shortly after Organization 1’s release, an associate of the high-ranking Trump Campaign official sent a text message to STONE that read “well done.” In subsequent conversations with senior Trump Campaign officials, STONE claimed credit for having correctly predicted the October 7, 2016 release.

DoJ Indictment of 12 Russian Intelligence Officers[3]

22. The Conspirators spearphished individuals affiliated with the Clinton Campaign throughout the summer of 2016. For example, on or about July 27, 2016, the Conspirators attempted after hours to spearphish for the first time email accounts at a domain hosted by a thirdparty provider and used by Clinton’s personal office. At or around the same time, they also targeted seventy-six email addresses at the domain for the Clinton Campaign.

Context: Former Trump Campaign adviser Roger Stone, Wikileaks, Guccifer 2.0, and Russian military intelligence (GRU)

During the 2016 Presidential campaign Roger Stone[4] made constant braggadocios statements about his ties to Guccifer 2.0, the DNC hacker, and Wikileaks. While Roger Stone has attempted to downplay his communication with Guccifer 2.0, he has admitted to have been in contact with the DNC hacking suspect.[5] On July 13, 2018 Special Counsel Mueller indicts 12 Russian Intelligence Officers that work for the GRU - Russia's military intelligence agency. This was a military operation conducted by the Russian state. The indictment details GRU officers using the moniker Guciffer 2.0 that disseminated the hacked material through Wikileaks.[6]

We also know that Special Counsel Mueller has been asking questions about whether or not President Trump knew of the hacked DNC emails before they were released. They've asked about the relationship between GOP operative Roger Stone and WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, and why Trump took policy positions favorable to Russia.[7] WikiLeaks should be considered an extension of Russia's 2016 disinformation campaign,[8] we know that WikiLeaks shared material hacked by the GRU.[9]

Roger Stone has been a target of this investigation for quite some time, he has tried to get ahead of a potential indictment by claiming he is ready to be indicted and that the Russian collusion scandal is a hoax.[10] A report by the Wall Street Journal confirmed that Roger Stone sought damaging information on Hillary Clinton from Julian Assange during the campaign.[11]

1) New York Times - Donald Trump Calls on Russia to Find Hillary Clinton’s Missing Emails (https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/28/us/politics/donald-trump-russia-clinton-emails.html)
2) U.S. Department of Justice indictment of Roger Stone (https://www.scribd.com/document/398210081/Stone-Indictment-012419#from_embed 2))
3) U.S. Department of Justice indictment of 12 Russian Intelligence Officers (https://www.justice.gov/file/1080281/download)
4) New York Times - Roger Stone, the ‘Trickster’ on Trump’s Side, Is Under F.B.I. Scrutiny (https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/21/us/roger-stone-donald-trump-russia.html)
5) Chicago Tribune - Ex-Trump adviser Roger Stone swapped messages with DNC hacking suspect (http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/ct-roger-stone-guccifer-20170311-story.html)
6) U.S. Justice Department Federal Indictment by a Grand Jury - 12 Russian Intelligence Officers and their role with election interference (https://www.justice.gov/file/1080281/download)
7) NBC - Mueller asking if Trump knew about hacked Democratic emails before release (https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/mueller-asking-what-trump-knew-about-hacked-emails-n851941?cid=sm_npd_nn_tw_np)
8) Foreign Policy - WikiLeaks Turned Down Leaks on Russian Government During U.S. Presidential Campaign (http://foreignpolicy.com/2017/08/17/wikileaks-turned-down-leaks-on-russian-government-during-u-s-presidential-campaign/)
9) CBS - How did WikiLeaks become associated with Russia? (https://www.cbsnews.com/news/how-did-wikileaks-become-associated-with-russia/)
10) NPR - Trump Adviser Roger Stone Says He's 'Prepared' If Indicted By Special Counsel Mueller (https://www.npr.org/2018/05/21/613117543/trump-adviser-roger-stone-says-hes-prepared-if-indicted-by-special-counsel-muell)
11) Wall Street Journal - Roger Stone Sought Information on Clinton From Assange, Emails Show (https://www.wsj.com/articles/roger-stone-sought-information-on-clinton-from-assange-emails-show-1527191428?mod=searchresults&page=1&pos=1)

http://www.netanimations.net/blue-girls-fingers-on-mouse.gif

Androidpk

01-26-2019, 01:32 PM

I say go to an approval voting system.

I have no idea what that is.

Methais

01-26-2019, 01:43 PM

Methais

01-26-2019, 01:46 PM

I'm sorry but stupid comments like this piss me off.

Yeah, buddy, all those agents, and all the people working on this are secretly collaborating and just doing it for republican tears. You casually dismiss hundreds of good people and their heroic hard work for your weird little shadow reality because you can't handle the actual truth that these corrupt politicians who are doing harm to our country, system, our way of life are getting caught and busted like they fucking should be.

You should be ashamed of yourself trying to pretend you are some great American patriot seeking justice when you're just complicit with the buttfucking these people are getting away with and trying to justify it with your trifling petty ass semantic bullshit.

Look how triggered you are. :lol:

Wrong again, other people called it as well. More lame trolling. Shocker.

I see you've been attending time4fun's sarcasm classes.

Methais

01-26-2019, 01:49 PM

and how Russian vodka would solve all the problems in the States

Who's disagreeing with that though?

Gelston

01-26-2019, 02:09 PM

The funny thing, the best rated Vodka is from France. The US has tons of that cheap Polish and Russian vodka.

RichardCranium

01-26-2019, 02:57 PM

I have no idea what that is.https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Approval_voting

Approval voting is a single-winner electoral system where each voter may select ("approve") any number of candidates. The winner is the most-approved candidate.

Basically eliminates the "lesser of two evils" system we have now and gives third party candidates a (slightly) better chance.

Gelston

01-26-2019, 03:02 PM

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Approval_voting

Basically eliminates the "lesser of two evils" system we have now and gives third party candidates a (slightly) better chance.

I like ranked choice better. With forced (instant) runoffs if no one gets over 50%.

https://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/mainercv/pages/105/attachments/original/1445210847/RCV_Easy_Ballot_Ranked_3.jpg?1445210847

Fortybox

01-26-2019, 03:11 PM

I like ranked choice better. With forced (instant) runoffs if no one gets over 50%.

https://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/mainercv/pages/105/attachments/original/1445210847/RCV_Easy_Ballot_Ranked_3.jpg?1445210847

Um...liberals cannot count. $5MM wow server per month ring a bell?

RichardCranium

01-26-2019, 03:11 PM

I like ranked choice better. With forced (instant) runoffs if no one gets over 50%.

https://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/mainercv/pages/105/attachments/original/1445210847/RCV_Easy_Ballot_Ranked_3.jpg?1445210847

The approval system is a form of score voting so a numerical value can be applied to each candidate (-1, 0, +1, 0-9.)

I'm good with either.

Gelston

01-26-2019, 03:23 PM

The best system would be where only I can vote though.

RichardCranium

01-26-2019, 03:26 PM

You can when you are the state.

Gelston

01-26-2019, 03:35 PM

You can when you are the state.

Soon enough.

Parkbandit

01-26-2019, 03:44 PM

Basically eliminates the "lesser of two evils" system we have now and gives third party candidates a (slightly) better chance.

What party do you believe will support such a measure.

It's like term limits.. most intelligent people are for them.. but they will never get voted on and passed because you are basically voting out people who have made a career out of being scumbag politicians.

Gelston

01-26-2019, 03:46 PM

What party do you believe will support such a measure.

It's like term limits.. most intelligent people are for them.. but they will never get voted on and passed because you are basically voting out people who have made a career out of being scumbag politicians.

A lot of states have jungle primaries, such as mine. I think it would be great. Maine actually used Ranked Choice last election for both primaries.

It actually makes it better for all concerned, because it is harder to split a vote. So you could have Hillary, Bernie, and Trump running at the same time, and Hillary wouldn't lose votes to Bernie and vice versa.

RichardCranium

01-26-2019, 03:51 PM

A lot of states have jungle primaries, such as mine. I think it would be great. Maine actually used Ranked Choice last election for both primaries.

*clears throat*

He means "ours."

Methais

01-26-2019, 04:00 PM

What party do you believe will support such a measure.

It's like term limits.. most intelligent people are for them.. but they will never get voted on and passed because you are basically voting out people who have made a career out of being scumbag politicians.

The only way it would ever pass is if it exempted the people who are currently in office. Which would be better than nothing short term, and good for long term once they all retire/die/get pwned from office, etc.

