Things that made you laugh today (Political Version)

[~Rocktar~]

You are entitled to your retarded opinion I suppose.

He can't have other opinion.

[Methais]

:club::club::bananahit: you are all on warning

REPORTED FOR THREATENING MY LIFE!!!!!

[Seran]

MAGA judge does exactly what one expects a Conservative appointee to do: he over steps his authority to try and retroactively revoke approval of a popular anti-pregnancy medication on religious grounds!


Judge halts FDA approval of abortion pill mifepristone

AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — A federal judge in Texas on Friday ordered a hold on U.S. approval of the abortion medication mifepristone, throwing into question access to the nation’s most common method of abortion in a ruling that waved aside decades of scientific approval.

The immediate impact of the ruling by U.S. District Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk, which does not go into immediate effect, was unclear.

The abortion drug has been widely used in the U.S. since 2000 and there is essentially no precedent for a lone judge overruling the medical decisions of the Food and Drug Administration. Mifepristone is one of two drugs used for medication abortion in the United States, along with misoprostol, which is also used to treat other medical conditions.

Kacsmaryk, a Trump administration appointee in Amarillo, Texas, signed an injunction directing the FDA to stay mifepristone’s approval while a lawsuit challenging the safety and approval of the drug continues. His 67-page order gave the government seven days to appeal.

https://apnews.com/article/abortion-pill-lawsuit-mifepristone-misoprostol-kacsmaryk-74cb1c4cfab2c04f6cf2696151bc86ef?utm_source=homepa ge&utm_medium=TopNews&utm_campaign=position_01

[Gelston]

MAGA judge does exactly what one expects a Conservative appointee to do: he over steps his authority to try and retroactively revoke approval of a popular anti-pregnancy medication on religious grounds!



https://apnews.com/article/abortion-pill-lawsuit-mifepristone-misoprostol-kacsmaryk-74cb1c4cfab2c04f6cf2696151bc86ef?utm_source=homepa ge&utm_medium=TopNews&utm_campaign=position_01

He isn't overstepping his authority. He literally has a case under his jurisdiction that is challenging the safety of the drug. You can disagree with his decision, but he is well within the purview of his authority.

[Seran]

He isn't overstepping his authority. He literally has a case under his jurisdiction that is challenging the safety of the drug. You can disagree with his decision, but he is well within the purview of his authority.

First of all no. He's not a medical doctor to make such a decision. And this drug was approved as safe 20 years ago. There is no jurisdiction

[~Rocktar~]

Flatly wrong as always.

[Gelston]

First of all no. He's not a medical doctor to make such a decision. And this drug was approved as safe 20 years ago. There is no jurisdiction

The vast majority of judges are not medical doctors. None of them should ever make rulings on medical cases? Most of them aren’t pilot either, so should they completely stay out of anything aviation related? It is a case within his court. He is within his jurisdiction and right to make his ruling.

You obviously didn’t read your own article nor do you understand how the courts work.

[Parkbandit]

You obviously didn’t read your own article nor do you understand how the courts work.

You can't be shocked by this.

[Seran]

The vast majority of judges are not medical doctors. None of them should ever make rulings on medical cases? Most of them aren’t pilot either, so should they completely stay out of anything aviation related? It is a case within his court. He is within his jurisdiction and right to make his ruling.

You obviously didn’t read your own article nor do you understand how the courts work.

Your lack of understanding is epic. Did you bother reading the judge's opinion or are you just assuming it's acceptable because you're pro-life and thus just agree that anything that removes an embryo is just?

The statute of limits has ran, the judge opines that the six year statute of limitations is inconsequential.

The FDA deemed the drug regime in safe. The judge here opines that pro-life advocates here have standing to request the judge overturn that decision because some doctors they represent may be harmed because their theoretical patients might not take their medication properly. So we've got a two-layer hypothetical masquerading as direct harm jurisdiction.

Lastly our pro-life judge has determined that because /some/ states have passed anti abortion legislation, that it has standing to overturn the rights of other state's without such legislation. This is a clear violation of true Supremecy Clause of the Constitution which favors their federal decision to make mifepristone available cannot be superceded by individual states trying to restrict usage for all.

[Tgo01]

Suddenly Democrats care about the statute of limitations. Gotta love it.

[Suppressed Poet]

anti-pregnancy medication

There you go again speaking the language of the damned. It’s an abortion drug. Call it what it is.

[Gelston]

Your lack of understanding is epic. Did you bother reading the judge's opinion or are you just assuming it's acceptable because you're pro-life and thus just agree that anything that removes an embryo is just?

The statute of limits has ran, the judge opines that the six year statute of limitations is inconsequential.

The FDA deemed the drug regime in safe. The judge here opines that pro-life advocates here have standing to request the judge overturn that decision because some doctors they represent may be harmed because their theoretical patients might not take their medication properly. So we've got a two-layer hypothetical masquerading as direct harm jurisdiction.

Lastly our pro-life judge has determined that because /some/ states have passed anti abortion legislation, that it has standing to overturn the rights of other state's without such legislation. This is a clear violation of true Supremecy Clause of the Constitution which favors their federal decision to make mifepristone available cannot be superceded by individual states trying to restrict usage for all.

There isn’t a statute of limitations when a new case hits his court. That is like saying the statute of limitations on Jim Criw was up in the 60s because they’d been around for a hundred years. He didn’t ban them, he put a stay in them until further info us gathered. A higher court can review, when it is appealed to, and keep it it drop it. Again, this is how the court system works for everything.

Tell me, do you have any formal education at the college level covering the judicial system of the US?

[Seran]

There isn’t a statute of limitations when a new case hits his court. That is like saying the statute of limitations on Jim Criw was up in the 60s because they’d been around for a hundred years. He didn’t ban them, he put a stay in them until further info us gathered. A higher court can review, when it is appealed to, and keep it it drop it. Again, this is how the court system works for everything.

Tell me, do you have any formal education at the college level covering the judicial system of the US?

Wow, your ignorance is pretty amazing. You really think judges have an unlimited power to call up any right, product, process or case regardless of circumstances and rule them illegal or unauthorized? No they do not have autocratic power to rule without checks and balances. Judges may only rule without the scope of the law, or interpretation of existing law. They may not legislate or make executive decisions. Yet this conservative judge, dudge? cudge? Said irrespective of the law, science, passage of time, or lack of injured complainant that he would instate a nationwide ban on a rigorously tested, time proven and federally authorized medication.

[Gelston]

Wow, your ignorance is pretty amazing. You really think judges have an unlimited power to call up any right, product, process or case regardless of circumstances and rule them illegal or unauthorized? No they do not have autocratic power to rule without checks and balances. Judges may only rule without the scope of the law, or interpretation of existing law. They may not legislate or make executive decisions. Yet this conservative judge, dudge? cudge? Said irrespective of the law, science, passage of time, or lack of injured complainant that he would instate a nationwide ban on a rigorously tested, time proven and federally authorized medication.

No, they don’t have unlimited power to call up things. He has a case before him on that specific drug. That is what his current ruling is based on. You seem to be constantly ignoring that fact.

Again, do you have any collegiate level education in the US Judicual system?

[Seran]

No, they don’t have unlimited power to call up things. He has a case before him on that specific drug. That is what his current ruling is based on. You seem to be constantly ignoring that fact.

Again, do you have any collegiate level education in the US Judicual system?

What part of lacking jurisdiction is hard to parse with that sentence? 22 year old drug, 7 years since a ruling was made on the plaintiff's objection to the drug. Those two items alone should have been an instant dismissal. Tack on the lack of an injured party, no federal rule or law which supports an unlimited barring of medication by judicial officer, lastly the lack of proper venue as the FDA is based out of Washington DC. All grounds for entry of judgment against the plaintiff.

Instead, Judge Fundamentalist applied his logic that because someone might be said to lose a baby they wanted to abort, he's got unlimited jurisdiction to institute a nationwide injunction. Lawl.

[Gelston]

What part of lacking jurisdiction is hard to parse with that sentence? 22 year old drug, 7 years since a ruling was made on the plaintiff's objection to the drug. Those two items alone should have been an instant dismissal. Tack on the lack of an injured party, no federal rule or law which supports an unlimited barring of medication by judicial officer, lastly the lack of proper venue as the FDA is based out of Washington DC. All grounds for entry of judgment against the plaintiff.

Instead, Judge Fundamentalist applied his logic that because someone might be said to lose a baby they wanted to abort, he's got unlimited jurisdiction to institute a nationwide injunction. Lawl.

There is no such thing as statute of limitations when the suit is directly infront of him. Imagine if a judge couldn’t put a pause on something because new info comes up. Lead pipes were great for thousands of years but I guess we better keep using them because Seran doesn’t know wtf statute of limitations means or how it applies to things.

[Seran]

There is no such thing as statute of limitations when the suit is directly infront of him. Imagine if a judge couldn’t put a pause on something because new info comes up. Lead pipes were great for thousands of years but I guess we better keep using them because Seran doesn’t know wtf statute of limitations means or how it applies to things.

You didn't read the ruling that much is obvious, because he noted they exceeded their six year statute of limitations. Then subsequently ruled it didn't matter, because public interest. Seems like you and the Judge have similar tendencies to ignore key details as it suits your political rhetoric.

[Parkbandit]

There is no such thing as statute of limitations when the suit is directly infront of him. Imagine if a judge couldn’t put a pause on something because new info comes up. Lead pipes were great for thousands of years but I guess we better keep using them because Seran doesn’t know wtf statute of limitations means or how it applies to things.

You know Seran still uses lead pipes, right?

SYMPTOMS INCLUDE: Developmental: learning disability or slow growth

[Gelston]

You didn't read the ruling that much is obvious, because he noted they exceeded their six year statute of limitations. Then subsequently ruled it didn't matter, because public interest. Seems like you and the Judge have similar tendencies to ignore key details as it suits your political rhetoric.

So, you think public interest shouldn’t override “statute of limitations” even if an approved drug is found to be dangerous?

[Suppressed Poet]

Fat women need access to Fen-Phen! -Seran 2023

[Seran]

So, you think public interest shouldn’t override “statute of limitations” even if an approved drug is found to be dangerous?

No because there is no overriding public interest here. If there was Congress would have legislated it.

[~Rocktar~]

No because there is no overriding public interest here. If there was Congress would have legislated it.

https://media0.giphy.com/media/2lbkOPVPhsMAKaf8zB/200w.gif?cid=6c09b952dxnrbcwt62p8tu4ldo9a1nvyvsve2 lflx3zkodx2&rid=200w.gif&ct=g

[Tgo01]

Suddenly Democrats are against legislating from the bench. So weird.

[Gelston]

No because there is no overriding public interest here. If there was Congress would have legislated it.

ROFL what? You are a horribly naive person.

[Seran]

ROFL what? You are a horribly naive person.

And yet you seem to think a medication approved by the federal government, found safe and made available with a prescription for two decades is something a federal judge has the jurisdiction to restrict, simply because a group of bible thumpers have asked him to. As if simply asking for an order gives a judicial officer unlimited power to grant whatever they want regardless of circumstance merely by wishing it so.

[~Rocktar~]

And yet you seem to think a medication approved by the federal government, found safe and made available with a prescription for two decades is something a federal judge has the jurisdiction to restrict, simply because a group of bible thumpers have asked him to. As if simply asking for an order gives a judicial officer unlimited power to grant whatever they want regardless of circumstance merely by wishing it so.

Cause no other drugs have ever been judged safe and then pulled later. (cough cough Baycol, Belviq, Belviq XR, Bextra, Cylert, DBI, DES, Duract etc.)

https://prescriptiondrugs.procon.org/fda-approved-prescription-drugs-later-pulled-from-the-market/

[Methais]

One of the most unintentionally hilarious things about Seran is his sheer arrogance in his posts while being completely wrong and stupid 100% of the time.

