Russia Investigation Heating Up

[time4fun]

Yeah. Just so we're clear- this is not the tweet of someone who knows he's innocent.

He's also kidding himself if he thinks that Pardoning himself counts as faithfully executing the law.

[Methais]

https://media0.giphy.com/media/w0vFxYaCcvvJm/giphy.gif

https://media2.giphy.com/media/xUPGcoTKhfDvStjxMA/source.gif


If you're so sure nothing is going to happen to Trump then lets make a bet. If he gets reelected in 2020 I'll have Kranar delete my account here. If you doesn't get reelected then you have to have yours deleted. Man up or shut up.

How is Trump going to be reelected in 2020 when OMG MUELLER IS GONNA TAKE HIM DOWNNNNNN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ??????


So Parkbandit tries to act tough behind the computer but it turns out he's a gutless cunt. Shocker. Let me know if you ever decide to man up and act on the bet, until then continue to act like the spineless little bitch we all know you really are.

Remember this from 3 days ago?



Says the snowflake who gets triggered any time posts a legitimate concern/criticism of Trump. Just another generic neo nazi.

10m silvers say you can't quote one instance of me being triggered over one of you retards ripping on Trump, even the far fetched bullshit that most of your posts consist of. Not that you'd pay up anyway because you're a trash person like that whose word means nothing to anyone, but the offer stands anyway.


Every single one of your posts comes across as butthurt because you can't stand seeing your piece of shit president criticized. And far fetched bullshit? The majority of my posts are just news updates on the Mueller investigation. Please post where I said something that was far fetched. You can add that to the request of finding a single instance of someone legitimately saying that Trump's takedown is going to happen any second now.

Let me know if you ever decide to man up and act on the bet, until then continue to act like the spineless little bitch we all know you really are. Even though everyone knows you're not good for it anyway because your word is a meaningless pile of dog logs.


MAGA 2a'ers: "We need the 2a to defend against tyrannical government!"

Also MAGA 2a'ers: "Emperor Trump is above the law!"

http://i0.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/facebook/001/066/088/412.jpg


Normally I'd give a hard pass on fucking another guy but now that I know parkbandit is a giant pussy I'm okay with it

Quoted because pk wants to have sex with Parkbandit.


The same source parkbandit uses to get his "facts" about me.

The Gemstone IV Players' Corner? Link to thread plz.

[time4fun]

But still far better than you. :)

No, you're really not. You're just a sad little man who never grew up.

[Parkbandit]

Yeah. Just so we're clear- this is not the tweet of someone who knows he's innocent.

He's also kidding himself if he thinks that Pardoning himself counts as faithfully executing the law.

FINALLY! We have "proof" he colluded with Russia!

YOU WERE RIGHT!!!!

[Parkbandit]

No, you're really not. You're just a sad little man who never grew up.

Chin up, cupcake! You finally have proof that President Trump colluded with Russia!

THIS IS YOUR DAY!!!

[Wrathbringer]

No, you're really not. You're just a sad little man who never grew up.

And you're a retard.

[Parkbandit]

And you're a retard.

https://media.giphy.com/media/26tknCqiJrBQG6bxC/giphy.gif

[cwolff]

His tweets are crazy as fuck. You can see him changing the channel. Today he's bouncing between Mueller, Farmers and Jobs with no apparent order. The dude's got a fucked up brain and even worse personality. He gives zero shits about farmers, jobs or the country except in how it can make him look good. Even Macron (http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/390515-cnn-trump-macron-phone-call-went-terrible) didn't get this until this week and that's totally inexcusable.

A call between President Trump and French President Emmanuel Macron last week that focused on trade and immigration went badly and saw Macron be highly critical of Trump’s policies, two sources familiar with the call told CNN.
"Just bad. It was terrible," one of the sources told CNN. "Macron thought he would be able to speak his mind, based on the relationship. But Trump can't handle being criticized like that."

[Methais]

His tweets are crazy as fuck. You can see him changing the channel. Today he's bouncing between Mueller, Farmers and Jobs with no apparent order. The dude's got a fucked up brain and even worse personality. He gives zero shits about farmers, jobs or the country except in how it can make him look good. Even Macron (http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/390515-cnn-trump-macron-phone-call-went-terrible) didn't get this until this week and that's totally inexcusable.

A call between President Trump and French President Emmanuel Macron last week that focused on trade and immigration went badly and saw Macron be highly critical of Trump’s policies, two sources familiar with the call told CNN.
"Just bad. It was terrible," one of the sources told CNN. "Macron thought he would be able to speak his mind, based on the relationship. But Trump can't handle being criticized like that."

https://m.popkey.co/c04d8d/w6045_s-200x150.gif

[Parkbandit]

His tweets are crazy as fuck. You can see him changing the channel. Today he's bouncing between Mueller, Farmers and Jobs with no apparent order. The dude's got a fucked up brain and even worse personality. He gives zero shits about farmers, jobs or the country except in how it can make him look good. Even Macron (http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/390515-cnn-trump-macron-phone-call-went-terrible) didn't get this until this week and that's totally inexcusable.

A call between President Trump and French President Emmanuel Macron last week that focused on trade and immigration went badly and saw Macron be highly critical of Trump’s policies, two sources familiar with the call told CNN.
"Just bad. It was terrible," one of the sources told CNN. "Macron thought he would be able to speak his mind, based on the relationship. But Trump can't handle being criticized like that."

Wait.. are you suggesting France doesn't like the better trade deals they are getting and doesn't want them re-negotiated to be more fair to the United States????

Sacré Bleu!!!

[Ashliana]

Wait.. are you suggesting France doesn't like the better trade deals they are getting and doesn't want them re-negotiated to be more fair to the United States????

Sacré Bleu!!!

Yeah, those damned french, they've been taking advantage of the US for far too long!

.... said no economist, ever. Still wallowing in frenzied, willful ignorance, I see, PB. Impressive.

[Wrathbringer]

Yeah, those damned french, they've been taking advantage of the US for far too long!

.... said no economist, ever. Still wallowing in frenzied, willful ignorance, I see, PB. Impressive.

You're retarded. Lol @ your rep.

[Parkbandit]

Yeah, those damned french, they've been taking advantage of the US for far too long!

.... said no economist, ever. Still wallowing in frenzied, willful ignorance, I see, PB. Impressive.

Really?

https://www.statista.com/statistics/263622/trade-balance-of-goods-in-france/

https://tradingeconomics.com/france/balance-of-trade <<This one has economics in the title.. so you know it's about economics...

https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c4279.html From the government itself.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-france-economy-trade/french-trade-deficit-widens-in-march-as-aircraft-sales-slump-idUSKBN1I50JZ

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/frances-trade-deficit-widens-as-exports-fall-2018-01-09

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/03/07/reuters-america-frances-trade-deficit-widened-in-january-to-5-point-56-bln-euros.html

But in your upside down world, it's 100% even!

But.. stay willfully ignorant. The Dems are counting on your stupidity!

[ClydeR]

Trump says that it is unconstitutional to have a special counsel and that Trump can totally pardon himself..







https://pbs.twimg.com/media/De2Q6O1U0AESN-m.jpg
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/De2kXanUwAAa_8m.jpg

[Methais]

Trump says that it is unconstitutional to have a special counsel and that Trump can totally pardon himself..







https://pbs.twimg.com/media/De2Q6O1U0AESN-m.jpg
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/De2kXanUwAAa_8m.jpg

This was already posted hours ago here. Try to keep up when you're not busy shaving your legs, Latrin. He probably said it because he knew it would cause mass triggering among the cwolffs of the world. Fortunately, the cwolffs of the world are incredibly dumb and predictable.

In other news, I'd also like you to confirm or deny this new report that I received this morning:

Thread: Another Porno Star
I bet latrin shaves his ass so that his sharts exit cleanly

Thank you in advance.

[Back]

We are actually witnessing an attempt at turning America into a dictatorship.

[Parkbandit]

We are actually witnessing an attempt at turning America into a dictatorship.

TUESDAY TUESDAY TUESDAY!!!

Wait, you're a day early Backlash..

[Methais]

TUESDAY TUESDAY TUESDAY!!!

Wait, you're a day early Backlash..

Sometimes Tuesday doesn't get here fast enough, so Backlash just mashes Monday and Tuesday together.

Also, can someone tell me when Trump signed this law into effect, since apparently it's brand new and certainly not something that's been in place for probably most/all of the existence of our country?

[Fortybox]

No, you're really not. You're just a sad little man who never grew up.

You play a OHB obsessed stuttering transgendered paladin in a multi-decade old text-based game. That is NOT grown up behavior. Pot meet kettle.

[Fortybox]

Trump says that it is unconstitutional to have a special counsel and that Trump can totally pardon himself..







https://pbs.twimg.com/media/De2Q6O1U0AESN-m.jpg
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/De2kXanUwAAa_8m.jpg

The appointment of this special council, with far overreaching powers is unconstitutional. The power given to Mueller with no confirmation from the house/senate is very concerning.

[Wrathbringer]

We are actually witnessing an attempt at turning America into a dictatorship.

9045

[Fortybox]

We are actually witnessing an attempt at turning America into a dictatorship.

Actually the opposite. In your world a business owner would be forced to do business against their values.

[Methais]

9045

https://media.giphy.com/media/26tknCqiJrBQG6bxC/giphy.gif

[Back]

The sky is blue.

[Ashliana]

Really?

https://www.statista.com/statistics/263622/trade-balance-of-goods-in-france/

https://tradingeconomics.com/france/balance-of-trade <<This one has economics in the title.. so you know it's about economics...

https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c4279.html From the government itself.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-france-economy-trade/french-trade-deficit-widens-in-march-as-aircraft-sales-slump-idUSKBN1I50JZ

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/frances-trade-deficit-widens-as-exports-fall-2018-01-09

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/03/07/reuters-america-frances-trade-deficit-widened-in-january-to-5-point-56-bln-euros.html

But in your upside down world, it's 100% even!

But.. stay willfully ignorant. The Dems are counting on your stupidity!

:rofl:

This exchange showcases exactly how shallow your "conservativism" is -- not a single one of your links demonstrates your contention. Having a trade deficit isn't evidence of the other country "taking advantage of" the United States. We benefit in numerous ways from trade deficits.

The fact that you moronically thought you were proving someone wrong is icing on the cake -- you're a gleefully ignorant, deluded tribalist, and nothing more. You don't know how to think beyond what the Cheeto-in-Chief tells you the stance du jour is.

The Cato Institute -- the Koch brothers' far-right "think tank":
Trade deficits are not a sign of unfair trade practices or a lack of American “competitiveness.”
Source: https://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/are-trade-deficits-really-bad-news

Forbes:
"He seems to think big trade deficits mean the U.S. is losing in the game of international trade. But nothing could be further from the truth. They are good: The bigger the better, in fact."
Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/simonconstable/2017/02/27/mr-trump-heres-why-trade-deficits-are-good/#7c6e44772b96

NYT:
"Most economists do not see the trade gap as money “lost” to other countries, nor do they worry about trade deficits to a large degree. That’s because trade imbalances are affected by a host of macroeconomic factors, including the relative growth rates of countries, the value of their currencies, and their saving and investment rates."
Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/05/us/politics/trade-deficit-tariffs-economists-trump.html

You are, as always, willfully ignorant and easily humiliated. Better luck next time, shit-for-brains.

[time4fun]

The appointment of this special council, with far overreaching powers is unconstitutional. The power given to Mueller with no confirmation from the house/senate is very concerning.

It's unconstitutional now? You do understand that not all appointments require Senate confirmation, right?

Watching you regurgitate the lies from a man who has done nothing but lie about this investigation is hilarious.

There is nothing unconstitutional about the SC guidelines.

[time4fun]

:rofl:

This exchange showcases exactly how shallow your "conservativism" is -- not a single one of your links demonstrates your contention. Having a trade deficit isn't evidence of the other country "taking advantage of" the United States. We benefit in numerous ways from trade deficits.

The fact that you moronically thought you were proving someone wrong is icing on the cake -- you're a gleefully ignorant, deluded tribalist, and nothing more. You don't know how to think beyond what the Cheeto-in-Chief tells you the stance du jour is.

The Cato Institute -- the Koch brothers' far-right "think tank":
Trade deficits are not a sign of unfair trade practices or a lack of American “competitiveness.”
Source: https://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/are-trade-deficits-really-bad-news

Forbes:
"He seems to think big trade deficits mean the U.S. is losing in the game of international trade. But nothing could be further from the truth. They are good: The bigger the better, in fact."
Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/simonconstable/2017/02/27/mr-trump-heres-why-trade-deficits-are-good/#7c6e44772b96

NYT:
"Most economists do not see the trade gap as money “lost” to other countries, nor do they worry about trade deficits to a large degree. That’s because trade imbalances are affected by a host of macroeconomic factors, including the relative growth rates of countries, the value of their currencies, and their saving and investment rates."
Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/05/us/politics/trade-deficit-tariffs-economists-trump.html

You are, as always, willfully ignorant and easily humiliated. Better luck next time, shit-for-brains.

This has been pointed out to him before.

Trade deficits are NOT about anyone losing money.

[Wrathbringer]

:rofl:

This exchange showcases exactly how shallow your "conservativism" is -- not a single one of your links demonstrates your contention. Having a trade deficit isn't evidence of the other country "taking advantage of" the United States. We benefit in numerous ways from trade deficits.

The fact that you moronically thought you were proving someone wrong is icing on the cake -- you're a gleefully ignorant, deluded tribalist, and nothing more. You don't know how to think beyond what the Cheeto-in-Chief tells you the stance du jour is.

The Cato Institute -- the Koch brothers' far-right "think tank":
Trade deficits are not a sign of unfair trade practices or a lack of American “competitiveness.”
Source: https://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/are-trade-deficits-really-bad-news

Forbes:
"He seems to think big trade deficits mean the U.S. is losing in the game of international trade. But nothing could be further from the truth. They are good: The bigger the better, in fact."
Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/simonconstable/2017/02/27/mr-trump-heres-why-trade-deficits-are-good/#7c6e44772b96

NYT:
"Most economists do not see the trade gap as money “lost” to other countries, nor do they worry about trade deficits to a large degree. That’s because trade imbalances are affected by a host of macroeconomic factors, including the relative growth rates of countries, the value of their currencies, and their saving and investment rates."
Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/05/us/politics/trade-deficit-tariffs-economists-trump.html

You are, as always, willfully ignorant and easily humiliated. Better luck next time, shit-for-brains.

You're retarded.

[Wrathbringer]

This has been pointed out to him before.

Trade deficits are NOT about anyone losing money.

You are also retarded.

[Ashliana]

You're retarded.

https://i.imgur.com/3XOZBE9.png

[Parkbandit]

:rofl:

This exchange showcases exactly how shallow your "conservativism" is -- not a single one of your links demonstrates your contention. Having a trade deficit isn't evidence of the other country "taking advantage of" the United States. We benefit in numerous ways from trade deficits.