Gelston

01-26-2019, 04:06 PM

The only way it would ever pass is if it exempted the people who are currently in office. Which would be better than nothing short term, and good for long term once they all retire/die/get pwned from office, etc.

Honestly, both parties should be for it. They wouldn't have to worry about third parties, like Libertarians or Socialist swooping in with their candidates and swiping votes. Ross Perot a problem? Not anymore! Bernie Sanders running as an I? No big deal!

George H.W. Bush would have won a second election with this system.

Parkbandit

01-26-2019, 07:35 PM

Honestly, both parties should be for it. They wouldn't have to worry about third parties, like Libertarians or Socialist swooping in with their candidates and swiping votes. Ross Perot a problem? Not anymore! Bernie Sanders running as an I? No big deal!

George H.W. Bush would have won a second election with this system.

I think he's talking about term limits.

RichardCranium

01-26-2019, 07:38 PM

I think he's talking about term limits.

I've been for term limits at the Federal level. But I'm talking about presidential elections.

Gelston

01-26-2019, 07:41 PM

I think he's talking about term limits.

No, he was talking about changing the election system. He said "It's like" to speak about term limits. Term limits would undoubtedly require an amendment to the Constitution because Congress would probably never pass that as an Act.

sellstuff1

01-26-2019, 08:20 PM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SEHPKyeWBas&feature=youtu.be

Solkern

01-27-2019, 12:40 AM

Who's disagreeing with that though?

What’s that shitty vodka in the states? McCromicks or something? Russian vodka is absolute horse piss, it makes the worst vodka in the states the best tasting drink ever. Shit is cheaper than water here! Most Russians prefer JD ��
Although, I’m sure if it was used to solve problems, they are probably right and most issues would be solved much easier!

Gelston

01-27-2019, 12:48 AM

What’s that shitty vodka in the states? McCromicks or something? Russian vodka is absolute horse piss, it makes the worst vodka in the states the best tasting drink ever. Shit is cheaper than water here! Most Russians prefer JD ��
Although, I’m sure if it was used to solve problems, they are probably right and most issues would be solved much easier!

Vodka is cheaper than water here. You can get 1.75 liters of that shit for 10.

SHAFT

01-27-2019, 12:56 AM

Solkern

01-27-2019, 01:26 AM

Vodka is cheaper than water here. You can get 1.75 liters of that shit for 10.

You can get a liter here for less than a dollar ��
Outside of Moscow, probably even cheaper

Gelston

01-27-2019, 02:01 PM

You can get a liter here for less than a dollar ��
Outside of Moscow, probably even cheaper

No, they'd never allow booze to be that cheap here. They'd add taxes to make it more.

Methais

01-27-2019, 03:08 PM

No, he was talking about changing the election system. He said "It's like" to speak about term limits. Term limits would undoubtedly require an amendment to the Constitution because Congress would probably never pass that as an Act.

I was talking about term limits. Reported.

Gelston

01-27-2019, 03:12 PM

I was talking about term limits. Reported.

No you weren't. I know what you were talking about. You don't know what you were talking about. Obey.

Methais

01-27-2019, 03:24 PM

No you weren't. I know what you were talking about. You don't know what you were talking about. Obey.

Don’t make me call pk’s lawyer. I’ll take action I swear!

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/gYqWi8imPRk/hqdefault.jpg

Gelston

01-27-2019, 03:26 PM

Don’t make me call pk’s lawyer. I’ll take action I swear!

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/gYqWi8imPRk/hqdefault.jpg

Am I going to have to slap a bitch?

Methais

01-27-2019, 03:30 PM

Am I going to have to slap a bitch?

You may slap pk, yes.

Wrathbringer

01-27-2019, 03:33 PM

You may slap pk, yes.

Reported for literally threatening pk's life.

Astray

01-27-2019, 03:35 PM

Reported for literally threatening pk's life.

https://i.imgur.com/01pVKIT.gif

Methais

01-27-2019, 03:46 PM

Reported for literally threatening pk's life.

Stop making death threats Gelston. Or else backtraced.

Gelston

01-27-2019, 03:48 PM

Stop making death threats Gelston. Or else backtraced.

I ONLY MAKE DEATH PROMISES.

Wait.

This was in jest FBI, don't SWAT me bro.

Methais

01-27-2019, 03:56 PM

don't SWAT me bro.

Dont give pk any ideas...

Androidpk

01-30-2019, 10:05 AM

It is just about February and Republicans still haven't assigned members to the House Intelligence Committe, despite having done so for just about every other committee? Is it just a coincidence or are they trying to obstruct the SCO investifation? Mueller can't get the transcripts of certain individuals until those committee members are seated or until Pelosi makes a rule change and assigns Republicans herself.

Tgo01

01-30-2019, 10:23 AM

Isn't Androidpk so cute when someone gives him even the slightest hint that they are taking his posts seriously? He starts to think everyone is taking his nonsense seriously.

I know Androidpk, I know. "Cool story, bro."

Androidpk

01-30-2019, 10:41 AM

More senseless rambling from tgo.

Androidpk

01-30-2019, 04:48 PM

Tgo01

01-30-2019, 05:07 PM

The good news - Michael Cohen is testifying to both the House and Senate Intelligence Committees and he'll be answering questions about Trump conspiring with Russia.

The bad news - It will all be behind closed doors.

So much for the lie that he couldn't testify because Trump was threatening his family. Surely we can 100% believe his testimony!

Androidpk

01-30-2019, 05:12 PM

So much for the lie that he couldn't testify because Trump was threatening his family. Surely we can 100% believe his testimony!

He got subpoenaed by the Senate.

Parkbandit

01-30-2019, 05:24 PM

So much for the lie that he couldn't testify because Trump was threatening his family. Surely we can 100% believe his testimony!

He's already confessed to lying to Congress.

Maybe this is Part II?

You know how to tell if a scumbag lawyer / politician is lying?

His lips are moving...

Gelston

01-30-2019, 06:57 PM

Thousands of Mueller investigation documents leaked online by... Russia.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/jan/30/mueller-evidence-leaked-online-russians?CMP=fb_gu&fbclid=IwAR2DoDdhtWmkRV8ZNDPZ8nClPEnzXi2ZbVcDcoHjQ ypxsyUVwX4AanUAKZY

Evidence gathered by Robert Mueller, the special counsel, was obtained by Russians and leaked online in an attempt to discredit his inquiry into Moscow’s interference in US politics, prosecutors said on Wednesday.

Mueller investigation is almost finished, says acting attorney general
Read more
A court filing by Mueller’s office said more than 1,000 files that it shared confidentially with attorneys for indicted Russian hackers later appeared to have been uploaded to a filesharing site and promoted by a Twitter account.

“We’ve got access to the Special Counsel Mueller’s probe database as we hacked Russian server with info from the Russian troll case,” a tweet from the account said. “You can view all the files Mueller had about the IRA and Russian collusion. Enjoy the reading!”

The tweet was posted in October last year by the account @HackingRedstone, according to the filing. A reporter was also offered leaked material via a direct message the same day. The account has since been removed from Twitter.

Mueller’s court filing on Wednesday said the names and structure of folders containing the leaked files matched those used by Mueller’s office when it shared the data, and that these had not been made public.

The prosecutors said the filesharing site had confirmed to the FBI that the account which posted the material was registered from an IP address – an identifier for devices connected to the internet – in Russia.

FBI investigators had found no evidence that government servers holding the data had been hacked, according to Mueller’s team, pointing instead to a leak on the Russian side.

Mueller disclosed the leak in a filing as part of his prosecution of Concord Management and Consulting, a Russian company that allegedly funded hacking operations by Russia’s notorious Internet Research Agency (IRA).

The filing argued that attorneys for Concord should not be given access to “sensitive” evidence gathered by Mueller’s team for the case.

It said: “The person who created the webpage used their knowledge of the non-sensitive discovery to make it appear as though the irrelevant files contained on the webpage were the sum total evidence of ‘IRA and Russian collusion’ gathered by law enforcement in this matter in an apparent effort to discredit the investigation.”

Androidpk

02-04-2019, 03:45 PM

The House Intelligence Committee’s Democratic leadership has scheduled a vote to send potentially explosive transcripts to special counsel Robert Mueller’s desk.

The committee will vote this Wednesday on turning over sensitive Russia probe transcripts to Mueller, in a move that carries serious implications for anyone who can be shown to have lied.

The handover could put President Trump’s eldest son, Don Jr., in the hot seat. Democrats have signaled suspicions that Don Jr. may have been untruthful. Rep. Jackie Speier (D-Calif.) has said she thinks Don Jr. lied to the committee “on at least two occasions.”