It's like watching a retarded toddler who has to wear a helmet all the time trying to tell people stories at a BBQ or something. With the only actual differences being that Seran is in his 30s, and that he would never get invited to anyone's BBQ.

[Seran]

Cause no other drugs have ever been judged safe and then pulled later. (cough cough Baycol, Belviq, Belviq XR, Bextra, Cylert, DBI, DES, Duract etc.)

https://prescriptiondrugs.procon.org/fda-approved-prescription-drugs-later-pulled-from-the-market/

As usual you can't be bothered to understand a conversation you're trying to join and as always you embarrass yourself. Your article cites the FDA withdrawing approval, which is it's regulatory duty as defined by federal law. The conversation surrounds a confused, conservative appointee who without basis under law is attempting to restrict Mifepristone nationwide by circumventing the FDA's sole federal authority regarding prescriptions. Go back to bed.

[Parkbandit]

One of the most unintentionally hilarious things about Seran is his sheer arrogance in his posts while being completely wrong and stupid 100% of the time.

It's like watching a retarded toddler who has to wear a helmet all the time trying to tell people stories at a BBQ or something. With the only actual differences being that Seran is in his 30s, and that he would never get invited to anyone's BBQ.

https://media2.giphy.com/media/3oeSACtXWKcCRcezSM/giphy.gif


One of the most unintentionally hilarious things about Seran is his sheer arrogance in his posts while being completely wrong and stupid 100% of the time.

It's like watching a retarded toddler who has to wear a helmet all the time trying to tell people stories at a BBQ or something. With the only actual differences being that Seran is in his 30s, and that he would never get invited to anyone's BBQ.

https://media4.giphy.com/media/26tknCqiJrBQG6bxC/giphy.gif

[Parkbandit]

As usual you can't be bothered to understand a conversation you're trying to join and as always you embarrass yourself. Your article cites the FDA withdrawing approval, which is it's regulatory duty as defined by federal law. The conversation surrounds a confused, conservative appointee who without basis under law is attempting to restrict Mifepristone nationwide by circumventing the FDA's sole federal authority regarding prescriptions. Go back to bed.

The FDA isn't the sole federal authority.. as evidenced by the lawsuit.

Honestly, what is it like to be this fucking stupid everyday?

[Seran]

The FDA isn't the sole federal authority.. as evidenced by the lawsuit.

Honestly, what is it like to be this fucking stupid everyday?

Yeah? Which other federal agency is responsible for green lighting medications? A snapshot from an article on the NIH website.


The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is the federal agency responsible for labeling medications and supplements. However, the approval process is different for prescription and for over-the-counter medications.

[Shaps]

Yeah? Which other federal agency is responsible for green lighting medications? A snapshot from an article on the NIH website.

I know you're a fucking moron, and it's pointless... but here's some reading for you.

https://prescriptiondrugs.procon.org/fda-approved-prescription-drugs-later-pulled-from-the-market/

Morons outnumber the logical these days, and you're just another example.

[Seran]

I know you're a fucking moron, and it's pointless... but here's some reading for you.

https://prescriptiondrugs.procon.org/fda-approved-prescription-drugs-later-pulled-from-the-market/

Morons outnumber the logical these days, and you're just another example.

That's not what he said, not-Parkbandit, if you're going to help, try assisting with the answer rather than a pointless diversion.

[Parkbandit]

Yeah? Which other federal agency is responsible for green lighting medications? A snapshot from an article on the NIH website.

If the FDA is the sole authority for medication.... why it's in front of a Federal Judge?

I thought that was obvious.. but here we are having to explain it to you.

SPOILER: If the FDA was the sole authority, the Court system wouldn't be able to do a single thing.

Also, the FDA is under the control of the President, via the Secretary Health and Human Services and that position is approved through the Senate.

[Parkbandit]

Also, this:


the FDA's sole federal authority regarding prescriptions.

Is not the same as this:


Yeah? Which other federal agency is responsible for green lighting medications? A snapshot from an article on the NIH website.

Nice try. For you I would give you a 3 for the attempt... for normal people, a zero.

[Gelston]

And yet you seem to think a medication approved by the federal government, found safe and made available with a prescription for two decades is something a federal judge has the jurisdiction to restrict, simply because a group of bible thumpers have asked him to. As if simply asking for an order gives a judicial officer unlimited power to grant whatever they want regardless of circumstance merely by wishing it so.

So you think the Executive Branch doesn’t answer to the Judicial in any way at all?

[time4fun]

So you think the Executive Branch doesn’t answer to the Judicial in any way at all?

+1 to the point being made here.

Let's just be CRYSTAL clear: the Executive Branch has no authority under the Constitution to ignore Judicial oversight.

Seran, this whole "the decision is optional because I don't agree with it" thing is dangerous talk. That's failed democracy talk.

Our democracy is barely holding up against one party's attacks against it. It will not survive two parties attacking it.

If the Executive disagrees with a Judicial decision, their ONLY remedies are to appeal the decision or to work with Congress to change the law.

[Seran]

If the FDA is the sole authority for medication.... why it's in front of a Federal Judge?

I thought that was obvious.. but here we are having to explain it to you.

SPOILER: If the FDA was the sole authority, the Court system wouldn't be able to do a single thing.

Also, the FDA is under the control of the President, via the Secretary Health and Human Services and that position is approved through the Senate.

You've hit the nail on the head, just why is it before a judge who has no jurisdiction over the matter? I'll tell you, it shouldn't be.

The federal judicial system has absolutely no involvement in approving or denying a medication making it through the FDAs rigorous vetting process. It's all the FDA. This judge is trying to seek through an injunction to supercede the FDAs sole authority in the matter by imposing Jude-Christian beliefs RETROACTIVELY in a decision that was already made. Approval was made, Bible Thumper Inc applied for an FDA appeal of it's approval, that was reviewed and denied. Petitioner Bible Thumper Inc is asking a sympathetic judicial officer to override the competent authority on the basis that Bible Thumper Inc on the sole basis that they didn't like the FDAs two separate decisions.

[Seran]

Seran, this whole "the decision is optional because I don't agree with it" thing is dangerous talk. That's failed democracy talk.

See above. This isn't an instance where the federal executive authority failed in it's duties or superceded it's mandate granted by the legislative branch, this is a judicial officer issuing an injunction because the citizen's group disagrees with abortion.

You think that a district Court Judge having more authority than the Executive Branch performing duties at outlined by the Legislative Branch because of a belief their ideology supercedes law isn't a failure of our democracy? I'd be surprised if you did.

[Seran]

So you think the Executive Branch doesn’t answer to the Judicial in any way at all?

Not what I'm saying at all actually, the opposite in fact. Where the Executive and Legislative branches are working within the legally defined parameters of the law, the judicial branch has no authority to affect a misinterpretation of the law.

[Parkbandit]

Our democracy is barely holding up against one party's attacks against it.

Please double/triple up on your meds, nutcase.

[Tgo01]

+1 to the point being made here.

Let's just be CRYSTAL clear: the Executive Branch has no authority under the Constitution to ignore Judicial oversight.

Seran, this whole "the decision is optional because I don't agree with it" thing is dangerous talk. That's failed democracy talk.

Our democracy is barely holding up against one party's attacks against it. It will not survive two parties attacking it.

If the Executive disagrees with a Judicial decision, their ONLY remedies are to appeal the decision or to work with Congress to change the law.

For once you’re making some sense, but how do you figure Republicans are “attacking our democracy”? AOC is literally telling Biden to just ignore the courts. Talk about attacking our democracy.

[Parkbandit]

You've hit the nail on the head, just why is it before a judge who has no jurisdiction over the matter? I'll tell you, it shouldn't be.

The federal judicial system has absolutely no involvement in approving or denying a medication making it through the FDAs rigorous vetting process. It's all the FDA. This judge is trying to seek through an injunction to supercede the FDAs sole authority in the matter by imposing Jude-Christian beliefs RETROACTIVELY in a decision that was already made. Approval was made, Bible Thumper Inc applied for an FDA appeal of it's approval, that was reviewed and denied. Petitioner Bible Thumper Inc is asking a sympathetic judicial officer to override the competent authority on the basis that Bible Thumper Inc on the sole basis that they didn't like the FDAs two separate decisions.

You are wrong. You've been wrong since you started this.. it's been pointed out why you are wrong. Yet, this is the retard hill you want to die on.

OK. Please die on it.

[Parkbandit]

For once you’re making some sense, but how do you figure Republicans are “attacking our democracy”? AOC is literally telling Biden to just ignore the courts. Talk about attacking our democracy.

We don't have to look very far to find examples of Democrats "attacking our democracy"... just look at anything Trump related.

[Seran]

You are wrong because the FDA previously withdrew it's approval of other completely unrelated medications and on that basis alone, an injunction should be placed on all safe abortion medications because Christians disagree with abortion.

OK. Please die on it.

Held you clarify your argument there.

[Gelston]

Not what I'm saying at all actually, the opposite in fact. Where the Executive and Legislative branches are working within the legally defined parameters of the law, the judicial branch has no authority to affect a misinterpretation of the law.

Fuck the founding fathers, the Constitution, and checks and balances right? I guess I missed where they said the Judicual branch has no power over any executive government agencies and those can just do whatever they want.

[Seran]

Fuck the founding fathers, the Constitution, and checks and balances right? I guess I missed where they said the Judicual branch has no power over any executive government agencies and those can just do whatever they want.

Why yes, the executive branch is balanced by the legislation it's presented, that passes or as defined by the Constitution. Likewise the Legislative branch has chosen not to legislate abortion drugs or to repeal the FDAs sole authority. But if you'd like to point out to me where the Constitution states the Executive Branch shall not exercise the powers conferred upon it without first checking with every district Court Judge, I'm welcome to the citation.

[Seran]

The Biden administration argued that the November legal challenge to the FDA's 2000 approval of mifepristone is "manifestly untimely" and said the group of anti-abortion rights physicians and medical associations that targeted access to the drug lack the legal standing to challenge the FDA's approval of mifepristone, which they neither take nor prescribe.

"The court's sweeping nationwide relief was especially unwarranted given the balance of harms: If allowed to take effect, the court's order would thwart FDA's scientific judgment and severely harm women, particularly those for whom mifepristone is a medical or practical necessity," the Justice Department said. "This harm would be felt throughout the country, given that mifepristone has lawful uses in every state. The order would undermine healthcare systems and the reliance interests of businesses and medical providers."

Go figure, the Justice Department has the exact same argument I did. Sucks to suck.

[time4fun]

See above. This isn't an instance where the federal executive authority failed in it's duties or superceded it's mandate granted by the legislative branch, this is a judicial officer issuing an injunction because the citizen's group disagrees with abortion.

You think that a district Court Judge having more authority than the Executive Branch performing duties at outlined by the Legislative Branch because of a belief their ideology supercedes law isn't a failure of our democracy? I'd be surprised if you did.

I think the Judge has more authority over the Executive Branch in this instance because of the Constitution. The only branch of government that can invalidate a Court decision is the Judiciary itself.

What I will say here is that it feels like you're doing exactly what these Trump supporters have been doing for years: you're focusing on this one situation without asking yourself what happens if we normalize this. Even talking about it is normalizing it. The Judiciary only has power because we believe it does. It has no enforcement mechanism for its decisions.

When people start questioning the Judiciary's Constitutional powers, our system breaks down. You're advocating for a Constitutional crisis here and opening the door for the Executive Branch to follow only decisions it agrees with.

The Judiciary has an appeals system for a reason. There is no need to destroy the foundations of our Separation of Powers over this case.

[Suppressed Poet]

Go figure, the Justice Department has the exact same argument I did. Sucks to suck.

The bureaucrats and executive branch wants unlimited power in government with no oversight. Seran totally supports this. Imagine that.

[time4fun]

Go figure, the Justice Department has the exact same argument I did. Sucks to suck.