The fact that you moronically thought you were proving someone wrong is icing on the cake -- you're a gleefully ignorant, deluded tribalist, and nothing more. You don't know how to think beyond what the Cheeto-in-Chief tells you the stance du jour is.

The Cato Institute -- the Koch brothers' far-right "think tank":
Trade deficits are not a sign of unfair trade practices or a lack of American “competitiveness.”
Source: https://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/are-trade-deficits-really-bad-news

Forbes:
"He seems to think big trade deficits mean the U.S. is losing in the game of international trade. But nothing could be further from the truth. They are good: The bigger the better, in fact."
Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/simonconstable/2017/02/27/mr-trump-heres-why-trade-deficits-are-good/#7c6e44772b96

NYT:
"Most economists do not see the trade gap as money “lost” to other countries, nor do they worry about trade deficits to a large degree. That’s because trade imbalances are affected by a host of macroeconomic factors, including the relative growth rates of countries, the value of their currencies, and their saving and investment rates."
Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/05/us/politics/trade-deficit-tariffs-economists-trump.html

You are, as always, willfully ignorant and easily humiliated. Better luck next time, shit-for-brains.


This has been pointed out to him before.

Trade deficits are NOT about anyone losing money.

Sit back and relax trannies... the MAGA Express is steam rolling ahead.

Just relax. You'll get to prove your ignorance again in November.

[Wrathbringer]

Sit back and relax trannies...

:lol:

[Fortybox]

It's unconstitutional now? You do understand that not all appointments require Senate confirmation, right?

Watching you regurgitate the lies from a man who has done nothing but lie about this investigation is hilarious.

There is nothing unconstitutional about the SC guidelines.

It violates the Appointments Clause of the constitution.

It is inaccurate to classify Mueller as an inferior officer with the broad scope he has. Rosenstein is not supervising his work directly. He is acting as a principle officer, which is to be appointed by POTUS and confirmed in the senate.

[Parkbandit]

I wonder if these were the same 'economists' that said manufacturing jobs would never come back to the US....

https://www.wsj.com/articles/manufacturing-industry-has-strongest-jobs-increase-in-three-years-1522845356

I'm all for letting our President, who is Mr. Art of the Deal, have a crack at leveling out the trade deficit.

[Parkbandit]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6-EWG6gYlhQ

And you can trust this video to be unbias.. because it has NEWS in the name.

[cwolff]

We are actually witnessing an attempt at turning America into a dictatorship.

Yes of course. This has been obvious since the beginning. When we brought that up to trump supporters they said things like, "If he ever does x then I'll be the first one to denounce him." He's since said X,Y,Z, and the rest of the alphabet (albeit spelled incorrectly) and they simply dial their value system down a notch to match his descent into tyranny. They give 0 fucks about the constitution.


You play a OHB obsessed stuttering transgendered paladin in a multi-decade old text-based game. That is NOT grown up behavior. Pot meet kettle.

I'm amazed that you guys always fall back on this. Get some new material.


The appointment of this special council, with far overreaching powers is unconstitutional. The power given to Mueller with no confirmation from the house/senate is very concerning.

Although I'm not surprised it's astonishing how trumps tweets get picked up and parroted by his trumpanzees. Have you no moral fiber? No ethical backbone? How far is too far for a trump supporter?


It's unconstitutional now? You do understand that not all appointments require Senate confirmation, right?

Watching you regurgitate the lies from a man who has done nothing but lie about this investigation is hilarious.

There is nothing unconstitutional about the SC guidelines.




It violates the Appointments Clause of the constitution.

It is inaccurate to classify Mueller as an inferior officer with the broad scope he has. Rosenstein is not supervising his work directly. He is acting as a principle officer, which is to be appointed by POTUS and confirmed in the senate.

Look at the constitutional scholar. Where did you get that talking point? Fox? Infowars? Breitbart? Ask yourself this. Would republicans have purposefully violated the constitution by appointing Mueller? If it's so unconstitutional how'd it get this far? Do you ever consider for a second that it's been done in accordance with our laws and Mueller is doing the job he's hired for?

Think about this for a second. Mueller doesn't leak. He's not out there giving press conferences about what a scumbag trump is yet the right is responding as if he is. There's actually nothing for them to fight against yet. He's not been subpoenaed, he's not been indicted. The people he hires and surrounds himself with have received some convictions and indictments but no one's said shit about trump's guilt but trump and his team.

[Ashliana]

Sit back and relax trannies... the MAGA Express is steam rolling ahead.

Just relax. You'll get to prove your ignorance again in November.

Aww. You couldn't even muster up one of your pretend responses. Good on you, though, for speeding up your concessions.


I'm all for letting our President, who is Mr. Art of the Deal, have a crack at leveling out the trade deficit.

This is one of the cringiest things you've ever written. Not only are you beyond moronic for thinking Trump is actually talented at dealmaking, calling yourself a conservative while not understanding that the American economy isn't state-run (nor the limited influence the executive branch can have on it) is especially comical.

Trump doesn't have a mind for policy. He demonstrated that quite clearly during the GOP's failed attempts to repeal Obamacare -- he didn't understand what the current law is, nor did he understand the GOP plans that Republicans were crafting for him to sign. He undermined his own party repeatedly, and had no underlying goals of his own. The same holds true for trade.

You are gullible beyond belief. No wonder you got conned.

[Methais]

Yes of course. This has been obvious since the beginning. When we brought that up to trump supporters they said things like, "If he ever does x then I'll be the first one to denounce him." He's since said X,Y,Z, and the rest of the alphabet (albeit spelled incorrectly) and they simply dial their value system down a notch to match his descent into tyranny. They give 0 fucks about the constitution.



I'm amazed that you guys always fall back on this. Get some new material.



Although I'm not surprised it's astonishing how trumps tweets get picked up and parroted by his trumpanzees. Have you no moral fiber? No ethical backbone? How far is too far for a trump supporter?







Look at the constitutional scholar. Where did you get that talking point? Fox? Infowars? Breitbart? Ask yourself this. Would republicans have purposefully violated the constitution by appointing Mueller? If it's so unconstitutional how'd it get this far? Do you ever consider for a second that it's been done in accordance with our laws and Mueller is doing the job he's hired for?

Think about this for a second. Mueller doesn't leak. He's not out there giving press conferences about what a scumbag trump is yet the right is responding as if he is. There's actually nothing for them to fight against yet. He's not been subpoenaed, he's not been indicted. The people he hires and surrounds himself with have received some convictions and indictments but no one's said shit about trump's guilt but trump and his team.

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/80/fc/28/80fc28e039083993bca52d23a15af06c.png

[Androidpk]

Oh man:

https://i.imgur.com/tS4IPol.jpg




GOP Sen. Chuck Grassley (Iowa) said on Monday that President Trump should get a new lawyer if he's been told that he can pardon himself.

"If I were president of the United States and I had a lawyer that told me I could pardon myself, I think I would hire a new lawyer," Grassley, the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, told CNN, when asked if Trump had the ability to pardon himself.





https://i.imgur.com/l63Vs1u.jpg

[time4fun]

It violates the Appointments Clause of the constitution.

It is inaccurate to classify Mueller as an inferior officer with the broad scope he has. Rosenstein is not supervising his work directly. He is acting as a principle officer, which is to be appointed by POTUS and confirmed in the senate.

Yeah, actually it doesn't.

First- Nixon tried that exact argument decades ago, and it was flatly rejected by SCOTUS. Secondly, it's considered to be an inherent power of the AG. You don't even need the Special Counsel statute for it to happen- it was put in place to help protect the independence of the Special Counsel.



So let's play this out:
1) First Trump told you that his campaign team never met with Russia- but it turns out they had met with Russia dozens of times

2) Then Trump told you that Russia didn't interfere in our elections- but it turns out that they definitely did, AND he knew about it because both the FBI AND Russia told him about it

3) Then he told you that the Democrats colluded with Russia, but it turns out that there's literally no evidence of that\

4) Then he told you that he fired James Comey because he was mean to Clinton, but it turns out that that wasn't true

5) Then he told you that Obama personally ordered a wiretap of Trump Tower, but it turns out that never happened

6) Then he told you that the entire investigation was started solely on the basis of the dossier, but it turns out that wasn't true

7) Then he told you that the FISA warrant application was intentionally lying about evidence, but it turns out the application was clear about its evidence

8) Then he told you that the Russia investigation is all about Democrats being angry, but it turns out that all Federal investigations into Trump's campaign are being run by Republicans

9) Then he told you that the FBI illegally planted a spy in his campaign, but it turns out that's not at all what happened

10) Then he told you that he didn't ever try to fire Mueller, but it turns out he tried twice

11) And now he tells you that the Special Prosecutor is unconstitutional, and you're just jumping right up to believe him again.


It's really pathetic.

[Androidpk]

lol, 2 snowflake neg reps from parkbandit in less than 4 days. Triggered much, you giant fucking pussy?

[Derp]

lol, 2 snowflake neg reps from parkbandit in less than 4 days. Triggered much, you giant fucking pussy?

is this where i come to get neg rep?

:whipit:

[Parkbandit]

lol, 2 snowflake neg reps from parkbandit in less than 4 days. Triggered much, you giant fucking pussy?

You sound upset little fella.

So, just so I get this correct.. According to you, if you give 2 negative reps within a 4 day period, you are a giant fucking pussy?

I just want to make sure that this is a rule you believe in...

[Androidpk]

You sound upset little fella.

So, just so I get this correct.. According to you, if you give 2 negative reps within a 4 day period, you are a giant fucking pussy?

I just want to make sure that this is a rule you believe in...

You being a massive pussy has nothing to do with you furiously smashing the rep button because you can't control your emotions.

[Androidpk]

is this where i come to get neg rep?

:whipit:

Yup, just criticize their glorious leader Trump and watch the red tears come rolling in.

[Parkbandit]

You being a massive pussy has nothing to do with you furiously smashing the rep button because you can't control your emotions.

So, your 4 day rule is only for me.. and not say, you?

Good to know flaming hypocrisy is the only thing you are decent at.

[cwolff]

Yup, just criticize their glorious leader Trump and watch the red tears come rolling in.

They're freaks. I've got 8 in the past 10 days. I'm going to save them all and see how many I collect then clear it out for New Years.

On a side note: This is proof that libertarian philosophies don't work and that we need government. People do OK as a whole but there's always a few bad apples that ruin everything. In other words, "This is why we can't have nice things"

[Androidpk]

insert trolling here


https://i.imgur.com/Kv2KpOL.jpg

[Wrathbringer]

lol, 2 snowflake neg reps from parkbandit in less than 4 days. Triggered much, you giant fucking pussy?

:lol: lol @ you getting triggered over rep.

[Androidpk]

They're freaks. I've got 8 in the past 10 days.

For people that are constantly calling other people sensitive snowflakes they sure do project their insecurities a lot.

[cwolff]

For people that are constantly calling other people sensitive snowflakes they sure do project their insecurities a lot.

I've had them ignored for months also. In PB's case, I've had him ignored for years. Still they reach out to make contact on the regular. What I've found, when I read their rep comments, is that they are dying to be heard. Hence the Doyle Hargraves persona one of them was running for a while. They can't stand to be ignored.

[Parkbandit]

For people that are constantly calling other people sensitive snowflakes they sure do project their insecurities a lot.

Wait.. I'm sensitive because I gave you red rep...

But your not sensitive because you came here to cry about it?

Thanks for the laughs.

[Wrathbringer]

For people that are constantly calling other people sensitive snowflakes they sure do project their insecurities a lot.

It's just a matter of time before you're red too. It has been decided. You did this to yourself by being a massive tard.

[Androidpk]

I've had them ignored for months also. In PB's case, I've had him ignored for years. Still they reach out to make contact on the regular. What I've found, when I read their rep comments, is that they are dying to be heard. Hence the Doyle Hargraves persona one of them was running for a while. They can't stand to be ignored.

That would be Methais' alt account.

[Androidpk]

Wait.. I'm sensitive because I gave you red rep...

But your not sensitive because you came here to cry about it?

Thanks for the laughs.

It's you're you illiterate fuck and no, I'm laughing at how fucking sensitive you are. Keep smashing that rep button as if it were your clit.

[Parkbandit]

I've had them ignored for months also. In PB's case, I've had him ignored for years. Still they reach out to make contact on the regular. What I've found, when I read their rep comments, is that they are dying to be heard. Hence the Doyle Hargraves persona one of them was running for a while. They can't stand to be ignored.

Let the record show that I called you out for being a pussy YEARS before these new sheep.

YEARS!

And you must have had a great time reading ................................................. over and over again. I can see it now.. "period period period period period period period period period period period.."

You a good reader!

[Parkbandit]

It's you're you illiterate fuck and no, I'm laughing at how fucking sensitive you are. Keep smashing that rep button as if it were your clit.

Noone wants to smash their clit when you're around.. that'll just give you something else to get so upset about.

As soon as I figure out how to show who sent rep on my upgraded computer.. I'll take a look at all the rep you gave me to find out if you are a giant fucking pussy by your own rule.

[Androidpk]

Noone wants to smash their clit when you're around.. that'll just give you something else to get so upset about.

As soon as I figure out how to show who sent rep on my upgraded computer.. I'll take a look at all the rep you gave me to find out if you are a giant fucking pussy by your own rule.

Keep crying old man, I haven't left you any neg rep in almost 3 years. Meanwhile you're still on here trolling anyone who gets under your skin. Maybe you should take a break from the PC.

[Parkbandit]

Keep crying old man, I haven't left you any neg rep in almost 3 years. Meanwhile you're still on here trolling anyone who gets under your skin. Maybe you should take a break from the PC.

3 years.. was that the exact time when rep wasn't anonymous any longer?

Coincidence?

Keep crying over red rep you little cupcake.

It's entertaining.

[Androidpk]

3 years.. was that the exact time when rep wasn't anonymous any longer?

Coincidence?

Keep crying over red rep you little cupcake.

It's entertaining.

Nope, rep was no longer anon either February or March 2016. I haven't left you a red rep since 2015.

[Parkbandit]

Nope, rep was no longer anon either February or March 2016. I haven't left you a red rep since 2015.

I'll have to take a look.

It's not that I don't trust you.. it's that you are very untrustworthy.

[Neveragain]

Soooo.... Still no collusion?

[Parkbandit]

Soooo.... Still no collusion?

Clearly you missed President Trump's tweet today that said it was possible to pardon himself.

IF HE WASN'T GUILTY WHY WOULD HE NEED TO PARDON HIMSELF!?!?

It's really heating up now. This is the first time evidence has been established that proves he's guilty of collusion.

