PDA

View Full Version : Russia Investigation Heating Up



Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 [38] 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48

Parkbandit
01-18-2019, 09:13 AM
The odds of Trump not making it through the year just increased significantly

This was said in 2017.

This was said in 2018.

This was said in 2019.

I imagine it'll be said in 2020.

I imagine it'll be said in 2021.

I imagine it'll be said in 2022.

I imagine it'll be said in 2023.

I imagine it'll be said in 2024.

If you say it in 2025, YOU WOULD FINALLY BE CORRECT!!!!

Methais
01-18-2019, 09:15 AM
Besides the Penis Pool Incident, I don't think we've ever had someone go after another user IRL. Ratolin threatened but didn't go beyond that.

wtf is the Penis Pool Incident? Closest thing I can remember is Tabor's cock & balls pond, but that wasn't a meltdown.


Short version is Tabor was lying about being a doctor, someone did some sleuthing and found he still lived with his parents, posted a GIS pic of his 'house' and the house had a penis-shaped pool in the backyard.

http://forum.gsplayers.com/showthread.php?62385-Anticor-Has-Sullied-My-Name!&p=1287503#post1287503

NEVERMIND THEN!!!!!!!!!111

I actually ran into him on Facebook a couple years ago. He's either an actual doctor now, or is still lying about being one IIRC.

Parkbandit
01-18-2019, 09:16 AM
I know the internet moves fast and it's probably difficult for you to understand, but Buzzfeed the shitty meme site and Buzzfeed News are essentially two separate entities with the latter doing a lot of good work.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/dems-vow-action-after-report-trump-directed-cohen-lie-about-n960156
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/congress-probe-report-trump-directed-lawyer-lie-60466989?cid=clicksource_4380645_1_heads_hero_live _headlines_hed
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-had-michael-cohen-lie-to-congress-about-moscow-trump-tower-project-buzzfeed/
https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/politics/2019/01/18/congress-probe-report-that-trump-directed-lawyer-lie/VoLLTRAWtaqIfITo1P4PDI/story.html
https://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-trump-cohen-20190118-story.html
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2019/01/18/trump-reportedly-told-michael-cohen-lie-his-own-attorney-general-pick-testified-thats-crime/?utm_term=.6591c10a6adc

I'm sure all those newsorgs picked it up on a whim because they have Trump Derangement Syndrome.

Jesus, even the trashfire that is the Washington Examiner picked up the story:

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/trump-told-cohen-to-lie-about-plans-to-meet-with-putin-in-russia-report

OMGOMGOMGOMGOMG! THIS IS IT THEN!!!!!!!!!!!!

LOL. Such triggering. Hopefully President Trump does something today that will just put you into a downward spiral you won't be able to get out of.

Wrathbringer
01-18-2019, 09:20 AM
The biggest meltdown I can remember is probably time4fun post 2016 presidential election till now, but especially right after the election when she was certain Trump himself was coming to deport her illegal alien brother she won't help get citizenship because she'd rather buy text.

Wrathbringer
01-18-2019, 09:22 AM
The odds of Trump not making it through the year just increased significantly

You're retarded.

peam
01-18-2019, 09:26 AM
wtf is the Penis Pool Incident? Closest thing I can remember is Tabor's cock & balls pond, but that wasn't a meltdown.



NEVERMIND THEN!!!!!!!!!111

I actually ran into him on Facebook a couple years ago. He's either an actual doctor now, or is still lying about being one IIRC.

toobz plz come back

Methais
01-18-2019, 09:28 AM
He doesn't actually need to be AFK to be in violation of policy 18. The mere fact that you can tap any number of his characters to receive service is in violation of the policy, that's the thing. The way that policy is written, witnessing a pattern of a character providing a service in response to a verb is all that is needed for him to be in violation.

Surely you've reported him in game for this and/or contacted feedback then, right? If not, why? And if so, what did they say?

Methais
01-18-2019, 09:33 AM
Senator Klobuchar asked Androidpk during his couch rent pounding if hearing a woman masturbating in the next room would be tantamount to obstruction of gayness. Pk said yes.

https://imgur.com/a/rTHh5Q4 (www.goatse.cx)

Can't say I'm surprised there.

Methais
01-18-2019, 09:36 AM
The odds of Trump not making it through the year just increased significantly

Quoted to preserve retardedness.

Methais
01-18-2019, 09:48 AM
This was said in 2017.

This was said in 2018.

This was said in 2019.

I imagine it'll be said in 2020.

I imagine it'll be said in 2021.

I imagine it'll be said in 2022.

I imagine it'll be said in 2023.

I imagine it'll be said in 2024.

If you say it in 2025, YOU WOULD FINALLY BE CORRECT!!!!

She'll just be like "I'll be shocked if Trump makes it to Inaguration Day for the new president!"

Tgo01
01-18-2019, 09:53 AM
So the authors of that Buzz Feed "news" article relied on supposedly two anonymous sources who claim they have seen the evidence, yet the people who wrote the article haven't seen any actual evidence yet.

Think I'll hold off on judgement until I see the evidence. I know that makes me the crazy one in the age of Trump Derangement Syndrome.

It really doesn't make much sense why Trump would direct his lawyer to commit perjury over plans to build a tower in Moscow. Contrary to what the people with Trump Derangement Syndrome believe, there is no crime against doing business in Russia.

Taernath
01-18-2019, 09:53 AM
wtf is the Penis Pool Incident? Closest thing I can remember is Tabor's cock & balls pond, but that wasn't a meltdown.


It was a pond, I've since corrected my original allegation.

It was definitely a meltdown. After being exposed as an entomology student instead of an MD, living with his wife's parents instead of building two houses, and using his sick daughter to solicit donations, the dude deleted his posts and never posted again. A lot of people quoted his posts before he deleted them, though, they were an entertaining read. Really there are a lot of parallels between Tabor and a certain other Problem Child.

Methais
01-18-2019, 09:53 AM
The biggest meltdown I can remember is probably time4fun post 2016 presidential election till now, but especially right after the election when she was certain Trump himself was coming to deport her illegal alien brother she won't help get citizenship because she'd rather buy text.

http://forum.gsplayers.com/showthread.php?39770-PC-Meltdown-Hall-of-Fame

Apparently I made a thread like this before this thread, but I can't find it.

I did, however, find this:


https://youtu.be/9rNUTzlDYlw

Methais
01-18-2019, 10:00 AM
It was a pond, I've since corrected my original allegation.

It was definitely a meltdown. After being exposed as an entomology student instead of an MD, living with his wife's parents instead of building two houses, and using his sick daughter to solicit donations, the dude deleted his posts and never posted again. A lot of people quoted his posts before he deleted them, though, they were an entertaining read. Really there are a lot of parallels between Tabor and a certain other Problem Child.

Hahaha oh yeah, I forgot all about the scrubbing part. I remember the pond and sick kid and all that. I may have been confusing this one with the Tabor voter card thread. Which also contained an immeasurable amount of fail, but somewhat certain it didn't reach meltdown status.

According to pk logic, Tabor never said those things.

Taernath
01-18-2019, 10:06 AM
I did, however, find this:


https://youtu.be/9rNUTzlDYlw

What the shit have you just unleashed?

Androidpk
01-18-2019, 10:06 AM
AG nominee Barr says the Mueller investigation should be protected and the report released to Congress and the American people. wonder what Trump will think when he hears about this and also finds out Barr and Mueller are close friends. :lol:



Washington (CNN) President Donald Trump was startled Tuesday as he watched television coverage of his nominee for attorney general describing a warm relationship with the special counsel Robert Mueller in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee, according to three people familiar with the matter.

While Barr said during his hearing that Trump "was interested" in hearing about the friendship, the details that emerged this week caught the President off guard, the three sources said. He bristled at Barr's description of the close relationship, complaining to aides he didn't realize how much their work overlapped or that they were so close.

https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/17/politics/donald-trump-william-barr-robert-mueller/index.html

The headline for this article is brilliant. "Cozy Barr"

Tgo01
01-18-2019, 10:10 AM
We should just rename this entire thread to "Anonymous sources say..."

Alfster
01-18-2019, 10:17 AM
We should just rename this entire thread to "Anonymous sources say..."

I agree. I'm not a Trump fan by any means, but I'm withholding my judgement until there's actual evidence.

Methais
01-18-2019, 10:22 AM
I agree. I'm not a Trump fan by any means, but I'm withholding my judgement until there's actual evidence.

Clearly you're an alt-right Nazi then.

Androidpk
01-18-2019, 10:28 AM
And now Trump is threatening Cohen's father in law. Just one more example of witness tampering to add to that ever growing list of crimes.

RichardCranium
01-18-2019, 10:39 AM
http://forum.gsplayers.com/showthread.php?39770-PC-Meltdown-Hall-of-Fame

Apparently I made a thread like this before this thread, but I can't find it.

http://forum.gsplayers.com/showthread.php?26251-Biggest-Forum-Uproar-Ever

Methais
01-18-2019, 10:44 AM
http://forum.gsplayers.com/showthread.php?26251-Biggest-Forum-Uproar-Ever

https://i.imgur.com/01pVKIT.gif

Wrathbringer
01-18-2019, 10:57 AM
Washington (CNN) President Donald Trump was startled Tuesday as he watched television coverage of his nominee for attorney general describing a warm relationship with the special counsel Robert Mueller in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee, according to three people familiar with the matter.

While Barr said during his hearing that Trump "was interested" in hearing about the friendship, the details that emerged this week caught the President off guard, the three sources said. He bristled at Barr's description of the close relationship, complaining to aides he didn't realize how much their work overlapped or that they were so close.

https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/17/politics/donald-trump-william-barr-robert-mueller/index.html

The headline for this article is brilliant. "Cozy Barr"

When you're as retarded as hemorrhoidpk, you have to seriously respond to your own posts because no one else is going to take them seriously enough to do that.

Methais
01-18-2019, 11:04 AM
When you're as retarded as hemorrhoidpk, you have to seriously respond to your own posts because no one else is going to take them seriously enough to do that.

I give him some credit for at least not having a second account to agree with himself over though.

Now his credit score is 1.

Parkbandit
01-18-2019, 11:38 AM
I give him some credit for at least not having a second account to agree with himself over though.

Now his credit score is 1.

There’s only been one idiot that we know who needed to do that...

But, in It’s defense.. he didn’t dox anyone and threaten to get them fired.

So it’s a tie.

Androidpk
01-18-2019, 01:10 PM
Presidential historian Jon Meacham on Friday resurfaced the first article of impeachment brought against former President Nixon in a discussion following a bombshell report (https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/425967-trump-directed-cohen-to-lie-about-plans-to-build-trump-tower-in) that President Trump (https://thehill.com/people/donald-trump) directed his former longtime lawyer Michael Cohen to lie to Congress.

“The first article of impeachment against Nixon was just this: obstruction by directing others to lie,” Meacham tweeted early Friday morning. “This is not hysteria or hyperventilating. It’s history.”

Wrathbringer
01-18-2019, 01:15 PM
Presidential historian Jon Meacham on Friday resurfaced the first article of impeachment brought against former President Nixon in a discussion following a bombshell report (https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/425967-trump-directed-cohen-to-lie-about-plans-to-build-trump-tower-in) that President Trump (https://thehill.com/people/donald-trump) directed his former longtime lawyer Michael Cohen to lie to Congress.

“The first article of impeachment against Nixon was just this: obstruction by directing others to lie,” Meacham tweeted early Friday morning. “This is not hysteria or hyperventilating. It’s history.”

OMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOM GOMG IT'S GOING TO START HEATING UP FOR REAL NOW GUYS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111111111111 OMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMG

Androidpk
01-18-2019, 01:17 PM
His poll numbers are rapidly drying up. They've never once gone over 50%. He has no political capital and he's weaker than ever. At this point I'm no longer worried that he isn't going to be held accountable.