Mueller has already slapped criminal charges on two people for making false statements to the committee in the course of it’s Russia investigation: President Trump’s longtime attorney and fixer, Michael Cohen, and former Trump campaign advisor, Roger Stone.

https://news.vice.com/en_us/article/vbwv74/don-jr-and-jared-kushners-congressional-testimonies-are-finally-going-to-mueller

Alfster

02-04-2019, 09:04 PM

Potentially explosive. Could put.

Translation: No one fucking knows.

Wait. For. The. Report.

Androidpk

02-04-2019, 09:08 PM

Potentially explosive. Could put.

Translation: No one fucking knows.

Wait. For. The. Report.

Could put what?

Alfster

02-04-2019, 09:12 PM

The words from your link.

The handover could put President Trump’s eldest son

None of it means anything

Androidpk

02-04-2019, 09:16 PM

Okay but it's still an update regardless.

Alfster

02-04-2019, 09:23 PM

Eh. Not really. The inaugural committee being ordered by a judge to turn over records would be an update. That happened today.

The subpoena marked an escalation of the investigation, which the prosecutors opened late last year amid a flurry of scrutiny of the inaugural committee. The United States attorney’s office in Brooklyn is separately investigating whether foreigners illegally funneled donations to Mr. Trump’s inaugural committee using so-called straw donors to disguise their donations. Federal law prohibits foreign contributions to inaugural committees.

Androidpk

02-04-2019, 09:33 PM

Yes, that too is an update, though not an SCO update. Mueller is indeed looking into the inauguration but these records are going to SDNY.

Androidpk

02-04-2019, 10:11 PM

And oh yeah, Gates hasn't been sentenced yet and the inauguration is the other investigation he has been spilling the beans on.

And, speculating here, if SDNY is digging into this now it means Mueller is wrapped up with it on his end.

Alfster

02-04-2019, 11:12 PM

It could mean he passed it off as well. I wouldn't get my hopes up over it.

Androidpk

02-05-2019, 08:22 AM

It could mean he passed it off as well. I wouldn't get my hopes up over it.

My hopes have nothing to do with my interests.

Androidpk

02-05-2019, 09:01 AM

The subpoena — issued by the U.S. attorney’s office in the Southern District of New York — indicates that prosecutors are investigating crimes related to conspiracy to defraud the United States, mail fraud, false statements, wire fraud and money laundering.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/federal-prosecutors-issue-sweeping-subpoena-for-documents-from-trump-inaugural-committee-a-sign-of-a-deepening-criminal-probe/2019/02/04/b6382642-28e5-11e9-8eef-0d74f4bf0295_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.ecae18431b4d

Tgo01

02-05-2019, 09:55 AM

My hopes have nothing to do with my interests.

Quite possibly the funniest thing Androidpk has ever said.

Methais

02-05-2019, 01:07 PM

Could put what?

Pretty sure he’s politely saying you’re stupid and that you should stop posting clickbait and pretending it’s news.

Methais

02-05-2019, 01:10 PM

The subpoena

:lol:

ClydeR

02-05-2019, 01:45 PM

BuzzFeed News is today publishing a cache of internal Trump Organization documents (https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/5719169-Trump-Moscow.html) that lay bare the secret negotiations that continued long after Cohen claimed the deal had been abandoned. The documents, many of which have been exclusively obtained by BuzzFeed News, reveal that — despite Trump’s claim that the development was never more than a passing notion — the effort to get the tower built was long-running, detail-oriented and directly entwined with the ups and downs of his campaign.

As Trump went from rally to rally, vociferously denying any dealings in Russia, his representatives, Michael Cohen and his associate Felix Sater, worked with Trump Organization lawyers and even Ivanka Trump to push forward negotiations to build a 100-story edifice just miles from the Kremlin. The fixers believed they needed Putin’s support to pull off the lucrative deal, and they planned to use Trump’s public praise for him to help secure it. At the same time, they plotted to persuade Putin to openly declare his support for Trump’s candidacy. “If he says it we own this election,” Sater wrote to Cohen.

More... (https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/azeenghorayshi/trump-tower-moscow-the-secret-files-cohen-sater-putin)

It made sense until that last sentence.

Parkbandit

02-05-2019, 01:48 PM

Quite possibly the funniest thing Androidpk has ever said.

No way. His meltdown over Methais' words and subsequent inventing his lawyer to get his IP address is Androidpk gold.

Gelston

02-05-2019, 01:48 PM

No way. His meltdown over Methais' words and subsequent inventing his lawyer to get his IP address is Androidpk gold.

You mean when Pk took action?

Parkbandit

02-05-2019, 01:49 PM

You mean when Pk took action?

In his defense.. there is only so much "action" you can do from someone's couch.

Androidpk

02-06-2019, 12:41 PM

Mueller's team filed sealed documents related to Cohen and Gates this morning and shortly afterwards Cohen's lawyer announced that Cohen would not be speaking to the House Intel Committee this Friday as originally planned, it's now going to happen on the 28th of this month. Either it was a gag order on Cohen or another set of indictments. Or both.

Androidpk

02-06-2019, 12:47 PM

House Intel Committee voted to send Mueller transcripts of the people that have testified in regards to the Trump/Russia conspiracy investigation.

Methais

02-06-2019, 12:50 PM

https://i.imgur.com/K1IEA1U.gif

Tgo01

02-06-2019, 12:53 PM

Androidpk still butthurt. He must have read that all of the fact checkers over Trump's SOTU are looking like big dildos so he figured "How can I look like an even bigger dildo?"

Androidpk

02-06-2019, 01:03 PM

Yes I'm very butthurt that Individual 1 is getting thoroughly investigated for breaking multiple laws. :lol:

Meanwhile, back in reality.. Schiff has released the parameters for the committee on it's investigation regarding Trump.

https://i.imgur.com/be2hDD7.png

https://i.imgur.com/Lz4RRmN.png

audioserf

02-06-2019, 01:06 PM

I thought Individual 1 was Stone

Androidpk

02-06-2019, 01:11 PM

I thought Individual 1 was Stone

No, Individual 1 is Donald Trump.

Alfster

02-06-2019, 01:22 PM

Yes I'm very butthurt that Individual 1 is getting thoroughly investigated for breaking multiple laws. :lol:

An investigation doesn't mean he did it. There's plenty of public information about the various oddities related to the campaign and inauguration. The question that's yet to be answered and proven is did he know about it?

Androidpk

02-06-2019, 01:28 PM

An investigation doesn't mean he did it. There's plenty of public information about the various oddities related to the campaign and inauguration. The question that's yet to be answered and proven is did he know about it?

Right.. which is why they are investigating. Derp.

Parkbandit

02-06-2019, 01:35 PM

Right.. which is why they are investigating. Derp.

That’s not really why. Derp.

Methais

02-06-2019, 01:43 PM

Androidpk

02-06-2019, 01:46 PM

That’s not really why. Derp.

Yes, actually it is. Unless you care to show something that indicates otherwise. Gonna show your source yet that shows Hillary orchestrated this whole massive conspiracy or are you still gonna sit there and cry while you repeat your same stupid bullshit?

Parkbandit

02-06-2019, 03:14 PM

Yes, actually it is. Unless you care to show something that indicates otherwise. Gonna show your source yet that shows Hillary orchestrated this whole massive conspiracy or are you still gonna sit there and cry while you repeat your same stupid bullshit?

I doubt Hillary came up with it.. it was her handlers who needed an excuse for blowing the easiest election of all time.

When it comes out that Mueller doesn't have any collusion between Russia and Trump.. are you going to finally admit that you were suckered or will your stance be that Mueller did a shitty job investigating it?

Gelston

02-06-2019, 03:17 PM

I doubt Hillary came up with it.. it was her handlers who needed an excuse for blowing the easiest election of all time.

When it comes out that Mueller doesn't have any collusion between Russia and Trump.. are you going to finally admit that you were suckered or will your stance be that Mueller did a shitty job investigating it?

He'll just slowly stop talking about it and then start spamming the PC with some other thing.

Androidpk

02-06-2019, 03:21 PM

I doubt Hillary came up with it.. it was her handlers who needed an excuse for blowing the easiest election of all time.

When it comes out that Mueller doesn't have any collusion between Russia and Trump.. are you going to finally admit that you were suckered or will your stance be that Mueller did a shitty job investigating it?

I'll accept it and move on, just like when Comey decided not to press charges on Hillary.

Parkbandit

02-06-2019, 03:24 PM

I'll accept it and move on, just like when Comey decided not to press charges on Hillary.