[cwolff]

Fox News host Shepard Smith slammed President Trump and the White House on Monday for its shifting story on the June 2016 Trump Tower meeting with a Russian lawyer and who wrote a later memo on the encounter, asserting that "somebody is lying to us."
"It's one of those days when you just don't know what to do because we have two things put out as truth, and they're opposites. And as a result of the fact they're opposites, one of them is untrue," Smith said following the White House's daily press briefing.

Yes, they're lying. It ain't no riddle.

http://thehill.com/homenews/media/390632-shep-smith-someone-in-white-house-is-lying-about-trump-tower-meeting?__twitter_impression=true&__twitter_impression=true

This is from Brit Hume. He's another fox news guy.

No way around the fact that Trump team lied when they said POTUS had nothing to do with the statement on the Trump Tower meeting. Now they acknowledge he dictated the statement.
12:25 PM - 4 Jun 2018

[Neveragain]

Clearly you missed President Trump's tweet today that said it was possible to pardon himself.

IF HE WASN'T GUILTY WHY WOULD HE NEED TO PARDON HIMSELF!?!?

It's really heating up now. This is the first time evidence has been established that proves he's guilty of collusion.

I guess I must have missed it. Today's laundry day, so important things took priority.

[ClydeR]

In a surprise move on twitter this afternoon, Trump confirmed that he is looking for another job..






https://pbs.twimg.com/media/De3_8XOUEAAo9jl.jpg

[Parkbandit]

In a surprise move on twitter this afternoon, Trump confirmed that he is looking for another job..






https://pbs.twimg.com/media/De3_8XOUEAAo9jl.jpg


http://i0.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/000/605/278/c8f.gif

[Fortybox]

Yeah, actually it doesn't.

First- Nixon tried that exact argument decades ago, and it was flatly rejected by SCOTUS. Secondly, it's considered to be an inherent power of the AG. You don't even need the Special Counsel statute for it to happen- it was put in place to help protect the independence of the Special Counsel.



So let's play this out:
1) First Trump told you that his campaign team never met with Russia- but it turns out they had met with Russia dozens of times

2) Then Trump told you that Russia didn't interfere in our elections- but it turns out that they definitely did, AND he knew about it because both the FBI AND Russia told him about it

3) Then he told you that the Democrats colluded with Russia, but it turns out that there's literally no evidence of that\

4) Then he told you that he fired James Comey because he was mean to Clinton, but it turns out that that wasn't true

5) Then he told you that Obama personally ordered a wiretap of Trump Tower, but it turns out that never happened

6) Then he told you that the entire investigation was started solely on the basis of the dossier, but it turns out that wasn't true

7) Then he told you that the FISA warrant application was intentionally lying about evidence, but it turns out the application was clear about its evidence

8) Then he told you that the Russia investigation is all about Democrats being angry, but it turns out that all Federal investigations into Trump's campaign are being run by Republicans

9) Then he told you that the FBI illegally planted a spy in his campaign, but it turns out that's not at all what happened

10) Then he told you that he didn't ever try to fire Mueller, but it turns out he tried twice

11) And now he tells you that the Special Prosecutor is unconstitutional, and you're just jumping right up to believe him again.


It's really pathetic.

Mueller is unchecked. He is acting as a principle officer without the appointment of POTUS or the confirmation of the senate. No collusion has been proven. He has intruded in Trump's personal life and has even destroyed attorney-client privilege. As far as I know, there has never been anything in history of being raided by the federal government over an affair.

You're willing to throw the constitution down the drain because your side didn't win. That's VERY dangerous. You're ideology is dangerous and I'm glad it's finally being challenged.

Good day sir! Ma'am...he-she? Whatever.

[Fortybox]

It's you're you illiterate fuck and no, I'm laughing at how fucking sensitive you are. Keep smashing that rep button as if it were your clit.

Confirmed triggering is confirmed.

[Fortybox]

Soooo.... Still no collusion?

They're waiting for the midterms. Believe me, a "story" will break at the opportune time when people are getting ready to vote.

[time4fun]

Mueller is unchecked. He is acting as a principle officer without the appointment of POTUS or the confirmation of the senate. No collusion has been proven. He has intruded in Trump's personal life and has even destroyed attorney-client privilege. As far as I know, there has never been anything in history of being raided by the federal government over an affair.

You're willing to throw the constitution down the drain because your side didn't win. That's VERY dangerous. You're ideology is dangerous and I'm glad it's finally being challenged.

Good day sir! Ma'am...he-she? Whatever.

Hey moron- this was already decided in US v Nixon and- indirectly- in Morrison v Olson.

If you bothered to fact check any of the garbage you're reading, you'd know that.

[time4fun]

Looks like Manafort may have been engaging in some witness tampering (https://www.politico.com/story/2018/06/04/mueller-accuses-manafort-of-witness-tampering-624159):


Special counsel Robert Mueller’s office on Monday accused Paul Manafort, the former Trump campaign chairman, of tampering with witnesses ahead of his upcoming trial on charges involving illegal lobbying work.

In an 18-page motion filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, prosecutor Andrew Weissmann called for an immediate hearing to determine whether Manafort violated his bail terms when he and another, unidentified person repeatedly contacted two other unnamed people “in an effort to secure materially false testimony” concerning the activities at the center of February’s superseding indictment.

Trump hires all the best people!

[Fortybox]

Hey moron- this was already decided in US v Nixon and- indirectly- in Morrison v Olson.

If you bothered to fact check any of the garbage you're reading, you'd know that.

All you do is Google crap in an attempt to sound smart. In Morrison v Olson, Chief Justice Rehnquist's opinion for the court set limits. Morrison's office was limited in jurisdiction whereas Mueller's is not.

Mueller is behaving like a principle officer...even going so far as to charge Manafort with crimes unrelated to the specific scope of the appointment. That is WAY too much power for ANY inferior officer to have. He is basically behaving like a U.S. Attorney. He is more powerful than the 93 appointed ones.

Like I said, you turn a blind eye to this because you'll do ANYTHING to discredit or dismantle the President because you lost.

[Gelston]

Hey moron

t4f is triggered

[time4fun]

All you do is Google crap in an attempt to sound smart. In Morrison v Olson, Chief Justice Rehnquist's opinion for the court set limits. Morrison's office was limited in jurisdiction whereas Mueller's is not.

Mueller is behaving like a principle officer...even going so far as to charge Manafort with crimes unrelated to the specific scope of the appointment. That is WAY too much power for ANY inferior officer to have. He is basically behaving like a U.S. Attorney. He is more powerful than the 93 appointed ones.

Like I said, you turn a blind eye to this because you'll do ANYTHING to discredit or dismantle the President because you lost.

ROFL- okay so first off. He's acting like a DoJ prosecutor. You know why? Because that's literally what he is.

Maybe you should try googling things before you embarrass yourself in these posts. Unlike you, I've spent quite a lot of time reading cases. But you don't need to have taken classes at a law school or to have gone to grad school to do it. It'll work wonders for helping you get a clue.

As for your ridiculous argument: Mueller has limits. And those limits are dictated by the DoJ- which is well within their authority to do.

Secondly, if you ever bothered to actually read beyond headlines you would know that Rosenstein explicitly authorized Mueller to look into Manafort's money laundering- which he did while working to install a Russian-backed President in the United St- erm sorry, the Ukraine. So it was wholly relevant, and this is a typical tactic in investigations to get a witness to talk. And it's not illegal or unconstitutional- the Courts have weighed in on this time and time again.

And third- if you had actually bothered to read Morrison v Olson, you'd realize that it was actually about the Congressional Special Prosecutor statute that expired in 1999. But it DID hinge on one key limitation: that the AG had the authority to fire the Special Prosecutor. Which, by the way, also applies to 28 CFR section 600.

[Androidpk]

All you do is Google crap in an attempt to sound smart.

As opposed to you? Are you a lawyer or... are you googling crap in an attempt to sound smart?

[Androidpk]

Looks like Manafort may have been engaging in some witness tampering (https://www.politico.com/story/2018/06/04/mueller-accuses-manafort-of-witness-tampering-624159):



Trump hires all the best people!

This is awesome. Want to bet that unidentified person is John Barron or Michael Cohen?

[time4fun]

This is awesome. Want to bet that unidentified person is John Barron or Michael Cohen?

It was someone from Hapsburg. I'm pretty sure they were all ex-EU leaders- which is crazy.

[time4fun]

As opposed to you? Are you a lawyer or... are you googling crap in an attempt to sound smart?

It's hilarious that the trolls think accusing someone of doing research on something before they form an opinion is an insult.

[Androidpk]

Either way I don't think Judge Amy Berman Jackson is going to have any of this, Manafort is gonna go to prison.

[time4fun]

Either way I don't think Judge Amy Berman Jackson is going to have any of this, Manafort is gonna go to prison.

Imminently. He's trying to get his home release vacated- which means he's trying to get him in jail now.

I'm guessing he's suddenly rethinking his stance on fighting this out in Court right about now. There's no way Trump is going to Pardon him for witness tampering.

[cwolff]

The news has been speculating all day what it means that trump seemed to dump on Manafort through twitter today. They figured it meant that Manafort was getting ready to flip but they were just guessing. I suppose it's safe to say trump heard about this and was trying to get ahead of the story.

[cwolff]

Rudy Giuliani denied Monday that the disclosure by Donald Trump's attorneys that the President dictated a crucial statement on the infamous June 2016 Trump Tower meeting -- a reversal from past denials -- constituted a lie, instead claiming it was a routine mistake.

"It was a mistake," Giulani, a lawyer for Trump in the Russia investigation, said on CNN's "Cuomo Prime Time" Monday. "I swear to God, it was a mistake."

Jesus Christ. Can Rudy be any worse at his job?

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/rudy-giuliani-on-shifting-trump-tower-story-it-was-a-mistake-i-swear-to-god/ar-AAye9tY?ocid=spartandhp

[Fortybox]

ROFL- okay so first off. He's acting like a DoJ prosecutor. You know why? Because that's literally what he is.

Maybe you should try googling things before you embarrass yourself in these posts. Unlike you, I've spent quite a lot of time reading cases. But you don't need to have taken classes at a law school or to have gone to grad school to do it. It'll work wonders for helping you get a clue.

As for your ridiculous argument: Mueller has limits. And those limits are dictated by the DoJ- which is well within their authority to do.

Secondly, if you ever bothered to actually read beyond headlines you would know that Rosenstein explicitly authorized Mueller to look into Manafort's money laundering- which he did while working to install a Russian-backed President in the United St- erm sorry, the Ukraine. So it was wholly relevant, and this is a typical tactic in investigations to get a witness to talk. And it's not illegal or unconstitutional- the Courts have weighed in on this time and time again.

And third- if you had actually bothered to read Morrison v Olson, you'd realize that it was actually about the Congressional Special Prosecutor statute that expired in 1999. But it DID hinge on one key limitation: that the AG had the authority to fire the Special Prosecutor. Which, by the way, also applies to 28 CFR section 600.

You're completely blinded by your hatred.

Mueller has become a rogue prosecutor with immense power AND who has not received direct supervision from his boss, like you make it out to be. He is not an inferior officer but quite arguably the most powerful attorney in America right now. Since he has not been appointed by the President nor confirmed by the Senate, his powers are unconstitutional.

Mueller's 4 henchmen basically have dual appointments with Special Assistant US Attorney status. They are not confined to the scope of the special counsel and have the ability to go outside any "confines".

Mueller is a roving US Attorney with broad overreach. He is NOT inferior by any means. There is NOTHING limited in scope, jurisdiction or power about this special council at all.

Anything this guy has done since last year is null and void.

[cwolff]

You're completely blinded by your hatred.

Mueller has become a rogue prosecutor with immense power AND who has not received direct supervision from his boss, like you make it out to be. He is not an inferior officer but quite arguably the most powerful attorney in America right now. Since he has not been appointed by the President nor confirmed by the Senate, his powers are unconstitutional.

Mueller's 4 henchmen basically have dual appointments with Special Assistant US Attorney status. They are not confined to the scope of the special counsel and have the ability to go outside any "confines".

Mueller is a roving US Attorney with broad overreach. He is NOT inferior by any means. There is NOTHING limited in scope, jurisdiction or power about this special council at all.

Anything this guy has done since last year is null and void.

Is this the new talking point? Where did you hear all this? It sounds too out there even for Fox. Mueller was instructed specifically to conduct an investigation including any links between Russia and trumps campaign and any matters that arise or may arise from the investigation. What's he supposed to do if he find criminality? Let it go?

In fact, this is the heading of the document that authorizes the Special Counsel:

APPOINTMENT OF SPECIAL COUNSEL TO INVESTIGATE RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE WITH THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION AND RELATED MATTERS

[Fortybox]

Is this the new talking point? Where did you hear all this? It sounds too out there even for Fox. Mueller was instructed specifically to conduct an investigation including any links between Russia and trumps campaign and any matters that arise or may arise from the investigation. What's he supposed to do if he find criminality? Let it go?

In fact, this is the heading of the document that authorizes the Special Counsel:

APPOINTMENT OF SPECIAL COUNSEL TO INVESTIGATE RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE WITH THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION AND RELATED MATTERS

Fixed:

APPOINTMENT OF SPECIAL COUNSEL TO INVESTIGATE EVERYTHING AND ANYTHING THEY WANT TO DO WITHOUT POTUS APPOINTMENT OR SENATE CONFIRMATION OH AND RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE WITH THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION AND RELATED MATTERS

[time4fun]

You're completely blinded by your hatred.

Mueller has become a rogue prosecutor with immense power AND who has not received direct supervision from his boss, like you make it out to be. He is not an inferior officer but quite arguably the most powerful attorney in America right now.Since he has not been appointed by the President nor confirmed by the Senate, his powers are unconstitutional.

Mueller's 4 henchmen basically have dual appointments with Special Assistant US Attorney status. They are not confined to the scope of the special counsel and have the ability to go outside any "confines".

Mueller is a roving US Attorney with broad overreach. He is NOT inferior by any means. There is NOTHING limited in scope, jurisdiction or power about this special council at all.

Anything this guy has done since last year is null and void.

I'm going to highlight everything in there that's pure opinion in red, the inaccuracies in yellow, and the facts in blue.

Most of that was just opinion, as you can see in the red. The rest blatantly inaccurate:

1) Rosenstein is his boss, and Rosenstein has had to sign off on every avenue of investigation. The DoJ submitted documentation of this to the Court.
2) There are literally hundreds of appointees in the Federal Government who don't require Senate confirmation. And the DoJ statute on appointing the Special Counsel was written BY the Executive Branch. The Executive Branch has the authority to determine how it does the vast majority most of its hiring. (And I already told you that this was affirmed by SCOTUS in US v Nixon, among other cases)
3) Just because a few of his team members have dual appointments doesn't mean they aren't bound by anything. For Mueller's investigation they still need Mueller's approval. For their other other appointments, they're bound by DoJ guidelines, their US Attorney, Rosenstein, and Sessions. And yes, they need approval to do things.