No one is arguing that the case was wrongly decided. We're arguing with the irresponsible notion that the Executive can just ignore Judicial decisions.

Notice that the DoJ is appealing the decision, not ignoring it.

[time4fun]

The bureaucrats and executive branch wants unlimited power in government with no oversight. Seran totally supports this. Imagine that.

You certainly don't seem to mind the Executive Branch sending a group of armed right wing militia to the Capitol building at the exact date and time Congress was certifying an election.

Glass houses and all of that.

[Seran]

No one is arguing that the case was wrongly decided. We're arguing with the irresponsible notion that the Executive can just ignore Judicial decisions.

Notice that the DoJ is appealing the decision, not ignoring it.

Umm, actually yes I've been stating all along the decision was wrongly decided on the basis of lack of jurisdiction or standing. So is the Department of Justice it seems.

[Tgo01]

Seran: Clarence Thomas stepped foot inside of a mansion! He is compromised! He has been bribed! IMPEACH!
Also Seran: Biden should just ignore the courts and do whatever he wants!

[Seran]

Think you all need to put your try hard hats on and learn the difference between a case being overturned due to a wrongly decided judgment, unconstitutional legislation, or executive decision, and the judge's lack of authority over a constitutionally and legislatively prescribed decision authorizing a medication. A good start would be to read the 38 page decision, arguments and citations the judge used in his rulings.

[Suppressed Poet]

You certainly don't seem to mind the Executive Branch sending a group of armed right wing militia to the Capitol building at the exact date and time Congress was certifying an election.

Glass houses and all of that.

1) After an entire special council investigation with millions of taxpayer’s dollars wasted you still lack any evidence to support your statement. Trump said we’re going to march down there and take our country back. That is not a planned insurrection despite your mental gymnastics to try to make it so.

2) The mob was unarmed.

Just like how Seran got triggered and insisted Trump broke the law when he posted a photo holding a baseball bat talking about Bragg, you got played. I’ll give you that Trump goes right up to the legal line to troll people, but he doesn’t cross it.

Edit to add: I don’t like or agree with Trump’s bad behavior post election results, but that doesn’t make it illegal.

[Tgo01]

Think you all need to put your try hard hats on and learn the difference between a case being overturned due to a wrongly decided judgment, unconstitutional legislation, or executive decision, and the judge's lack of authority over a constitutionally and legislatively prescribed decision authorizing a medication. A good start would be to read the 38 page decision, arguments and citations the judge used in his rulings.

Okay let's just end this once and for all:

Why was it okay for the courts to literally draft legislation out of thin air when it came to abortion, but the courts lack jurisdiction here? Is it because you agree with killing babies so you're okay with the courts getting involved there?

[Suppressed Poet]

Think you all need to put your try hard hats on and learn the difference between a case being overturned due to a wrongly decided judgment, unconstitutional legislation, or executive decision, and the judge's lack of authority over a constitutionally and legislatively prescribed decision authorizing a medication. A good start would be to read the 38 page decision, arguments and citations the judge used in his rulings.

I think what your much smarter liberal-minded friend is trying to tell you is that it’s fine to disagree with the ruling. It’s a completely different matter entirely to say that the courts have no authority and suggest it should be simply ignored. There is a process within the judicial system to work these matters out.

[Seran]

Okay let's just end this once and for all:

Why was it okay for the courts to literally draft legislation out of thin air when it came to abortion, but the courts lack jurisdiction here? Is it because you agree with killing babies so you're okay with the courts getting involved there?

You've not cited any new information here, read the arguments in favor and against the judgment, the judge is ruling and come back informed..

This is all striking me as very familiar to that other judge, in Florida who inserted her personal opinion in lieu of the law and then was unanimously overruled by the court of appeals. Her being admonished by the upper Court was particularly choice. Remember when she tried to assert her authority over an executive branch function and was told that she was a dumb bitch by the court of appeals?

[Seran]

I think what your much smarter liberal-minded friend is trying to tell you is that it’s fine to disagree with the ruling. It’s a completely different matter entirely to say that the courts have no authority and suggest it should be simply ignored. There is a process within the judicial system to work these matters out.

One of your friends suggested that it should just be ignored, but that was not my argument. My argument was that he lacked subject matter jurisdiction all together and should have dismissed the petition accordingly. Which is exactly what the court of appeals will probably do.

[Suppressed Poet]

One of your friends suggested that it should just be ignored, but that was not my argument. My argument was that he lacked subject matter jurisdiction all together and should have dismissed the petition accordingly. Which is exactly what the court of appeals will probably do.

We’ll see in time. Good to hear you are not trying to start an insurrection.

[Parkbandit]

You certainly don't seem to mind the Executive Branch sending a group of armed right wing militia to the Capitol building at the exact date and time Congress was certifying an election.

Glass houses and all of that.

Who was armed, specifically? Last I checked, it was illegal to carry a firearm in DC unless you had a special permit.

Be specific.. how many armed individuals were there?

[Tgo01]

Be specific.. how many armed individuals were there?

The media and Democrats tried so hard to make it look like the entire group was armed, the best they could come up with was a whole THREE people.

One person was arrested at the capitol and the police found a gun in his truck, so not armed.

Another person was arrested at the capitol and the police found guns at his home, so not armed.

The final person was indeed arrested at the capitol and was armed with a gun.

So apparently all it takes to overthrow the US government is a bunch of grannies wandering around aimlessly and ONE GUN.

[Tgo01]

You've not cited any new information here, read the arguments in favor and against the judgment, the judge is ruling and come back informed..

This is all striking me as very familiar to that other judge, in Florida who inserted her personal opinion in lieu of the law and then was unanimously overruled by the court of appeals. Her being admonished by the upper Court was particularly choice. Remember when she tried to assert her authority over an executive branch function and was told that she was a dumb bitch by the court of appeals?

Oh my bad, you actually clarified the difference between the two cases I listed? Now be honest, did you actually state the differences in a coherent and meaningful matter, or did you just say something to the extent of "It's different because I say it's different!"

[Seran]

Oh my bad, you actually clarified the difference between the two cases I listed? Now be honest, did you actually state the differences in a coherent and meaningful matter, or did you just say something to the extent of "It's different because I say it's different!"

There's no constitutional argument in restricting mifepristone for one. Roe v Wade was predicated on the Constitutional argument. You'd know this if you bothered to read the source material. Do you you usually arguing from a place of ignorance on a topic, or is this one special for your people?

[Seran]

It's most telling that the judge ruled in part on the basis of the 1873 Comstock Act which at the time banned the US Postal Service from being used to mail obscene material or contraceptives. Obviously Trump.Judge had no understanding that Congress repealed most of the Comstock Act and the Supreme Court ruled it's tenants unconstitutional in two separate cases. But you MAGA folk can be bothered to be informed or to do your research after all.

[Tgo01]

There's no constitutional argument in restricting mifepristone for one. Roe v Wade was predicated on the Constitutional argument.

So....the constitution doesn't touch on abortion pills, but the constitution does touch on abortion?

Alright then.

Also why do you keep disagreeing with time4fun? Do you just want to date her?

[Methais]

See above. This isn't an instance where the federal executive authority failed in it's duties or superceded it's mandate granted by the legislative branch, this is a judicial officer issuing an injunction because the citizen's group disagrees with abortion.

You think that a district Court Judge having more authority than the Executive Branch performing duties at outlined by the Legislative Branch because of a belief their ideology supercedes law isn't a failure of our democracy? I'd be surprised if you did.

Here dude, because you really need it and can hopefully start being slightly less stupid than you already are every time you post:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N5Qv3lfu7gY

[Parkbandit]

It's most telling that the judge ruled in part on the basis of the 1873 Comstock Act which at the time banned the US Postal Service from being used to mail obscene material or contraceptives. Obviously Trump.Judge had no understanding that Congress repealed most of the Comstock Act and the Supreme Court ruled it's tenants unconstitutional in two separate cases. But you MAGA folk can be bothered to be informed or to do your research after all.

I love it when you pretend to be smart.

It's my 2nd favorite thing here.. right after time4fun's "I have experience in that area because : (enter made up story here)"

[Methais]

The media and Democrats tried so hard to make it look like the entire group was armed, the best they could come up with was a whole THREE people.

One person was arrested at the capitol and the police found a gun in his truck, so not armed.

Another person was arrested at the capitol and the police found guns at his home, so not armed.

The final person was indeed arrested at the capitol and was armed with a gun.

So apparently all it takes to overthrow the US government is a bunch of grannies wandering around aimlessly and ONE GUN.

Everything the left says and does is performative.

https://i.imgur.com/NKmoICo.png (https://babylonbee.com/news/youll-never-beat-the-government-with-just-guns-says-party-that-also-believes-government-was-almost-toppled-by-unarmed-mob-on-january-6)

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

There's no constitutional argument in restricting mifepristone for one.



State Interest in Protecting Potential Life: One constitutional argument that may be used to restrict mifepristone is based on the state's interest in protecting potential life. Some individuals and groups may argue that life begins at conception, and therefore, fetuses have a constitutional right to life under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment or under state laws protecting the rights of the unborn. From this perspective, mifepristone, as a medication used to terminate pregnancies, could be seen as infringing on the rights of the fetus, and restricting its use could be justified to protect the potential life of the unborn.
State Interest in Promoting Maternal Health: Another constitutional argument that could be used to restrict mifepristone is based on the state's interest in promoting maternal health. Advocates for restrictions on mifepristone may argue that the use of this medication for medical abortion carries risks and complications, and that the state has a legitimate interest in regulating its use to protect the health and well-being of pregnant individuals. This argument could be based on the state's authority to regulate the practice of medicine and protect the health and safety of its citizens, as recognized under the police powers doctrine or other constitutional principles.
State Interest in Regulating Prescription Medications: A third constitutional argument that may be used to restrict mifepristone is based on the state's interest in regulating prescription medications. Some may argue that mifepristone is a prescription medication that should be subject to government regulation, including restrictions on its use, in order to ensure its safe and appropriate use. This argument could be based on the state's authority to regulate the pharmaceutical industry, protect public health, and prevent the misuse or abuse of prescription medications, as recognized under federal or state laws.

[Neveragain]

There's no constitutional argument in restricting mifepristone for one. Roe v Wade was predicated on the Constitutional argument. You'd know this if you bothered to read the source material. Do you you usually arguing from a place of ignorance on a topic, or is this one special for your people?

I'm glad there's no constitutional argument against ordering cocaine through the US postal service.

[Neveragain]

Seran Mengele: Deliver this baby killing pill for me.

Postal Worker: I don't think I want any part in delivering a baby killing pill.

Seran Mengele: You can't make that argument, Ultra MAGA fascist Nazi Hitler!

[Seran]

State Interest in Protecting Potential Life: One constitutional argument that may be used to restrict mifepristone is based on the state's interest in protecting potential life. Some individuals and groups may argue that life begins at conception, and therefore, fetuses have a constitutional right to life under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment or under state laws protecting the rights of the unborn. From this perspective, mifepristone, as a medication used to terminate pregnancies, could be seen as infringing on the rights of the fetus, and restricting its use could be justified to protect the potential life of the unborn.
State Interest in Promoting Maternal Health: Another constitutional argument that could be used to restrict mifepristone is based on the state's interest in promoting maternal health. Advocates for restrictions on mifepristone may argue that the use of this medication for medical abortion carries risks and complications, and that the state has a legitimate interest in regulating its use to protect the health and well-being of pregnant individuals. This argument could be based on the state's authority to regulate the practice of medicine and protect the health and safety of its citizens, as recognized under the police powers doctrine or other constitutional principles.
State Interest in Regulating Prescription Medications: A third constitutional argument that may be used to restrict mifepristone is based on the state's interest in regulating prescription medications. Some may argue that mifepristone is a prescription medication that should be subject to government regulation, including restrictions on its use, in order to ensure its safe and appropriate use. This argument could be based on the state's authority to regulate the pharmaceutical industry, protect public health, and prevent the misuse or abuse of prescription medications, as recognized under federal or state laws.