2016 Androidpk didn't accept it and move on though :(

2019 Androidpk is even worse... so hopefully you will surprise us all with a glimmer of honesty and maturity.

I'm not holding my breath though.

Androidpk

02-06-2019, 03:31 PM

2016 Androidpk didn't accept it and move on though :(

2019 Androidpk is even worse... so hopefully you will surprise us all with a glimmer of honesty and maturity.

I'm not holding my breath though.

2016 Androidpk did accept it and did move on, especially considering she lost the election because of the investigation, which was the best possible outcome.

I have no problem with accepting Mueller's report if it turns out Trump wasn't involved. He is highly respected so if that's his determination then I'm good with it. I already said as much back in 2017 in the Comey thread I made. And given my interests in the natsec field finding out that the POTUS wasn't conspiring with a hostile nation state would be pretty damn good in my book.

The question though is will you accept Mueller's findings if it turns out Trump was illegally conspiring with Russia to defraud the US. Would you call for his impeachment or would you vote for him again in 2020?

Methais

02-06-2019, 03:37 PM

I'll accept it and move on, just like when Comey decided not to press charges on Hillary.

Did you clear this with time4fun? If not you’re gonna be in for an extra brutal pounding and no one should have to go through that, not even for a couch.

Parkbandit

02-06-2019, 03:41 PM

2016 Androidpk did accept it and did move on, especially considering she lost the election because of the investigation, which was the best possible outcome.

I have no problem with accepting Mueller's report if it turns out Trump wasn't involved. He is highly respected so if that's his determination then I'm good with it. I already said as much back in 2017 in the Comey thread I made. And given my interests in the natsec field finding out that the POTUS wasn't conspiring with a hostile nation state would be pretty damn good in my book.

You might want to go back to the Clinton email thread and do your little scrub-a-dub-dumb on your hundreds of posts after July 2016 if you want to believe your own bullshit.

Weren't you the crazy fuck who after Comey said she won't be charged, kept saying "It's not over!!!" over and over again? Because I only remember you being the one that thought she would be indicted.

The question though is will you accept Mueller's findings if it turns out Trump was illegally conspiring with Russia to defraud the US. Would you call for his impeachment or would you vote for him again in 2020?

Depends.

If he was getting op research from Russia or whoever.. that's US politics imo. No worse than the Dossier that was fabricated to bring Trump down.

If Trump did something illegal that caused him to win with the help of Russia, then yes.. he should be impeached.

Alfster

02-06-2019, 03:48 PM

If he was getting op research from Russia or whoever.. that's US politics imo. No worse than the Dossier that was fabricated to bring Trump down.

I wrote the steele dossier off when it first rolled out as political bullshit - but can you point to what part of it that's been disproven at this point? A lot of it's still up in the air, but to my knowledge nothing has been proven to be factually incorrect

Tgo01

02-06-2019, 03:49 PM

I wrote the steele dossier off when it first rolled out as political bullshit - but can you point to what part of it that's been disproven at this point? A lot of it's still up in the air, but to my knowledge nothing has been proven to be factually incorrect

Has the Russian hooker pissing thing been confirmed?

Gelston

02-06-2019, 03:51 PM

Androidpk

02-06-2019, 03:55 PM

I wrote the steele dossier off when it first rolled out as political bullshit - but can you point to what part of it that's been disproven at this point? A lot of it's still up in the air, but to my knowledge nothing has been proven to be factually incorrect

Depends on who you ask. Even some people who believe Trump conspired with Russia think the dossier isn't true.

Androidpk

02-06-2019, 03:56 PM

I'm not gonig to agree with "findings" anymore than I agree with a prosecutor's "findings". He can find whatever he want, he has to PROVE it. Only this time, Trump's jury would be the Senate.

People acting like DAs and shit don't find shit that is proven false.

The American voter is also the jury here, just like it was with Hillary's investigation. Even if the Senate does nothing all of this is going to severely effect Trump's 2020 chances.

Gelston

02-06-2019, 04:12 PM

The American voter is also the jury here, just like it was with Hillary's investigation. Even if the Senate does nothing all of this is going to severely effect Trump's 2020 chances.

I think the only thing that is effecting Trump's 2020 run is the candidate the DNC finally puts up. People who are OMG RUSSIA INVESTIGATION! likely aren't voting for Trump regardless. I honestly don't think most people give a fuck about this, because it is just "investigation fatigue". Too much "OMG this is it!" that turns into a big fat nothing or gets disproved.

Androidpk

02-06-2019, 04:38 PM

I think the only thing that is effecting Trump's 2020 run is the candidate the DNC finally puts up. People who are OMG RUSSIA INVESTIGATION! likely aren't voting for Trump regardless. I honestly don't think most people give a fuck about this, because it is just "investigation fatigue". Too much "OMG this is it!" that turns into a big fat nothing or gets disproved.

Except all the polling shows that the majority of Americans believe Mueller's investigation needs to be carried out. And of course Democrats won't vote for Trump, that was never the issue. The issue is independents and Republicans that are tiring of Trump.

Gelston

02-06-2019, 04:42 PM

Except all the polling shows that the majority of Americans believe Mueller's investigation needs to be carried out. And of course Democrats won't vote for Trump, that was never the issue. The issue is independents and Republicans that are tiring of Trump.

Just because people believe an investigation needs to be carried out, doesn't mean the results are going to massively sway anyone. I think there should be an investigation after every Presidential election.

And again, polls are bullshit.

Alfster

02-06-2019, 04:51 PM

Has the Russian hooker pissing thing been confirmed?

I didn't ask what's been confirmed. I asked what has been proven to be false.

Alfster

02-06-2019, 04:52 PM

I think the only thing that is effecting Trump's 2020 run is the candidate the DNC finally puts up. People who are OMG RUSSIA INVESTIGATION! likely aren't voting for Trump regardless. I honestly don't think most people give a fuck about this, because it is just "investigation fatigue". Too much "OMG this is it!" that turns into a big fat nothing or gets disproved.

Don't forget if any independent candidates come out. That could help either party depending on who it is.

Tgo01

02-06-2019, 04:53 PM

I didn't ask what's been confirmed. I asked what has been proven to be false.

It would be almost impossible to prove Trump never hired Russian prostitutes to piss on a bed, this is usually why the onus is on the one making the accusation to prove it happened.

Gelston

02-06-2019, 04:55 PM

Don't forget if any independent candidates come out. That could help either party depending on who it is.

The only independents I see that could really do damage would all be sucking Democrat votes, Schultz or Sanders. I can't think of any on the right off the top of my head.

audioserf

02-06-2019, 05:02 PM

Gelston

02-06-2019, 05:03 PM

Schultz is polling just fucking horribly. He spent all of last week lowkey having tomatos thrown at him in public. Everyone hates that dude. I don't get that candidacy at all. Running on "won't someone think of the billionaires!" fuck outta here, shit's dead in the womb.

Sanders is going to run but he'll do it as a Dem again.

Eh, I think Schultz could pull enough to fuck over whoever gets the Dem nom in some states. He doesn't have to win, he just has to take enough votes. He has enough money to do constant nationwide advertising and all that, which would get him votes... Because sometimes people literally "SAW GUY ON TV BEFORE COMING HERE!" *votes for that guy*

I think a lot of the time 3rd parties do as bad as they do in most places because no one knows who the fuck they are, this wouldn't be the issue here.

Sanders... I don't think he has a snowballs chance in hell to get the Dem nom. If he wants to actually make it to the election, he has to go I.

Although, with as many people throwing their shit into the ring, perhaps he could chug along like Trump did with all the others destroying each other leaving him as the only one left standing.

Alfster

02-06-2019, 05:03 PM

It would be almost impossible to prove Trump never hired Russian prostitutes to piss on a bed, this is usually why the onus is on the one making the accusation to prove it happened.

If memory serves...didnt Trump lie about his reasoning as to why it didn't happen? His claim was essentially - I never stayed overnight in Moscow there so it's impossible to happen. Turns out he did.

Again - it's more intriguing to look through all of this as more information comes out. I have no doubts that the answer to whether this happened is known by the investigators.

Alfster

02-06-2019, 05:04 PM

The only independents I see that could really do damage would all be sucking Democrat votes, Schultz or Sanders. I can't think of any on the right off the top of my head.

Not really independent, but someone like Romney could flip over to independent simply to run against Trump. That would steal some votes.

audioserf

02-06-2019, 05:08 PM

Eh, I think Schultz could pull enough to fuck over whoever gets the Dem nom in some states. He doesn't have to win, he just has to take enough votes. He has enough money to do constant nationwide advertising and all that, which would get him votes... Because sometimes people literally "SAW GUY ON TV BEFORE COMING HERE!" *votes for that guy*

I think a lot of the time 3rd parties do as bad as they do in most places because no one knows who the fuck they are, this wouldn't be the issue here.