You actually only had one fact- that some members of his team have dual appointments. But your conclusion about what that means is wildly ignorant of how DoJ process works.

And, by the way, NO Prosecutor or investigator who uncovers evidence of a new crime while looking into an old one is going to ignore the new crime. Their job is to enforce the law. Stop acting like it's wildly inappropriate for them to prosecute crimes. That's literally their job. They have an ethical and statutory duty to report evidence of any crimes they uncover while doing their jobs. Trump and his friends don't get special treatment here.

[cwolff]

Fixed:

APPOINTMENT OF SPECIAL COUNSEL TO INVESTIGATE EVERYTHING AND ANYTHING THEY WANT TO DO WITHOUT POTUS APPOINTMENT OR SENATE CONFIRMATION OH AND RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE WITH THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION AND RELATED MATTERS

Kind of. You're getting closer to the truth. He is charged with investigating the Russian connections and anything else that comes up. This will include things like money laundering, influence peddling, backroom deals etc...I suppose it could even extend to Kushners connections attempting to get his building refinanced and Ivankas precious trademarks. Basically, he is not instructed to turn a blind eye to law breaking. He's actually instructed to follow up on that and even bring charges when warranted.

Why is this so hard to understand? It's not changed from the beginning when trump, Gingrich and every other fucking "conservative" was all happy with Muellers appointment.

[time4fun]

Is this the new talking point? Where did you hear all this? It sounds too out there even for Fox. Mueller was instructed specifically to conduct an investigation including any links between Russia and trumps campaign and any matters that arise or may arise from the investigation. What's he supposed to do if he find criminality? Let it go?

In fact, this is the heading of the document that authorizes the Special Counsel:

APPOINTMENT OF SPECIAL COUNSEL TO INVESTIGATE RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE WITH THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION AND RELATED MATTERS

This is Sean Hannity/Tucker Carlson garbage I'm sure. Combined with a deep lack of understanding of the issues here.

Everything he's saying is just his interpretation of some baseless argument he's heard thrown his way.

[cwolff]

This is awesome. Want to bet that unidentified person is John Barron or Michael Cohen?


It was someone from Hapsburg. I'm pretty sure they were all ex-EU leaders- which is crazy.

Whatever trump's doing sure as hell isn't slowing down Mueller. It seems like there is nothing that happens with trumps guys that Mueller doesn't already know about. Not only are people coming out of interviews astonished that Mueller knows everything, but he's still got all their communications. LMAO. What the hell was Manafort thinking? Did he believe that he somehow encrypted his phone sufficiently to defeat the Justice Department of USA?

[Fortybox]

I'm going to highlight everything in there that's pure opinion in red, the inaccuracies in yellow, and the facts in blue.

Most of that was just opinion, as you can see in the red. The rest blatantly inaccurate:

1) Rosenstein is his boss, and Rosenstein has had to sign off on every avenue of investigation. The DoJ submitted documentation of this to the Court.
2) There are literally hundreds of appointees in the Federal Government who don't require Senate confirmation. And the DoJ statute on appointing the Special Counsel was written BY the Executive Branch. The Executive Branch has the authority to determine how it does the vast majority most of its hiring. (And I already told you that this was affirmed by SCOTUS in US v Nixon, among other cases)
3) Just because a few of his team members have dual appointments doesn't mean they aren't bound by anything. For Mueller's investigation they still need Mueller's approval. For their other other appointments, they're bound by DoJ guidelines, their US Attorney, Rosenstein, and Sessions. And yes, they need approval to do things.


You actually only had one fact- that some members of his team have dual appointments. But your conclusion about what that means is wildly ignorant of how DoJ process works.

And, by the way, NO Prosecutor or investigator who uncovers evidence of a new crime while looking into an old one is going to ignore the new crime. Their job is to enforce the law. Stop acting like it's wildly inappropriate for them to prosecute crimes. That's literally their job. They have an ethical and statutory duty to report evidence of any crimes they uncover while doing their jobs. Trump and his friends don't get special treatment here.

At what point, in your opinion, would Mueller be overreaching in this investigation? At what point does it become too large?

[Fortybox]

Kind of. You're getting closer to the truth. He is charged with investigating the Russian connections and anything else that comes up. This will include things like money laundering, influence peddling, backroom deals etc...I suppose it could even extend to Kushners connections attempting to get his building refinanced and Ivankas precious trademarks. Basically, he is not instructed to turn a blind eye to law breaking. He's actually instructed to follow up on that and even bring charges when warranted.

Why is this so hard to understand? It's not changed from the beginning when trump, Gingrich and every other fucking "conservative" was all happy with Muellers appointment.

Perhaps he will send his gumshoes to investigate your crying. With his far overreaching power I'm sure there's a connection there somewhere.

Perhaps he'll find Carmen Sandiego too.

https://media3.giphy.com/media/lkpT33i3KSjN6/giphy.gif

[Androidpk]

You're completely blinded by your hatred.

Mueller has become a rogue prosecutor with immense power AND who has not received direct supervision from his boss, like you make it out to be. He is not an inferior officer but quite arguably the most powerful attorney in America right now. Since he has not been appointed by the President nor confirmed by the Senate, his powers are unconstitutional.

Mueller's 4 henchmen basically have dual appointments with Special Assistant US Attorney status. They are not confined to the scope of the special counsel and have the ability to go outside any "confines".

Mueller is a roving US Attorney with broad overreach. He is NOT inferior by any means. There is NOTHING limited in scope, jurisdiction or power about this special council at all.

Anything this guy has done since last year is null and void.

You should really really stop getting your talking points from infowars and 4chan.

[Androidpk]

What the hell was Manafort thinking? Did he believe that he somehow encrypted his phone sufficiently to defeat the Justice Department of USA?

This is the same Manafort that doesn't know how to edit PDF files :lol:

[drauz]

This is the same Manafort that doesn't know how to edit PDF files :lol:

Like with a cloth or something?

[Wrathbringer]

Whatever trump's doing sure as hell isn't slowing down Mueller. It seems like there is nothing that happens with trumps guys that Mueller doesn't already know about. Not only are people coming out of interviews astonished that Mueller knows everything, but he's still got all their communications. LMAO. What the hell was Manafort thinking? Did he believe that he somehow encrypted his phone sufficiently to defeat the Justice Department of USA?

You're retarded.

[Neveragain]

Like with a cloth or something?

:Lol:

[Neveragain]

I'm assuming that from here on out the FBI placing spies within all presidential campaigns will be accepted as common place by all parties?

[cwolff]

I'm assuming that from here on out the FBI placing spies within all presidential campaigns will be accepted as common place by all parties?

One might assume that if one was plain stupid. It's shameful to see you debase yourself like this just to defend on indefensible man you're crushing on.

[Parkbandit]

I'm assuming that from here on out the FBI placing spies within all presidential campaigns will be accepted as common place by all parties?

Yes.. but you can't use the word "spy".

And you have to make it seem like you are doing it for their benefit.. not yours.

[ClydeR]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/De7LKkyU8AAYPwv.jpg



As I have said many times before, the main thing Trump needs to do is stop acting guilty. Out of all the Washington scandals I've seen, I can't remember accused person ever acting as guilty as Trump acts. It's the main reason I think he must be innocent. Nobody who was actually guilty would act this guilty.

[RichardCranium]

Lol @ "so many lives ruined..."

[Neveragain]

One might assume that if one was plain stupid. It's shameful to see you debase yourself like this just to defend on indefensible man you're crushing on.

I see you're still having difficulties deciphering the "?" symbol.

[cwolff]

I see you're still having difficulties deciphering the "?" symbol.

You're hiding your manhood behind a punctuation mark.

[Neveragain]

You're hiding your manhood behind a punctuation mark.

I have no need to prove my manhood, I have known what "?" means since grade 1.

[cwolff]

Judge Nap doesn't think too highly of trump's legal beagles. Who knows; maybe they're job is to stir up a hornet's nest while giving Flood room to do his work in peace and quiet.


Judge Andrew Napolitano blasted President Trump's legal team during an appearance on Fox News Monday, arguing it was showing a “sophomoric view of the law" and that it was not serving the president well.

The senior judicial analyst for Fox News called the January memo from Trump’s legal team to special counsel Robert Mueller a "disgrace" and "very harmful" to the president's case.

He also faulted the leaking of the letter, saying he did not understand why the president's team would want it public given it had cited the wrong statute in one case an incorrectly interpreted an opinion in another.
“I don’t know how it got out,” Napolitano said. “I don’t know why the White House would have leaked it, as has been suggested, because it shows a sophomoric view of the law.”

“They are not serving him well when they needlessly show their cards,” Napolitano added during the appearance on “The Story” with Martha MacCallum.
Napolitano faulted the memo for arguing that the president can't be found to have obstructed justice, saying Trump's team forgot that a president can be found to have obstructed justice by ending a prosecution for a "corrupt purpose."

"They forgot that part," Napolitano said.

He also faulted Trump's team for saying that the president can "interfere" with an FBI investigation, saying it had missed an amendment to the relevant statute from 2002 that said the interference "with an FBI investigation intended to produce evidence is obstruction."

Napolitano said it was difficult for him to offer the criticism because he knows the leading members of Trump's legal team, Jay Sekulow and former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani.
But he said they were not serving the president well.

Napolitano said Giuliani’s claim that Trump wouldn’t be indicted if he shot former FBI Director James Comey was “absurd.”

“He could be arrested, charged, indicted, released, tried after he leaves the White House but no way would any law enforcement agency allow a murder or an attempted murder go uncharged because the person behind it was the president and Giuliani knows that,” Napolitano said.

He also suggested that Trump may want Giuliani “causing this chaos” because it dominates the news cycles.

http://thehill.com/homenews/media/390719-fox-newss-napolitano-trump-team-legal-letter-shows-sophomoric-view-of-the-law

[Androidpk]

Not only did Trump's junior varsity legal team cite the wrong statute the memo was written with the comic sans font. :lol:

[Androidpk]

Here's some more information on Manafort's terrible OPSEC which got him caught trying to tamper with witnesses.

https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/zm8q43/paul-manafort-icloud-whatsapp-bad-opsec-witness-tampering

[Neveragain]

Not only did Trump's junior varsity legal team cite the wrong statute the memo was written with the comic sans font. :lol:

Still no collusion then?

[cwolff]

Here's some more information on Manafort's terrible OPSEC which got him caught trying to tamper with witnesses.

https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/zm8q43/paul-manafort-icloud-whatsapp-bad-opsec-witness-tampering

That's too funny. No wonder Mueller can't wrap up his investigation fast. These fucks keep breaking the law.

[cwolff]

Trump Administration Sidelines Effort to Appoint Justice Department No. 3
Early potential candidates said they weren’t interested in the position, which would oversee the Mueller probe if Rod Rosenstein were to depart
By Sadie Gurman and Aruna Viswanatha
June 5, 2018 10:19 a.m. ET

The Trump administration has put its search for the Justice Department’s No. 3 official on the back burner after failing to persuade several early candidates to take the challenging position, according to people familiar with the matter.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-administration-sidelines-effort-to-appoint-justice-department-no-3-1528208396?mod=e2twp

Surprised he can't fill this slot. Is this a position that has to make it through a nomination process with Congress? If not, it should be simple for him put a lackey in there.

[Androidpk]

Still no collusion then?

You mean asides from all the secretive back channel meetings and deal making between the Kremlin, agents of the Kremlin, agents of the Kremlin within the Trump campaign, and Trump and his closest advisers? :lol:

[Androidpk]

That's too funny. No wonder Mueller can't wrap up his investigation fast. These fucks keep breaking the law.

Not only that but they're fucking stupid as hell. Manafort knows the FBI are watching him like a hawk and it's certainly likely the CIA and NSA are keeping tabs on his communications. But sure, lets reach out and do some witness tampering.

[Androidpk]

https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-administration-sidelines-effort-to-appoint-justice-department-no-3-1528208396?mod=e2twp

Surprised he can't fill this slot. Is this a position that has to make it through a nomination process with Congress? If not, it should be simple for him put a lackey in there.

That would be the associate attorney general position which has to be confirmed by the Senate.

[Neveragain]

You mean asides from all the secretive back channel meetings and deal making between the Kremlin, agents of the Kremlin, agents of the Kremlin within the Trump campaign, and Trump and his closest advisers? :lol:

So, still no collusion and Trump is still your president?

[Androidpk]

So, still no collusion and Trump is still your president?

You mean asides from all the secretive back channel meetings and deal making between the Kremlin, agents of the Kremlin, agents of the Kremlin within the Trump campaign, and Trump and his closest advisers? :lol: Collusion for days. Its why your fav POTUS is going to be relegated to a single term.

[Neveragain]

You mean asides from all the secretive back channel meetings and deal making between the Kremlin, agents of the Kremlin, agents of the Kremlin within the Trump campaign, and Trump and his closest advisers? :lol: Collusion for days. Its why your fav POTUS is going to be relegated to a single term.

So, still no collusion and Trump is still your president?

[Androidpk]

Oh dear, it's retarded.

[Methais]

lol, 2 snowflake neg reps from parkbandit in less than 4 days. Triggered much, you giant fucking pussy?


You being a massive pussy has nothing to do with you furiously smashing the rep button because you can't control your emotions.


https://i.imgur.com/Kv2KpOL.jpg


For people that are constantly calling other people sensitive snowflakes they sure do project their insecurities a lot.

You sure seem to care a lot about rep for supposedly not caring about rep. That must be why you keep getting triggered and obsessing over rep literally every day on here, even when there’s no new rep to cry about, because you don’t care about it.

PS: Other than the sentence below, the only one who has been throwing out the word “snowflake” is you. Literally every day, usually multiple times.

Zero. Self. Awareness.

Stop being such a sensitive snowflake, you sensitive little snowflake you.

https://giphy.com/gifs/wwe-wrestling-people-always-pinched-my-cheeks-RxGWPF28VAnpC


waaah waaah waaaaaaah waaah waaah waaaah WAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!

http://i0.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/original/000/002/078/StopWhining.jpeg

[Androidpk]

Laughing at you trolls raging like little impotent Trumplets isn't crying over rep. It's no wonder the PC voted on you 3 three snowflakes.

https://i.imgur.com/Kv2KpOL.jpg

[cwolff]

The other side—the accurate perspective—isn’t that complicated. In 2016, Vladimir Putin’s regime mounted information warfare against the United States, in part to help Trump become president. While this attack was underway, the Trump crew tried to collude covertly with Moscow, sought to set up a secret communications channel with Putin’s office, and repeatedly denied in public that this assault was happening, providing cover to the Russian operation. Trump and his lieutenants aligned themselves with and assisted a foreign adversary, as it was attacking the United States. The evidence is rock-solid: They committed a profound act of betrayal. That is the scandal.
…
An overseas enemy struck at the core of the republic—and it succeeded. Trump and his minions helped and encouraged this attack by engaging in secret contacts with Moscow and publicly insisting no such assault was happening. This is far bigger than a bribe, a break-in, or a blow job. And, worse, the United States remains vulnerable to such a strike.