Gelston
01-18-2019, 01:18 PM
His poll numbers are rapidly drying up. They've never once gone over 50%. He has no political capital and he's weaker than ever. At this point I'm no longer worried that he isn't going to be held accountable.

Keep living in your fantasy world.

Androidpk
01-18-2019, 01:22 PM
Keep living in your fantasy world.

Its called reality, come and join us.

Gelston
01-18-2019, 01:25 PM
Its called reality, come and join us.

No, I'm living in the reality where Trump is the President of the US.

Androidpk
01-18-2019, 01:26 PM
No, I'm living in the reality where individual 1 is the President of the US.

https://www.npr.org/2019/01/17/685539207/poll-trump-approval-down-slips-with-base

Gelston
01-18-2019, 01:28 PM
https://www.npr.org/2019/01/17/685539207/poll-trump-approval-down-slips-with-base

You said he has no political capital, which he definitely does.

Androidpk
01-18-2019, 01:32 PM
You said he has no political capital, which he definitely does.

Would love to see you prove he has capital or that he's not a Russian agent and a Benedict Arnold all rolled into one.

Methais
01-18-2019, 01:33 PM
His poll numbers are rapidly drying up. They've never once gone over 50%. He has no political capital and he's weaker than ever. At this point I'm no longer worried that he isn't going to be held accountable.

Good, maybe you'll stop spamming every folder 24/7 with your Trump butthurt. Even though we know you won't, because this is your whole life.


Would love to see you prove he has capital or that he's not a Russian agent and a Benedict Arnold all rolled into one.

https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/facebook/001/103/802/918.png

Gelston
01-18-2019, 01:33 PM
Would love to see you prove he has capital or that he's not a Russian agent and a Benedict Arnold all rolled into one.

Prove he is, because if he is a Russian agent he is doing a very bad fucking job. Threatening to punish countries that agree to gas deals with Russia?

Androidpk
01-18-2019, 01:40 PM
Prove he is, because if he is a Russian agent he is doing a very bad fucking job. Threatening to punish countries that agree to gas deals with Russia?

So you can't, shocker. I never would have figured you for a fan of Benedict Arnold.

Gelston
01-18-2019, 01:41 PM
So you can't, shocker. I never would have figured you for a fan of Benedict Arnold.

And you can't prove he is, shocker.

I don't know how exactly you expect someone to prove someone isn't doing something. Like... He isn't doing it. You need to prove he IS doing something.

Androidpk
01-18-2019, 01:46 PM
I don't need to, the OSC and FBI are doing that for us.

Parkbandit
01-18-2019, 01:47 PM
So you can't, shocker. I never would have figured you for a fan of Benedict Arnold.

You’re as deluded about this as you were about the Hillary emails. Like everything else, you aren’t good at this.

Gelston
01-18-2019, 01:48 PM
I don't need to, the OSC and FBI are doing that for us.

I mean, you're asking me to prove he isn't a Russian agent... How the fuck would I even do that? Get a log of everything he has ever done? I couldn't disprove that you are a Russian Agent if that was the standard that was required. Either way, I see you are also backing out of proving he is a Russian Agent, so there we are.

Androidpk
01-18-2019, 01:53 PM
You’re as deluded about this as you were about the Hillary emails. Like everything else, you aren’t good at this.

Says the guy that also believed Hillary broke the law. GG

Tgo01
01-18-2019, 01:54 PM
Says the guy that also believed Hillary broke the law. GG

Again I'll ask you straight up:

Do you now believe Hillary was 100% innocent in the whole email server thing?

Androidpk
01-18-2019, 01:54 PM
I mean, you're asking me to prove he isn't a Russian agent... How the fuck would I even do that? Get a log of everything he has ever done? I couldn't disprove that you are a Russian Agent if that was the standard that was required. Either way, I see you are also backing out of proving he is a Russian Agent, so there we are.

You're so sure he's innocent. You aren't even the slightest bit concerned he may be compromised.

Androidpk
01-18-2019, 01:58 PM
Again I'll ask you straight up:

Do you now believe Hillary was 100% innocent in the whole email server thing?

I don't think the FBI should have dropped the case, it wasn't up to Comey to do that. They should have presented what they found to the DOJ and let them decide to prosecute or not. With Lynch recusing herself a special counsel should have been appointed.

Gelston
01-18-2019, 02:00 PM
You're so sure he's innocent. You aren't even the slightest bit concerned he may be compromised.

Like I said, if he is a Russian Agent, he is the worst one ever. And no, I'm pretty sure he isn't. Further, if Mueller had found any compelling evidence that he was, I imagine he would have acted quickly to have that information brought to light, rather than letting a Russian Agent remain as the Commander in Chief of the US.

Androidpk
01-18-2019, 02:04 PM
Like I said, if he is a Russian Agent, he is the worst one ever. And no, I'm pretty sure he isn't. Further, if Mueller had found any compelling evidence that he was, I imagine he would have acted quickly to have that information brought to light, rather than letting a Russian Agent remain as the Commander in Chief of the US.

When you have a counter intelligence case against the POTUS don't you think it should be handled carefully so they make sure they have plenty of evidence to support the case? Correct me if I'm wrong but this is uncharted territory for the CIA and FBI.

Wrathbringer
01-18-2019, 02:07 PM
When you have a counter intelligence case against the POTUS don't you think it should be handled carefully so they make sure they have plenty of evidence to support the case? Correct me if I'm wrong but this is uncharted territory for the CIA and FBI.

You're uber retarded.

Gelston
01-18-2019, 02:08 PM
When you have a counter intelligence case against the POTUS don't you think it should be handled carefully so they make sure they have plenty of evidence to support the case? Correct me if I'm wrong but this is uncharted territory for the CIA and FBI.

If you have compelling evidence you need to act, especially given that this is a very public investigation. If it was quiet and no one knew about, sure, but it isn't. This just rings to me that there is no compelling evidence that Trump himself is in any way under the thumb of Putin. Of course, there was also a secret FBI investigation launched against Trump checking for it also, after he fired Comey. That one came up with nothing as well.

Androidpk
01-18-2019, 02:13 PM
If you have compelling evidence you need to act, especially given that this is a very public investigation. If it was quiet and no one knew about, sure, but it isn't. This just rings to me that there is no compelling evidence that Trump himself is in any way under the thumb of Putin. Of course, there was also a secret FBI investigation launched against Trump checking for it also, after he fired Comey. That one came up with nothing as well.

If they have no evidence why did they just extend the grand jury another 6 months? If Trump is so innocent why does he keep obstructing the investigation? And why do you keep saying the FBI came up with nothing? They never said that and they never closed the case, they only handed it off to Mueller when he was appointed, which was shortly after the FBI opened their investigation.

Gelston
01-18-2019, 02:14 PM
If they have no evidence why did they just extend the grand jury another 6 months? If Trump is so innocent why does he keep obstructing the investigation? And why do you keep saying the FBI came up with nothing? They never said that and they never closed the case, they only handed it off to Mueller when he was appointed, which was shortly after the FBI opened their investigation.

I said evidence against Trump. There could always be other people they are looking at.

Astray
01-18-2019, 02:16 PM
I said evidence against Trump. There could always be other people they are looking at.

Which they are, so it's not really a surprise that the grand jury got the extension.

Wrathbringer
01-18-2019, 02:21 PM
If they have no evidence why did they just extend the grand jury another 6 months? If Trump is so innocent why does he keep obstructing the investigation? And why do you keep saying the FBI came up with nothing? They never said that and they never closed the case, they only handed it off to Mueller when he was appointed, which was shortly after the FBI opened their investigation.

Thanks for admitting that as far as you know they have nothing and you're just prognosticating, at which you're demonstrably bad.

Androidpk
01-18-2019, 02:22 PM
Of course there are other people, how many indictments do we have so far? 34 or something.. Ultimately Trump is the target and he's still refusing to sit down with Mueller. You'd think he would want to clear his name if he was truly innocent instead of dumping gas on the fire and repeating Russian propaganda.

Gelston
01-18-2019, 02:24 PM
Of course there are other people, how many indictments do we have so far? 34 or something.. Ultimately Trump is the target and he's still refusing to sit down with Mueller. You'd think he would want to clear his name if he was truly innocent instead of dumping gas on the fire and repeating Russian propaganda.

No, I think he gets off on the publicity. He'll probably do it eventually and make everyone look retarded.

Androidpk
01-18-2019, 02:27 PM
No, I think he gets off on the publicity. He'll probably do it eventually and make everyone look retarded.

Before or after he's legally forced to?

Gelston
01-18-2019, 02:28 PM
Before or after he's legally forced to?

I doubt he is ever legally forced to do anything.

Androidpk
01-18-2019, 02:30 PM
I doubt he is ever legally forced to do anything.

:lol:

Methais
01-18-2019, 02:34 PM
Would love to see you prove he has capital or that he's not a Russian agent and a Benedict Arnold all rolled into one.


Prove he is, because if he is a Russian agent he is doing a very bad fucking job. Threatening to punish countries that agree to gas deals with Russia?


So you can't, shocker. I never would have figured you for a fan of Benedict Arnold.

This is pretty much every pk argument in history in a nutshell.

You can't prove a negative, and you're a fucking tard and a half.

Methais
01-18-2019, 02:39 PM
Says the guy that also believed Hillary broke the law. GG

That was never in question. Everyone including you knows she did.

You were 100% she was going to be indicted, and IIRC PB said she probably wouldn't be because Hillary.

You're really bad at this. Which is nothing new.

Methais
01-18-2019, 02:42 PM
Like I said, if he is a Russian Agent, he is the worst one ever. And no, I'm pretty sure he isn't. Further, if Mueller had found any compelling evidence that he was, I imagine he would have acted quickly to have that information brought to light, rather than letting a Russian Agent remain as the Commander in Chief of the US.

MAYBE MUELLER IS A RUSSIAN AGENT TOO AND IS REALLY TRUMP'S ACE IN THE HOLE


Of course, there was also a secret FBI investigation launched against Trump checking for it also, after he fired Comey. That one came up with nothing as well.

THOSE GUYS TOO

Alfster
01-18-2019, 02:46 PM
I doubt he is ever legally forced to do anything.

Considering he still blocks people on Twitter through official communications, he's not great at complying with rulings against him.

At this point he's either oblivious to the world around him or he's a part of it. Not sure which is better.

Stumplicker
01-18-2019, 02:51 PM
You'd think he would want to clear his name if he was truly innocent instead of dumping gas on the fire and repeating Russian propaganda.

Yeah I'm sure giving ammunition to someone specifically trying to find reasons to indict you is a great idea.

From a left leaning source: https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/mvkgnp/law-professor-police-interrogation-law-constitution-survival

A Law Professor Explains Why You Should Never Talk to Police

"James Duane doesn't think you should ever talk to the police. Not just, "Don't talk to the police if you're accused of a crime," or, "Don't talk to the police in an interrogation setting"—never talk to the cops, period. If you are found doing something suspicious by an officer (say, breaking into your own house because you locked yourself outside), you are legally obligated to tell the cop your name and what you're doing at that very moment.

Other than that, Duane says, you should fall back on four short words: "I want a lawyer."

In 2008, Duane, a professor at Virginia's Regent Law School, gave a lecture about the risks of talking to police that was filmed and posted to YouTube. It's since been viewed millions of times, enjoying a new viral boost after the Netflix documentary Making a Murderer spurred interest in false confessions. His argument, which he's since expanded into a new book called You Have the Right to Remain Innocent, is that even if you haven't committed a crime, it's dangerous to tell the police any information. You might make mistakes when explaining where you were at the time of a crime that the police interpret as lies; the officer talking to you could misremember what you say much later; you may be tricked into saying the wrong things by cops under no obligation to tell you the truth; and your statements to police could, in combination with faulty eyewitness accounts, shoddy "expert" testimony, and sheer bad luck, lead to you being convicted of a serious crime."