Sanders... I don't think he has a snowballs chance in hell to get the Dem nom. If he wants to actually make it to the election, he has to go I.

I think the Dem establishment hate Bernie, but if polling (yeah, I know, post 2016 polling, blahblah, they'll still rely on it) points at him being the strongest contender vs Trump AND he's kicking Dem ass in the primaries they may swallow the bitter pill and go with him just for the sake of best 2020 chance. The HRC machine absolutely screwed him for 2016, and a lot of those people are now backing Harris and Gillibrand hard, but I'm not sure they'll do Bernie the same way again. We'll see, I guess.

Gelston

02-06-2019, 05:11 PM

I think the Dem establishment hate Bernie, but if polling (yeah, I know, post 2016 polling, blahblah, they'll still rely on it) points at him being the strongest contender vs Trump AND he's kicking Dem ass in the primaries they may swallow the bitter pill and go with him just for the sake of best 2020 chance. The HRC machine absolutely screwed him for 2016, and a lot of those people are now backing Harris and Gillibrand hard, but I'm not sure they'll do Bernie the same way again. We'll see, I guess.

I can't see the Superdelegates supporting Sanders because he just straight up left the Democrat party right after the election, which he only joined to get their nom.

As I once said, if I were a Superdelegate, he wouldn't have my vote. If he'd stayed in the party after the election, I'd have considered it.

audioserf

02-06-2019, 05:23 PM

Gelston

02-06-2019, 05:29 PM

And I think that pisses them off but this time around it is fully win by whatever means time and they'll go with him if they think it's their best shot at beating Trump. I don't picture them going, "Well, Gillibrand is HRC Lite and she isn't up on Trump in a single General Election poll, but fuck that Bernie guy, let's go with Gillibrand" if that's the choice.

I think it really all depends on RBG. She dies or resigns and her seat is filled prior to the election, nah. If she is still kicking then, oh yeah, they are going to put up whatever they can that they think is winning, even if it is a detriment to their party.

Androidpk

02-06-2019, 05:41 PM

If memory serves...didnt Trump lie about his reasoning as to why it didn't happen? His claim was essentially - I never stayed overnight in Moscow there so it's impossible to happen. Turns out he did.

Again - it's more intriguing to look through all of this as more information comes out. I have no doubts that the answer to whether this happened is known by the investigators.

Mueller is certainly investigating aspects of the dossier. The mystery company fighting the documents subpoena for example, is supposedly tied to it. Given the available information I think it's the Qatari Investment Authority, which was involved in the brokerage of the Rosneft shares, which the dossier talks about.

Parkbandit

02-06-2019, 05:56 PM

I didn't ask what's been confirmed. I asked what has been proven to be false.

Didn't the author of it testify that most of it isn't true? Didn't he testify to that as well?

I'll have to look it up when I get home tonight.

Parkbandit

02-06-2019, 06:00 PM

Depends on who you ask. Even some people who believe Trump conspired with Russia think the dossier isn't true.

Not many people who believe that Trump colluded with Russia to beat Hillary don't believe the dossier isn't real. They would believe anything that paints Trump in a bad manner.

Even a fabricated dossier.

Parkbandit

02-06-2019, 06:07 PM

Schultz is polling just fucking horribly. He spent all of last week lowkey having tomatos thrown at him in public. Everyone hates that dude. I don't get that candidacy at all. Running on "won't someone think of the billionaires!" fuck outta here, shit's dead in the womb.

Yea, that "person of wealth" comment won't play well... but he is the only Democrat running as a Democrat currently though. Every other candidate is a Democrat who's running as a Socialist. At least he acknowledges that the Socialist policies of Medicare for all, free tuition, student debt forgiveness, etc... come with a gigantic price tag that we can't afford.

Sanders is going to run but he'll do it as a Dem again.

So, he was an Independent, who changed to Democrat to run for President.. when that didn't work out, he went back to Independent.. and you believe he's going to do that bullshit all over again and people won't think he's a socialist fraud?

Good to know..

Parkbandit

02-06-2019, 06:08 PM

Not really independent, but someone like Romney could flip over to independent simply to run against Trump. That would steal some votes.

Romney is dumb.. but he's not that dumb.

Flake hates Trump enough to do it.. but he's a flake and no one likes him except the never Trumpers who wouldn't vote for Trump anyway.

Parkbandit

02-06-2019, 06:09 PM

I think the Dem establishment hate Bernie, but if polling (yeah, I know, post 2016 polling, blahblah, they'll still rely on it) points at him being the strongest contender vs Trump AND he's kicking Dem ass in the primaries they may swallow the bitter pill and go with him just for the sake of best 2020 chance. The HRC machine absolutely screwed him for 2016, and a lot of those people are now backing Harris and Gillibrand hard, but I'm not sure they'll do Bernie the same way again. We'll see, I guess.

Kamala Harris is the one to beat at this point.. she has the structure and personnel in place to go far... until Biden throws his perv hat in.

Androidpk

02-06-2019, 06:18 PM

Not many people who believe that Trump colluded with Russia to beat Hillary don't believe the dossier isn't real. They would believe anything that paints Trump in a bad manner.

Even a fabricated dossier.

No.

Androidpk

02-06-2019, 06:19 PM

Not really independent, but someone like Romney could flip over to independent simply to run against Trump. That would steal some votes.

If Romney runs it will be as a Republican.

Methais

02-06-2019, 07:08 PM

Too much "OMG this is it!" that turns into a big fat nothing or gets disproved.

That’s certainly not something that would happen here on the PC.

Androidpk

02-06-2019, 07:28 PM

Paul Erickson was indicted and arrested. The charges aren't related to Russia but he was Butina's BF and is alleged to have laundered money to the NRA that went to Trump.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/paul-erickson-russian-agent-maria-butinas-boyfriend-indicted-for-fraud?ref=home

Parkbandit

02-06-2019, 08:07 PM

No.

Yes.

See time4fun as an example.

Fortybox

02-07-2019, 11:25 PM

Yes.

See time4fun as an example.

Speaking of which, where did she go? PK is boring...tries way too hard to troll. Time4fun is a natural kind of stupid and much more entertaining.

~Rocktar~

02-07-2019, 11:47 PM

Speaking of which, where did she go? PK is boring...tries way too hard to troll. Time4fun is a natural kind of stupid and much more entertaining.

Probably completing another couple of Phd dissertations.

Fortybox

02-08-2019, 12:41 AM

Probably completing another couple of Phd dissertations.

:lol:

Methais

02-08-2019, 07:53 AM

Is the investigation heating up yet?

Parkbandit

02-08-2019, 10:42 AM

Speaking of which, where did she go? PK is boring...tries way too hard to troll. Time4fun is a natural kind of stupid and much more entertaining.

I agree. PK just recycles his stupidity again and again and again... at least time4fun's stupidity comes directly from the source.

She has a PhD in stupidity.

Tgo01

02-08-2019, 11:12 AM

According to Roger Stone's home surveillance CNN got to his house 40 minutes before the FBI did and setup their cameras 10 minutes before the FBI arrived.

But Androidpk immediately went with the fake news narrative that CNN had been camped out at his house for weeks prior to the raid.

I wonder if Androidpk ever gets tired of falling for literal fake news and being made the fool of?

Androidpk

02-08-2019, 11:14 AM

It's not fake news if it's true. It wasn't the first time CNN was camped outside of Stone's house anticipating an arrest. Try harder, troll, you'll get there someday :/

Tgo01

02-08-2019, 11:18 AM

It's not fake news if it's true. It wasn't the first time CNN was camped outside of Stone's house anticipating an arrest. Try harder, troll, you'll get there someday :/

Oh wow. Androidpk is so delusional he is sticking to his guns that CNN setting up their cameras 10 minutes before the FBI arrived is just "good journalisming" on CNN's part and not a very obvious tip off by the FBI.

It's a weird thing to be proud of that you willingly gobble up as much fake news as possible, but you do you.

Androidpk

02-08-2019, 11:20 AM

Oh wow. Androidpk is so delusional he is sticking to his guns that CNN setting up their cameras 10 minutes before the FBI arrived is just "good journalisming" on CNN's part and not a very obvious tip off by the FBI.

It's a weird thing to be proud of that you willingly gobble up as much fake news as possible, but you do you.