Stating the obvious here, but all of that was weighed in the approval of mifepristone and then again when the Church group who initiated the current lawsuit appealed the approval initially. It safely ends a pregnancy that a woman does not want. It has side effects, like any other medication, and can only be prescribed by the order of a doctor. So what then does the overriding state interest entail to determine it's Christian morality supercedes the informed decision of the FDA to decide women are required to bring a pregnancy to term?

No state challenged the approval of mifepristone. You're inferring an argument that was not made. Moreover the lawsuit by the Church group alleges that a hypothetical woman might suffer depression or side effects in taking the medication as it's sole arguments for the injunction, there is no actual affected individual behind the suit. Since we know the FDA approved the medication, that doctors are required by law to discuss the side effects before prescribing, what then is the argument.

[Suppressed Poet]

Everything the left says and does is performative.

https://i.imgur.com/NKmoICo.png (https://babylonbee.com/news/youll-never-beat-the-government-with-just-guns-says-party-that-also-believes-government-was-almost-toppled-by-unarmed-mob-on-january-6)

Off-topic but I always find it odd when someone makes Biden’s argument that you need F16s and nukes to fight against our government.

1) Tell that to our combat veterans who fought against illiterate insurgents with rusty AKs in Afghanistan, Iraq, Vietnam, etc.
2) Is the US government going to air strike and nuke its own people in their own country?
3) As pointed out and Babylon Bee makes great humor from, according to the left an unarmed mob almost brought down our republic on January 6th. Imagine if the majority of the mob was armed and actually had a plan.

I don’t want a civil war as that would be horrible. We are so fortunate in this country to live in peace. I’ll tell you though, if they ever start rounding people up for transport to some interment camp (like some countries did during Covid)…I’m not getting in that cattle cart. There is a nefarious reason beyond the rhetoric “it’s the only way we can stop kids dying by mass shooting” that those in power want to disarm the public.

[Parkbandit]

Off-topic but I always find it odd when someone makes Biden’s argument that you need F16s and nukes to fight against our government.

1) Tell that to our combat veterans who fought against illiterate insurgents with rusty AKs in Afghanistan, Iraq, Vietnam, etc.
2) Is the US government going to air strike and nuke its own people in their own country?
3) As pointed out and Babylon Bee makes great humor from, according to the left an unarmed mob almost brought down our republic on January 6th. Imagine if the majority of the mob was armed and actually had a plan.

I don’t want a civil war as that would be horrible. We are so fortunate in this country to live in peace. I’ll tell you though, if they ever start rounding people up for transport to some interment camp (like some countries did during Covid)…I’m not getting in that cattle cart. There is a nefarious reason beyond the rhetoric “it’s the only way we can stop kids dying by mass shooting” that those in power want to disarm the public.

That's what gets me.. have guns suddenly become deadlier in the past 3-4 decades? No, they've always been lethal. Has it gotten easier to get a weapon? Nope.. there are more restrictions now than when I was growing up.

So guns haven't changed much.. so it's not the gun that accounts for the uptick in mass shootings.

Has to be something else.. like something in society......

Weird.

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

Stating the obvious here, but all of that was weighed in the approval of mifepristone and then again when the Church group who initiated the current lawsuit appealed the approval initially. It safely ends a pregnancy that a woman does not want. It has side effects, like any other medication, and can only be prescribed by the order of a doctor. So what then does the overriding state interest entail to determine it's Christian morality supercedes the informed decision of the FDA to decide women are required to bring a pregnancy to term?

No state challenged the approval of mifepristone. You're inferring an argument that was not made. Moreover the lawsuit by the Church group alleges that a hypothetical woman might suffer depression or side effects in taking the medication as it's sole arguments for the injunction, there is no actual affected individual behind the suit. Since we know the FDA approved the medication, that doctors are required by law to discuss the side effects before prescribing, what then is the argument.

You state no constitutional argument. I gave you 3. Jump through more hoops, pedo.

[Seran]

You state no constitutional argument. I gave you 3. Jump through more hoops, pedo.

You stated three that weren't argued by the plaintiffs on the case, why would theoreticals be considered when they're not the subject of contested judgment?

[Methais]

Jump through more hoops, pedo.



<JUMPS THROUGH MORE HOOPS>

.

[Gelston]

You stated three that weren't argued by the plaintiffs on the case, why would theoreticals be considered when they're not the subject of contested judgment?

I refuse to believe someone is as stupid as you. No way you aren’t a troll.

[Seran]

I refuse to believe someone is as stupid as you. No way you aren’t a troll.

HI, you evidently don't know this, but the Court doesn't get to rule on matters not submitted. Judge's aren't private counsel representing parties like you seem to believe. You can't just submit what you want done and request a Court to create, argue and rule on a legal theory you didn't put forth. Matters common live and die on their initial moving papers. Again I encourage you to actually read those documents.

[Suppressed Poet]

I refuse to believe someone is as stupid as you. No way you aren’t a troll.

1,000 years from now students of history will be reading the PC & will marvel at inconceivable stupidity of Seran, the GOAT retard champion of the human race.

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

Curious.

Why does the tag cloud just scream Seran is a pedophile?

[Parkbandit]

I refuse to believe someone is as stupid as you. No way you aren’t a troll.

You better respect his stupidity.

[Parkbandit]

https://nypost.com/2023/04/11/bud-light-boycott-has-legs-as-sales-outlook-thrown-into-doubt/

https://nypost.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2023/04/NYPICHPDPICT000009479178-1.jpg?w=607

This is what happens when you don't know who your base is.

SPOILER: Trannies aren't chugging Bud Light.

Go woke = Go Broke

Whoever the retard is at Anheiser Busch that thought this would be a good idea needs to be fired. I'm guessing it's a woman with a sociology degree or a gay guy with a liberal arts degree.

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

https://nypost.com/2023/04/11/bud-light-boycott-has-legs-as-sales-outlook-thrown-into-doubt/

https://nypost.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2023/04/NYPICHPDPICT000009479178-1.jpg?w=607

This is what happens when you don't know who your base is.

SPOILER: Trannies aren't chugging Bud Light.

Go woke = Go Broke

Whoever the retard is at Anheiser Busch that thought this would be a good idea needs to be fired. I'm guessing it's a woman with a sociology degree or a gay guy with a liberal arts degree.

Fanning the flames were remarks by Anheuser-Busch’s president of marketing, Alissa Heinerscheid, who said she hoped to update the “fratty” and “out of touch” (https://nypost.com/2023/04/10/bud-lights-marketing-vp-was-inspired-to-update-fratty-out-of-touch-branding/)humor of the beer company to appeal to younger consumers.

Says it all. Middle America doesn't give a fuck about your woke agenda. Fucking go broke. I'll drink a Modela.

[Parkbandit]

Fanning the flames were remarks by Anheuser-Busch’s president of marketing, Alissa Heinerscheid, who said she hoped to update the “fratty” and “out of touch” (https://nypost.com/2023/04/10/bud-lights-marketing-vp-was-inspired-to-update-fratty-out-of-touch-branding/)humor of the beer company to appeal to younger consumers.

Says it all. Middle America doesn't give a fuck about your woke agenda. Fucking go broke. I'll drink a Modela.


Wait... when you see this:

https://www.spiked-online.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Dylan-Mulvaney-1536x864.jpg

You don't immediately think about drinking a bud light?

[Parkbandit]

https://dab57h0r8ahff.cloudfront.net/615674/uploads/71fbae20-d856-11ed-9617-797fff189431_800_420.png

HAHAHA.

I hope AB goes bankrupt over this.

Celebrating mental illness is never a good idea.

[Shaps]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XqJKAnN0-gM

Utter hilariousness.

Logic vs. the fucking morons of the world (ie. Seran and his ilk)...

And that fucking "journalist", and their articles, are the ones shaping public opinion? No fucking wonder the masses are absolute idiots.

[Shaps]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0-LmKczleWg

A bit long, but you will never hear the "mainstream media" report it...

Video from the Jan 6 trials... showing armed federal agents + police... all armed... instigating and pushing people to go into the capitol. Leading it.

40+ different officers known about.

This is THEIR BODY CAMERA footage, THEIR AUDIO, and the court documents.

Will the morons care? No.
Will the partisans care? No.
Will the dipshit, batshit crazy, unhinged people understand what's happening? No.
Does that excuse the crowd from their actions? No.

But if you understand mob mentality and mechanism of instigation, well... the outcome is pretty evident.

[Realk]

I'll drink a Modela.

ab holds the majority of stock i think they own 60% of the company atm in modela and profits from it just the same. but at least you don't have to drink bud light

[Parkbandit]

"She said she's a woman budweiser adam's apple so big?"

[Seran]

MAGA judge does exactly what one expects a Conservative appointee to do: he over steps his authority to try and retroactively revoke approval of a popular anti-pregnancy medication on religious grounds!



https://apnews.com/article/abortion-pill-lawsuit-mifepristone-misoprostol-kacsmaryk-74cb1c4cfab2c04f6cf2696151bc86ef?utm_source=homepa ge&utm_medium=TopNews&utm_campaign=position_01

As expected, the nationwide ban on mifepristone was overturned for lack of jurisdiction, shocker. Pending oral arguments, the three Republican members of the appeals court issuing the ruling left in place a ban on medications by mail and reversed the extension of eligibility of 10 weeks to 7. This was stayed pending further hearings, but you can bet if mediations by mail is made illegal then the Pharmaceutical lobby will be abandoning Republicans.

[Methais]

HI, you evidently don't know this, but the Court doesn't get to rule on matters not submitted. Judge's aren't private counsel representing parties like you seem to believe. You can't just submit what you want done and request a Court to create, argue and rule on a legal theory you didn't put forth. Matters common live and die on their initial moving papers. Again I encourage you to actually read those documents.

When and How To Use an Apostrophe ( ’ ) (https://grammar.yourdictionary.com/punctuation/apostrophe-rules.html)

[Methais]

https://nypost.com/2023/04/11/bud-light-boycott-has-legs-as-sales-outlook-thrown-into-doubt/

https://nypost.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2023/04/NYPICHPDPICT000009479178-1.jpg?w=607

This is what happens when you don't know who your base is.

SPOILER: Trannies aren't chugging Bud Light.

Go woke = Go Broke

Whoever the retard is at Anheiser Busch that thought this would be a good idea needs to be fired. I'm guessing it's a woman with a sociology degree or a gay guy with a liberal arts degree.

Duh

https://i.imgur.com/XA0P8pk.png?1

[Methais]

https://i.imgur.com/LXpZM43.png

[Shaps]

https://youtu.be/7683350kRjA

Education in America.

[Methais]

https://youtu.be/7683350kRjA

Education in America.

Remember the days when it was easy to tell satire from reality?

Good times.

https://media0.giphy.com/media/IV2DvTArF5b9u/200w.gif?cid=6c09b952b81jnxit428syb0bkzzroa1w42l6s 28eidbg8eur&rid=200w.gif&ct=g

[Solkern]

Remember the days when it was easy to tell satire from reality?

Good times.

https://media0.giphy.com/media/IV2DvTArF5b9u/200w.gif?cid=6c09b952b81jnxit428syb0bkzzroa1w42l6s 28eidbg8eur&rid=200w.gif&ct=g

Yup, I think about the 80’s and 90’s all the time, when we didn’t have these easily offended snowflakes running around crying about every fucking thing possible that doesn’t go right in their silver-spoon fed lives.

[Shaps]

https://youtu.be/ESgUqeexZ0U

Hmmm... someone gets it.