And from a right leaning source: https://www.learnliberty.org/blog/advice-from-cops-dont-talk-to-cops/

Androidpk
01-18-2019, 02:55 PM
Hillary talked to the FBI.

Astray
01-18-2019, 03:01 PM
Hillary talked to the FBI.

Pretty sure the FBI had the highest suicide by double bullets to the back of the head that year.

Androidpk
01-18-2019, 03:02 PM
Pretty sure the FBI had the highest suicide by double bullets to the back of the head that year.

Riiiiight

Astray
01-18-2019, 03:03 PM
It's a joke. Probably.

Androidpk
01-18-2019, 03:05 PM
It's a joke. Probably.

I'd be more concerned with the Russians and polonium tea parties.

Parkbandit
01-18-2019, 03:13 PM
Would love to see you prove he has capital or that he's not a Russian agent and a Benedict Arnold all rolled into one.

So.. in your head.. you believe that Donald Trump is a Russian agent here to infiltrate our government?

You can't just be high with this.. are you smoking bath salts too?

sellstuff1
01-18-2019, 03:16 PM
So.. in your head.. you believe that Donald Trump is a Russian agent here to infiltrate our government?

You can't just be high with this.. are you smoking bath salts too?

If Trump isn't compromised by Russia, why the everliving fuck is he trying to repeal sanctions on Putin's ally?

Oh right. You haven't thought that far ahead. If Trump does something, it's obviously for the betterment of the country, not because Russia has blackmailed the president of the united states.

Androidpk
01-18-2019, 03:17 PM
So.. in your head.. you believe that Donald Trump is a Russian agent here to infiltrate our government?

You can't just be high with this.. are you smoking bath salts too?

The CIA and FBI think so.

Parkbandit
01-18-2019, 03:18 PM
If Trump isn't compromised by Russia, why the everliving fuck is he trying to repeal sanctions on Putin's ally?

Oh right. You haven't thought that far ahead. If Trump does something, it's obviously for the betterment of the country, not because Russia has blackmailed the president of the united states.

So, that is your "proof" that Donald Trump is a Russian agent?

Parkbandit
01-18-2019, 03:18 PM
The CIA and FBI think so.

Cite a source that isn't as full of shit as you are?

Or is this what your super secret sources are telling you??

Neveragain
01-18-2019, 03:21 PM
Would love to see you prove he has capital or that he's not a Russian agent and a Benedict Arnold all rolled into one.

https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/001/239/110/8a8.gif

Androidpk
01-18-2019, 03:29 PM
Cite a source that isn't as full of shit as you are?

Or is this what your super secret sources are telling you??

Did they open a CI case because Hillary told them? Is that what you actually believe?

Tgo01
01-18-2019, 03:44 PM
Hey look at that, the stock market is up almost 15% since it suddenly became Trump's stock market and economy and he was going to personally destroy the entire economy because of his orange skin. It's also only 2000 points away from reaching yet another all time high.

Where all the whiners at? Suddenly the economy isn't too important to talk about when it's doing well, but when there is a slight, minor, very temporary lull in the economy suddenly it's Trump's fault and it's all we can talk about 24/7. Weird how that works.

Oh by the way these are all facts sourced from actual people who aren't afraid to put their names behind the information, these are not anonymous sources. See how that works too?

Parkbandit
01-18-2019, 03:44 PM
Did they open a CI case because Hillary told them? Is that what you actually believe?

So, no source to cite that says "The CIA and FBI believe that Donald Trump is a Russian Agent".

Didn't see this coming.

At all......

Alfster
01-18-2019, 03:52 PM
It's like androidpk read the articles where they stated the CIA investigated whether he was an agent and jumped to the conclusion that snow investigation means he is?

Wtf man.

Androidpk
01-18-2019, 03:52 PM
So, no source to cite that says "The CIA and FBI believe that Donald Trump is a Russian Agent".

Didn't see this coming.

At all......

Ahhh, so they DID open a CI investigation only because Hillary told them to. Glad you could clear that up for us, buddy.

Parkbandit
01-18-2019, 04:11 PM
It's like androidpk read the articles where they stated the CIA investigated whether he was an agent and jumped to the conclusion that snow investigation means he is?

Wtf man.

Trying to decipher what happens in Androidpk's head is impossible.. unless you are high as fuck and living on someone's couch.

Parkbandit
01-18-2019, 04:12 PM
Ahhh, so they DID open a CI investigation only because Hillary told them to. Glad you could clear that up for us, buddy.

You made the claim that the CIA and FBI believe that Donald Trump is a Russian agent. I'm merely asking you to provide a cite source.

But as usual.. you can't because it's just in your head.

SPOILER: You do realize that people get investigated for things that turn out to be false.. right?

Androidpk
01-18-2019, 04:13 PM
I'm not a lawyer, can someone tell me if suborning perjury counts as high crimes and misdemeanors that the Constitution talks about in regards to impeaching POTUS?

Androidpk
01-18-2019, 04:19 PM
You made the claim that the CIA and FBI believe that Donald Trump is a Russian agent. I'm merely asking you to provide a cite source.

But as usual.. you can't because it's just in your head.

SPOILER: You do realize that people get investigated for things that turn out to be false.. right?

So you still can't admit they opened a CI investigation against Trump because they were concerned he may be acting on Putin's behalf. Shocker. You're going to stick to the ridiculous story that it's all a vast left wing conspiracy :lol:

Tgo01
01-18-2019, 04:21 PM
Androidpk is already talking about impeachment based on a news article which is based on anonymous sources and of which the authors of said article have seen no evidence as of yet.

Oh yeah and one of the authors of the article has a long history of lying, plagiarizing, and flat out making up sources. One of those sources he made up claimed Karl Rove was going to be indicted. He wasn't of course.

"But I SO want this to be true!"

Androidpk
01-18-2019, 04:24 PM
"I so want to believe Trump is the chosen one!"

Awww, PB and Tgo are such a CUTE couple!

Tgo01
01-18-2019, 04:26 PM
Something tells me Androidpk wasn't aware that one of his new favorite reporters has been a known liar for almost 2 decades now. In fact wasn't he earlier claiming what great journalists they are and shit?

It's okay, Androidpk. Everyone gets fooled every once in a while, but you've been fooled enough to fill hundreds of lifetimes. Maybe it's time to vet the "news" you read a bit better there, buddy.

Androidpk
01-18-2019, 04:30 PM
Do you and PB share your strategies for trolling the PC as you paint each other's toe nails? Adorable.

time4fun
01-18-2019, 04:34 PM
I'm not a lawyer, can someone tell me if suborning perjury counts as high crimes and misdemeanors that the Constitution talks about in regards to impeaching POTUS?

That clause isn't well defined. Basically there's no actual limit on what you can impeach someone for.

But, for the record, this is part of what Nixon got impeached for. It was the first article of impeachment, I believe.

Tgo01
01-18-2019, 04:38 PM
Do you and PB share your strategies for trolling the PC as you paint each other's toe nails? Adorable.

Aww, look at the adorable baby. He thinks facts is trolling and citing articles based on anonymous sources from a writer who has been a known liar for almost 20 years is considered real news and evidence that Trump is a Russian asset and needs to be impeached.

You do time4fun proud. I bet she even allowed you to wash the couch cushions today.

sellstuff1
01-18-2019, 04:42 PM
Aww, look at the adorable baby. He thinks facts is trolling and citing articles based on anonymous sources from a writer who has been a known liar for almost 20 years is considered real news and evidence that Trump is a Russian asset and needs to be impeached.

You do time4fun proud. I bet she even allowed you to wash the couch cushions today.

Republicans are the last people on earth to go on about accuracy when it comes to sources. Fox News is your bible, an edutainment channel.

Tgo01
01-18-2019, 04:43 PM
Know how you can tell when a far leftist is losing an argument? They go straight to Fox News. Never fails.

Androidpk
01-18-2019, 04:44 PM
Know how you can tell when a far leftist is losing an argument? They go straight to Fox News. Never fails.

Coming from the troll that always goes after the source. Every. Single. Time. You and PB are two peas in a pod.

Alfster
01-18-2019, 04:45 PM
Something tells me Androidpk wasn't aware that one of his new favorite reporters has been a known liar for almost 2 decades now. In fact wasn't he earlier claiming what great journalists they are and shit?

It's okay, Androidpk. Everyone gets fooled every once in a while, but you've been fooled enough to fill hundreds of lifetimes. Maybe it's time to vet the "news" you read a bit better there, buddy.

Everyone involved in this shit show is a known liar. That's what's so crazy about this. Reporters. Guiliani. Cohen. Manafort. Fuck. Trump can't even buy hamburgers without lying about how many are out there.

Then you gave idiots jumping to a conclusion on both sides because they're believing the lies. I'm waiting for the evidence.

Stumplicker
01-18-2019, 04:47 PM
Everyone involved in this shit show is a known liar. That's what's so crazy about this. Reporters. Guiliani. Cohen. Manafort. Fuck. Trump can't even buy hamburgers without lying about how many are out there.

Then you gave idiots jumping to a conclusion on both sides because they're believing the lies. I'm waiting for the evidence.

Androidpk had all the evidence he would ever need 940 pages ago (read: none). Once again he made a false claim, failed to provide his nonexistent sources, and is now calling everyone involved in calling out his BS trolls.

So...normal Friday I guess.

Androidpk
01-18-2019, 04:50 PM
What false claim did I make exactly?

Androidpk
01-18-2019, 04:51 PM
Everyone involved in this shit show is a known liar. That's what's so crazy about this. Reporters. Guiliani. Cohen. Manafort. Fuck. Trump can't even buy hamburgers without lying about how many are out there.

Then you gave idiots jumping to a conclusion on both sides because they're believing the lies. I'm waiting for the evidence.

Speculating in politics is half the fun!

Stumplicker
01-18-2019, 04:51 PM
What false claim did I make exactly?


The CIA and FBI think so.

Source?

Tgo01
01-18-2019, 04:52 PM
Speculating in politics is half the fun!

Speculating is fine. You've been convinced Trump was a Russian asset from day 1 based on next to nothing.

Parkbandit
01-18-2019, 04:52 PM
So you still can't admit they opened a CI investigation against Trump because they were concerned he may be acting on Putin's behalf. Shocker. You're going to stick to the ridiculous story that it's all a vast left wing conspiracy :lol:

I never said they didn't. I simply asked you to provide a cite source for your claim that the CIA and FBI believe that Donald Trump is a Russian agent.

Parkbandit
01-18-2019, 04:53 PM
I'm not a lawyer, can someone tell me if suborning perjury counts as high crimes and misdemeanors that the Constitution talks about in regards to impeaching POTUS?

Why not just ask the attorney you were going to get to subpoena Kranar for the IP addresses of some people who post here?

Parkbandit
01-18-2019, 04:55 PM
Republicans are the last people on earth to go on about accuracy when it comes to sources. Fox News is your bible, an edutainment channel.

Did you sound that word out in your head and guess at it?

Androidpk
01-18-2019, 04:55 PM
Source?

I lied about something that has been plastered all over the news? I know fortybox called you a Mitt Romney but at least Mitt occasionally displays a spine.

Androidpk
01-18-2019, 04:55 PM
Speculating is fine. You've been convinced Trump was a Russian asset from day 1 based on next to nothing.

Really? Define day 1..

Parkbandit
01-18-2019, 04:56 PM
"I so want to believe Trump is the chosen one!"

Awww, PB and Tgo are such a CUTE couple!


Do you and PB share your strategies for trolling the PC as you paint each other's toe nails? Adorable.

Look how Androidpk goes straight to the homoerotic when he's been caught being stupid again.

Androidpk
01-18-2019, 04:57 PM
I never said they didn't. I simply asked you to provide a cite source for your claim that the CIA and FBI believe that Donald Trump is a Russian agent.

You've said multiple times this investigation is only because Hillary made up a lie about Trump. Is that why a counter intelligence investigation was started?