It's weird to see you talking about gobbling up fake news when you and parkbandit still refuse to share your sources showing the SCO is a hoax perpetrated by Hillary. GG

Methais

02-08-2019, 01:40 PM

It's not fake news if it's true. It wasn't the first time CNN was camped outside of Stone's house anticipating an arrest. Try harder, troll, you'll get there someday :/

This kind of extreme willful dumbassery is why we want you to never stop posting.

Parkbandit

02-08-2019, 04:02 PM

This kind of extreme willful dumbassery is why we want you to never stop posting.

"No matter how badly you want me to leave, I'm not going to!" - Androidpk's next post.

Because he's a fucking retard.

Methais

02-08-2019, 04:03 PM

"No matter how badly you want me to leave, I'm not going to because I’m a strong independent woman!" - Androidpk's next post.

Because he's a fucking retard.

Fixed.

Ashlander

02-08-2019, 04:09 PM

"No matter how badly you want me to leave, I'm not going to because I like taking it from a strong independent woman!" - Androidpk's next post.

Because he's a fucking retard.

Fixed.

Fixed your fix.

Androidpk

02-12-2019, 02:37 PM

Donald Trump should be impeached if he obstructed justice or colluded with Russia, more than 60 percent of Americans say in new poll.

https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-impeachment-obstruction-justice-collusion-russia-60-percent-1327839

RichardCranium

02-12-2019, 03:05 PM

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/senate-has-uncovered-no-direct-evidence-conspiracy-between-trump-campaign-n970536

After two years and 200 interviews, the Senate Intelligence Committee is approaching the end of its investigation (https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/national-security/senate-intel-heads-say-trump-russia-collusion-still-open-question-n807401)into the 2016 election, having uncovered no direct evidence of a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia, according to both Democrats and Republicans (https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/senate-intelligence-heads-showcase-bipartisanship-russian-probe-n740076)on the committee.

Parkbandit

02-12-2019, 03:33 PM

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/senate-has-uncovered-no-direct-evidence-conspiracy-between-trump-campaign-n970536

I'm shocked. SHOCKED.

You ready to admit you were had yet, lefties?

Back

02-12-2019, 03:55 PM

I'm shocked. SHOCKED.

You ready to admit you were had yet, lefties?

You also did not read the whole article. Not shocked.

Parkbandit

02-12-2019, 04:16 PM

You also did not read the whole article. Not shocked.

I didn't read any of the article.

But.. when Mueller comes back with nothing on Trump colluding with Russia.. will you be willing to apologize to this entire forum for you being so fucking stupid for believing it in the first place?

As champion, other retards here look down to you for guidance. I believe this will help bridge the gap between those with all the intelligence and those of you who don't have your fair share.

Androidpk

02-12-2019, 04:16 PM

You also did not read the whole article. Not shocked.

It's not the slightest bit of a surprise that they ignore that actual substance of Burr's interview. Their investigation isn't almost over, he expect it to continue for at least another 8 years.

sellstuff1

02-12-2019, 04:24 PM

I'm shocked. SHOCKED.

You ready to admit you were had yet, lefties?

Wow, a Republican said there's no collusion. 100% proof Trump and Russia aren't in bed together. Shut down the investigation boys.

Androidpk

02-12-2019, 04:33 PM

Wow, a Republican said there's no collusion. 100% proof Trump and Russia aren't in bed together. Shut down the investigation boys.

Burr was on Trump's transition team, which is under investigation.

Back

02-12-2019, 04:38 PM

I didn't read any of the article.

But.. when Mueller comes back with nothing on Trump colluding with Russia.. will you be willing to apologize to this entire forum for you being so fucking stupid for believing it in the first place?

As champion, other retards here look down to you for guidance. I believe this will help bridge the gap between those with all the intelligence and those of you who don't have your fair share.

:lol::lol::lol:

Apologize to this entire forum?

Dude you take this shit, and yourself, waaaaaaay too seriously.

Nothing is going to change my opinion that Trump is a liar, fool, the personification of what is bad about America, and not fit for the office. Trump himself has proved and continues to prove this every day.

Trump may get off on some legal technicality, people will take the fall for him, but at the end of the day we all know he has buddied up to Russia for personal gain.

Jeril

02-12-2019, 04:50 PM

:lol::lol::lol:

Apologize to this entire forum?

Dude you take this shit, and yourself, waaaaaaay too seriously.

Nothing is going to change my opinion that Trump is a liar, fool, the personification of what is bad about America, and not fit for the office. Trump himself has proved and continues to prove this every day.

Trump may get off on some legal technicality, people will take the fall for him, but at the end of the day we all know he has buddied up to Russia for personal gain.

I highly doubt that any politician currently serving is fit to be president.

Astray

02-12-2019, 04:57 PM

I highly doubt that any politician currently serving is fit to be president.

Agreed*.

*This is not consent.

Parkbandit

02-12-2019, 06:00 PM

Wow, a Republican said there's no collusion. 100% proof Trump and Russia aren't in bed together. Shut down the investigation boys.

Wow, a butthurt, racist snowflake said there was collusion. 100% proof Trump and Russia are in bed together. Start the impeachment boys.

Parkbandit

02-12-2019, 06:01 PM

:lol::lol::lol:

Apologize to this entire forum?

Dude you take this shit, and yourself, waaaaaaay too seriously.

Nothing is going to change my opinion that Trump is a liar, fool, the personification of what is bad about America, and not fit for the office. Trump himself has proved and continues to prove this every day.

Trump may get off on some legal technicality, people will take the fall for him, but at the end of the day we all know he has buddied up to Russia for personal gain.

So.. no matter what Mueller finds.. you will still say he colluded with Russia.

Good to know that your stupidity knows no bounds.

Thank you.

Parkbandit

02-12-2019, 06:02 PM

I highly doubt that any politician currently serving is fit to be president.

Two words:

TERM
LIMITS

RichardCranium

02-12-2019, 06:02 PM

It's not the slightest bit of a surprise that they ignore that actual substance of Burr's interview. Their investigation isn't almost over, he expect it to continue for at least another 8 years.

Burr was careful to note that more facts may yet be uncovered, but he also made clear that the investigation was nearing an end.

I read the entire article.

Gelston

02-12-2019, 06:18 PM

I read the entire article.

Dick head

Seizer

02-12-2019, 06:22 PM

It's not the slightest bit of a surprise that they ignore that actual substance of Burr's interview. Their investigation isn't almost over, he expect it to continue for at least another 8 years.

Burr was careful to note that more facts may yet be uncovered, but he also made CLEAR that the investigation was nearing an END.

I read the entire article.
:flames:

Androidpk

02-12-2019, 09:59 PM

Democrats on the Senate Intelligence Committee are pushing back on a claim by the panel’s chair, Richard Burr (R-N.C.), that the committee’s two-year investigation has not found “anything that would suggest there was collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.” And they dispute an NBC News report saying that Democrats agreed with Burr that they have yet to see clear evidence of a conspiracy between President Donald Trump and Moscow.

“That’s not true,” Sen. Angus King, a Maine independent who caucuses with Democrats, told Mother Jones. “I think it’s misleading. The intelligence committee hasn’t discussed the matter, let alone released a committee report.”

https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2019/02/senate-intelligence-committee-democrats-dispute-claims-russia-probe-found-no-collusion/

Fortybox

02-12-2019, 10:17 PM

I love stalking other PC members.

Yes, we know. Please stop.

Tgo01

02-12-2019, 10:27 PM

Fortybox

02-12-2019, 10:29 PM

Androidpk

02-12-2019, 10:43 PM

Androidpk

02-12-2019, 10:44 PM

I want to see the meltdown once he goes red.

The only people that care about the rep system are you MAGA bots that obsess about it.

Tgo01

02-12-2019, 10:49 PM

When Mueller absolves Trump of any wrongdoing which is becoming ever more likely as the days drag on, I think we here on the PC shouldn’t “stick it” to the libs. I say we take the high road and extend a open hand. There will be a lot of crying and for some a serious mental breakdown (seriously.) Whatever differences we may have politically, we’re all still Americans and we should try to help one another.

Honestly I don't plan on rubbing it in anyone's faces except Androidpk, but he's not a real human being so it's all good.

Androidpk

02-12-2019, 11:40 PM

Honestly I don't plan on rubbing it in anyone's faces except Androidpk, but he's not a real human being so it's all good.

When you're so upset you have to try and dehumanize people you don't like.. You're an even bigger snowflake than Trump, and that's really saying something considering how thin his skin is :lol:

Neveragain

02-13-2019, 12:01 AM

When you're so upset you have to try and dehumanize people you don't like.. You're an even bigger snowflake than Trump, and that's really saying something considering how thin his skin is :lol:

Dehumanizing is what Democrats do best.