Yet the full impact of this scandal does not resonate in the daily coverage and discourse. In many ways, the media presents the Russia scandal mostly as a political threat to Trump, not as a serious threat to the nation. And many Americans, thanks to Trump and his allies, view it as a charade. All this shows how easy it is for disinformation and demagoguery to distort reality. That is a tragedy for the United States. For Trump—and Putin—that is victory.

Trump is excellent at disinformation and driving a storyline. David Corn is trying to put a dent into his propaganda machine with this article (https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2018/06/trump-russia-scandal-media/) and I wish him luck. It's an uphill battle when so many of us forget what it means to be an American and instead join the church of trump.

[Methais]

Laughing at you trolls raging like little impotent Trumplets isn't crying over rep. It's no wonder the PC voted on you 3 three snowflakes.

https://i.imgur.com/Kv2KpOL.jpg

Stop being so triggered. Literally no one here except you cares about rep. Not even cwolff, and he’s a huge pussy. So big of a pussy that when he’s rubbing sunscreen on himself, you put your earplugs in.

Otherwise feel free to tell us who has brought up rep more than you lately.

What a fragile little Nancy.

I’ll do you a solid and respond for you so that you can save some of that energy you have in such short supply. Except the part about telling us who’s been bringing up rep more than you, because you care so little about it.



Stop being so triggered. Literally no one here except you cares about rep. Not even cwolff, and he’s a huge pussy. So big of a pussy that when he’s rubbing sunscreen on himself, you put your earplugs in.

Otherwise feel free to tell us who has brought up rep more than you lately.

What a fragile little Nancy.

No need to respond though, I’ll do you a solid and respond for you so that you can save some of that energy you have in such short supply...

https://i.imgur.com/Kv2KpOL.jpg

Good luck keeping up with my cleverness, snowflake!

[Neveragain]

Trump is excellent at disinformation and driving a storyline. David Corn is trying to put a dent into his propaganda machine with this article (https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2018/06/trump-russia-scandal-media/) and I wish him luck. It's an uphill battle when so many of us forget what it means to be an American and instead join the church of trump.

This would be readable if not for the fact that you don't believe in private land ownership nor the right to free thought.

[Taernath]

lol, 2 snowflake neg reps from parkbandit in less than 4 days. Triggered much, you giant fucking pussy?

Remember when you spent several months sending me neg rep every few days?

[cwolff]

This would be readable if not for the fact that you don't believe in private land ownership nor the right to free thought.

Found a vid of NA begging for attention


https://youtu.be/DRK0-ZZAhMk

[Methais]

Remember when you spent several months sending me neg rep every few days?

https://i.imgur.com/TuKf61l.jpg

[Androidpk]

Literally no one here except you cares about rep.

Which is why you constantly spam people with it as well as use alt accounts. Because literally no one cares about it. Uh huh.

[RichardCranium]

Trump is excellent at disinformation and driving a storyline. David Corn is trying to put a dent into his propaganda machine with this article (https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2018/06/trump-russia-scandal-media/) and I wish him luck. It's an uphill battle when so many of us forget what it means to be an American and instead join the church of trump.

Is Trump a tactical political genius, using his wealth and contacts to navigate a far-reaching espionage campaign to usurp our country?

Or is he a functional retard that shit-posts from the toilet each morning?

[Methais]

Which is why you constantly spam people with it as well as use alt accounts. Because literally no one cares about it. Uh huh.

Because giving out rep, 99% of which is green, is the exact same thing as making post after post every single day all bent out of shape crying about rep someone else gave you while simultaneously claiming to not care about rep.

I’d like to meet the kid in your class growing up who was dumber than you. Just to see if he can breathe on his own.

Don’t forget to respond to Taernath too!

PS: It’s literally impossible to spam rep. If you’d bother to learn how rep works after all these years instead of being a lazy twatstika you’d know this.


Remember when you spent several months sending me neg rep every few days?

[Androidpk]

cry harder methais

https://i.imgur.com/Kv2KpOL.jpg

[cwolff]

Is Trump a tactical political genius, using his wealth and contacts to navigate a far-reaching espionage campaign to usurp our country?

Or is he a functional retard that shit-posts from the toilet each morning?

There's a genius to his madness. I don't think he has it in him to plot out an extensive long term plan then follow through. I think he's impulsive and a gambler with great instincts for manipulating people to get what he wants in the short term though and he's winning the public side of this thing now, but will lose eventually.

[Androidpk]

Is Trump a tactical political genius, using his wealth and contacts to navigate a far-reaching espionage campaign to usurp our country?

Or is he a functional retard that shit-posts from the toilet each morning?

He's obviously a stable genius, he already told us this.

[Taernath]

Don’t forget to respond to Taernath too!

I wouldn't have said anything if he weren't trying to act like he doesn't do it as well.

[Androidpk]

I wouldn't have said anything if he weren't trying to act like he doesn't do it as well.

You mean the rep I left you 3 years ago? And the 1 neg rep I've left since then? Oh you tender snowflake.

[Taernath]

You mean the rep I left you 3 years ago? And the 1 neg rep I've left since then? Oh you tender snowflake.

"People that send me large amounts of neg rep are triggered snowflakes. People that I send large amounts of red rep to are also triggered snowflakes." - Androidpk

https://ih1.redbubble.net/image.253066070.3154/ap,550x550,12x12,1,transparent,t.u1.png

[Neveragain]

You mean the rep I left you 3 years ago? And the 1 neg rep I've left since then? Oh you tender snowflake.

I'm 99.9998% sure you left me neg rep but not a few weeks ago. I think you were lashing out over your continued escape from your theft accusations and your hate for loud vaginas.

[Back]

Is Trump a tactical political genius, using his wealth and contacts to navigate a far-reaching espionage campaign to usurp our country?

Or is he a functional retard that shit-posts from the toilet each morning?

Definitely not the first one.

Definitely the second one.

You forgot the truth though: A man so naive, egotistical, and power hungry that he would sell out America to Putin.

[Neveragain]

Definitely not the first one.

Definitely the second one.

You forgot the truth though: A man so naive, egotistical, and power hungry that he would sell out America to Putin.

Hillary sold uranium to Russia, not Trump........ Nevermind I forgot it was Tuesday.

[Methais]

Definitely not the first one.

Definitely the second one.

You forgot the truth though: A man so naive, egotistical, and power hungry that he would sell out America to Putin.

https://am11.akamaized.net/med/cnt/uploads/2012/03/flexibility-obama.jpg
http://www.traditioninaction.org/HotTopics/HTimages_g-k/I099_045_Flexibility_2.jpg

I'm pretty sure Frank Gallagher is more sober than Back at this point.

[Parkbandit]

Remember when you spent several months sending me neg rep every few days?

Now, now.. it's only when HE GETS rep.. not when he GIVES rep.

Get it right.

[Methais]

Noone wants to smash their clit when you're around.. that'll just give you something else to get so upset about.

As soon as I figure out how to show who sent rep on my upgraded computer.. I'll take a look at all the rep you gave me to find out if you are a giant fucking pussy by your own rule.

http://forum.gsplayers.com/showthread.php?100750-AUTOMATE-RED-REP-NAMES


As many of you know, there is now a way to see the name of the red repper!

INSTRUCTIONS For Chrome: (SEE NEXT POST FOR FIREFOX INSTRUCTIONS)

Download Tapermonkey Extension for Chrome

CLICK Here-> https://gist.github.com/Franknozly/d6ac26ef386fe1ab3f7e/raw/9e1dc5bd4e63e2effabe1b224d48939b8634a244/reputation.user.js
Click Yes/Install
Close Tab

Go Here: http://forum.gsplayers.com/usercp.php

DONE!

http://oi64.tinypic.com/2d9crgg.jpg

[Parkbandit]

Definitely not the first one.

Definitely the second one.

You forgot the truth though: A man so naive, egotistical, and power hungry that he would sell out America to Putin.

How is President Trump, specifically "selling out America to Putin"?

Be specific. Not just that you have a bad feeling about stuff.

Also:

https://media1.tenor.com/images/721f1e0ef5e300c7dce111a1cdc8f8a2/tenor.gif?itemid=4971622

Keep pouring! Make Drunk Tuesdays Great Again!!

[Methais]

How is President Trump, specifically "selling out America to Putin"?

Be specific. Not just that you have a bad feeling about stuff.

Also:

https://media1.tenor.com/images/721f1e0ef5e300c7dce111a1cdc8f8a2/tenor.gif?itemid=4971622

Keep pouring! Make Drunk Tuesdays Great Again!!

How ignorant are you to not realize that when Trump hurts someone's feelings, even if he didn't actually do anything, it's because Trump is selling out America?

I'm curious what brain dead amoebas like Back think a billionaire like Trump would even have to gain to by selling out to Russia, or anyone for that matter, especially if he's selling out the country where he made most most of his money.

Maybe one day Back will make a post that isn't centered around his emotions.

[Parkbandit]

http://forum.gsplayers.com/showthread.php?100750-AUTOMATE-RED-REP-NAMES

I apologize for calling you all those mean names.

You are the man.

[Parkbandit]

lol, 2 snowflake neg reps from parkbandit in less than 4 days. Triggered much, you giant fucking pussy?

Confirmed: Androidpk just called himself a giant fucking pussy.

Red rep given to me on 5-24-15 8:11PM and again on 5-28-15 6:51PM

Less than 4 days apart = giant fucking pussy.

[Methais]

Confirmed: Androidpk just called himself a giant fucking pussy.

Red rep given to me on 5-24-15 8:11PM and again on 5-28-15 6:51PM

Less than 4 days apart = giant fucking pussy.

Using pk math, if 4 days = giant fucking pussy, then 3 days = gargantuan fucking pussy making very loud *SCHLUP SCHLUP* noises.

[Parkbandit]

Using pk math, if 4 days = giant fucking pussy, then 3 days = gargantuan fucking pussy making very loud *SCHLUP SCHLUP* noises.

Why are you trying to upset him?? YOU KNOW HE HATES THE SOUNDS OF A GIRL MASTURBATING!

[Androidpk]

Confirmed: Androidpk just called himself a giant fucking pussy.

Red rep given to me on 5-24-15 8:11PM and again on 5-28-15 6:51PM

Less than 4 days apart = giant fucking pussy.

I know your reading comprehension is shit but I specifically said you weren't a pussy because of the rep. You're a pussy because you don't have the balls to take me up on a bet. But continue to be troll, it's your specialty after all.


https://i.imgur.com/Kv2KpOL.jpg

[Androidpk]

Judge AMB has set a date for next Friday to discuss the witness tampering allegations against Manafort. From what I gather each charge (2 witnesses tampered with) could result in 20 years each.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/De743N-W0AAvxbc.jpg

[Parkbandit]

I know your reading comprehension is shit but I specifically said you weren't a pussy because of the rep. You're a pussy because you don't have the balls to take me up on a bet. But continue to be troll, it's your specialty after all.



Remember when I addressed any wager with you BEFORE you suddenly became a "man" and demanded a bet with me?

You aren't trustworthy. You don't have the money, the personal fortitude or the character to make any bet with anyone.

Sorry. Like I said before... insufficient funds... something I'm sure you are very familiar with.

But I'll make a bet with you, knowing you aren't man enough to keep up your end of the wager.

Same stakes, but with Impeachment. I bet President Trump will not be impeached and forced to leave office. That means both House and Senate.

Put up or shut up cupcake.

Don't be a gigantic flapping pussy as usual.

[Androidpk]

I've already offered terms and you turned it down cause you're a massive pussy. If you want to change your mind though I won't laugh too much at you. Pussy.

[Parkbandit]

I've already offered terms and you turned it down cause you're a massive pussy. If you want to change your mind though I won't laugh too much at you. Pussy.

https://media.giphy.com/media/seroHIloLZIgE/giphy.gif

[Androidpk]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mDqayJDJHg8

[Androidpk]

>House Speaker Paul D. Ryan breaks with President Trump, says he sees ‘no evidence’ to claims FBI spied on president’s campaign.


>House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-WI) on Wednesday warned President Donald Trump against pardoning himself, saying that it was obvious that Trump shouldn’t attempt to do so.

“Do you believe that the President has power to pardon himself?” a reporter asked Ryan at his weekly press conference.

“I don’t know the technical answer to that question, but I think, obviously, the answer is he shouldn’t, and no one is above the law,” Ryan responded.

[RichardCranium]

Confirming that there was in fact a confidential informant contacting members of the Trump campaign as it investigated its ties to Russia and then claiming that there is no evidence of spying seems a little intellectually dishonest to me.

[time4fun]

Confirming that there was in fact a confidential informant contacting members of the Trump campaign as it investigated its ties to Russia and then claiming that there is no evidence of spying seems a little intellectually dishonest to me.

A spy is someone you send in preemptively to try to find dirt.

An informant is someone you send in after you've received numerous Intelligence reports indicating the Russians are talking with the Trump campaign.

There's a HUGE difference. Are you honestly telling me that you don't think we should be following up on Intel like that? That's about as serious a threat to national security as it gets.

[RichardCranium]

There's a HUGE difference. Are you honestly telling me that you don't think we should be following up on Intel like that? That's about as serious a threat to national security as it gets.

That's not what I'm saying. Of course they have to look at it. It just appears to me that they're playing the semantics game. Merely my personal opinion.

[Androidpk]

Confirming that there was in fact a confidential informant contacting members of the Trump campaign as it investigated its ties to Russia and then claiming that there is no evidence of spying seems a little intellectually dishonest to me.

Apples and oranges.

[Neveragain]

A spy is someone you send in preemptively to try to find dirt.

An informant is someone you send in after you've received numerous Intelligence reports indicating the Russians are talking with the Trump campaign.

There's a HUGE difference. Are you honestly telling me that you don't think we should be following up on Intel like that? That's about as serious a threat to national security as it gets.

So why were there no "informants" placed within the Clinton campaign?

[Androidpk]

So why were there no "informants" placed within the Clinton campaign?

Because the Clinton campaign wasn't staffed with known/suspected foreign agents.

[Neveragain]

Warning! I'm a theif.

Yes we know, you keep reminding us.

[Androidpk]

Yes we know, you keep reminding us.

Be a good lad and show us on the doll where I touched you. Do you want a support group?

[Neveragain]

Be a good lad and show us on the doll where I touched you. Do you want a support group?

Maybe you should be asking that of the woman you stole from, the woman you ripped off over rent and the husband who's wife you fucked.

[Methais]

Be a good lad and show us on the doll where I touched you. Do you want a support group?

Did you just admit to touching Neveragain? That sounds pretty gay.

What a gaylord focker.