Parkbandit
01-18-2019, 04:58 PM
What false claim did I make exactly?

That the CIA and FBI believe that Donald Trump is a Russian agent.

Also, even if you go back and scrub to pretend you weren't dumb enough to post it.. it's been quoted.

Androidpk
01-18-2019, 04:59 PM
Look how Androidpk goes straight to the homoerotic when he's been caught being stupid again.

Is that why you're always going straight to the homoerotic material? Because you're always feeling stupid? Don't be ashamed, embrace your homosexuality!

Parkbandit
01-18-2019, 04:59 PM
Speculating is fine. You've been convinced Trump was a Russian asset from day 1 based on next to nothing.

In Androidpk's defense.. he didn't have his mental breakdown until August 2017. I'm assuming that was the time period he moved into someone's couch and was given explicit instructions that in lieu of rent, he needs to come here and post like a brain dead retard.

Androidpk
01-18-2019, 05:00 PM
That the CIA and FBI believe that Donald Trump is a Russian agent.

Also, even if you go back and scrub to pretend you weren't dumb enough to post it.. it's been quoted.

So why was a CI case opened? I keep asking you why and you keep wildly deflecting.

Parkbandit
01-18-2019, 05:00 PM
You've said multiple times this investigation is only because Hillary made up a lie about Trump. Is that why a counter intelligence investigation was started?

Let's get back to your claim that the CIA and FBI believe that Donald Trump is a Russian agent. Do you have a cite source on that yet? If you just admit you made that up, we can continue with your question.

Parkbandit
01-18-2019, 05:01 PM
So why was a CI case opened? I keep asking you why and you keep wildly deflecting.

http://forum.gsplayers.com/showthread.php?110469-Russia-Investigation-Heating-Up&p=2078174#post2078174

I await your admission. It's free.. it's not like you have any self respect at this point. Not sure why you can't just come clean.

Androidpk
01-18-2019, 05:06 PM
Let's get back to your claim that the CIA and FBI believe that Donald Trump is a Russian agent. Do you have a cite source on that yet? If you just admit you made that up, we can continue with your question.

Like I said, wildly deflecting. I'm assuming because you're finally starting to realize that you babbling that this is still a Clinton conspiracy is making you look as unhinged as rocktar.

Parkbandit
01-18-2019, 05:27 PM
Like I said, wildly deflecting. I'm assuming because you're finally starting to realize that you babbling that this is still a Clinton conspiracy is making you look as unhinged as rocktar.

On what planet now am I the one deflecting here? YOU made the claim that the CIA and FBI believe that Donald Trump is a Russian agent. I asked you to cite a source that says that.


You've been deflecting like this since:

https://www.reactiongifs.com/r/dflct.gif

Hell, I even gave you an out... admit you simply made it up and we can move forward.

Until then, keep doing what you always do when you are cornered like this:

https://www.reactiongifs.com/r/dflct.gifhttps://www.reactiongifs.com/r/dflct.gifhttps://www.reactiongifs.com/r/dflct.gif

Androidpk
01-18-2019, 05:47 PM
On what planet now am I the one deflecting here? YOU made the claim that the CIA and FBI believe that Donald Trump is a Russian agent. I asked you to cite a source that says that.


You've been deflecting like this since:

https://www.reactiongifs.com/r/dflct.gif

Hell, I even gave you an out... admit you simply made it up and we can move forward.

Until then, keep doing what you always do when you are cornered like this:

https://www.reactiongifs.com/r/dflct.gifhttps://www.reactiongifs.com/r/dflct.gifhttps://www.reactiongifs.com/r/dflct.gif

So you still can't admit the CIA/FBI opened up an CI investigation on Trump because of Russia and not simply because Hillary told them to. Shocker. Don't worry, your BF Tgo will come along shortly to help you deflect some more.

Parkbandit
01-18-2019, 05:53 PM
So you still can't admit the CIA/FBI opened up an CI investigation on Trump because of Russia and not simply because Hillary told them to. Shocker. Don't worry, your BF Tgo will come along shortly to help you deflect some more.

I've never spoken about the CIA / FBI opening up an investigation. Strawman much?

Now, stop deflecting and just admit you fucked up.

It's simple... and it's free, so you don't have to panhandle again tonight.

Fortybox
01-18-2019, 06:07 PM
On what planet now am I the one deflecting here? YOU made the claim that the CIA and FBI believe that Donald Trump is a Russian agent. I asked you to cite a source that says that.


You've been deflecting like this since:

https://www.reactiongifs.com/r/dflct.gif

Hell, I even gave you an out... admit you simply made it up and we can move forward.

Until then, keep doing what you always do when you are cornered like this:

https://www.reactiongifs.com/r/dflct.gifhttps://www.reactiongifs.com/r/dflct.gifhttps://www.reactiongifs.com/r/dflct.gif

This is so fake. She blinks when she is deflecting.

Wonder Woman is FAKEEEEEEEE. But so is PK - so great analogy.

Androidpk
01-18-2019, 06:10 PM
I've never spoken about the CIA / FBI opening up an investigation. Strawman much?

Now, stop deflecting and just admit you fucked up.

It's simple... and it's free, so you don't have to panhandle again tonight.

You only mentioned all of this is because Hillary lied about Russia. So admit that you're a partisan hack that doesn't care about facts. Or just deflect some more because you got nothing else. My guess though is you'll just continue to troll and deflect some more.

Wrathbringer
01-18-2019, 06:13 PM
I'm a partisan hack that doesn't care about facts. I just deflect some more because I got nothing else. My guess though is I'll just continue to troll and deflect some more.

Agreed.

Parkbandit
01-18-2019, 07:15 PM
You only mentioned all of this is because Hillary lied about Russia. So admit that you're a partisan hack that doesn't care about facts. Or just deflect some more because you got nothing else. My guess though is you'll just continue to troll and deflect some more.

So.. still no cite source.

Shocking... really.

One.

Trick.

Pony.

Androidpk
01-18-2019, 08:07 PM
So.. still no cite source.

Shocking... really.

One.

Trick.

Pony.

Still can't cite anything showing this is all a conspiracy started by Hillary. Shocker. Still deflecting and trolling. Shocker. You're really bad at this, like really bad.

time4fun
01-18-2019, 08:23 PM
Mueller's team just ran a very rare statement disputing the BuzzFeed Article. Though it wasn't specific about which parts.

They wouldn't have issued that statement for no reason.

Tgo01
01-18-2019, 08:37 PM
I see time4fun beat me to posting that Mueller's team basically said the Buzzfeed story is fake news.

Good job, Androidpk. Keep chasing them ghosts.

Tgo01
01-18-2019, 08:42 PM
I know the internet moves fast and it's probably difficult for you to understand, but Buzzfeed the shitty meme site and Buzzfeed News are essentially two separate entities with the latter doing a lot of good work.


https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/dems-vow-action-after-report-trump-directed-cohen-lie-about-n960156
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/congress-probe-report-trump-directed-lawyer-lie-60466989?cid=clicksource_4380645_1_heads_hero_live _headlines_hed
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-had-michael-cohen-lie-to-congress-about-moscow-trump-tower-project-buzzfeed/
https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/politics/2019/01/18/congress-probe-report-that-trump-directed-lawyer-lie/VoLLTRAWtaqIfITo1P4PDI/story.html
https://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-trump-cohen-20190118-story.html
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2019/01/18/trump-reportedly-told-michael-cohen-lie-his-own-attorney-general-pick-testified-thats-crime/?utm_term=.6591c10a6adc

I'm sure all those newsorgs picked it up on a whim because they have Trump Derangement Syndrome.

Jesus, even the trashfire that is the Washington Examiner picked up the story:

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/trump-told-cohen-to-lie-about-plans-to-meet-with-putin-in-russia-report

Mueller's office disputes BuzzFeed report that Trump directed Michael Cohen to lie to Congress (https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/18/politics/mueller-statement-buzzfeed/index.html)

This post didn't age well at all, and it's not even 24 hours old.

Alfster
01-18-2019, 08:42 PM
Which is crazy considering how little information they've released publicly.

time4fun
01-18-2019, 08:43 PM
I see time4fun beat me to posting that Mueller's team basically said the Buzzfeed story is fake news.

Good job, Androidpk. Keep chasing them ghosts.

That's not what they said actually. They were characteristically vague.

BuzzFeed is standing by their reporting here. They're trying to figure out what exactly the OSC is disputing.

It's an interesting situation.

Tgo01
01-18-2019, 08:46 PM
That's not what they said actually. They were characteristically vague.

BuzzFeed is standing by their reporting here. They're trying to figure out what exactly the OSC is disputing.

It's an interesting situation.

Vague? This is what they said, according to CNN:

"BuzzFeed's description of specific statements to the Special Counsel's Office, and characterization of documents and testimony obtained by this office, regarding Michael Cohen's Congressional testimony are not accurate," said Peter Carr, a spokesman for Mueller's office, in a statement.

I don't know how much more specific they can get. They are saying statements, documents, and testimony claimed in the Buzzfeed article are not accurate, a nice way of saying fake news.

Just because the authors of the story are digging their heels in doesn't mean what the special counsel's office said is vague.

Tgo01
01-18-2019, 08:50 PM
Which is crazy considering how little information they've released publicly.

Probably because the Democrats were already talking about impeachment based on this report and Mueller's office didn't want them to be called in to provide evidence that didn't exist.

I suppose there is a small chance that time4fun is alluding to that Mueller's office really does have this evidence but they don't want to have to reveal their evidence just quite yet because they are working on gathering more evidence. But if that were the case I would imagine Mueller's office would have been actually vague, saying something like "There are some inaccuracies in the story." But they specifically called out the specifics of just about the whole story as being inaccurate.

Astray
01-18-2019, 09:08 PM
I wonder what the response from people calling for Trump to resign over the Buzzfeed article is now. Likely the same.

Tgo01
01-18-2019, 09:14 PM
I wonder what the response from people calling for Trump to resign over the Buzzfeed article is now. Likely the same.

It's amazing watching the spin unfold in real time. People are already saying that the statement from Mueller's office basically means nothing because he never used the word "false" but instead said "inaccurate" meaning the entire story overall is true, but some parts of the story are merely "inaccurate."

Or that Mueller's office was somehow vague to leave open the possibility that only some parts of the story are inaccurate (but not false!) but regardless Mueller still has the evidence.

Some of the more realistic ones are sort of accepting the Buzzfeed article might be false but it doesn't matter because Mueller has oh so much other evidence on Trump that he will still be impeached.

It's amazing watching people actually believe a Buzzfeed article OVER MUELLER HIMSELF.

Let me recap for those who are not quite caught up.

Buzzfeed: Orange man bad. He committed crime.
Far left: Impeach! Impeach!
Mueller: Buzzfeed is wrong.
Buzzfeed: I'm pretty sure we know more about your investigation than you do, but thanks anyways.
Far left: Wait, is Mueller right?
Buzzfeed: Of course not, the sky is still yellow right?
Far left: Oh yeah, right! Impeach! Impeach!

sellstuff1
01-18-2019, 09:16 PM
It's amazing watching the spin unfold in real time. People are already saying that the statement from Mueller's office basically means nothing because he never used the word "false" but instead said "inaccurate" meaning the entire story overall is true, but some parts of the story are merely "inaccurate."

Or that Mueller's office was somehow vague to leave open the possibility that only some parts of the story are inaccurate (but not false!) but regardless Mueller still has the evidence.

Some of the more realistic ones are sort of accepting the Buzzfeed article might be false but it doesn't matter because Mueller has oh so much other evidence on Trump that he will still be impeached.

It's amazing watching people actually believe a Buzzfeed article OVER MUELLER HIMSELF.

Let me recap for those who are not quite caught up.

Buzzfeed: Orange man bad. He committed crime.
Far left: Impeach! Impeach!
Mueller: Buzzfeed is wrong.
Buzzfeed: I'm pretty sure we know more about your investigation than you do, but thanks anyways.
Far left: Wait, is Mueller right?
Buzzfeed: Of course not, the sky is still yellow right?
Far left: Oh yeah, right! Impeach! Impeach!