[Seran]

Oh man, SpaceX courtesy of Elon Musk launched one of the biggest fireworks shows ever for the people of Texas.


https://youtu.be/BZ07ZV3kji4

[~Rocktar~]

Oh man, SpaceX courtesy of Elon Musk launched one of the biggest fireworks shows ever for the people of Texas.


https://youtu.be/BZ07ZV3kji4

How many failed launches of experimental, new technology rockets exploded on the way to the Moon? Pretty sure this is why they do TEST flights.

[Suppressed Poet]

Oh man, SpaceX courtesy of Elon Musk launched one of the biggest fireworks shows ever for the people of Texas.


https://youtu.be/BZ07ZV3kji4

Losers quit after their first encounter with failure. Winners are resilient and treat each failure as a learning opportunity.

[Methais]

Oh man, SpaceX courtesy of Elon Musk launched one of the biggest fireworks shows ever for the people of Texas.


https://youtu.be/BZ07ZV3kji4

Add "test flight" to the neverending list of things that Seran doesn't understand.

Stop putting your own personal butthurt over literally everything else. It makes you look just as stupid as you actually are.

[Seran]

Losers quit after their first encounter with failure. Winners are resilient and treat each failure as a learning opportunity.

Indeed and at three billion dollars a pop, that's a very expensive learning opportunity for a company whose sister organization Tesla is absolutely rife with equipment recalls and failures due to poor quality control.

[Parkbandit]

Indeed and at three billion dollars a pop, that's a very expensive learning opportunity for a company whose sister organization Tesla is absolutely rife with equipment recalls and failures due to poor quality control.

You're still so upset about Musk buying Twitter. It's funny, because it makes you look even dumber than usual.

https://datahub.transportation.gov/Automobiles/NHTSA-Recalls-by-Manufacturer/mu99-t4jn

According to the Biden Administration and Little Petey Buttigieg, Tesla ranked 11th in recalls last year.

Please stop being stupid just to prove how stupid you are.

That skeleton left the closet long, long ago.

[Seran]

You're still so upset about Musk buying Twitter. It's funny, because it makes you look even dumber than usual.

https://datahub.transportation.gov/Automobiles/NHTSA-Recalls-by-Manufacturer/mu99-t4jn

According to the Biden Administration and Little Petey Buttigieg, Tesla ranked 11th in recalls last year.

Please stop being stupid just to prove how stupid you are.

That skeleton left the closet long, long ago.

So what I hear you saying is that Tesla, having delivered 1.3 million cars GLOBALLY, but also recalled over a million cars in 2022 should be given a pass because even through they recall two-thirds of the vehicles they produce, it's okay. Because somehow, because manufacturers who sell way more vehicles and have a far lower number of vehicles should be held to a higher standard.

https://www.fox4news.com/news/carmakers-most-recalls-2022-how-to-check-for-recalls

20 separate recalls in 2022 for Musky Musk. Impressive when you have only 4 models of vehicles in production.

[Parkbandit]

So what I hear you saying is that Tesla, having delivered 1.3 million cars GLOBALLY, but also recalled over a million cars in 2022 should be given a pass because even through they recall two-thirds of the vehicles they produce, it's okay. Because somehow, because manufacturers who sell way more vehicles and have a far lower number of vehicles should be held to a higher standard.

https://www.fox4news.com/news/carmakers-most-recalls-2022-how-to-check-for-recalls

20 separate recalls in 2022 for Musky Musk. Impressive when you have only 4 models of vehicles in production.

I didn't track the top 10 recalls of the country.. your butty Petey did. He said Tesla was 11th on the list.

Where is your distain and mistrust of the top 10 on the list? Why Tesla?

Oh.. because you are so upset at that bully Musk.

Stay triggered, retard.

[Methais]

BuzzFeed News Shutting Down (https://www.forbes.com/sites/katherinehamilton/2023/04/20/buzzfeed-news-shutting-down/?sh=353ffe397ff3)

kek

[Methais]

https://i.imgur.com/MfBrZcE.png

[Seran]

The Supreme Court fully stayed the terms of MAGA.Judge's rulings in Texas on mifepristone and remanded the matter to the Fifth Circuit for a full hearing.


Supreme Court says abortion pill mifepristone will remain broadly available during legal battle

The Supreme Court on Friday ordered the abortion pill mifepristone to remain broadly available as litigation plays out in a lower court.

The high court’s decision came in response to an emergency request by the Justice Department to block lower court rulings that would severely limit access to the medication even in some states where abortion remains legal.

The case will now be heard in the U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals. The appeals court has scheduled oral arguments for Wednesday, May 17 at 1 pm CT.

Mifepristone has become the central flashpoint in the legal battle over abortion since the Supreme Court last summer overturned Roe v. Wade, the landmark 1973 decision that guaranteed abortion as a constitutional right nationwide.

Mifepristone, used in combination with another drug called misoprostol, is the most common method to terminate a pregnancy in the U.S., accounting for about half of all abortions.

President Joe Biden said the Supreme Court’s decision keeps mifepristone available to women and FDA approved to terminate early pregnancies. Biden said his administration will continue to protect access to mifepristone in the ongoing legal battle in the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals.

“I continue to stand by FDA’s evidence-based approval of mifepristone, and my Administration will continue to defend FDA’s independent, expert authority to review, approve, and regulate a wide range of prescription drugs,” Biden said.

https://www.cnbc.com/2023/04/21/supreme-court-says-abortion-pill-mifepristone-will-remain-broadly-available-during-legal-battle.html

[~Rocktar~]

Russia, Russia, Russia!


Bombshell: Ex-CIA Chief Confessed He Got 50 Colleagues To Co-sign False Hunter Biden Laptop Letter In Bed To ‘Help Biden’

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/bombshell-ex-cia-chief-confessed-he-got-50-colleagues-to-co-sign-false-hunter-biden-laptop-letter-in-bed-to-help-biden/ar-AA1a9XdN?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=12d6aefe97a048f0d6eecb08e940be71&ei=23

Want to take odds on which Leftist shitbag claims this doesn't prove anything, it wasn't political and that these officials should still be believed?

[Parkbandit]

Russia, Russia, Russia!

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/bombshell-ex-cia-chief-confessed-he-got-50-colleagues-to-co-sign-false-hunter-biden-laptop-letter-in-bed-to-help-biden/ar-AA1a9XdN?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=12d6aefe97a048f0d6eecb08e940be71&ei=23

Want to take odds on which Leftist shitbag claims this doesn't prove anything, it wasn't political and that these officials should still be believed?

Seran.

I mean, come on.. he honestly still believes that Trump colluded with Russia and that January 6th was an armed insurrection.

[ClydeR]

Trump says he is being treated worse than Abraham Lincoln was.


For the second weekend in a row, Fox host Mark Levin continued showing videos of his conversation with Donald Trump. Among the things Trump thought the Fox audience needed to know is that he was treated worse than Abraham Lincoln, who was killed before leaving office.

Trump began by saying that former President Andrew Jackson was treated very badly after he broke previous treaties, stole land, and forced the march of Native Americans to "Indian Territory." That land was then taken from the Native tribes and became known as Oklahoma.

"Abraham Lincoln, they say, was, you know, he had a civil war going on," Trump educated Levin. "But Abraham Lincoln was just vilified. But now they say Trump got treated the worst of all."

He never explained who "they" were.

More... (https://www.alternet.org/trump-treated-worse-abraham-lincoln/)

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

I wonder what percent of heaven will be women after the ones who murdered their children aren't allowed in for the mortal sin.

[Seran]

I wonder what percent of heaven will be women after the ones who murdered their children aren't allowed in for the mortal sin.

If His clergy is permitted to victimize children and torture innocents over the last century in His name, I doubt the Lord has any issues with women refusing to have children.

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

If His clergy is permitted to victimize children and torture innocents over the last century in His name, I doubt the Lord has any issues with women refusing to have children.

Pretty sure that's not how it works.

[Shaps]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Tdwar3jahU

No wonder the insane "Left" hates Elon now...

Oh... and guess explains Seran's too...

[Parkbandit]

If His clergy is permitted to victimize children and torture innocents over the last century in His name, I doubt the Lord has any issues with women refusing to have children.

They aren't refusing to have children, they are literally killing the ones that God gave them. That's a slap in the face to Our Lord and Savior.

His clergy who victimized children aren't permitted into the Pearly Gates either.

Neither are the leftists who try to normalize pedophelia, Seran.

Repent.

[Seran]

They aren't refusing to have children, they are literally killing the ones that God gave them. That's a slap in the face to Our Lord and Savior.

His clergy who victimized children aren't permitted into the Pearly Gates either.

Neither are the leftists who try to normalize pedophelia, Seran.

Repent.

I think that you're under the impression that people are somehow intimidated by the fact you're so eager to slander them with bold face lies on the basis this is an unmoderated forum, but no one is.

[Parkbandit]

I think that you're under the impression that people are somehow intimidated by the fact you're so eager to slander them with bold face lies on the basis this is an unmoderated forum, but no one is.

Which was the bold face lie? That a woman who gets an abortion is literally killing their child?

That's a statement of fact.

SPOILER: I'm pro abortion and an atheist... but I'm not retarded.

[Methais]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Tdwar3jahU

No wonder the insane "Left" hates Elon now...

Oh... and guess explains Seran's too...

Seran is going to be very upset by this.

[Shaps]

https://www.yahoo.com/sports/transgender-cyclist-austin-killips-wins-144900217.html

"Transgender cyclist Austin Killips wins women's Tour of the Gila"

"It marked the most significant result yet for Killips, a trans-identifying biological male from Chicago, who also won a medal in women's cyclocross at the US National Championships and who is now tipped to challenge for a place at the Tour de France Femmes and at next summer's Paris Olympics."

"Killips, who only took up cycling in 2019 before starting on hormone replacement therapy...."

ROFL... so a dude, who's only been cycling 4 years... is beating all the women who have been bike racing their whole lives... HAHAHAHHAA...

Sorry ladies.. the insane lefties don't think you're worth shit.. just proving that yes, men are better than women.. ROFL... how's it feel?

God people are fucking insane.

[Seran]

Is this political or is this just you venting about your bigotry?

[Methais]

Is this political or is this just you venting about your bigotry?

Explain why "trans women" should be allowed to compete vs. real women in sports.


Here's what your actual response will be:

https://media1.giphy.com/media/uLy4Bo680hZxm/giphy.gif



I'm like 87% sure at this point that Seran is also trans. Best case he's just a non-trans incel who hates women because none of them will give him the time of day.

[Suppressed Poet]

I think that you're under the impression that people are somehow intimidated by the fact you're so eager to slander them with bold face lies on the basis this is an unmoderated forum, but no one is.

Libel is the word your are looking for. Pro tip…slander is oral while libel is written. It’s also not libel if it’s true.

Do you need a forum moderator to protect you from all the meanies on the PC hurting your feelings?

[Methais]

Libel is the word your are looking for. Pro tip…slander is oral while libel is written. It’s also not libel if it’s true.

Do you need a forum moderator to protect you from all the meanies on the PC hurting your feelings?

99% chance he doesn't know what anything you just said means.

[Shaps]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ghVKrAShrlg

This is a pretty hilarious monologue... LOL.

[Shaps]

https://youtu.be/hnW3BLXcJyc

This has to be an act right? ROFL... hilarious.

[Shaps]

https://www.yahoo.com/news/chilly-willy-photo-phallic-iceberg-171928906.html

"Chilly willy: photo of phallic iceberg off Canadian coast prompts merriment"

"It was a calm spring day when Canadian photographer Ken Pretty spotted an interestingly shaped 30ft iceberg off Newfoundland’s east coast. As he flew his drone overhead, Pretty, who hails from the town of Dildo, realized the hulk of ice bore a distinct resemblance to a characteristic part of the male human anatomy."

Ha..haha...hahahahahahahahahahhahaha...

This is the best news article I've seen in forever... can't make this shit up!

A dick and balls iceberg... and the photo taken by a guy from Dildo, Canada... HAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAA... fucking amazing...