Fortybox

02-13-2019, 12:38 AM

The only people that care about the rep system are you MAGA bots that obsess about it.

:lol:

Parkbandit

02-13-2019, 08:28 AM

Honestly the only reason I haven't placed Androidpk on ignore is because I want to see his meltdown when Mueller concludes his investigation with no charges against Trump.

He is so useless to this forum and to all of humanity that the only purpose he serves anymore is to be the laughingstock whenever he is around.

I disagree. Androidpk2016 was mostly useless.. just a scumbag trolling the boards, looking for his next couch to squat on.. but Androidpk2018 has been an amazing transformation to behold.

He's the #1 contender for the belt and you don't get there for being "useless". He's finally put forth an effort to be the dumbest poster on these boards.. and that effort will finally pay off soon.. with a title match.

Parkbandit

02-13-2019, 08:30 AM

The only people that care about the rep system are you MAGA bots that obsess about it.

I know.. you keep telling everyone everytime I give you red rep....

lol

Parkbandit

02-13-2019, 08:32 AM

When Mueller absolves Trump of any wrongdoing which is becoming ever more likely as the days drag on, I think we here on the PC shouldn’t “stick it” to the libs. I say we take the high road and extend a open hand. There will be a lot of crying and for some a serious mental breakdown (seriously.) Whatever differences we may have politically, we’re all still Americans and we should try to help one another.

I wish I was as strong as you are in cases like this.. but I'm not.

https://media.giphy.com/media/3o6Zt2l7JNe272QpqM/giphy.gif

Androidpk

02-13-2019, 09:38 AM

I know.. you keep telling everyone everytime I give you red rep....

lol

Resident troll spams people with unhinged ranting and raving because he thinks it hurts people. That makes you a sadist. Except it doesn't hurt people, it just makes people think you're weird and unhinged and obsessed and creepy.

Parkbandit

02-13-2019, 09:54 AM

Resident troll spams people with unhinged ranting and raving because he thinks it hurts people. That makes you a sadist. Except it doesn't hurt people, it just makes people think you're weird and unhinged and obsessed and creepy.

REMINDER:

Words Androidpk should never use to avoid looking even more dumb:

Troll
Spam
Unhinged
Ranting
Raving
Sadist
Obsessed
Creepy

Thank you.

Androidpk

02-13-2019, 10:09 AM

REMINDER:

Words Androidpk should never use because they trigger the fuck out of me and make me even angrier.

Troll
Spam
Unhinged
Ranting
Raving
Sadist
Obsessed
Creepy

Thank you.

I know, the truth hurts, sorry buddy, just trying to make you a better person for the PC :/

Parkbandit

02-13-2019, 10:42 AM

I know, the truth hurts, sorry buddy, just trying to make you a better person for the PC :/

I gave up making you a better person. You lack the character and moral fiber.

This is the best you you can be: A sociopath, thief and all around scumbag. I know, I know: "NOU!"

Androidpk

02-13-2019, 10:45 AM

I gave up trying to be a better person. I lack the character and moral fiber.

This is the best I can be: A sociopath, a sadist, and all around scumbag.

We know, buddy, we know, but we're all still rooting for you!

Parkbandit

02-13-2019, 10:50 AM

We know, buddy, we know, but we're all still rooting for you!

I know, I know: "NOU!"

Literally, your "comebacks" are the only thing that is reliable about you.

Androidpk

02-13-2019, 11:07 AM

Literally, your "comebacks" are the only thing that is reliable about you.

Pointing out the obvious troll isn't a comeback, it's just reality.

Parkbandit

02-13-2019, 11:31 AM

Pointing out the obvious troll isn't a comeback, it's just reality.

https://media1.tenor.com/images/a84ddcc735aec20979d0eef871aa2937/tenor.gif?itemid=5471477

Androidpk

02-13-2019, 01:51 PM

Wrathbringer

02-13-2019, 01:57 PM

Sam Patten is the next to be sentenced it looks like, on April 12th. He's the one that was illegally steering foreign money into Trump's inauguration committee, via a pro-Russian Ukrainian oligarch, and was charged as acting as an unregistered foreign agent. He's been cooperating with federal prosecutors since last August.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DzTl5T4WwAAKB-M.png

OMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMG GUUUUUUUUUUUUYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!! THIS IS REALLY REALLY REALLY REALLY IT THIS TIME GUYS!!!! IT'S GOING TO START HEATING UP NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!11 THEY'RE REALLY GOING TO FIND SOMETHING SOON THIS TIME FOR REALLY REAL! ANYDAY NOW TRUMP IS GOING TO BE IMPEACHED, JAILED THEN KILLED VIA FIRING SQUAD AND HILLARY WILL BE PRESIDENT AND I'LL FINALLY STOP MY INCESSANT CHILD-LIKE WHINING FOR REALLY REAL THIS TIME GUYS!!!!!!!!!!! OMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMG

Wrathbringer

02-13-2019, 01:58 PM

Back

02-13-2019, 02:00 PM

So still no collusion, huh? Weird.

Still no wall, huh? LOL

Wrathbringer

02-13-2019, 02:01 PM

Still no wall, huh? LOL

You obviously haven't been keeping up with the news. Walls are currently being built where Border Security said they were needed. Keep listening to your fake news though, libtard.

Back

02-13-2019, 02:03 PM

You obviously haven't been keeping up with the news. Walls are currently being built where Border Security said they were needed. Keep listening to your fake news though, libtard.

Will Mexico still pay for it? LOL

RichardCranium

02-13-2019, 02:09 PM

Moving the goalposts isn't a good look.

Parkbandit

02-13-2019, 02:10 PM

Still no wall, huh? LOL

You don't believe there are any walls between US and Mexico?

What kind of reality do you live in?

Back

02-13-2019, 02:13 PM

Moving the goalposts isn't a good look.

I'm just fucking with him. He can take it.

Methais

02-13-2019, 03:24 PM

The only people that care about the rep system are you MAGA bots that obsess about it.

That must be why you constantly whine about it and for months couldn't stop posting screenshots from the "who got exposed" poll that means literally shit that you thought was super important.

Tgo01

02-13-2019, 04:52 PM

So Roger Stone's lawyers apparently have evidence to suggest someone from Robert Mueller's office did indeed leak the indictment to CNN.

5 minutes after Stone was arrested CNN had already contacted Stone's lawyers to tell him of the arrest. A few minutes after that the same person from CNN sent Stone's lawyers a draft indictment, only problem is at that time the indictment had still been officially sealed. Now how did CNN obtain a draft of that indictment? HMMMMMMMMM! One wonders.

But I'm sure Androidpk will be along shortly to say CNN are just such good journalists that surely they simply knew what the indictment would be so they wrote it up themselves and happened to be spot on.

I think it's long past time we go ahead and end this "investigation."

sellstuff1

02-13-2019, 04:59 PM

Wow, a butthurt, racist snowflake said there was collusion. 100% proof Trump and Russia are in bed together. Start the impeachment boys.

https://i.imgur.com/PNvTL11.jpg

sellstuff1

02-13-2019, 05:01 PM

Tgo01

02-13-2019, 05:07 PM

Oh my bad, sellstuff1 beat Androidpk to the punch. You're getting slow in your old age, Androidpk.

sellstuff1

02-13-2019, 05:19 PM

Oh my bad, sellstuff1 beat Androidpk to the punch. You're getting slow in your old age, Androidpk.

Nah I'm just making fun of the Nixon parallels at this point.

sellstuff1

02-13-2019, 05:25 PM

Tgo01

02-13-2019, 05:29 PM

Does sellstuff1 not realize he's just like Androidpk Jr these days? He's just here for our amusement, not to think anyone takes anything he says seriously.

Gelston

02-13-2019, 05:31 PM

Does sellstuff1 not realize he's just like Androidpk Jr these days? He's just here for our amusement, not to think anyone takes anything he says seriously.

I just picture him raging all day.

sellstuff1

02-13-2019, 05:33 PM

I just picture him raging all day.

I've come to terms with my racism, but you haven't come to terms with yours yet. I'm just trying to help you out, fam.

sellstuff1

02-13-2019, 05:33 PM

Does sellstuff1 not realize he's just like Androidpk Jr these days? He's just here for our amusement, not to think anyone takes anything he says seriously.

So, that would be a no, you're not willing to discuss your contradictory statements. Got it.

Gelston

02-13-2019, 05:35 PM

I've come to terms with my racism, but you haven't come to terms with yours yet. I'm just trying to help you out, fam.

What racism would that be?

Tgo01

02-13-2019, 05:36 PM

What racism would that be?