It's not a Buzzfeed article, it's a Buzzfeed news article. Buzzfeed news has been nominated for a Pulitzer for their journalism work in 2018, and maintains no less than THREE Pulitzer prize-winning journalists.

Your news source is legitimately Fox & Friends. The only awards they've won is the Order of the Red Banner.

time4fun
01-18-2019, 09:19 PM
Vague? This is what they said, according to CNN:

"BuzzFeed's description of specific statements to the Special Counsel's Office, and characterization of documents and testimony obtained by this office, regarding Michael Cohen's Congressional testimony are not accurate," said Peter Carr, a spokesman for Mueller's office, in a statement.

I don't know how much more specific they can get. They are saying statements, documents, and testimony claimed in the Buzzfeed article are not accurate, a nice way of saying fake news.

Just because the authors of the story are digging their heels in doesn't mean what the special counsel's office said is vague.

Your reading comprehension deficits are showing, as usual.

Mueller's team could have released a statement that said: The OSC has not determined that that President Trump directed Cohen to alter his Congressional testimony. Instead, they released this incredibly vague statement that focused on specific pieces of evidence, not the actual conclusion of the article.

It's almost guaranteed that the sources here were *not* from Mueller's team. The BuzzFeed article positions them specifically as not being a part of the OSC. So this is probably information from one of the other investigations- likely this is from SDNY (who raided Cohen's office).

Secondly- there are already numerous Court filings that more or less support the notion that Cohen was working with people in the Trump orbit to prepare for his Congressional testimony.

Finally- the OSC's release doesn't say that Buzzfeed's conclusion is inaccurate- it's calling into question what the OSC has specifically been told and the characterization of their documents. It actually very much leaves open the possibility that Cohen told SDNY all of this, and *they* relayed it to OSC, for example. It also leaves open the possibility that the culmination of various pieces of evidence lead to this conclusion, but that the OSC doesn't have any single piece of evidence that ties it all together.

I'm not saying that BuzzFeed's article isn't currently in question. I'm saying that the OSC's statement has some really interesting language here, and that's worth paying attention to. We don't know the motivation behind the statement.

time4fun
01-18-2019, 09:21 PM
I wonder what the response from people calling for Trump to resign over the Buzzfeed article is now. Likely the same.

If you look at the statements, people were generally very careful to say "IF the article is true, THEN the following should happen".

Wrathbringer
01-18-2019, 09:24 PM
Your reading comprehension deficits are showing, as usual.

Mueller's team could have released a statement that said: The OSC has not determined that that President Trump directed Cohen to alter his Congressional testimony. Instead, they released this incredibly vague statement that focused on specific pieces of evidence, not the actual conclusion of the article.

It's almost guaranteed that the sources here were *not* from Mueller's team. The BuzzFeed article positions them specifically as not being a part of the OSC. So this is probably information from one of the other investigations- likely this is from SDNY (who raided Cohen's office).

Secondly- there are already numerous Court filings that more or less support the notion that Cohen was working with people in the Trump orbit to prepare for his Congressional testimony.

Finally- the OSC's release doesn't say that Buzzfeed's conclusion is inaccurate- it's calling into question what the OSC has specifically been told and the characterization of their documents. It actually very much leaves open the possibility that Cohen told SDNY all of this, and *they* relayed it to OSC, for example. It also leaves open the possibility that the culmination of various pieces of evidence lead to this conclusion, but that the OSC doesn't have any single piece of evidence that ties it all together.

I'm not saying that BuzzFeed's article isn't currently in question. I'm saying that the OSC's statement has some really interesting language here, and that's worth paying attention to. We don't know the motivation behind the statement.

TR;DR

Astray
01-18-2019, 09:25 PM
If you look at the statements, people were generally very careful to say "IF the article is true, THEN the following should happen".

There are others who omitted the 'if' entirely and simply demanded resignation. While others may have taken the reasonable and fair route, not everyone had.

My wondering remains specifically with those individuals.

Tgo01
01-18-2019, 09:27 PM
It's not a Buzzfeed article, it's a Buzzfeed news article. Buzzfeed news has been nominated for a Pulitzer for their journalism work in 2018, and maintains no less than THREE Pulitzer prize-winning journalists.

Your news source is legitimately Fox & Friends. The only awards they've won is the Order of the Red Banner.

Look at this denial right here on the PC. Isn't it glorious?

Tgo01
01-18-2019, 09:28 PM
Your reading comprehension deficits are showing, as usual.

Mueller's team could have released a statement that said: The OSC has not determined that that President Trump directed Cohen to alter his Congressional testimony. Instead, they released this incredibly vague statement that focused on specific pieces of evidence, not the actual conclusion of the article.

It's almost guaranteed that the sources here were *not* from Mueller's team. The BuzzFeed article positions them specifically as not being a part of the OSC. So this is probably information from one of the other investigations- likely this is from SDNY (who raided Cohen's office).

Secondly- there are already numerous Court filings that more or less support the notion that Cohen was working with people in the Trump orbit to prepare for his Congressional testimony.

Finally- the OSC's release doesn't say that Buzzfeed's conclusion is inaccurate- it's calling into question what the OSC has specifically been told and the characterization of their documents. It actually very much leaves open the possibility that Cohen told SDNY all of this, and *they* relayed it to OSC, for example. It also leaves open the possibility that the culmination of various pieces of evidence lead to this conclusion, but that the OSC doesn't have any single piece of evidence that ties it all together.

I'm not saying that BuzzFeed's article isn't currently in question. I'm saying that the OSC's statement has some really interesting language here, and that's worth paying attention to. We don't know the motivation behind the statement.

Even more denial! Where do you people get your marching orders from? Barely been two hours since Mueller's office themselves said Buzzfeed's article is wrong and you all are already repeating the same shit no matter where I go on the internet.

sellstuff1
01-18-2019, 09:41 PM
Even more denial! Where do you people get your marching orders from? Barely been two hours since Mueller's office themselves said Buzzfeed's article is wrong and you all are already repeating the same shit no matter where I go on the internet.

“BuzzFeed’s description of SPECIFIC statements TO THE SPECIAL COUNSEL'S OFFICE, and CHARACTERIZATION of documents and testimony OBTAINED BY THIS OFFICE, regarding Michael Cohen’s Congressional testimony are not ACCURATE.”

Your reading comprehension is about at the fifth grade level if you think that statement completely nullifies the Buzzfeednews report.

Androidpk
01-18-2019, 09:45 PM
Your reading comprehension deficits are showing, as usual.

Mueller's team could have released a statement that said: The OSC has not determined that that President Trump directed Cohen to alter his Congressional testimony. Instead, they released this incredibly vague statement that focused on specific pieces of evidence, not the actual conclusion of the article.

It's almost guaranteed that the sources here were *not* from Mueller's team. The BuzzFeed article positions them specifically as not being a part of the OSC. So this is probably information from one of the other investigations- likely this is from SDNY (who raided Cohen's office).

Secondly- there are already numerous Court filings that more or less support the notion that Cohen was working with people in the Trump orbit to prepare for his Congressional testimony.

Finally- the OSC's release doesn't say that Buzzfeed's conclusion is inaccurate- it's calling into question what the OSC has specifically been told and the characterization of their documents. It actually very much leaves open the possibility that Cohen told SDNY all of this, and *they* relayed it to OSC, for example. It also leaves open the possibility that the culmination of various pieces of evidence lead to this conclusion, but that the OSC doesn't have any single piece of evidence that ties it all together.

I'm not saying that BuzzFeed's article isn't currently in question. I'm saying that the OSC's statement has some really interesting language here, and that's worth paying attention to. We don't know the motivation behind the statement.

The sources for the article are most certainly SDNY. Mueller's folks don't leak.

Androidpk
01-18-2019, 09:46 PM
“BuzzFeed’s description of SPECIFIC statements TO THE SPECIAL COUNSEL'S OFFICE, and CHARACTERIZATION of documents and testimony OBTAINED BY THIS OFFICE, regarding Michael Cohen’s Congressional testimony are not ACCURATE.”

Your reading comprehension is about at the fifth grade level if you think that statement completely nullifies the Buzzfeednews report.

He already has his marching orders from alt right websites.

Fortybox
01-18-2019, 09:51 PM
Mueller's team just ran a very rare statement disputing the BuzzFeed Article. Though it wasn't specific about which parts.

They wouldn't have issued that statement for no reason.

Maybe because Buzzfeed is wrong.

Go away.

Tgo01
01-18-2019, 10:02 PM
Look at the radical far leftists of the board taking this defeat as some sort of victory.

Buzzfeed says the sky is yellow and they believe it.

sellstuff1
01-18-2019, 10:08 PM
Look at the radical far leftists of the board taking this defeat as some sort of victory.

Buzzfeed says the sky is yellow and they believe it.

Projection.

Androidpk
01-18-2019, 10:08 PM
Look at the radical far leftists of the board taking this defeat as some sort of victory.

Buzzfeed says the sky is yellow and they believe it.

What defeat exactly? Individual 1 is still a criminal and you're still a useless troll. Don't let me interrupt your meltdown though :lol2:

sellstuff1
01-18-2019, 10:13 PM
The funniest fucking part of this is the conservatives scrambling to suck Meuller's dick now after calling him a traitor for the past four months.

Tgo01
01-18-2019, 10:23 PM
The funniest fucking part of this is the conservatives scrambling to suck Meuller's dick now after calling him a traitor for the past four months.

Are you saying we shouldn’t listen to what Mueller says? Not sure you thought this one through.

Androidpk
01-18-2019, 10:28 PM
Are you saying we shouldn’t listen to what Mueller says? Not sure you thought this one through.

Lefties!
Far lefties!
Radical far lefties!
Extremist radical lefties!

Who would have figured that you being outed as an alt right white supremacist would trigger you so much. :lol:

RichardCranium
01-18-2019, 10:31 PM
What defeat exactly? Individual 1 is still a criminal and you're still a useless troll. Don't let me interrupt your meltdown though :lol2:

Alleged criminal.

Neveragain
01-19-2019, 12:23 AM
PK's daily pavlovian reaction is reaching the level of epic.

Ding!

Fortybox
01-19-2019, 12:49 AM
I lied about something that has been plastered all over the news? I know fortybox called you a Mitt Romney but at least Mitt occasionally displays a spine.

Stumps doesn’t have one.

Neither do you.

Wrathbringer
01-19-2019, 03:31 AM
What defeat exactly? Individual 1 is still a criminal and you're still a useless troll. Don't let me interrupt your meltdown though :lol2:

You're retarded.

Tgo01
01-19-2019, 05:27 AM
For the far leftist morons still pushing the "Mueller didn't say the Buzzfeed story was fake!"

This is directly from the Washington Post (https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/2019/01/18/b9c40d34-1b85-11e9-8813-cb9dec761e73_story.html?utm_term=.b2c5dcb4730f):


Mueller’s denial, according to people familiar with the matter, aims to make clear that none of those statements in the story are accurate.

Mueller's aims was to make clear that NONE OF THOSE STATEMENTS IN THE STORY ARE ACCURATE. Right there in plain English for even the simplest of mind to read and comprehend. And hey look, they cited anonymous sources so you know it's true.

Wrathbringer
01-19-2019, 07:21 AM
For the far leftist morons still pushing the "Mueller didn't say the Buzzfeed story was fake!"

This is directly from the Washington Post (https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/2019/01/18/b9c40d34-1b85-11e9-8813-cb9dec761e73_story.html?utm_term=.b2c5dcb4730f):



Mueller's aims was to make clear that NONE OF THOSE STATEMENTS IN THE STORY ARE ACCURATE. Right there in plain English for even the simplest of mind to read and comprehend. And hey look, they cited anonymous sources so you know it's true.