[Methais]

https://www.yahoo.com/news/chilly-willy-photo-phallic-iceberg-171928906.html

"Chilly willy: photo of phallic iceberg off Canadian coast prompts merriment"

"It was a calm spring day when Canadian photographer Ken Pretty spotted an interestingly shaped 30ft iceberg off Newfoundland’s east coast. As he flew his drone overhead, Pretty, who hails from the town of Dildo, realized the hulk of ice bore a distinct resemblance to a characteristic part of the male human anatomy."

Ha..haha...hahahahahahahahahahhahaha...

This is the best news article I've seen in forever... can't make this shit up!

A dick and balls iceberg... and the photo taken by a guy from Dildo, Canada... HAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAA... fucking amazing...

Finally, something Seran can use to help soothe his butthurt.

[Shaps]

https://youtu.be/UaPpbqIBjTM

ROFL... haven't seen a self-own this bad in awhile. Damn that dude be stupid. LOL.

[Parkbandit]

ROFL... haven't seen a self-own this bad in awhile. Damn that dude be stupid. LOL.

Most liberal "policies" can be destroyed using common sense.

[Shaps]

https://www.yahoo.com/news/vomit-jaws-star-richard-dreyfuss-160417954.html

"‘They Make Me Vomit’: Jaws Star Richard Dreyfuss Blasts New Oscars Diversity Rules"

"New policies enacted by the Oscars in 2024 will see film award eligibility dependent upon meeting two of four stipulated diversity benchmarks. One, for instance, mandates a third of a movie cast must be comprised of “an underrepresented group.”

Inch by inch.

Been happening awhile now... the cancelling movement, etc.... but once you have full control of the media and it's jesters... what do you think happens?

I'll reference you to all of history...

Land of the Free.... except what you can say....

They've done a great job tying the strings to people, all under the auspice of compassion.... and they're getting ready to pull on them.

We had a good 100 year run of it though.

What's really hilarious, it used to be the Evangelical Right that pushed for this shit... and I hated them.

Now it's the fucking Leftists (they are not Liberals - taking it back)... and now I hate them.

Got to love the irony of that don't you?

[Shaps]

https://www.yahoo.com/news/majority-americans-oppose-gender-affirming-132053232.html

"Majority of Americans oppose gender-affirming care for minors, trans women participating in sports: poll"

Now this is not really about the article (it's scary enough there are roughly 35% of the population that somehow thinks it's okay to castrate kids - according to this report), per se... but something mentioned in the article which is hilarious... and if you don't think it's on purpose... well then.. LOL...

"Bans or restrictions on minors accessing gender-affirming care have been implemented in 18 states, according to the Movement Advancement Project (MAP), which tracks state legislation affecting the LGBTQ community."

See it? HAHAHAHAHA....

What else does MAP stand for? What are they trying to normalize in society now? Why are they trying to change legislation and legal terms to MAP? Do you really think it's a coincidence?

Look it up yourself, the prevalence and attempt to change the terms in the past 2-3 years.... then go to the Movement Advancement Project and look at their mission statement... "MAP believes that to transform America, we need to change hearts and minds."

There are a lot of words to use... "transform" has a very specific connotation though...

[Elanthil]

SHAFT for president!

[Parkbandit]

California panel approves reparations proposal of up to $1.2 million EACH for black residents... but activists demand more than $200 million at heated public meeting

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12055465/California-panel-approves-reparations-proposal-life-long-black-residents-1-2million.html

[Shaps]

https://youtu.be/fVruk_DzGmU

Love this guys vids. He befriended a coyote and raccoon out in the country. They live wild, but hang around... and the coyote LOVES beer... LOL... it's hilarious.

[Seran]

So much criminality in the Republican party!


Exclusive: Rep. George Santos charged by Justice Department in federal probe

Federal prosecutors have filed criminal charges against New York Rep. George Santos, the Republican lawmaker whose astonishing pattern of lies and fabrications stunned even hardened politicos, according to three sources familiar with the matter.

Santos is expected to appear as soon as Wednesday at federal court in New York’s eastern district, where the charges have been filed under seal.

The exact nature of the charges couldn’t immediately be learned but the FBI and the Justice Department public integrity prosecutors in New York and Washington have been examining allegations of false statements in Santos’ campaign finance filings and other claims.

During his brief time in office, Santos has been accused of breaking campaign finance laws, violating federal conflict of interest laws, stealing cash meant for an Iraq War veteran’s dying dog, masterminding a credit card fraud scheme and lying about where he went to school and worked.

https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/09/politics/george-santos-charged-justice-department/index.html

[Suppressed Poet]

So much criminality in the Republican party!

Being overtly racist isn’t enough for you today, is it? We’ll just tack on antisemitic to your growing list of negative qualities. :lol:

[beldannon5]

So much criminality in the Republican party!

LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

So much criminality in the Republican party!

Not sure about your blanket statement, but thank fucking god, the dude is a complete douche and needs to get driven out of congress.

[Solkern]

AP sources: US Rep. George Santos facing federal charges

https://us.yahoo.com/news/ap-sources-us-rep-george-222416066.html

Lol, looks like all his lies have caught up to him.

[Seran]

AP sources: US Rep. George Santos facing federal charges

https://us.yahoo.com/news/ap-sources-us-rep-george-222416066.html

Lol, looks like all his lies have caught up to him.

Just can't believe how tightly the Republican leadership stood behind him, even giving him committee assignments for a time despite knowing well enough he was a conman and fraud.

[Parkbandit]

Just can't believe how tightly the Republican leadership stood behind him, even giving him committee assignments for a time despite knowing well enough he was a conman and fraud.

Wait... a politician who is a con man and a fraud should not be allowed committee assignments?

We would have exactly zero committees if that is the threshold.

[Seran]

Wait... a politician who is a con man and a fraud should not be allowed committee assignments?

We would have exactly zero committees if that is the threshold.

So you've moved on to George Santos is okay because everyone else does it too? Funny, last I checked it was Republican members of the house from San Diego, North Carolina, and now New York in the last few years that have all been investigated and usually indicted on campaign finance violations.

[Parkbandit]

So you've moved on to George Santos is okay because everyone else does it too? Funny, last I checked it was Republican members of the house from San Diego, North Carolina, and now New York in the last few years that have all been investigated and usually indicted on campaign finance violations.

I didn't say a thing about George Santos there.

I just believe your threshold that politicians can't be liars is unrealistic.

They are all liars... it's a prerequisite for the job.

[Seizer]

I didn't say a thing about George Santos there.

I just believe your threshold that politicians can't be liars is unrealistic.

They are all liars... it's a prerequisite for the job.
Stupid is forever.
“Youth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever.” Aristophanes

[Suppressed Poet]

So you've moved on to George Santos is okay because everyone else does it too? Funny, last I checked it was Republican members of the house from San Diego, North Carolina, and now New York in the last few years that have all been investigated and usually indicted on campaign finance violations.

Why do you have hate in your heart for the Jew-ish people?

[Seran]

I didn't say a thing about George Santos there.

I just believe your threshold that politicians can't be liars is unrealistic.

They are all liars... it's a prerequisite for the job.

In a rebuttal to a post criticizing George Santos being given committee assignments despite knowing he was a fraud and conman, which you addressed in he post, you're somehow not talking about George Santos? LOL.

[Parkbandit]

In a rebuttal to a post criticizing George Santos being given committee assignments despite knowing he was a fraud and conman, which you addressed in he post, you're somehow not talking about George Santos? LOL.

I'll try to keep this down to 2-3 syllable words so you won't be so confused:

You said people in Congress should not be good for being on meetings if they are liars.

I said every people in Congress is a liar so there would be no meetings.

Does that help?

[Seran]

I'll try to keep this down to 2-3 syllable words so you won't be so confused:

You said people in Congress should not be good for being on meetings if they are liars.

I said every people in Congress is a liar so there would be no meetings.

Does that help?

'Every people is a liar' is a bit hard to parse, but I think you're trying to assert an opinion that everyone in Congress is a liar? That is an interesting opinion, though highly subjective. Interesting how you continue to try and defend Republican choices to protect conmen and frauds with a strawman argument though.

[Solkern]

CENTRAL ISLIP, N.Y. (AP) — U.S. Rep. George Santos, the New York Republican infamous for fabricating key parts of his life story, has been indicted on charges that he embezzled money from his campaign, lied to Congress about his income and cheated his way into undeserved unemployment benefits, prosecutors said Wednesday.

The indictment says Santos induced supporters to donate to a company under the false pretense that the money would be used to support his campaign. Instead, it says, he used it for personal expenses, including to buy designer clothes and to pay his credit cards and car payments.

Santos also is accused of lying about his finances on congressional disclosure forms and applying for and receiving unemployment benefits while he was employed as regional director of an investment firm that the government shut down in 2021 over allegations that it was a Ponzi scheme.

Santos surrendered Wednesday and was taken to a federal courthouse on Long Island, where he was expected to make an initial court appearance later in the day on charges of wire fraud, money laundering, theft of public funds and making false statements to Congress.


DAMN.

[Parkbandit]

'Every people is a liar' is a bit hard to parse, but I think you're trying to assert an opinion that everyone in Congress is a liar? That is an interesting opinion, though highly subjective. Interesting how you continue to try and defend Republican choices to protect conmen and frauds with a strawman argument though.

Name a single member of Congress that isn't a liar.

Just one.

I know you can't come up with a single one.. so I'll just leave it at that.

The only strawman here is you.. and by strawman I really mean strawtard.. as I didn't defend any Republican at all.

[Seran]

Name a single member of Congress that isn't a liar.

Just one.

I know you can't come up with a single one.. so I'll just leave it at that.

The only strawman here is you.. and by strawman I really mean strawtard.. as I didn't defend any Republican at all.

You're wanting me to find evidence to refute a claim that you yourself haven't supported or substantiated, all to draw attention from your party's epic levels of corruption and criminal indictments? No. How about you back yourself up first.

Meanwhile, Trump, Santos, Cawthorn, Hunter are all MAGA Republicans indicted or sentenced for criminal acts in the last few years.

[Parkbandit]

You're wanting me to find evidence to refute a claim that you yourself haven't supported or substantiated, all to draw attention from your party's epic levels of corruption and criminal indictments? No. How about you back yourself up first.

How are you this.fucking.stupid.every.single.day?

It's like you have to literally psych yourself up every morning to post something dumber than you posted the day before.

I don't know how you manage it.

[Methais]

Not sure about your blanket statement, but thank fucking god, the dude is a complete douche and needs to get driven out of congress.

If Santos were a democrat, Seran would be telling us about how stunning and brave he is with all this oppression he's facing.

I wonder if Santos is gonna set a new record for shortest lived member of Congress when he gets kicked out. I just hope he gets replaced by another republican so I can watch Seran cry about it.

[Methais]

'Every people is a liar' is a bit hard to parse, but I think you're trying to assert an opinion that everyone in Congress is a liar? That is an interesting opinion, though highly subjective. Interesting how you continue to try and defend Republican choices to protect conmen and frauds with a strawman argument though.

Name at least 3 people in Congress from either party who aren't liars.

Or even just name 1.

And before you cry about it with some made up argument that I never made, Santos sucks and deserves to go.

[Solkern]

Name at least 3 people in Congress from either party who aren't liars.

Or even just name 1.

And before you cry about it with some made up argument that I never made, Santos sucks and deserves to go.

I do like the overconfidence that he projects, I’m innocent, and still running for reelection! I wish he said it while handcuffed.

[Solkern]

https://www.yahoo.com/news/russia-floating-plan-build-village-071609704.html

Russia is floating a plan to build a village for conservative Americans who want to move to a 'Christian country' and are tired of liberal ideology in the US


Around 200 families have expressed interest in the project, Beslangurov said in a speech at a legal forum in St. Petersburg, the state outlet reported.