[Androidpk]

Maybe you should be asking that of the woman you stole from, the woman you ripped off over rent and the husband who's wife you fucked.


http://gifimage.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/triggered-gif-16.gif

[cwolff]

Paul Ryan, Like Trey Gowdy, Says FBI’s Trump Campaign Probe Was Appropriate
House speaker says no evidence backs up the president’s claims of spying
By Sadie Gurman
June 6, 2018 1:05 p.m. ET

WASHINGTON—House Speaker Paul Ryan (R., Wis.) sided with House Oversight Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy in disputing President Donald Trump’s claims that “spies” infiltrated his 2016 presidential campaign.
Speaking with reporters, Mr. Ryan on Wednesday said he had seen no evidence to contradict the assessment last week from Mr. Gowdy, a South Carolina Republican, that the Federal Bureau of Investigation acted appropriately when it sent an informant to meet with two Trump campaign aides during the run-up to the 2016 election.

The only ones who speak sense are quitting. Next years republican congressional crop will be purged of non-trumpanzees. It's horrifying that these politicians only speak out if they're not running for re-election.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/paul-ryan-like-trey-gowdy-says-fbis-trump-campaign-probe-was-appropriate-1528304716

[Methais]

The only ones who speak sense are quitting. Next years republican congressional crop will be purged of non-trumpanzees. It's horrifying that these politicians only speak out if they're not running for re-election.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/paul-ryan-like-trey-gowdy-says-fbis-trump-campaign-probe-was-appropriate-1528304716

https://media2.giphy.com/media/q5LvAuRuzMj6g/giphy.gif

[Parkbandit]

A spy is someone you send in preemptively to try to find dirt.

An informant is someone you send in after you've received numerous Intelligence reports indicating the Russians are talking with the Trump campaign.

There's a HUGE difference. Are you honestly telling me that you don't think we should be following up on Intel like that? That's about as serious a threat to national security as it gets.

Honest question: Would you be against it if it were spying vs. being an informant?

[cwolff]

#Russia's state TV:
Dean of Moscow state University: "The EU is coming apart at the seams —thanks to American God & voters, Trump is smashing it with a sledgehammer. That's why Putin says he isn't trying to weaken the EU. Why would he bother? Trump is doing all the work for him." https://t.co/ot4siOyzAx

Winning!

[Methais]

Winning!

You really are that dense. And it is entertaining.

[Gelston]

A spy is someone you send in preemptively to try to find dirt.

An informant is someone you send in after you've received numerous Intelligence reports indicating the Russians are talking with the Trump campaign.

There's a HUGE difference. Are you honestly telling me that you don't think we should be following up on Intel like that? That's about as serious a threat to national security as it gets.

Stop inventing definitions. Informant is just a nicer name for spy. They do the same function and have the same result.

"Oh, that guy isn't a spy, he went infiltrated the Russian Government AFTER we heard about it!" See how retarded that sounds?

[Androidpk]

Stop inventing definitions. Informant is just a nicer name for spy. They do the same function and have the same result.

"Oh, that guy isn't a spy, he went infiltrated the Russian Government AFTER we heard about it!" See how retarded that sounds?

Stop being stupid. Spy and informant are 2 different things.

[Gelston]

Stop being stupid. Spy and informant are 2 different things.

No, they really aren't.

[Androidpk]

No, they really aren't.

Yeah, they really are. For someone that was interested in joining law enforcement you should know this.

[Parkbandit]

Yeah, they really are. For someone that was interested in joining law enforcement you should know this.

Actually, they are listed as synonyms.

Also, so you don't have to ask an adult.. the definition of synonym is:

"a word or phrase that means exactly or nearly the same as another word or phrase in the same language, for example shut is a synonym of close."

[Fortybox]

A spy is someone you send in preemptively to try to find dirt.

An informant is someone you send in after you've received numerous Intelligence reports indicating the Russians are talking with the Trump campaign.

There's a HUGE difference. Are you honestly telling me that you don't think we should be following up on Intel like that? That's about as serious a threat to national security as it gets.

Wow, you totally made these definitions up or just spouted crap from whatever “source of information” you googled.

An informant does not have to be someone you send in. It’s not conditional on “reports” either.

Stahp googling. Just stahp it Rahn!

[cwolff]

They used a confidential human source. He's not confidential any more though. Got outed because of these traitors.

trumps done great signalling to his followers about the message. We see that here with these guys carrying the torch for their boy.

Although I knew it was theoretically possible I never believed it would come to pass that a chunk of our citizens would turn on the USA like this.

Its all out in the open too. Its not hidden. trumps running down anything and anyone that he find uncomfortable to his rule. And these cowardly fucks go right along with it. No questions asked. Get the talking points of Twitter and repeat. Its a damn shame.

[cwolff]

God these guys are scum. Giuliani said that Mueller was framing trump. Hell of an accusation to make especially to a foreign audience. It flat makes me disgusted to see this. Women with value? Again they make an opponent out to be some sort of lesser human. And this guy represents the President of the United States. SMH


#Giuliani on @StormyDaniels: "I respect women—beautiful women and women with value—but a woman who sells her body for sexual exploitation I don't respect. Tell me what damage she suffered. Someone who sells his or her body for money has no good name." https://t.co/zpkHt3kUXv https://t.co/3IMq3Jpuxr

[Parkbandit]

They used a confidential human source. He's not confidential any more though. Got outed because of these traitors.

trumps done great signalling to his followers about the message. We see that here with these guys carrying the torch for their boy.

Although I knew it was theoretically possible I never believed it would come to pass that a chunk of our citizens would turn on the USA like this.

Its all out in the open too. Its not hidden. trumps running down anything and anyone that he find uncomfortable to his rule. And these cowardly fucks go right along with it. No questions asked. Get the talking points of Twitter and repeat. Its a damn shame.

I really hope Trump does the same thing that Obama did.. exactly the same thing. I can't wait for dumbasses like you to cry holy hell when it's found out Trump put a spy.. oh sorry, an "informant" in the 2020 Democratic nominee's camp... you know, to help and support him.

[drauz]

God these guys are scum. Giuliani said that Mueller was framing trump. Hell of an accusation to make especially to a foreign audience. It flat makes me disgusted to see this. Women with value? Again they make an opponent out to be some sort of lesser human. And this guy represents the President of the United States. SMH

https://i.imgflip.com/oxsic.jpg

[Methais]

Stop being stupid. Spy and informant are 2 different things.


https://youtu.be/lJrV8sJ3e1o

[~Rocktar~]

So this happened . . .


McCabe has requested the Senate Judiciary Committee promise not to use his testimony to prosecute him after he appears before an upcoming congressional panel that will look into how senior officials at the FBI and Justice Department handled the investigation of Hillary Clinton's private email server, according to a letter obtained by CNN.

"Under the terms of such a grant of use immunity, no testimony or other information provided by Mr. McCabe could be used against him in a criminal case," wrote Michael Bromwich, a lawyer for McCabe, to Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley, who has requested McCabe testify next week.

“We hereby request that the Judiciary Committee authorize a grant of use immunity to Mr. McCabe,” to ensure “no testimony or other information provided by Mr. McCabe could be used against him in any criminal case,” Bromwich wrote in his letter.

“If this Committee is unwilling or unable to obtain such an order [of immunity], then Mr. McCabe will have no choice but to invoke his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination,” Bromwich added.


https://www.dailywire.com/news/31526/fired-fbi-official-wants-immunity-testimony-n-joseph-curl

So, the investigation was on the up and up huh?

[Androidpk]

So this happened . . .




https://www.dailywire.com/news/31526/fired-fbi-official-wants-immunity-testimony-n-joseph-curl

So, the investigation was on the up and up huh?


Does asking for immunity mean the party is guilty? Flynn was asking for immunity to testify as well.

[time4fun]

Does asking for immunity mean the party is guilty? Flynn was asking for immunity to testify as well.

It's actually pretty standard for witnesses to ask for Immunity as a part of coming in. Any good defense attorney would request it beforehand.

[cwolff]

“There is no defense today for Paul Ryan siding with the FBI and Department of Justice over against those of us in the Congress who are working for transparency and accountability,” Gaetz said.

Gaetz continued that Ryan’s defenses of the FBI are “deeply frustrating,” referring to the agency as “the Deep State.”

These guys are vicious if you don't side with the supreme leader. They seem to be way more afraid of Gowdy.

[time4fun]

These guys are vicious if you don't side with the supreme leader. They seem to be way more afraid of Gowdy.

Such patriots.

[Androidpk]

These guys are vicious if you don't side with the supreme leader. They seem to be way more afraid of Gowdy.

transparency and accountability.. :lol2:

[Androidpk]

Fox News host Sean Hannity appeared on Wednesday to advise witnesses in special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation to destroy their personal phones before handing them over to prosecutors.

This coming from the same guy that raged over Hillary and her folks destroying their phones.

[cwolff]

This coming from the same guy that raged over Hillary and her folks destroying their phones.

They're not even partisan. Its beyond that.

[Androidpk]

Some salient points here by former Fox News military analyst Ralph Peters.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKuat8VJxq8&amp;t=328s

[Fortybox]

I really hope Trump does the same thing that Obama did.. exactly the same thing. I can't wait for dumbasses like you to cry holy hell when it's found out Trump put a spy.. oh sorry, an "informant" in the 2020 Democratic nominee's camp... you know, to help and support him.

Sorry but an informant is someone you send in after many super duper reports are made first. Since Democrats don’t do anything bad it’s impossible to send in an informant.

-Sincerely time4logic

[time4fun]

Some salient points here by former Fox News military analyst Ralph Peters.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKuat8VJxq8&t=328s

Yeah this was actually really on point.


I'm getting so tired of watching a few conservative media machines destroy our country by spilling out endless lies and conspiracy theories just to keep their ratings high. And I don't understand why people keep going back to them even after time and time again they find out the things they were being told were lies. Obama DID have a birth certificate. The ACA did NOT have death panels. Climate Change IS real. Trump DID have extensive relationships with the Russian government and mafia. Obama did NOT wiretap Trump Tower. There was no spy planted in the campaign. There is NO evidence the Democrats colluded with Russia (to lose the election, apparently). Trump's crowd size was NOT larger than Obama's. Trump did NOT fire Comey because he was "too mean to Hillary Clinton".

It's this endless spew of garbage, and it genuinely twists and warps people to the point where they won't trust objective facts anymore. It's like talking to anti-vacc'ers. They've been trained to distrust the medical industry- which is the only industry that can produce the facts and information to disprove their fears of vaccines- so there's no actual way to change their minds. Fox News turns its viewers into the conservative version of that- making conservatives paranoid about all nonpartisan media outlets and even fact checkers (which is INSANE). So there's no way to use facts to change their minds.

Because facts had nothing to do with their beliefs in the first place.

[cwolff]

Rep. Tom Rooney (R-Fla.) on Wednesday went after President Trump for his repeated claims that the FBI planted a spy in his campaign, suggesting the president spread the theory despite knowing it was false.
"What is the point of saying that there was a spy in the campaign when there was none?" Rooney told Politico.
"It’s like, ‘Lets create this thing to tweet about knowing that it’s not true,' " he continued. "Maybe it’s just to create more chaos but it doesn’t really help the case."

Another one who breaks ranks but only because he's also retiring. The GOP is chock full of cowards and their base is nuts.

http://thehill.com/homenews/house/391093-gop-rep-on-trumps-spy-claims-what-is-the-point-of-saying-that

[time4fun]

Another one who breaks ranks but only because he's also retiring. The GOP is chock full of cowards and their base is nuts.

http://thehill.com/homenews/house/391093-gop-rep-on-trumps-spy-claims-what-is-the-point-of-saying-that

I suspect that after primary season, many of them will suddenly grow a bit of a back bone.

What IS interesting is how many of them suddenly did after that classified briefing. I'm guessing they saw something bad.

[Neveragain]

Yeah this was actually really on point.


I'm getting so tired of watching a few conservative media machines destroy our country by spilling out endless lies and conspiracy theories just to keep their ratings high. And I don't understand why people keep going back to them even after time and time again they find out the things they were being told were lies. Obama DID have a birth certificate. The ACA did NOT have death panels. Climate Change IS real. Trump DID have extensive relationships with the Russian government and mafia. Obama did NOT wiretap Trump Tower. There was no spy planted in the campaign. There is NO evidence the Democrats colluded with Russia (to lose the election, apparently). Trump's crowd size was NOT larger than Obama's. Trump did NOT fire Comey because he was "too mean to Hillary Clinton".

"Obama did have a birth certificate"


WASHINGTON
Two supporters of Hillary Clinton’s 2008 presidential campaign reportedly shared the claim that then-rival Barack Obama was not born in the United States and thus was not eligible to be president.

One was a volunteer in Iowa, who was fired, Clinton’s former campaign manager said Friday. The other was Clinton confidant Sidney Blumenthal, according to a former McClatchy Washington Bureau chief.

The issue arose Friday as Donald Trump finally acknowledged that Obama was born in the U.S. Trump, a leading champion of the debunked “birther” conspiracy theory for years, attempted to blame Clinton for starting it when she ran against Obama in 2008 for the Democratic presidential nomination.

"The ACA didn't have death panels"


Buried deep within Obamacare is a provision that takes away health care from you and your doctors, by taking away payment for critical health care that may be needed to save your life. It is called The Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB).

The board will be independent of you, your doctors, your hospitals, Medicare, Congress, the judiciary, the democratic process, ultimately even the Constitution itself. As the Cato Institute tried to warn us five years ago, IPAB is “independent in the worst sense of the word: independent of Congress, independent of the president, independent of the judiciary, and independent of the will of the people.”

IPAB is to be composed of 15 unelected bureaucrats appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate. But the board and its powers are so dangerous that even President Obama never made any appointments.

Starting next year, if Medicare spending is projected to grow faster than the rate of economic growth per capita plus 1 percentage point, IPAB is empowered to make a proposal that will cut Medicare spending at least to the targeted growth rate. IPAB will be proposing such Medicare cuts every year starting next year because historically, Medicare spending has grown every year by per capita economic growth plus 2.6 percentage points.

"Climate change is real"

Of course climate change is real, man made climate change is not.

"Russian Collusion"

Trump is still your president.

[Neveragain]

I really hope Trump does the same thing that Obama did.. exactly the same thing. I can't wait for dumbasses like you to cry holy hell when it's found out Trump put a spy.. oh sorry, an "informant" in the 2020 Democratic nominee's camp... you know, to help and support him.

To be fair, the Democrats have to find a viable candidate first.

[Parkbandit]

Yeah this was actually really on point.


I'm getting so tired of watching a few conservative media machines destroy our country by spilling out endless lies and conspiracy theories just to keep their ratings high. And I don't understand why people keep going back to them even after time and time again they find out the things they were being told were lies. Obama DID have a birth certificate. The ACA did NOT have death panels. Climate Change IS real. Trump DID have extensive relationships with the Russian government and mafia. Obama did NOT wiretap Trump Tower. There was no spy planted in the campaign. There is NO evidence the Democrats colluded with Russia (to lose the election, apparently). Trump's crowd size was NOT larger than Obama's. Trump did NOT fire Comey because he was "too mean to Hillary Clinton".