This was a big win for trump. This fake news was just the latest example of the liberal media compromising their journalistic integrity for a chance to bash trump. They have no credibility at this point. The takeaway here for the public is, "huh, trump was right about fake news again, and the media proved they cannot be trusted to report the truth again." Retards like pk and time4dung won't care and will continue to munch the asses of liberal media as long as they bash trump.

Tgo01
01-19-2019, 07:24 AM
This was a big win for trump. This fake news was just the latest example of the liberal media compromising their journalistic integrity for a chance to bash trump. They have no credibility at this point. The takeaway here for the public is, "huh, trump was right about fake news again, and the media proved they cannot be trusted to report the truth again." Retards like pk and time4dung won't care and will continue to munch the asses of liberal media as long as they bash trump.

A guest on Don Lemon's show was referencing the fake Buzzfeed story to show how the media often makes shit up and Don Lemon said "I don't want to talk about the Buzzfeed story anymore."

Of course not! When it turns out Trump is 100% spot on about fake news Don Lemon says "Well let's stop talking about actual fake news." If Mueller himself hadn't come out and called the story fake news all Don Lemon would be talking about for the next month would be the Buzzfeed article.

But I'm sure in a few days Androidpk will unironically be citing Buzzfeed and CNN articles as "news."

Wrathbringer
01-19-2019, 07:28 AM
A guest on Don Lemon's show was referencing the fake Buzzfeed story to show how the media often makes shit up and Don Lemon said "I don't want to talk about the Buzzfeed story anymore."

Of course not! When it turns out Trump is 100% spot on about fake news Don Lemon says "Well let's stop talking about actual fake news." If Mueller himself hadn't come out and called the story fake news all Don Lemon would be talking about for the next month would be the Buzzfeed article.

But I'm sure in a few days Androidpk will unironically be citing Buzzfeed and CNN articles as "news."

:lol: terrible.

Parkbandit
01-19-2019, 07:44 AM
Mueller's team just ran a very rare statement disputing the BuzzFeed Article. Though it wasn't specific about which parts.

They wouldn't have issued that statement for no reason.

Wait.. so I was right.

Shocker again.

Parkbandit
01-19-2019, 07:46 AM
That's not what they said actually. They were characteristically vague.

BuzzFeed is standing by their reporting here. They're trying to figure out what exactly the OSC is disputing.

It's an interesting situation.

You know it's bad when Salon had to fire one of the authors because of questionable sources.. and Buzzfeed was like "Hey, come work for us.. we don't have that hangup!"

Parkbandit
01-19-2019, 07:48 AM
It's not a Buzzfeed article, it's a Buzzfeed news article. Buzzfeed news has been nominated for a Pulitzer for their journalism work in 2018, and maintains no less than THREE Pulitzer prize-winning journalists.

Your news source is legitimately Fox & Friends. The only awards they've won is the Order of the Red Banner.

Pulitzer prizes are like Nobel Prizes and the Oscars... the far left decides who "wins" and "awards" them.

Parkbandit
01-19-2019, 07:52 AM
The funniest fucking part of this is the conservatives scrambling to suck Meuller's dick now after calling him a traitor for the past four months.

More over, we don't go to some questionable "news" site to get a glimmer of hope the big mean orange man will be forced out.

Sorry.. but I warned you allllll the way back when it was released. Buzzfeed "News" has a habit of cutting corners, making up 'anonymous' sources and plagiarism.

But hey! THEY HAVE SOME PULITZER PRIZE WINNERS ON STAFF, SO YOU KNOW IT'S REAL!!!!!!!!!!!

Parkbandit
01-19-2019, 07:54 AM
My boy Trump pressing that nuclear button! :flames:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DxOnq0_WoAs8UNq.jpg

https://media.giphy.com/media/NmMb69LluiCmA/200.gif

If he pulls the nuclear option ala Harry Reid.. there's going to be penance to pay in the future if a Democrat ever wins again.

Parkbandit
01-19-2019, 07:55 AM
Still can't cite anything showing this is all a conspiracy started by Hillary. Shocker. Still deflecting and trolling. Shocker. You're really bad at this, like really bad.

STILL waiting on that cite source that said the CIA and FBI believe Trump is a Russian spy.

Parkbandit
01-19-2019, 07:57 AM
Oh god.. I hope It doesn't sashay into the fray. I have posted SEVEN times in a single thread without anyone interrupting me.

Parkbandit
01-19-2019, 08:04 AM
OMG! Buzzfeed News is saying that President Trump went over to Michael Cohen's house and kicked the shit out of him!

Here's the proof!

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2019/01/18/18/8705628-6608247-image-a-56_1547837297485.jpg


IMPEACH HIM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Methais
01-19-2019, 09:45 AM
I lied

Finally, an honest and accurate post from pk

https://media.giphy.com/media/1Z02vuppxP1Pa/giphy.gif

Androidpk
01-19-2019, 09:47 AM
For the far leftist morons still pushing the "Mueller didn't say the Buzzfeed story was fake!"

This is directly from the Washington Post (https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/2019/01/18/b9c40d34-1b85-11e9-8813-cb9dec761e73_story.html?utm_term=.b2c5dcb4730f):



Mueller's aims was to make clear that NONE OF THOSE STATEMENTS IN THE STORY ARE ACCURATE. Right there in plain English for even the simplest of mind to read and comprehend. And hey look, they cited anonymous sources so you know it's true.

Mocks people for using anonymous sources. Pushes anonymous source when it fits his extremist agenda. Talk about desperation :lol:

Androidpk
01-19-2019, 09:51 AM
STILL waiting on that cite source that said the CIA and FBI believe Trump is a Russian spy.

Sure thing buddy, soon as you cite your source that this is all a big conspiracy started by Hillary. I know you won't though, because you have nothing, absolutely nothing, that will back that up. Maybe Infowars can help out.

Methais
01-19-2019, 09:52 AM
Your reading comprehension deficits are showing, as usual.

Mueller's team could have released a statement that said: The OSC has not determined that that President Trump directed Cohen to alter his Congressional testimony. Instead, they released this incredibly vague statement that focused on specific pieces of evidence, not the actual conclusion of the article.

It's almost guaranteed that the sources here were *not* from Mueller's team. The BuzzFeed article positions them specifically as not being a part of the OSC. So this is probably information from one of the other investigations- likely this is from SDNY (who raided Cohen's office).

Secondly- there are already numerous Court filings that more or less support the notion that Cohen was working with people in the Trump orbit to prepare for his Congressional testimony.

Finally- the OSC's release doesn't say that Buzzfeed's conclusion is inaccurate- it's calling into question what the OSC has specifically been told and the characterization of their documents. It actually very much leaves open the possibility that Cohen told SDNY all of this, and *they* relayed it to OSC, for example. It also leaves open the possibility that the culmination of various pieces of evidence lead to this conclusion, but that the OSC doesn't have any single piece of evidence that ties it all together.

I'm not saying that BuzzFeed's article isn't currently in question. I'm saying that the OSC's statement has some really interesting language here, and that's worth paying attention to. We don't know the motivation behind the statement.

https://media1.tenor.com/images/7d05f940425850f9427e3ff89274338e/tenor.gif?itemid=4558036

You’re so desperate :lol:

Methais
01-19-2019, 09:57 AM
PK's daily pavlovian reaction is reaching the level of epic.

Ding!


https://youtu.be/LSHWzOXJDSs

Methais
01-19-2019, 10:02 AM
Sure thing buddy, soon as you cite your source that this is all a big conspiracy started by Hillary. I know you won't though, because you have nothing, absolutely nothing, that will back that up. Maybe Infowars can help out.

You are the biggest bitch to ever be on the PC. Which is really saying something because we’ve had some really hardcore trash come through here over the years.

Please keep posting.

Parkbandit
01-19-2019, 10:05 AM
So.. in your head.. you believe that Donald Trump is a Russian agent here to infiltrate our government?



The CIA and FBI think so.


Cite a source that isn't as full of shit as you are?


I'll give you this.. your NOU game is strong.

It's too bad you can't make a living using it.

Unfortunately, all the reader has to do is go back to this point in our conversation to realize you are doing nothing but deflecting.

I'll accept your deflection as "I have no idea what the fuck I'm talking about. At this point, I'm just posting as much as I can about how much I hate Trump because time4fun said I have to or I'll be evicted off her couch"

Methais
01-19-2019, 10:05 AM
People with extreme political views ‘cannot tell when they are wrong’, study finds (https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/radical-politics-extreme-left-right-wing-neuroscience-university-college-london-study-a8687186.html)

Parkbandit
01-19-2019, 10:07 AM
You are the biggest bitch to ever be on the PC. Which is really saying something because we’ve had some really hardcore trash come through here over the years.

Please keep posting.

I never want him to stop posting. I'm waiting for his other voice in his head to swing back to the right so we can make more fun of him.

He can't live on time4fun's couch forever!

Methais
01-19-2019, 10:12 AM
I never want him to stop posting. I'm waiting for his other voice in his head to swing back to the right so we can make more fun of him.

He can't live on time4fun's couch forever!

This is where he’ll be like “I’m not going anywhere I’m staying right here you can’t make me leave!”

Methais
01-19-2019, 10:18 AM
time4fun will be crawling back into her hole too, at least until the next breaking fake news piece hits where she’ll show back up, remind us how stupid she is, then disappear again once that story gets debunked, and the cycle will repeat.

The only thing I’m surprised about is that she doesn’t have another new PhD this week.

https://radiosadie.files.wordpress.com/2018/04/fake-news-gif.gif?w=653&h=1&crop=1

Parkbandit
01-19-2019, 10:32 AM
This is where he’ll be like “I’m not going anywhere I’m staying right here you can’t make me leave!”

Ok... here are the available posts available to Androidpk at this point:

1) Link a story about how bad Trump is, pretending his "The CIA and FBI believe Trump to be a Russian agent" never happened.
2) Deflection level 8
3) "You guys are just trolls"
4) A post reminding us how he doesn't care, he's still going to post here.

I'm going with 2

Androidpk
01-19-2019, 10:33 AM
I'll give you this.. your NOU game is strong.

It's too bad you can't make a living using it.

Unfortunately, all the reader has to do is go back to this point in our conversation to realize you are doing nothing but deflecting.

I'll accept your deflection as "I have no idea what the fuck I'm talking about. At this point, I'm just posting as much as I can about how much I hate Trump because time4fun said I have to or I'll be evicted off her couch"

More deflection. More trolling. Just like I said you would do. Dance, puppet, dance!

Parkbandit
01-19-2019, 10:38 AM
More deflection. More trolling. Just like I said you would do. Dance, puppet, dance!


Ok... here are the available posts available to Androidpk at this point:

1) Link a story about how bad Trump is, pretending his "The CIA and FBI believe Trump to be a Russian agent" never happened.
2) Deflection level 8
3) "You guys are just trolls"
4) A post reminding us how he doesn't care, he's still going to post here.

I'm going with 2

A 2 & 3 combo! Who said Androidpk is a lazy fuck!! Well done.

Androidpk
01-19-2019, 10:43 AM
PB talking about lazy, talk about irony to the extreme. GG, buddy.

Parkbandit
01-19-2019, 10:49 AM
PB talking about lazy, talk about irony to the extreme. GG, buddy.

And a bonus 2!!

Well done.

Androidpk
01-19-2019, 10:55 AM
NOU!

Like I said, lazy.

Parkbandit
01-19-2019, 10:58 AM
Like I said, lazy.

People.. it's a TRIPLE 2!

So for those scoring at home.. it's a 2/3/2/2 combination. If I can just get a 1 in there, everything would be right in the world.