Many of these families don't have Russian roots but are tired of "the inculcation of radical values" in the US and Canada, Beslangurov said.

"Today, they have 70 genders, it is not known what will happen next," he added, per RIA Novosti. The same rhetoric has been used frequently by Russian Vladimir Putin as US-Russia relations worsened over the last several years. In December 2021, he compared gender nonconformity to the COVID-19 pandemic.


Which one of you are one of the 200 families?!

[Elanthil]

1. Make it so nobody with business before congress or the senate or a court justice (all courts) can donate to them for one full year from the date their business is scheduled, and one year after their business is resolved.
2. Outlaw lobbying. Period.
3. Limit terms for ALL politicians.
4. Crucify Hillary.

[Parkbandit]

1. Make it so nobody with business before congress or the senate or a court justice (all courts) can donate to them for one full year from the date their business is scheduled, and one year after their business is resolved.
2. Outlaw lobbying. Period.
3. Limit terms for ALL politicians.
4. Crucify Hillary.

1) Like the idea, but I'm sure it would be found unconstitutional. People have the right to give their money to whomever they want.
2) Same as above.
3) 100% x 1000000000 but it'll never happen because 99% of politicians are about control, power and money and they won't kill the golden goose.
4) For what? Just because you don't like her?

[Seran]

https://www.yahoo.com/news/russia-floating-plan-build-village-071609704.html

Russia is floating a plan to build a village for conservative Americans who want to move to a 'Christian country' and are tired of liberal ideology in the US


Around 200 families have expressed interest in the project, Beslangurov said in a speech at a legal forum in St. Petersburg, the state outlet reported.

Many of these families don't have Russian roots but are tired of "the inculcation of radical values" in the US and Canada, Beslangurov said.

"Today, they have 70 genders, it is not known what will happen next," he added, per RIA Novosti. The same rhetoric has been used frequently by Russian Vladimir Putin as US-Russia relations worsened over the last several years. In December 2021, he compared gender nonconformity to the COVID-19 pandemic.


Which one of you are one of the 200 families?!

That'd be great, those snowflakes can go live in Russia. Good riddance.

[Parkbandit]

That'd be great, those snowflakes can go live in Russia. Good riddance.

I agree.

Don't like the country you live in? Then gtfo. No one is forcing you to stay here.

[Methais]

I agree.

Don't like the country you live in? Then gtfo. No one is forcing you to stay here.

100% chance that your post will be completely lost on him.

[Parkbandit]

100% chance that your post will be completely lost on him.

And that's the entertaining part for me. :P

[Solkern]

https://i.imgur.com/i7PHkQO.jpg

A used 2022 bmw X6… cost $250,000 USD in Russia right now… just holy shit.

[Elanthil]

No, because shes a lying, murderous cunt.

[Gelston]

No, because shes a lying, murderous cunt.

Wut

[Methais]

No, because shes a lying, murderous cunt.

Who?

[Parkbandit]

Who?

He sounds like he is describing Hillary, but it's Elanthil, so who really knows.

Could just be his tourettes flaring up again.

[Methais]

He sounds like he is describing Hillary, but it's Elanthil, so who really knows.

Could just be his tourettes flaring up again.


https://youtu.be/C-M8mfBAaBs

[~Rocktar~]

https://scontent-atl3-2.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t45.1600-4/321287881_23853556763880654_1127253087878961878_n. jpg?stp=cp0_dst-jpg_p526x296_q75_spS444&_nc_cat=105&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=e84a38&_nc_ohc=dOFku0_2qDEAX_8TMDm&_nc_ht=scontent-atl3-2.xx&oh=00_AfD6LuNaryjXVhMmDY1N5xb2NcyPlQkH2jKmFLuaKkAb 6w&oe=6466F04F

[Shaps]

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2023/may/16/joe-biden-issues-third-veto-against-bipartisan-eff/

"Biden issues third veto against bipartisan effort to restore Chinese solar panel tariffs"

Get what you pay for... and China paid a lot for Biden...

So blatant, but here we are... the US President lobbying for the CCP over his own constituents.

[Seran]

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2023/may/16/joe-biden-issues-third-veto-against-bipartisan-eff/

"Biden issues third veto against bipartisan effort to restore Chinese solar panel tariffs"

Get what you pay for... and China paid a lot for Biden...

So blatant, but here we are... the US President lobbying for the CCP over his own constituents.

His constituents want affordable, reliable solar panels to produce cheap, abundant clean energy. Placing a tariff on solar panels only drastically raises prices and limits the market. Nice try though.

[Shaps]

His constituents want affordable, reliable solar panels to produce cheap, abundant clean energy. Placing a tariff on solar panels only drastically raises prices and limits the market. Nice try though.

So you, and Biden, support slave labor. Not surprising considering the Democrats history of it.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-57124636

"China uses Uyghur forced labour to make solar panels, says report"

https://www.businessinsider.com/forced-uyghur-labor-china-solar-panel-supply-chain-research-report-2022-11

"Forced Uyghur labor is being used in China's solar panel supply chain, researchers say"

So not only do you support pedophilia, but also openly support slavery. Great job you fucking jackass.

[Solkern]

So you, and Biden, support slave labor. Not surprising considering the Democrats history of it.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-57124636

"China uses Uyghur forced labour to make solar panels, says report"

https://www.businessinsider.com/forced-uyghur-labor-china-solar-panel-supply-chain-research-report-2022-11

"Forced Uyghur labor is being used in China's solar panel supply chain, researchers say"

So not only do you support pedophilia, but also openly support slavery. Great job you fucking jackass.

China as a country is slave labor, I could say, if you bought anything made in China, you support slave labor.

[Methais]

His constituents want affordable, reliable solar panels to produce cheap, abundant clean energy. Placing a tariff on solar panels only drastically raises prices and limits the market. Nice try though.

Is that from KJP's notes? Because every time you respond you sound just like her and are just as full of shit.

[Shaps]

China as a country is slave labor, I could say, if you bought anything made in China, you support slave labor.

If you think slave labor is the only receipts I have regarding the issue... you should know better by now. Biden did what he did, because he was paid off... not out of some altruistic sentiment to save the planet.

Report from the IEA: https://www.iea.org/reports/solar-pv-global-supply-chains/executive-summary

And if you don't know what the IEA is: https://www.energy.gov/ia/international-energy-agency-iea

"Costs in China are 10% lower than in India, 20% lower than in the United States, and 35% lower than in Europe. Large variations in energy, labour, investment and overhead costs explain these differences. Still, in the absence of financial incentives and manufacturing support, the bankability of manufacturing projects outside of panel assembly remains limited outside of China and few countries in Southeast Asia."

So to save 20% on production costs..... Biden supports:

"Domestic manufacturing can reduce manufacturing CO2 emissions if the local electricity mix is less carbon-intensive than in the exporting country." ----- Increasing CO2 emissions

"The production of many key minerals used in PV is highly concentrated, with China playing a dominant role... This rapid growth, combined with long lead times for mining projects, increases the risk of supply and demand mismatches, which can lead to cost increases and supply shortages." ----- Falling behind in control of key mineral production to China

"The world will almost completely rely on China for the supply of key building blocks for solar panel production through 2025. Based on manufacturing capacity under construction, China’s share of global polysilicon, ingot and wafer production will soon reach almost 95%." ---- Close to 100% reliance on China

"Governments therefore need to turn their attention to ensuring the security of solar PV supplies as an integral part of clean energy transitions. Countries should consider assessing their domestic solar PV supply chain vulnerabilities and risks – and developing strategies and actions to address them." ---- Harming our own National Security

Now... you can read the rest of the International Energy Agency's report for yourself... but what Biden did is nothing good for the United States, and only benefits China.

[Shaps]

https://youtu.be/ergAxY5lHn4

ROFL... need more comedy like this, bringing us all together... not the bullshit separating us.

Reminds me of the old Chappelle skits... especially the one where he's the milkman... LOL.

[Seran]

If you think slave labor is the only receipts I have regarding the issue... you should know better by now. Biden did what he did, because he was paid off... not out of some altruistic sentiment to save the planet.

Report from the IEA: https://www.iea.org/reports/solar-pv-global-supply-chains/executive-summary

And if you don't know what the IEA is: https://www.energy.gov/ia/international-energy-agency-iea

"Costs in China are 10% lower than in India, 20% lower than in the United States, and 35% lower than in Europe. Large variations in energy, labour, investment and overhead costs explain these differences. Still, in the absence of financial incentives and manufacturing support, the bankability of manufacturing projects outside of panel assembly remains limited outside of China and few countries in Southeast Asia."

So to save 20% on production costs..... Biden supports:

"Domestic manufacturing can reduce manufacturing CO2 emissions if the local electricity mix is less carbon-intensive than in the exporting country." ----- Increasing CO2 emissions

"The production of many key minerals used in PV is highly concentrated, with China playing a dominant role... This rapid growth, combined with long lead times for mining projects, increases the risk of supply and demand mismatches, which can lead to cost increases and supply shortages." ----- Falling behind in control of key mineral production to China

"The world will almost completely rely on China for the supply of key building blocks for solar panel production through 2025. Based on manufacturing capacity under construction, China’s share of global polysilicon, ingot and wafer production will soon reach almost 95%." ---- Close to 100% reliance on China

"Governments therefore need to turn their attention to ensuring the security of solar PV supplies as an integral part of clean energy transitions. Countries should consider assessing their domestic solar PV supply chain vulnerabilities and risks – and developing strategies and actions to address them." ---- Harming our own National Security

Now... you can read the rest of the International Energy Agency's report for yourself... but what Biden did is nothing good for the United States, and only benefits China.

How to take legitimate information and to add false narratives and outright lies to support an argument, by Shaps

[Methais]

I regularly take legitimate information and add false narratives and outright lies to support the argument my TV tells me to.

This is correct.

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

How to take legitimate information and to add false narratives and outright lies to support an argument, by Shaps

How to ignore legitimate information and an interpretation of it and then provide literally nothing refuting it as trolling, by Seran.

[~Rocktar~]

How to ignore legitimate information and an interpretation of it and then provide literally nothing refuting it as trolling, by Seran.

I know you were hoping beyond hope that Seran would stop being a complete and utter retard loser but you have to give him this, he is at least consistent.

[Shaps]

https://youtu.be/DeRjxd4oY08

LOL...

When you really think about it... Trump was synonymous with America... loved by the masses, celebrities, the media... known the world over... and all it took was one letter in the alphabet in front of his name...

R

Love or hate him... dude has some balls to put himself through the hellfire that he has endured over the past 8 years.

[Shaps]

https://youtu.be/J_6nAXBVp8w

You mean it's not up to the people??

What you mean... select the candidate you want to run for office??

What are you... stupid?

Totalitarianism in full view.

[Parkbandit]

https://youtu.be/J_6nAXBVp8w

You mean it's not up to the people??

What you mean... select the candidate you want to run for office??

What are you... stupid?

Totalitarianism in full view.

To be fair, do you believe the Republicans would have an open primary if the sitting Republican President declared they were running for President for a 2nd term?

They wouldn't.

[Methais]

To be fair, do you believe the Republicans would have an open primary if the sitting Republican President declared they were running for President for a 2nd term?

They wouldn't.

To be fair to those being fair, the difference this time around is that we've never had this bad of a train wreck like Biden in office before. The other train wreck presidents at least knew that they were president, knew where they were, knew the difference between dead and living people, etc.

Probably.

[Parkbandit]

To be fair to those being fair, the difference this time around is that we've never had this bad of a train wreck like Biden in office before. The other train wreck presidents at least knew that they were president, knew where they were, knew the difference between dead and living people, etc.

Probably.

True, but prior to Biden, Jimmy Carter was probably considered the worst President in the modern era and he didn't have to debate Ted Kennedy.

[Methais]

True, but prior to Biden, Jimmy Carter was probably considered the worst President in the modern era and he didn't have to debate Ted Kennedy.