It's this endless spew of garbage, and it genuinely twists and warps people to the point where they won't trust objective facts anymore. It's like talking to anti-vacc'ers. They've been trained to distrust the medical industry- which is the only industry that can produce the facts and information to disprove their fears of vaccines- so there's no actual way to change their minds. Fox News turns its viewers into the conservative version of that- making conservatives paranoid about all nonpartisan media outlets and even fact checkers (which is INSANE). So there's no way to use facts to change their minds.

Because facts had nothing to do with their beliefs in the first place.

Trump fired Comey because he was doing a bad job. I would have thought that was obvious to even the dumbest people by now.. especially since Comey's book came out.

Oh look, it's flailing in ignorance time4dum.

Shock.

[Fortybox]

Yeah this was actually really on point.


I'm getting so tired of watching a few conservative media machines destroy our country by spilling out endless lies and conspiracy theories just to keep their ratings high. And I don't understand why people keep going back to them even after time and time again they find out the things they were being told were lies. Obama DID have a birth certificate. The ACA did NOT have death panels. Climate Change IS real. Trump DID have extensive relationships with the Russian government and mafia. Obama did NOT wiretap Trump Tower. There was no spy planted in the campaign. There is NO evidence the Democrats colluded with Russia (to lose the election, apparently). Trump's crowd size was NOT larger than Obama's. Trump did NOT fire Comey because he was "too mean to Hillary Clinton".

It's this endless spew of garbage, and it genuinely twists and warps people to the point where they won't trust objective facts anymore. It's like talking to anti-vacc'ers. They've been trained to distrust the medical industry- which is the only industry that can produce the facts and information to disprove their fears of vaccines- so there's no actual way to change their minds. Fox News turns its viewers into the conservative version of that- making conservatives paranoid about all nonpartisan media outlets and even fact checkers (which is INSANE). So there's no way to use facts to change their minds.

Because facts had nothing to do with their beliefs in the first place.

Sorry “sweetie”...”honey”...

Ratings are high because people are tired of watching the same Russia collusion crap, Trump bashing crybaby reporting that’s been going on since 2016.

[Parkbandit]

This coming from the same guy that raged over Hillary and her folks destroying their phones.

That path is a 2 way street.

Liberals didn't seem to have a problem with Hillary destroying phones, hard drives, etc... but suddenly it's a bad idea?

[Ashliana]

Trump fired Comey because he was doing a bad job. I would have thought that was obvious to even the dumbest people by now.. especially since Comey's book came out.

Oh look, it's flailing in ignorance time4dum.

Shock.

Oh, look! It's Parkbandit calling someone else "flailing in ignorance" while pretending that Trump didn't go on national television and admit, explicitly, that he fired Comey in order to obstruct the Russia investigation (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=haH987kwtt8).

Isn't reality just inconvenient, shit-for-brains?

[Wrathbringer]

Oh, look! It's Parkbandit calling someone else "flailing in ignorance" while pretending that Trump didn't go on national television and admit, explicitly, that he fired Comey in order to obstruct the Russia investigation (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=haH987kwtt8).

Isn't reality just inconvenient, shit-for-brains?

Cut some farts.

[Wrathbringer]

Another one who breaks ranks but only because he's also retiring. The GOP is chock full of cowards and their base is nuts.

http://thehill.com/homenews/house/391093-gop-rep-on-trumps-spy-claims-what-is-the-point-of-saying-that

9048

[Methais]

This coming from the same guy that raged over Hillary and her folks destroying their phones.


They're not even partisan. Its beyond that.

https://media.giphy.com/media/jXD7kFLwudbBC/giphy.gif

[ClydeR]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DfGQAtaUEAEmc3a.jpg

That will happen any day now.

[Ashliana]

Honest question: Would you be against it if it were spying vs. being an informant?

Except, as always, you remain completely divorced from reality, and there was no "spy" -- much to your obvious dismay.

Tom Rooney, Republican on the House Intelligence Committee:

"What is the point of saying that there was a spy in the campaign when there was none? You know what I’m saying? It’s like, ‘Lets create this thing to tweet about, knowing that it’s not true.’ … Maybe it’s just to create more chaos but it doesn’t really help the case." Source. (https://www.politico.com/story/2018/06/06/trump-spygate-rooney-629550)

Trey "King of Benghazi" Gowdy, Republican on the House Intelligence Committee, post briefing, to Fox News:

"I am even more convinced that the FBI did exactly what my fellow citizens would want them to do. It has nothing to do with Donald Trump."

House Speaker Ryan:
"Gowdy's initial assessment is accurate. I've seen no evidence to the contrary."

Senate Majority Leader McConnell:
"I support both (the OIG and Mueller investigations), and I don't really have anything to add to this subject based upon the Gang of Eight briefing that we had today, which was classified."

Reality continues to be so embarrassing and inconvenient to you. But that's what happens when you take the cheeto-in-chief's Twitter rants at face value.

[time4fun]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DfGQAtaUEAEmc3a.jpg

That will happen any day now.

Wait- is this real?

[RichardCranium]

Wait- is this real?

I automatically assume any tweet on the internet said to be Trumps is real. I used to think that there were some talented shitposters on the PC but he puts this place to shame.

[time4fun]

Trump fired Comey because he was doing a bad job. I would have thought that was obvious to even the dumbest people by now.. especially since Comey's book came out.

Oh look, it's flailing in ignorance time4dum.

Shock.

That's a dumbfounding response.

Trump had at least 4 different stated reasons for firing Comey that changed- at one point- within hours. Do you actually not remember this?


And at the end- he was on national television clearly stating he did it because of the Russia investigation. Do you actually not remember this either?

This is exactly my point.

[time4fun]

I automatically assume any tweet on the internet said to be Trumps is real. I used to think that there were some talented shitposters on the PC but he puts this place to shame.

It's so surreal. This should never be normal.

[Ashliana]

"Obama did have a birth certificate"

Spoiler Alert: The next paragraph of the article you quoted -- which you conveniently didn't continue with -- says: "but there is no evidence that Clinton herself or her campaign spread the story."

Not only is there absolutely no evidence that anyone in the Clinton campaign spread the birther nonsense, the "evidence" the Trump campaign tried to cite in favor of it never brings up anything remotely relevant. And more than that, even if you could somehow demonstrate that Clinton was responsible for it, she never touted the issue -- unlike Trump, who literally conned retarded conservatives about it on Twitter for years.


"The ACA didn't have death panels"

Your own mostly-delusional article confirms the IPAB -- which still wasn't "a death panel" -- never had a single appointment. All IPAB had the power to do, even if it had been filled, was to make recommendations to Congress. If anything, opposition to IPAB demonstrates the hypocrisy that supposedly "fiscally conservative" Republicans have.


"Climate change is real"

Of course climate change is real, man made climate change is not.

Ooh! How inconvenient for you -- Trump's handpicked NASA administrator, himself a climate change skeptic Republican congressman from Oklahoma appointed in April -- just announced that he now understands and accepts climate science:

NASA administrator Bridenstein, testifying before Congress: “The National Climate Assessment, that includes NASA, and it includes the Department of Energy, and it includes NOAA, has clearly stated it is extremely likely, [that] is the language they use, that human activity is the dominant cause of global warming, and I have no reason to doubt the science that comes from that.” Bridenstine said.

Senator Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii): “Is it fair to call this an evolution of your views?”

Bridenstine: “Yes.”

Source. (https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/capital-weather-gang/wp/2018/05/23/nasa-head-jim-bridenstine-once-doubtful-confirms-he-believes-humans-are-the-leading-cause-of-climate-change/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.b4b11511bd4e)


"Russian Collusion"

Trump is still your president.

Too bad "collusion" has already been established, by Trump Jr's own admission on Twitter, no less. Did you forget about the 70+ criminal charges that have been filed, resulting in a half-dozen guilty pleas already? Stay tuned, my delusional friend.

[Neveragain]

Spoiler Alert: The next paragraph of the article you quoted -- which you conveniently didn't continue with -- says: "but there is no evidence that Clinton herself or her campaign spread the story."

Not only is there absolutely no evidence that anyone in the Clinton campaign spread the birther nonsense, the "evidence" the Trump campaign tried to cite in favor of it never brings up anything remotely relevant. And more than that, even if you could somehow demonstrate that Clinton was responsible for it, she never touted the issue -- unlike Trump, who literally conned retarded conservatives about it on Twitter for years.



Your own mostly-delusional article confirms the IPAB -- which still wasn't "a death panel" -- never had a single appointment. All IPAB had the power to do, even if it had been filled, was to make recommendations to Congress. If anything, opposition to IPAB demonstrates the hypocrisy that supposedly "fiscally conservative" Republicans have.



Ooh! How inconvenient for you -- Trump's handpicked NASA administrator, himself a climate change skeptic Republican congressman from Oklahoma appointed in April -- just announced that he now understands and accepts climate science:

NASA administrator Bridenstein, testifying before Congress: “The National Climate Assessment, that includes NASA, and it includes the Department of Energy, and it includes NOAA, has clearly stated it is extremely likely, [that] is the language they use, that human activity is the dominant cause of global warming, and I have no reason to doubt the science that comes from that.” Bridenstine said.

Senator Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii): “Is it fair to call this an evolution of your views?”

Bridenstine: “Yes.”

Source. (https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/capital-weather-gang/wp/2018/05/23/nasa-head-jim-bridenstine-once-doubtful-confirms-he-believes-humans-are-the-leading-cause-of-climate-change/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.b4b11511bd4e)



Too bad "collusion" has already been established, by Trump Jr's own admission on Twitter, no less. Did you forget about the 70+ criminal charges that have been filed, resulting in a half-dozen guilty pleas already? Stay tuned, my delusional friend.

So in Ashlianaville Clinton campaign is not Clinton but Trump campaign members are Trump ?

The fact is, as stated by Clinton campaign members, the Clinton team started the birther movement.

More importantly, PK is outed as pedophile and magically Ashliana comes out of the woodwork.

Confirmed Ashliana is PK the pedophile.

[Ashliana]

So in Ashlianaville Clinton campaign is not Clinton but Trump campaign members are Trump ?

The fact is, as stated by Clinton campaign members, the Clinton team started the birther movement.

You didn't even read your own article, or my response to you. Try again. Your article disproves your assertions.


More importantly, PK is outed as pedophile and magically Ashliana comes out of the woodwork.

Confirmed Ashliana is PK the pedophile.

Uhh.. I don't know what kind of fanfic you're writing, but please leave me out of it. Also, nice concession on all the other issues, especially the climate change one.

[Neveragain]

You didn't even read your own article, or my response to you. Try again. Your article disproves your assertions.



Uhh.. I don't know what kind of fanfic you're writing, but please leave me out of it. Also, nice concession on all the other issues, especially the climate change one.

Not wanting to reply to your entire line of drivel on my cellphone is not a concession, it's me not wanting to spend 20 minutes dissecting your hackery.

Again, Clinton's own campaign advisor from '08 is the one who is saying members of the Clinton campaign started the birther BS. I know this because I was a part of the'08 Obama campaign and specifically remember the day rumor rolled out. Trump was not even in the picture, at all.

I didn't feel the need to paste the entire article as it makes clear in what I posted that it was Clinton campaign members.

[Ashliana]

Not wanting to reply to your entire line of drivel on my cellphone is not a concession, it's me not wanting to spend 20 minutes dissecting your hackery.

Nope. You conceded -- you could have waited until you weren't on a phone to respond, but chose not to. I love the blatant stupidity that goes into calling pointing out your failure to read your own article, and literally quoting Trump's agency administrators verbatim as "hackery."


Again, Clinton's own campaign advisor from '08 is the one who is saying members of the Clinton campaign started the birther BS. I know this because I was a part of the'08 Obama campaign and specifically remember the day rumor rolled out. Trump was not even in the picture, at all.

I didn't feel the need to paste the entire article as it makes clear in what I posted that it was Clinton campaign members.

Wrong. Your own article:

"Patti Solis Doyle, Clinton’s campaign manager during part of the 2008 race, told CNN on Friday that an Iowa campaign worker had passed on an email about the birther conspiracy and that Clinton quickly fired him."

Nowhere does that establish that "the Clinton campaign started the birther BS" as you're retardedly claiming. If anything, it demonstrates the opposite.

Your own article: "There is no evidence that Clinton herself or her campaign spread the story."

Your article itself admits that there is no evidence, whatsoever, that anyone with the Clinton campaign started the birther movement -- and again, even if you could demonstrate that, that in no way explains or rationalizes Trump's multiple years of conning gullible reactionary morons like yourself.

[Neveragain]

Nope. You conceded -- you could have waited until you weren't on a phone to respond, but chose not to. I love the blatant stupidity that goes into calling pointing out your failure to read your own article, and literally quoting Trump's agency administrators verbatim as "hackery."



Wrong. Your own article:

"Patti Solis Doyle, Clinton’s campaign manager during part of the 2008 race, told CNN on Friday that an Iowa campaign worker had passed on an email about the birther conspiracy and that Clinton quickly fired him."

Nowhere does that establish that "the Clinton campaign started the birther BS" as you're retardedly claiming. If anything, it demonstrates the opposite.

Your own article: "There is no evidence that Clinton herself or her campaign spread the story."

Your article itself admits that there is no evidence, whatsoever, that anyone with the Clinton campaign started the birther movement -- and again, even if you could demonstrate that, that in no way explains or rationalizes Trump's multiple years of conning gullible reactionary morons like yourself.

Ok, PK.

P.S. I am at home, just moved 1700 miles this past week and the house is in shambles. You should take it as a courtesy that I took the time to reply to your circular logic.

This reminds me that I have rudely left Ticket hanging. I'll give you more details Ticket when this place is a bit more organized. Sorry for the delay. :(

grrrr. Replace ticket with Tisket.

[Parkbandit]

People.. we FINALLY HAVE CONCRETE EVIDENCE OF TRUMP / RUSSIA COLLUSION!!!!!!!!

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/06/08/trump-calls-for-russia-to-be-included-in-meetings-of-powers-like-g-7.html

[Parkbandit]

Except, as always, you remain completely divorced from reality, and there was no "spy" -- much to your obvious dismay.

Tom Rooney, Republican on the House Intelligence Committee:

"What is the point of saying that there was a spy in the campaign when there was none? You know what I’m saying? It’s like, ‘Lets create this thing to tweet about, knowing that it’s not true.’ … Maybe it’s just to create more chaos but it doesn’t really help the case." Source. (https://www.politico.com/story/2018/06/06/trump-spygate-rooney-629550)

Trey "King of Benghazi" Gowdy, Republican on the House Intelligence Committee, post briefing, to Fox News:

"I am even more convinced that the FBI did exactly what my fellow citizens would want them to do. It has nothing to do with Donald Trump."