Androidpk
01-19-2019, 10:58 AM
The best thing to come out of Mueller denying being the source of the leak is the MAGA bots who have been screamingscreaming, "don't listen to Mueller, he's a liar!" are all now screaming, " Listen to Mueller, he's telling the truth! " . It's going to be great when the obstruction report is released. Thanks for helping to legitimize Mueller :lol:

Parkbandit
01-19-2019, 10:59 AM
The best thing to come out of Mueller denying being the source of the leak is the MAGA bots who have been screamingscreaming, "don't listen to Mueller, he's a liar!" are all now screaming, " Listen to Mueller, he's telling the truth! " . It's going to be great when the obstruction report is released. Thanks for helping to legitimize Mueller :lol:

Fuck. Going back to the well with a 4th #2.

I was so close.

Androidpk
01-19-2019, 11:00 AM
People.. it's a TRIPLE 2!

So for those scoring at home.. it's a 2/3/2/2 combination. If I can just get a 1 in there, everything would be right in the world.

Do you and Tgo cuddle in bed while coming up with these lame ass trolling strategies?

Gelston
01-19-2019, 11:00 AM
The best thing to come out of Mueller denying being the source of the leak is the MAGA bots who have been screamingscreaming, "don't listen to Mueller, he's a liar!" are all now screaming, " Listen to Mueller, he's telling the truth! " . It's going to be great when the obstruction report is released. Thanks for helping to legitimize Mueller :lol:

He didn't say there was a leak, he said the information was inaccurate. That would mean Buzzfeed has a source that is lying.

Parkbandit
01-19-2019, 11:02 AM
Do you and Tgo cuddle in bed while coming up with these lame ass trolling strategies?

Fuck.. I knew I was missing a #5... homoerotica... Androidpk's last ditch defensive mechanism.

time4fun
01-19-2019, 11:23 AM
He didn't say there was a leak, he said the information was inaccurate. That would mean Buzzfeed has a source that is lying.

Not necessarily. Again, the wording of the denial was very careful. It didn't take issue with the idea that Trump directed Cohen to lie, it just vaguely stated that some information about the evidence OSC was purported to have in the article is inaccurate.

It is both notable that OSC felt the need to issue this statement and also that the statement, in effect, said so little.

Neveragain
01-19-2019, 11:37 AM
Not necessarily. Again, the wording of the denial was very careful. It didn't take issue with the idea that Trump directed Cohen to lie, it just vaguely stated that some information about the evidence OSC was purported to have in the article is inaccurate.

It is both notable that OSC felt the need to issue this statement and also that the statement, in effect, said so little.

And Time4fun steps up to the plate to remind us that having 16756478 PHD's does not = an education.

Gelston
01-19-2019, 11:39 AM
Not necessarily. Again, the wording of the denial was very careful. It didn't take issue with the idea that Trump directed Cohen to lie, it just vaguely stated that some information about the evidence OSC was purported to have in the article is inaccurate.

It is both notable that OSC felt the need to issue this statement and also that the statement, in effect, said so little.

Something to note.

"I think that we should put a lot of weight in the fact that the special counsel's office does not issue statements. And they have chosen - they felt that they needed to issue a statement in this case, you know, in part because so many members of Congress - Democratic members of Congress were saying if this is true, then the president has committed a crime, and there needs to be a response. So now we have this, and we're back where we started, in some ways, waiting for Robert Mueller to reveal more of what he knows that none of us do know."

I'm pretty sure that points to the Buzzfeed story being complete bullshit. Of course, Buzzfeed is going to stand by their bullshit, just like they'll stand by what dinosaur you most closely associate with.

Androidpk
01-19-2019, 11:42 AM
NOU!

It's like you and Tgo read from the same exact script.

Androidpk
01-19-2019, 11:44 AM
Something to note.

"I think that we should put a lot of weight in the fact that the special counsel's office does not issue statements. And they have chosen - they felt that they needed to issue a statement in this case, you know, in part because so many members of Congress - Democratic members of Congress were saying if this is true, then the president has committed a crime, and there needs to be a response. So now we have this, and we're back where we started, in some ways, waiting for Robert Mueller to reveal more of what he knows that none of us do know."

I'm pretty sure that points to the Buzzfeed story being complete bullshit. Of course, Buzzfeed is going to stand by their bullshit, just like they'll stand by what dinosaur you most closely associate with.

It's far more likely they're denying being the leak to preserve the integrity of the investigation. Mueller's team doesn't leak. Feel free to assume whatever you want though.

time4fun
01-19-2019, 11:46 AM
Something to note.

"I think that we should put a lot of weight in the fact that the special counsel's office does not issue statements. And they have chosen - they felt that they needed to issue a statement in this case, you know, in part because so many members of Congress - Democratic members of Congress were saying if this is true, then the president has committed a crime, and there needs to be a response. So now we have this, and we're back where we started, in some ways, waiting for Robert Mueller to reveal more of what he knows that none of us do know."

I'm pretty sure that points to the Buzzfeed story being complete bullshit. Of course, Buzzfeed is going to stand by their bullshit, just like they'll stand by what dinosaur you most closely associate with.

1) I agree that it's notable that they felt the need to release this statement. Which is why I said exactly that in my post.

2) Candidly, the notion that Cohen lied in his Congressional testimony to cover Trump's business dealings in Russia with no direction from Trump himself is patently absurd. And I think that fact got lost both in the release of the story and in the aftermath of the OSC statement. This story was never a wild bombshell report. It was just confirming what we already know to be true based on court filings, some of Cohen's own words, and common sense.

3) There's a strong argument here that OSC issued their incredibly vague statement specifically to stop impeachment proceedings/Congressional interference in their investigation not because the story's tagline wasn't true but because it was in the best interest of the investigation.

And yes, it's also absolutely possible that Buzzfeed was fed a fake story, or that the informants they have were themselves mistaken. But they're not going to die on this hill for no reason. So don't for a second think they're pushing back right now as a reflexive action.

Tgo01
01-19-2019, 11:47 AM
Mocks people for using anonymous sources. Pushes anonymous source when it fits his extremist agenda. Talk about desperation :lol:

Are you saying we shouldn't listen to anonymous sources? Not sure you thought that one through.

Tgo01
01-19-2019, 11:52 AM
Not necessarily. Again, the wording of the denial was very careful. It didn't take issue with the idea that Trump directed Cohen to lie, it just vaguely stated that some information about the evidence OSC was purported to have in the article is inaccurate.

It is both notable that OSC felt the need to issue this statement and also that the statement, in effect, said so little.

Washington Post (https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/2019/01/18/b9c40d34-1b85-11e9-8813-cb9dec761e73_story.html?utm_term=.b2c5dcb4730f):


Mueller’s denial, according to people familiar with the matter, aims to make clear that none of those statements in the story are accurate.

MUELLER'S DENIAL AIMS TO MAKE CLEAR THAT NONE OF THOSE STATEMENTS IN THE STORY ARE ACCURATE.

Have your handlers really not given you an updated narrative to parrot back yet?

Neveragain
01-19-2019, 11:52 AM
Ok... here are the available posts available to Androidpk at this point:

1) Link a story about how bad Trump is, pretending his "The CIA and FBI believe Trump to be a Russian agent" never happened.
2) Deflection level 8
3) "You guys are just trolls"
4) A post reminding us how he doesn't care, he's still going to post here.

I'm going with 2



More deflection. More trolling. Just like I said you would do. Dance, puppet, dance!


https://media.giphy.com/media/AweMfPaVIS5kA/giphy.gif

Neveragain
01-19-2019, 11:56 AM
1) I agree that it's notable that they felt the need to release this statement. Which is why I said exactly that in my post.

2) Candidly, the notion that Cohen lied in his Congressional testimony to cover Trump's business dealings in Russia with no direction from Trump himself is patently absurd. And I think that fact got lost both in the release of the story and in the aftermath of the OSC statement. This story was never a wild bombshell report. It was just confirming what we already know to be true based on court filings, some of Cohen's own words, and common sense.

3) There's a strong argument here that OSC issued their incredibly vague statement specifically to stop impeachment proceedings/Congressional interference in their investigation not because the story's tagline wasn't true but because it was in the best interest of the investigation.

And yes, it's also absolutely possible that Buzzfeed was fed a fake story, or that the informants they have were themselves mistaken. But they're not going to die on this hill for no reason. So don't for a second think they're pushing back right now as a reflexive action.

Or it's possible that buzzfeed is cashing in on mindless idiots, like you.

Tgo01
01-19-2019, 11:58 AM
Or it's possible that buzzfeed is cashing in on mindless idiots, like you.

This would be my guess. There are plenty of people all over Twitter and Reddit who flat out refuse to believe the story is fake. Or even if they concede the story might be fake they are saying it doesn't matter.

Clearly Buzzfeed is not interested in journalism at all and is instead interested in cashing in on mindless drones such as time4fun who flat out don't care if they are being lied to, as long as they enjoy the narrative they are being fed.

Androidpk
01-19-2019, 12:04 PM
Are you saying we shouldn't listen to anonymous sources? Not sure you thought that one through.

Look up hypocrisy in the dictionary.

Tgo01
01-19-2019, 12:06 PM
Look up hypocrisy in the dictionary.

Simple yes or no question:

Should we listen to news stories that rely exclusively on anonymous sources and no other information?

Astray
01-19-2019, 12:08 PM
Honestly the Facist right here are correct in some respects.

Hey McGuyver.

Tgo01
01-19-2019, 12:08 PM
Honestly the Facist right here are correct in some respects. Mueller is taking his sweet time here. If he goes beyond Feburary then I really think he’s just dicking around.

The far left knows they done fucked up when even Praetor is feeling like he's being jerked around.

Astray
01-19-2019, 12:09 PM
Breaking news! Tgo is a facist!

Edit- Stupid phone.

Tgo01
01-19-2019, 12:11 PM
Breaking news! Tgo is a facist!

Well yeah, I'm a straight white male so that goes without saying.

Androidpk
01-19-2019, 12:12 PM
Simple yes or no question:

Should we listen to news stories that rely exclusively on anonymous sources and no other information?

Look up hypocrisy in a dictionary.

Androidpk
01-19-2019, 12:13 PM
Well yeah, I'm a straight white male so that goes without saying.

Straight except when you and PB are balls deep in each other you mean. Which is daily.

Tgo01
01-19-2019, 12:13 PM
Androidpk can't answer a simple question. Imagine my non-shock.

Hey, time4fun. When are you going to evict Androidpk from your couch for his obviously anti-homsexual views?

Neveragain
01-19-2019, 12:15 PM
This would be my guess. There are plenty of people all over Twitter and Reddit who flat out refuse to believe the story is fake. Or even if they concede the story might be fake they are saying it doesn't matter.

Clearly Buzzfeed is not interested in journalism at all and is instead interested in cashing in on mindless drones such as time4fun who flat out don't care if they are being lied to, as long as they enjoy the narrative they are being fed.

It's a complete freak show at this point.

Clickbait news: Trump is a Russian agent, the anon. homeless dude said so.

PK4pegging: This is really it this time!

Me: :popcorn:

Androidpk
01-19-2019, 12:21 PM
Androidpk can't answer a simple question. Imagine my non-shock.

Hey, time4fun. When are you going to evict Androidpk from your couch for his obviously anti-homsexual views?

Talking about homosexuality in itself isn't anti-homosexuality. Nice try though, really. Meanwhile you and your boyfriend still can't cite a single shred of evidence showing Mueller's investigation is a left wing conspiracy.

Gelston
01-19-2019, 12:27 PM
Talking about homosexuality in itself isn't anti-homosexuality. Nice try though, really. Meanwhile you and your boyfriend still can't cite a single shred of evidence showing Mueller's investigation is a left wing conspiracy.

When you consistently use it as a means to insult someone it is. You are basically saying being a homosexual is bad.

Fortybox
01-19-2019, 12:28 PM
Talking about homosexuality in itself isn't anti-homosexuality. Nice try though, really. Meanwhile you and your boyfriend still can't cite a single shred of evidence showing Mueller's investigation is a left wing conspiracy.

LOL PK talking about citing sources.