Remember that one day you said you liked the color green more than the color brown? Racist.

sellstuff1

02-13-2019, 05:37 PM

What racism would that be?

You stated that you believed that Trump is no more racist than any American after being confronted with a specific list of occurrences of Trump's racism - so one can only infer that you believe that his actions aren't racist, or you believe that every American is racist. Both of these views can be construed in such a way that paints you - an American citizen defending a racist President - as racist.

sellstuff1

02-13-2019, 05:37 PM

Remember that one day you said you liked the color green more than the color brown? Racist.

Are you ready to discuss how The Washington Post is simultaneously fake news and 100% accurate, according to your own posts? These were made on the same day, BTW.

Gelston

02-13-2019, 05:38 PM

You stated that you believed that Trump is no more racist than any American after being confronted with a specific list of occurrences of Trump's racism - so one can only infer that you believe that his actions aren't racist, or you believe that every American is racist. Both of these views can be construed in such a way that paints you - an American citizen defending a racist President - as racist.

If you construe it as such you are a retard, but we already knew that.

sellstuff1

02-13-2019, 05:39 PM

If you construe it as such you are a retard, but we already knew that.

How is there any other way to construe it? Are you admitting that you aren't a US citizen?

Gelston

02-13-2019, 05:42 PM

How is there any other way to construe it? Are you admitting that you aren't a US citizen?

You're retarded.

Parkbandit

02-13-2019, 05:55 PM

I've come to terms with my racism

That's the first step... now, what about your pedophilia tendencies?

Gelston

02-13-2019, 05:58 PM

I wonder if he has come to terms with the scarab belonging to the box owner and the npc being the best option.

sellstuff1

02-13-2019, 06:07 PM

I wonder if he has come to terms with the scarab belonging to the box owner and the npc being the best option.

I wonder if you've come to terms with being addicted to a text-based roleplaying game for 25 years.

Taernath

02-13-2019, 06:18 PM

I wonder if you've come to terms with being addicted to a text-based roleplaying game for 25 years.

You sure that's the angle you want to go with here?

Gelston

02-13-2019, 06:19 PM

You sure that's the angle you want to go with here?

It is even better because I don't currently have an active account.

Taernath

02-13-2019, 06:20 PM

It is even better because I don't currently have an active account.

Next he'll be like, 'you don't even play GS and you post on these boards!!!1'

Androidpk

02-13-2019, 06:42 PM

Manafort had another hearing today and the judge determined that he did lie to Mueller, especially about his interactions with Russian spy Kilimnik. This means his plea agreement deal is null and void and he's going to face the full sentence. Dude is gonna die in prison.

Alfster

02-13-2019, 06:48 PM

It's federal charges so he can be pardoned

Androidpk

02-13-2019, 06:51 PM

It's federal charges so he can be pardoned

A pardon would also force him to testify.

Parkbandit

02-13-2019, 07:06 PM

Next he'll be like, 'you don't even play GS and you post on these boards!!!1'

LOL... exactly.

Tgo01

02-13-2019, 07:47 PM

A pardon would also force him to testify.

I see Androidpk still doesn't know how the law works.

Unless Trump granted him a full and complete pardon of all federal crimes (which is highly unlikely) then Manafort could still claim his testimony could put him at risk for other federal prosecution.

Also note a presidential pardon only covers federal crimes, if Manafort's testimony would put him in danger of state prosecution he could indeed refuse to testify.

Go back to raging over everything, Androidpk. You embarrassing yourself with your utter lack of knowledge about anything you discuss isn't really funny. It's just sad.

Androidpk

02-13-2019, 07:49 PM

I see Androidpk still doesn't know how the law works.

Unless Trump granted him a full and complete pardon of all federal crimes (which is highly unlikely) then Manafort could still claim his testimony could put him at risk for other federal prosecution.

Also note a presidential pardon only covers federal crimes, if Manafort's testimony would put him in danger of state prosecution he could indeed refuse to testify.

Go back to raging over everything, Androidpk. You embarrassing yourself with your utter lack of knowledge about anything you discuss isn't really funny. It's just sad.

Says I don't know how the law works.. proceeds to fabricate complete bullshit. :lol2:

Fortybox

02-13-2019, 07:51 PM

Literally, your "comebacks" are the only thing that is reliable about you.

He is trying in a really bad way to respond to you the way he thinks you respond to him.

The irony is that it shows he is triggered.

Alfster

02-13-2019, 08:15 PM

Says I don't know how the law works.. proceeds to fabricate complete bullshit. :lol2:

The thing is, he's not wrong. That's exactly how it works.

Androidpk

02-13-2019, 08:22 PM

The thing is, he's not wrong. That's exactly how it works.

Except that is not how it works. Accepting a pardon means accepting guilt. Once you accept a pardon you can't use the 5th amendment to refuse to testify about the crimes you committed. The only thing he'd be able to do in this case is just flat out refuse, which would put him in contempt of court, which would put him back in jail.

Tgo01

02-13-2019, 08:34 PM

Except that is not how it works. Accepting a pardon means accepting guilt. Once you accept a pardon you can't use the 5th amendment to refuse to testify about the crimes you committed. The only thing he'd be able to do in this case is just flat out refuse, which would put him in contempt of court, which would put him back in jail.

A presidential pardon only protects you from the specific crime the pardon covered. Trump could pardon him for any and all federal crimes, but again that's unlikely. Most likely the pardon (if he receives one) would just cover the crimes for which he is in jail for.

And again a presidential pardon ONLY protects you from federal prosecution, so even if Trump issued him a complete pardon from all federal crimes Manafort could still refuse to testify for fear of being charged in a state court should a state decide to go after him.

Again go back to doing shit we can laugh at, because watching you fail like this is just pitiful.

Androidpk

02-13-2019, 08:40 PM

A presidential pardon only protects you from the specific crime the pardon covered. Trump could pardon him for any and all federal crimes, but again that's unlikely. Most likely the pardon (if he receives one) would just cover the crimes for which he is in jail for.

And again a presidential pardon ONLY protects you from federal prosecution, so even if Trump issued him a complete pardon from all federal crimes Manafort could still refuse to testify for fear of being charged in a state court should a state decide to go after him.

Again go back to doing shit we can laugh at, because watching you fail like this is just pitiful.

Again, that's not how a pardon works. Mueller could force Manafort to testify about his crimes and there's nothing Manafort could do except comply or refuse and get sent back to prison. Keep saying stupid shit so we can continue laughing at you. Watching you fail like this is fucking hilarious.

Tgo01

02-13-2019, 08:46 PM

Except that is not how it works. Accepting a pardon means accepting guilt. Once you accept a pardon you can't use the 5th amendment to refuse to testify about the crimes you committed. The only thing he'd be able to do in this case is just flat out refuse, which would put him in contempt of court, which would put him back in jail.

Also accepting a pardon doesn't mean accepting guilt, just what kind of dumb ass are you? You get this from all of the political pundits who refer to the Burdick vs US supreme court case or something?

There is NOTHING in the law that suggests receiving a pardon means accepting guilt, nothing about the pardon's origins suggests receiving a pardon means one is accepting guilt.

The rational in Burdick vs US was making the argument for allowing one to turn down a pardon, it did not state that legally or otherwise accepting a pardon makes one guilty, it was the supreme court explaining their decision to allow one to turn down a pardon.

Tgo01

02-13-2019, 08:47 PM

Again, that's not how a pardon works. Mueller could force Manafort to testify about his crimes and there's nothing Manafort could do except comply or refuse and get sent back to prison. Keep saying stupid shit so we can continue laughing at you. Watching you fail like this is fucking hilarious.

You are so wrong it's embarrassing to all of mankind. Yes, mankind.

Turn off MSNBC and CNN once in a while, it's clearly having an impact on your ability to even comprehend the simplest of things.

Androidpk

02-13-2019, 08:55 PM

Keep digging your hole even deeper, i'm sure your pretend legal knowledge will be of great use to Manafort :lol:

Wrathbringer

02-13-2019, 09:16 PM

Keep digging your hole even deeper, i'm sure your pretend legal knowledge will be of great use to Manafort :lol:

So still no collusion huh? Weird.

Androidpk

02-13-2019, 09:59 PM

So still no collusion huh? Weird.

Collusion has already been proven, it's one of the lies Manafort got busted for today.

Parkbandit

02-13-2019, 10:45 PM

Collusion has already been proven, it's one of the lies Manafort got busted for today.

Wait.. so the Senate and House committees said there was no evidence.. but you know of some secret evidence that collusion has already been proven?

Dude.. stop.