House Speaker Ryan:
"Gowdy's initial assessment is accurate. I've seen no evidence to the contrary."

Senate Majority Leader McConnell:
"I support both (the OIG and Mueller investigations), and I don't really have anything to add to this subject based upon the Gang of Eight briefing that we had today, which was classified."

Reality continues to be so embarrassing and inconvenient to you. But that's what happens when you take the cheeto-in-chief's Twitter rants at face value.

Literally, it was a simple question.. even a simpleton like yourself could have answered it.

Instead, you deflect. I'm guessing your the type of guy who wears crazy colored hair to deflect gaze upon all the ugliness below the pretty hair.

So again... "Would you be against it if it were spying vs. being an informant?

A simple question.. nothing more.

[Parkbandit]

That's a dumbfounding response.

Trump had at least 4 different stated reasons for firing Comey that changed- at one point- within hours. Do you actually not remember this?

And at the end- he was on national television clearly stating he did it because of the Russia investigation. Do you actually not remember this either?

This is exactly my point.

Selective memory issue. Even Rosenstein recommended Comey's termination.

And at the end, he clearly stated he did it because:

“As far as I’m concerned, I want that thing to be absolutely done properly. When I did this now, I said I probably maybe will confuse people. Maybe I’ll expand that — you know, I’ll lengthen the time because it should be over with. It should — in my opinion, should’ve been over with a long time ago because it — all it is an excuse. But I said to myself I might even lengthen out the investigation. But I have to do the right thing for the American people. He’s the wrong man for that position.”

[Ardwen]

Do you actually think Russia, which was thrown out of the G8 for the invasion of Ukraine and annexation of Crimea should be in the G7, the are still attacking multiple European countries election services and the US power grid, other then that oh and the murders of Putin critics, I am sure they are good people too?

[Ashliana]

Literally, it was a simple question.. even a simpleton like yourself could have answered it.

Instead, you deflect. I'm guessing your the type of guy who wears crazy colored hair to deflect gaze upon all the ugliness below the pretty hair.

So again... "Would you be against it if it were spying vs. being an informant?

A simple question.. nothing more.

It's a moot point, as your question is predicated on false assumptions. As even the Republicans involved have stated repeatedly, the FBI did it's job as intended, properly, justifiably.

Kudos, however, on you deflecting yourself -- without a shred of self-awareness -- as well as using the incorrect usage of "you're." Impressive.

[Parkbandit]

It's a moot point, as your question is predicated on false assumptions. As even the Republicans involved have stated repeatedly, the FBI did it's job as intended, properly, justifiably.

Kudos, however, on you deflecting yourself -- without a shred of self-awareness -- as well as using the incorrect usage of "you're." Impressive.

So.. you can't answer the simple question.

I'm shocked. Really.

[Methais]

Nope. You conceded -- you could have waited until you weren't on a phone to respond, but chose not to.

Yeah Neveragain. Everyone here knows that Ashliana makes the rules and the rest of us are to follow them.

[Ashliana]

So.. you can't answer the simple question.

I'm shocked. Really.

Are you coming down with Alzheimer's? You asked that question of Time -- and it was moronic of you when you asked her (and she certainly had no burden of answering it, either). Your question is predicated on your faulty assumptions, rooted in your ignorance.

Isn't it funny how something can be so dumb that it's even shot down by Republicans and Fox News, but lo and behold, Parkbandit is retarded enough to uncritically parrot Trump. Impressive as always.

[Wrathbringer]

Are you coming down with Alzheimer's? You asked that question of Time -- and it was moronic of you when you asked her (and she certainly had no burden of answering it, either). Your question is predicated on your faulty assumptions, rooted in your ignorance.

Isn't it funny how something can be so dumb that it's even shot down by Republicans and Fox News, but lo and behold, Parkbandit is retarded enough to uncritically parrot Trump. Impressive as always.

9050

[Parkbandit]

Are you coming down with Alzheimer's? You asked that question of Time -- and it was moronic of you when you asked her (and she certainly had no burden of answering it, either). Your question is predicated on your faulty assumptions, rooted in your ignorance.

Isn't it funny how something can be so dumb that it's even shot down by Republicans and Fox News, but lo and behold, Parkbandit is retarded enough to uncritically parrot Trump. Impressive as always.

So.. is it the dripping HIV in your eyes that makes you respond to simple questions that aren't for you.. literally with no answers?

It's funny how you roll around in stupidity and all the while, you STILL were unable to muster enough intelligence to type out a "yes" or "no".

Also, there is absolutely nothing about you that is "impressive".

Sorry. Did you want to try for a third time.. or did you just want to not answer another question not for you with another post where you can't answer... yet again?

[Parkbandit]

9050

He wishes he were a girl. It would probably take care of many of the issues he currently goes through.

[Fortybox]

He wishes he were a girl. It would probably take care of many of the issues he currently goes through.

Is Ashliana Flimbo in game?

[Wrathbringer]

Is Ashliana Flimbo in game?

lol no

[Parkbandit]

Is Ashliana Flimbo in game?

Cut from the same burlap...

[Ashliana]

So.. is it the dripping HIV in your eyes that makes you respond to simple questions that aren't for you.. literally with no answers?

A question doesn't have to be directed to someone in order for them to point out that it's predicated on faulty assumptions, my willfully deluded friend.


It's funny how you roll around in stupidity and all the while, you STILL were unable to muster enough intelligence to type out a "yes" or "no".

See above. Your question is meaningless. FYI: Periods go inside quotation marks. If you're going to be questioning other people's intelligence, perhaps you should first demonstrate an 8th grader's level of mastery over your presumably native language.


Also, there is absolutely nothing about you that is "impressive".

Sorry. Did you want to try for a third time.. or did you just want to not answer another question not for you with another post where you can't answer... yet again?

I realize you're completely flabbergasted by the notion, gnashing your teeth in your usual impotent rage -- but your "question" doesn't magically become any more valid by repeating it. Your obsession with a magical conspiracy theory that even Republicans -- even Fox News -- have debunked reflects only on you.

[Parkbandit]

A question doesn't have to be directed to someone in order for them to point out that it's predicated on faulty assumptions, my willfully deluded friend.

But you still can't/won't/are too stupid to answer it. Fantastic.


See above. Your question is meaningless. FYI: Periods go inside quotation marks. If you're going to be questioning other people's intelligence, perhaps you should first demonstrate an 8th grader's level of mastery over your presumably native language.

It's not meaningless.. you just can't/won't are too stupid to answer it. Fantastic.


I realize you're completely flabbergasted by the notion, gnashing your teeth in your usual impotent rage -- but your "question" doesn't magically become any more valid by repeating it. Your obsession with a magical conspiracy theory that even Republicans -- even Fox News -- have debunked reflects only on you.

Flabbergaasted? Isn't that your nickname?

And what exactly has Fox News "debunked"? A question I'm asking?

You really are the weakest link. Thankfully, we have Darwin's Law and knowing that your "special" kind of stupidity will end with you gives me hope for the world.

[Androidpk]

Do you actually think Russia, which was thrown out of the G8 for the invasion of Ukraine and annexation of Crimea should be in the G7, the are still attacking multiple European countries election services and the US power grid, other then that oh and the murders of Putin critics, I am sure they are good people too?

In before Trump says there was violence on both sides and Putin is being treated very unfairly and that the only invasion of Ukraine/Crimea was from the Democrats and the deep state.

[Ashliana]

But you still can't/won't/are too stupid to answer it. Fantastic.

Nope. I merely pointed out that you're a deluded imbecile for asking a stupid question predicated on your ignorance of law enforcement.


It's not meaningless.. you just can't/won't are too stupid to answer it. Fantastic.

It is meaningless. You not understanding how law enforcement operates reflects solely on you.


Flabbergaasted? Isn't that your nickname?

And what exactly has Fox News "debunked"? A question I'm asking?

You really are the weakest link. Thankfully, we have Darwin's Law and knowing that your "special" kind of stupidity will end with you gives me hope for the world.

Fox debunked the notion that the FBI """spied""" on the Trump campaign:

"There were no spies in Trump's campaign, of this Fox News can confirm, we have no evidence of any spies. It's talk." 1m, 10s (https://twitter.com/i/videos/1004818975228923905).

Debunked by Fox, debunked by all the relevant Republicans. Doubling down on your humiliation doesn't change it. Even Nunes stopped shrieking hysterically after DOJ briefed him on the evidence. Why? Because the evidence is damaging to the Trump campaign, and they don't want it getting out. (Beeteedubs: It's getting out, eventually, in the form of Mueller's report).

Though, speaking of the "end" -- I know you're super bitter about whites inevitably becoming an ever-dwindling minority in the United States; nothing Trump can do is going to change that. Sorry, Archie Bunker 2.0.

[time4fun]

In before Trump says there was violence on both sides and Putin is being treated very unfairly and that the only invasion of Ukraine/Crimea was from the Democrats and the deep state.

Let's see....damaging our relationships with our allies, storming out of G-7 like a child, and now lobbying for Russia to be a part of it.

And once again we get to play the, "Is he just dangerously bad at his job, or is he a Russian puppet?" game.

[Androidpk]

Let's see....damaging our relationships with our allies, storming out of G-7 like a child, and now lobbying for Russia to be a part of it.

And once again we get to play the, "Is he just dangerously bad at his job, or is he a Russian puppet?" game.


Both, I think it's both.

[time4fun]

Both, I think it's both.

Ding Ding Ding.

We have a winner.


Except that all of us are losing.

[Wrathbringer]

Ding Ding Ding.

We have a winner.


Except that all of us are losing.

Lol what a whiner

[Androidpk]

Mueller filed new indictment charges today against Manafort. Next Friday should be very interesting.. :popcorn:


Special counsel Robert Mueller filed new witness tampering criminal charges against ex-Trump campaign chief Paul Manafort as well as Russian citizen Konstantin Kilimnik as a defendant.

The superseding indictment lodged by a grand jury sitting in federal court in Washington, DC, came days after Mueller asked the judge in Manafort's case to revoke his $10 million bail and jail him because of an alleged effort to tamper with witnesses.

Manafort, 69, and the 48-year-old Moscow resident Kilimnik were both hit with new charges accusing them of obstructing justice and conspiracy to obstruct justice by using intimidation or force against a witness, and also with tampering with a witness, victim or informant.

[Parkbandit]

Ding Ding Ding.

We have a winner.

Except that all of us are losing.

I'm not. I've been winning since 11/8/16... the night you were never more scared in your life....

And it just keeps getting better and better.

[Wrathbringer]

Mueller filed new indictment charges today against Manafort. Next Friday should be very interesting.. :popcorn:

OMFG GUYS!!!!11!! IT'S FINALLY HEATING UP NOW!!!!!!!!11!!! FOR REAL THIS TIME GUYS!!!!!1!! OMGOMGOMG

[~Rocktar~]

I'm not. I've been winning since 11/8/16... the night you were never more scared in your life....

And it just keeps getting better and better.

This is correct.

[cwolff]

No serious foreign policy analyst I know (nor any ex-Trump Admin official) has a good explanation for why Trump is so singularly enamored with Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Whatever the reason is, we don’t know it yet.

This guy poses a question on that needs answered.
https://twitter.com/ianbremmer/status/1005204639392960512?s=19

This is from an opinion piece. I'll include a link but it doesnt matter because people all across the news and,social media are asking the same question. Why is trump splintering the USA away from our allies to coddle up with Russia?


Putin can hardly conceal his glee. He's in Europe now, presenting himself as a more reliable trading partner, basking in the success of populist Europeans, who want to pull closer to Moscow and have been winning elections in Hungary, Italy, Austria, Greece and elsewhere.

Trump is weakening the alliances that gave strength to America. At the same time, he is aiding Putin, who took a nascent democracy and turned into an autocratic regime where political rivals are imprisoned or murdered in the streets, and he is helping to make him stronger.

The only world leader who can rely on trump is Putin (https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/08/opinions/trump-is-vladimir-putins-best-friend/index.html)

[Fortybox]

I'm not. I've been winning since 11/8/16... the night you were never more scared in your life....

And it just keeps getting better and better.

Winning economy. Record low black employment. Tax cuts putting money back in pockets. Meeting with pork chop next week.

His agenda is working.

#winning

[cwolff]

Winning economy. Record low black employment. Tax cuts putting money back in pockets. Meeting with pork chop next week.

His agenda is working.

#winning

None of that's working. He started with a great economy and its continued the same trend it was on. Tax cuts mean bigger deficits and national debt. It hasn't trickled down. Anyone can meet Kim. That's no breakthrough. To get the meeting trump backed off, started calling him honorable and talked about playing golf with the guy.

You're too enamored with short term low hanging fruit. We're not building a solid foundation of anything. Just chasing headlines. If anyone should be critical it'd be a proper conservative.

[Fortybox]

None of that's working. He started with a great economy and its continued the same trend it was on. Tax cuts mean bigger deficits and national debt. It hasn't trickled down. Anyone can meet Kim. That's no breakthrough. To get the meeting trump backed off, started calling him honorable and talked about playing golf with the guy.

You're too enamored with short term low hanging fruit. We're not building a solid foundation of anything. Just chasing headlines. If anyone should be critical it'd be a proper conservative.

Oh soywolf...

https://media3.giphy.com/media/BBAdXxBAXp3wc/giphy.gif

[Androidpk]

20 indictments with more on the way.

#winning

[Fortybox]

20 indictments with more on the way.

#winning


20 indictments with more on the way.

#winning

omgogmgogmgomwjkasjkljaskljAkjiapoakawjaasdjasjd it's happening!!!11infinity!!

https://media0.giphy.com/media/816QOYrqg1MME/giphy.gif

[cwolff]

omgogmgogmgomwjkasjkljaskljAkjiapoakawjaasdjasjd it's happening!!!11infinity!!

https://media0.giphy.com/media/816QOYrqg1MME/giphy.gif

It still surprises me to these posts and know that a middle age man is typing it.

[cwolff]

1. Trump's campaign manager was charged with CONSPIRACY AGAINST THE UNITED STATES and now he's been charged, working in concert with an individual with "ties to Russian intelligence," with obstruction of justice

And they wonder why there's an investigation

[Parkbandit]

None of that's working. He started with a great economy and its continued the same trend it was on. Tax cuts mean bigger deficits and national debt. It hasn't trickled down. Anyone can meet Kim. That's no breakthrough. To get the meeting trump backed off, started calling him honorable and talked about playing golf with the guy.

You're too enamored with short term low hanging fruit. We're not building a solid foundation of anything. Just chasing headlines. If anyone should be critical it'd be a proper conservative.

It still surprises me to these posts and know that a man of any age is typing it.

Slow down on the soy, boy...