HAHAHAHHAHAHA

Archigeek
01-19-2019, 12:30 PM
Simple yes or no question:

Should we listen to news stories that rely exclusively on anonymous sources and no other information?

Maybe we should stop listening to people who start their claims with "people are saying" or "I've been hearing."

Androidpk
01-19-2019, 12:32 PM
When you consistently use it as a means to insult someone it is. You are basically saying being a homosexual is bad.

Who is insulting them? They make a very cute couple.

Parkbandit
01-19-2019, 12:35 PM
It's like you and Tgo read from the same exact script.

It's not us, kid... it's you.. and your transparent defense mechanisms kicking in.

Parkbandit
01-19-2019, 12:37 PM
This would be my guess. There are plenty of people all over Twitter and Reddit who flat out refuse to believe the story is fake. Or even if they concede the story might be fake they are saying it doesn't matter.

Clearly Buzzfeed is not interested in journalism at all and is instead interested in cashing in on mindless drones such as time4fun who flat out don't care if they are being lied to, as long as they enjoy the narrative they are being fed.

Well, when you are so invested in the downfall of Trump and you got your hopes up so high.. you don't want to believe that it wasn't true.

It's like when Androidpk was 18 and found out Santa Claus wasn't real.

Androidpk
01-19-2019, 12:38 PM
It's not us, kid... it's you.. and your transparent defense mechanisms kicking in.

Says the old codger who's been transparent trolling mechanisms have been the exact same for 10+ years. GG, buddy.

Gelston
01-19-2019, 12:38 PM
Well, when you are so invested in the downfall of Trump and you got your hopes up so high.. you don't want to believe that it wasn't true.

It's like when Androidpk was 18 and found out Santa Claus wasn't real.

Tim Allen is Santa Claus.

Parkbandit
01-19-2019, 12:38 PM
Straight except when you and PB are balls deep in each other you mean. Which is daily.

#5!!

He's struggling...

Fortybox
01-19-2019, 12:39 PM
It's not us, kid... it's you.. and your transparent defense mechanisms kicking in.

https://media.giphy.com/media/pB27flArJ6u3e/giphy.gif

Parkbandit
01-19-2019, 12:41 PM
Says the old codger who's been transparent trolling mechanisms have been the exact same for 10+ years. GG, buddy.

http://www.animatedimages.org/data/media/712/animated-number-image-0197.gif

Parkbandit
01-19-2019, 12:45 PM
https://media.giphy.com/media/pB27flArJ6u3e/giphy.gif

Maybe I shouldn't use words with "parent" in them when responding to Androidpk...

Good call.

Androidpk
01-19-2019, 12:52 PM
And PB's epic meltdown continues.

Parkbandit
01-19-2019, 01:28 PM
And PB's epic meltdown continues.

#6 NOU

How the fuck did I miss that one on my list!?

Fortybox
01-19-2019, 01:37 PM
#6 NOU

How the fuck did I miss that one on my list!?

He thinks he's acting the way you and other conservatives act. He's attempting to "prove" a point but it's not working out all that well.

Androidpk
01-19-2019, 01:47 PM
I'm not melting down, you're melting down!

More NOU! from Tgo's boyfriend.

Androidpk
01-19-2019, 01:59 PM
Astute analysis from Marcy Wheeler on why this rebuttal from Mueller is just him acting as a prosecutor protecting his investigation/case.

https://www.emptywheel.net/2019/01/19/peter-carr-speaks/

Neveragain
01-19-2019, 02:34 PM
Astute analysis from Marcy Wheeler on why this rebuttal from Mueller is just him acting as a prosecutor protecting his investigation/case.

https://www.emptywheel.net/2019/01/19/peter-carr-speaks/

Oh goody, the daily cycle begins.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/70/Pavlov%27s_dog_conditioning.svg/2000px-Pavlov%27s_dog_conditioning.svg.png

Parkbandit
01-19-2019, 02:36 PM
I get pegged by time4fun so I can live on her couch.

Finally, some rare honesty from Androidpk!

Parkbandit
01-19-2019, 02:37 PM
He thinks he's acting the way you and other conservatives act. He's attempting to "prove" a point but it's not working out all that well.

He's just PANIC PANIC PANIC at this point.

It's funny as hell.

Androidpk
01-19-2019, 02:42 PM
He's just PANIC PANIC PANIC at this point.

It's funny as hell.

More projection from PB since his rabid conspiracies are being laughed at. Your meltdown is delicious, please keep it up.

Tgo01
01-19-2019, 02:44 PM
Astute analysis from Marcy Wheeler on why this rebuttal from Mueller is just him acting as a prosecutor protecting his investigation/case.

https://www.emptywheel.net/2019/01/19/peter-carr-speaks/

I’m starting to think Androidpk has real psychological problems. This denial of reality can’t be good for you. Maybe it’s time to get off the couch and seek professional help.

Fortybox
01-19-2019, 02:45 PM
More projection from PB since his rabid conspiracies are being laughed at. Your meltdown is delicious, please keep it up.

You’re the one posting none sense, the majority without any factual evidence.

Fortybox
01-19-2019, 02:47 PM
I’m starting to think Androidpk has real psychological problems. This denial of reality can’t be good for you. Maybe it’s time to get off the couch and seek professional help.

You’re just now starting to think this?

Tisket
01-19-2019, 02:48 PM
And PB's epic meltdown continues.

You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

In an ever-changing world, it's comforting to know that some things always stay the same. Knowing that you are so constantly devoted to your own self-delusions is one such thing.

Androidpk
01-19-2019, 02:54 PM
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

In an ever-changing world, it's comforting to know that some things always stay the same. Knowing that you are so constantly devoted to your own self-delusions is one such thing.

And here comes the troll's queen bee to defend their honor!

Androidpk
01-19-2019, 02:54 PM
I’m starting to think Androidpk has real psychological problems. This denial of reality can’t be good for you. Maybe it’s time to get off the couch and seek professional help.

Project much?

Parkbandit
01-19-2019, 03:01 PM
More projection from PB since his rabid conspiracies are being laughed at. Your meltdown is delicious, please keep it up.

You mean how the CIA and FBI believe Trump is a Russian agent?

Like everything else: You are really bad at this.

Androidpk
01-19-2019, 03:03 PM
You mean how the CIA and FBI believe Trump is a Russian agent?

Like everything else: You are really bad at this.

You mean how the FBI/OSC investigation only started because Hillary told them to?

Despite being asked for a source on this for over a year you keep madly deflecting. Who knew you'd be so bad at this?

Parkbandit
01-19-2019, 03:09 PM
I’m starting to think Androidpk has real psychological problems. This denial of reality can’t be good for you. Maybe it’s time to get off the couch and seek professional help.

You're starting?

He's a clinical example of a sociopath with very low moral fibers.

This has been known for at least a decade on this message board.

Tgo01
01-19-2019, 03:10 PM
You’re just now starting to think this?

I guess it’s been in the back of my mind for a while now but he really seems to have lost it these past few months, especially the past few weeks.

Androidpk
01-19-2019, 03:29 PM
You're starting?

He's a clinical example of a sociopath with very low moral fibers.

This has been known for at least a decade on this message board.

Such massive levels of projection from the boards biggest sociopath. Don't you have some angry rep to be spamming people with?

Fortybox
01-19-2019, 04:07 PM
Such massive levels of projection from the boards biggest sociopath. Don't you have some angry rep to be spamming people with?

Yawnfest

https://media.giphy.com/media/3o6ZtfTCIi26cW3vB6/giphy.gif

You're not even trying anymore.

Methais
01-19-2019, 04:12 PM
https://media.giphy.com/media/pB27flArJ6u3e/giphy.gif

:lol:

Methais
01-19-2019, 04:17 PM
Astute desperation from me, latching onto any false hope I can find, like Marcy Wheeler on why this rebuttal from Mueller is just him acting as a prosecutor protecting his investigation/case.

https://www.emptywheel.net/2019/01/19/peter-carr-speaks/

You’re stupid.

Methais
01-19-2019, 04:21 PM
Such massive levels of projection from the boards biggest sociopath. Don't you have some angry rep to be spamming people with?

Do you do anything but regurgitate the same insults made against you because you’re too brain dead to do anything else? Or are you still in denial due to your mental illness that you NOU every time you get called out for being a huge tard?

Methais
01-19-2019, 04:23 PM
I’m starting to think Androidpk has real psychological problems. This denial of reality can’t be good for you. Maybe it’s time to get off the couch and seek professional help.

People with extreme political views ‘cannot tell when they are wrong’, study finds (https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/radical-politics-extreme-left-right-wing-neuroscience-university-college-london-study-a8687186.html)

Parkbandit
01-19-2019, 05:15 PM
Such massive levels of projection from the boards biggest sociopath.

NOU!!!!!!!!!!

Dude, here's the definition of a sociopath:

a person with a personality disorder manifesting itself in extreme antisocial attitudes and behavior and a lack of conscience.

Diethx said you were in her home for weeks on end, never going out.. and couldn't muster up enough courage to get a job... sounds pretty anti-social.

You committed adultery with msconstrew and then stole stuff from her account.. and have no problem with it. That shows a lack of conscience.

You are a textbook definition of a sociopath.


Don't you have some angry rep to be spamming people with?

Weird.. ever since it was released that you could find out who gave you rep... your constant negative rep to me has stopped. Weird.

It's almost as if you are a gigantic pussy.

Parkbandit
01-19-2019, 05:16 PM
Do you do anything but regurgitate the same insults made against you because you’re too brain dead to do anything else? Or are you still in denial due to your mental illness that you NOU every time you get called out for being a huge tard?

He's a scumbag thief.. what do you expect him to do? Not steal?

Come on....

Fortybox
01-19-2019, 05:29 PM
NOU!!!!!!!!!!

Dude, here's the definition of a sociopath:

a person with a personality disorder manifesting itself in extreme antisocial attitudes and behavior and a lack of conscience.

Diethx said you were in her home for weeks on end, never going out.. and couldn't muster up enough courage to get a job... sounds pretty anti-social.

You committed adultery with msconstrew and then stole stuff from her account.. and have no problem with it. That shows a lack of conscience.

You are a textbook definition of a sociopath.



Weird.. ever since it was released that you could find out who gave you rep... your constant negative rep to me has stopped. Weird.

It's almost as if you are a gigantic pussy.

Don't forget the stalking of Methais too. It brings a nice Silence of the Lambs Buffalo Bill aspect to it.


https://youtu.be/yNeQm5aqrHo

Androidpk
01-19-2019, 05:49 PM
NOU!!!!!!!!!!

Dude, here's the definition of a sociopath:

a person with a personality disorder manifesting itself in extreme antisocial attitudes and behavior and a lack of conscience.

Diethx said you were in her home for weeks on end, never going out.. and couldn't muster up enough courage to get a job... sounds pretty anti-social.

You committed adultery with msconstrew and then stole stuff from her account.. and have no problem with it. That shows a lack of conscience.

You are a textbook definition of a sociopath.



Weird.. ever since it was released that you could find out who gave you rep... your constant negative rep to me has stopped. Weird.

It's almost as if you are a gigantic pussy.

You can make up whatever story you want about me, doesn't matter. At the end of the day the creep here is you. Relentlessly stalking people on here for 10+ years plus because you have 0 life outside of trolling the PC and leaving unhinged rep comments to the people that trigger you. :lol:

Androidpk
01-19-2019, 05:56 PM
Still waiting on your source that the special counsel investigation was started because Hillary told them to. Do you have any answers beyond your impotent rage and vitriol? Survey says no.

Parkbandit
01-19-2019, 06:08 PM
You can make up whatever story you want about me, doesn't matter. At the end of the day the creep here is you. Relentlessly stalking people on here for 10+ years plus because you have 0 life outside of trolling the PC and leaving unhinged rep comments to the people that trigger you. :lol:

Nothing is made up. All came from posts of yours and other people here.

And what about all the negative rep comments you left me before you could tell who sent it??