That just shows even more that Biden is really just that bad, even to other democrats who aren't Seran. At least until his TV tells him to stop liking Biden anyway, in which case Seran will argue that he never supported Biden.

[Shaps]

To be fair, do you believe the Republicans would have an open primary if the sitting Republican President declared they were running for President for a 2nd term?

They wouldn't.

As far as I understand, I'd have to follow up the research... but both the R and D National Committees are required to hold debates if poll support for a candidate surpasses a certain threshold.

So a candidate meeting that threshold can demand the debate, or acquiesce, to the incumbent.

For example: https://www.politico.com/story/2019/09/23/dnc-debate-1508516

"Candidates will need to clear 3 percent in four DNC-approved polls, up from the 2 percent required to qualify for the September and October debates."

This time the DNC is just deciding, nope! not going to do it at all... even though there are 2 other Democrat Presidential candidates polling over 5%.

So fuck the voters. Fuck their own regulations. Fuck the process. You will only vote for who they want you to vote for.

[Shaps]

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/09/06/republicans-cancel-primaries-trump-challengers-1483126

"Republicans to scrap primaries and caucuses as Trump challengers cry foul"

Found this on the R side also... which I disagree with. I can't find any %'s for competition from the 2020 primary though (perhaps someone else can dig them up)... so no idea if contenders were polling high enough.

It's shitty either way... but more so when such a large % are for other candidates, and their National Committees ignore them. Shameful on both sides IMO.

[Shaps]

https://youtu.be/ntNRdUSyjwk

When ol'Chucky used to like Trump. LOL

[Parkbandit]

As far as I understand, I'd have to follow up the research... but both the R and D National Committees are required to hold debates if poll support for a candidate surpasses a certain threshold.

So a candidate meeting that threshold can demand the debate, or acquiesce, to the incumbent.

For example: https://www.politico.com/story/2019/09/23/dnc-debate-1508516

"Candidates will need to clear 3 percent in four DNC-approved polls, up from the 2 percent required to qualify for the September and October debates."

This time the DNC is just deciding, nope! not going to do it at all... even though there are 2 other Democrat Presidential candidates polling over 5%.

So fuck the voters. Fuck their own regulations. Fuck the process. You will only vote for who they want you to vote for.

No.

In 2020, there was no sitting Democrat President.. so they established polling percentages as a way to narrow down the field so we didn't have 50 people running for President on the stage.

[Methais]

https://i.imgur.com/6aVMJCE.png

[Shaps]

https://i.imgur.com/6aVMJCE.png

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA... so fucking clueless.

[Methais]

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA... so fucking clueless.

You can literally see the mental illness oozing out of their faces.

[Parkbandit]

You can literally see the mental illness oozing out of their faces.

That has to be a meme.. no?

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

https://i.imgur.com/6aVMJCE.png

Is the dude throwing up gang signs?

[Bhaalizmo]

Is the dude throwing up gang signs?

I thought he was moob mashin, or doing a corpse pose, I s'pose.

[Parkbandit]

Is the dude throwing up gang signs?

It's the "WAKANDA FOREVER" salute.

DUH.

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/66/df/50/66df50495644091b59e5b1f6f4f08c99.gif

[Shaps]

https://youtu.be/G2leAHi7UNk

ROFL... love it.

[Suppressed Poet]

It's the "WAKANDA FOREVER" salute.

DUH.

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/66/df/50/66df50495644091b59e5b1f6f4f08c99.gif

Clearly it’s a poor imitation & cultural appropriation. Just look how that white kid is all limp wristing the salute with an open hand!

The ghost of Chadwick Boseman is going to pay a visit to this cracker one night and bust a cap in his ass.

[Seran]

Good on Zelensky for calling out the Cheeto and his ridiculous boast.


https://youtube.com/shorts/TDp7085Ui60?feature=share4

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

Good on Zelensky for calling out the Cheeto and his ridiculous boast.


https://youtube.com/shorts/TDp7085Ui60?feature=share4

So... exactly, what did either of them say?

[Methais]

So... exactly, what did either of them say?

"There was no Russian invasion when Trump was in office, but it's still his fault for not solving it." -Zelensky, paraphrased

I don't think Trump could solve shit in 24 hours, but there's a 100% chance that Biden will drag this on for as long as he's in office no matter what.

[Parkbandit]

"There was no Russian invasion when Trump was in office, but it's still his fault for not solving it." -Zelensky, paraphrased

I don't think Trump could solve shit in 24 hours, but there's a 100% chance that Biden will drag this on for as long as he's in office no matter what.

It wouldn't be solved in 24 hours, but he would start applying pressure right after he won election.. and the 2 1/2 months when he took office, he would have the plan in place to get them to the negotiating table with some sort of cease fire from both sides.

[Suppressed Poet]

Trump on social media regarding DeSantis declaring his candidacy. Ok Trump…that one was pretty funny. :rofl:

https://twitter.com/eudaimoniaesq/status/1661543467401502721?s=42&t=l6G-S1S4ix_cMZScYufUYw

[Gelston]

If Trump gets the Republican nomination I'm just going to vote libertarian again.

[Seran]

It wouldn't be solved in 24 hours, but he would start applying pressure right after he won election.. and the 2 1/2 months when he took office, he would have the plan in place to get them to the negotiating table with some sort of cease fire from both sides.

Considering he did nothing to get Russia to back off their border buildup on Ukraine and actually encouraged it by trying to extort campaign benefiting statements from Ukraine about Hillary? Said Crimea belonged to Russia? Nah he made the problem what it is.

[Gelston]

Considering he did nothing to get Russia to back off their border buildup on Ukraine and actually encouraged it by trying to extort campaign benefiting statements from Ukraine about Hillary? Said Crimea belonged to Russia? Nah he made the problem what it is.

What President was in office when Russia took over Crimea? Not Trump.

What President was in office when Russia invaded Ukraine? Not Trump.

You can't blame him for everything.

[Seran]

What President was in office when Russia took over Crimea? Not Trump.

What President was in office when Russia invaded Ukraine? Not Trump.

You can't blame him for everything.

What President did nothing but encourage the situation to become worse? Trump.

[Gelston]

What President did nothing but encourage the situation to become worse? Trump.

Seran - but Trump!

Yeah, still wasn't the guy on watch when it happened.

[Seran]

Seran - but Trump!

Yeah, still wasn't the guy on watch when it happened.

Oh, he wasn't the one who tried blackmailing Zelensky in the infamous quid pro quo call? He didn't make a joint press appearance with Putin supporting Russia's claim to Crimea? Oh wait no, those were still Trump.

[Gelston]

Oh, he wasn't the one who tried blackmailing Zelensky in the infamous quid pro quo call? He didn't make a joint press appearance with Putin supporting Russia's claim to Crimea? Oh wait no, those were still Trump.

Still more "But Trump!!!"

It wasn't his administration that did next to nothing when Russia took Crimea. It wasn't his administration when Russia invaded Ukraine (again). Those is plain facts.

[Methais]

What President did nothing but encourage the situation to become worse? Trump.

Why aren't you answering Gelston's questions though?

Everyone already knows why you constantly dodge shit like this, but that's beside the point.

[Methais]

Oh, he wasn't the one who tried blackmailing Zelensky in the infamous quid pro quo call? He didn't make a joint press appearance with Putin supporting Russia's claim to Crimea? Oh wait no, those were still Trump.

Maximum NPC status achieved.

Jesus Christ dude how can you be this fucking stupid all the time? Does it ever hurt?

[Methais]

Trump on social media regarding DeSantis declaring his candidacy. Ok Trump…that one was pretty funny. :rofl:

https://twitter.com/eudaimoniaesq/status/1661543467401502721?s=42&t=l6G-S1S4ix_cMZScYufUYw

That's pretty fucking great. :lol:


Fun fact: Seran legit believes that Hitler was in that Twitterspace.

[Methais]

It wouldn't be solved in 24 hours, but he would start applying pressure right after he won election.. and the 2 1/2 months when he took office, he would have the plan in place to get them to the negotiating table with some sort of cease fire from both sides.

And then Seran will unironically be like, "TRUMP IS STEALING ALL THE CREDIT FROM BIDEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!" but only after MSNBC tells him to.

[Parkbandit]

What President did nothing but encourage the situation to become worse? Trump.

Actually, that would be Biden.

He literally said that if it was just an incursion, that would be ok..

[~Rocktar~]

Does it ever hurt?

Yes, mostly us.

[Shaps]

https://youtu.be/-wlh04GEduI

ROFL... guy talking about getting a uterus transplant... hahahahahahahaha...

God people are such fucking morons.

[Parkbandit]

https://youtu.be/-wlh04GEduI

ROFL... guy talking about getting a uterus transplant... hahahahahahahaha...

God people are such fucking morons.


And that mental illness is embraced by the left.

[Seran]

Only five our of thirty-three students qualified for graduation, wow. A year spent worrying about school shootings, their parents draining them for blood to keep them young, made up social issues perpetrated by their backwards Texas GOP platform, students evidently had no time to learn and study. I'd say have the Texas Attorneys General investigate, but he's too busy being impeached.


High school reschedules graduation ceremony due to only 5 seniors found eligible to graduate

MARLIN, Texas (KWTX/Gray News) - A high school in Texas has rescheduled its graduation ceremony after most of the senior class was found ineligible to graduate.

According to the Marlin Independent School District, the ceremony has been pushed to June to give nearly 30 seniors more time to meet graduation requirements.

According to an audit from the district, 28 of 33 seniors at Marlin High School did not meet the graduation requirements due to their attendance or grades.

“We hold firm to our belief that every student in Marlin ISD can and will achieve their potential,” said Superintendent Darryl Henson. “Students will be held to the same high standard as any other student in Texas.”

Alondra Alvarado is among the five that met the graduation requirements.

“They told us that because of the students that didn’t meet the requirements it wouldn’t be fair for only five students to walk the stage,” Alvarado said.

Salvador Guerrero is one of the 28 seniors who was told he was not eligible to graduate. He said he learned last week that he needs to complete the STAAR test for an online U.S. history course, but the test is not available until the summer.

“It’s a bag of emotions, anxiety, and a bit of disappointment,” he said.

The decision to reschedule the school’s graduation ceremony was made this week. School officials said they are also planning a mandatory meeting with seniors and their parents Wednesday night.

https://www.kolotv.com/2023/05/24/high-school-reschedules-graduation-ceremony-due-only-5-seniors-found-eligible-graduate/

[Methais]

https://youtu.be/-wlh04GEduI

ROFL... guy talking about getting a uterus transplant... hahahahahahahaha...

God people are such fucking morons.

Their kids if this ever happened:

https://i2-prod.dailystar.co.uk/incoming/article25238877.ece/ALTERNATES/s615b/0_maxresdefault.jpg

[Methais]

Only five our of thirty-three students qualified for graduation, wow. A year spent worrying about school shootings, their parents draining them for blood to keep them young, made up social issues perpetrated by their backwards Texas GOP platform, students evidently had no time to learn and study. I'd say have the Texas Attorneys General investigate, but he's too busy being impeached.



https://www.kolotv.com/2023/05/24/high-school-reschedules-graduation-ceremony-due-only-5-seniors-found-eligible-graduate/

23 Baltimore schools have zero students proficient in math, per state test results (https://foxbaltimore.com/news/project-baltimore/state-test-results-23-baltimore-schools-have-zero-students-proficient-in-math-jovani-patterson-maryland-comprehensive-assessment-program-maryland-governor-wes-moore)

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

Only five our of thirty-three students qualified for graduation, wow. A year spent worrying about school shootings, their parents draining them for blood to keep them young, made up social issues perpetrated by their backwards Texas GOP platform, students evidently had no time to learn and study. I'd say have the Texas Attorneys General investigate, but he's too busy being impeached.



https://www.kolotv.com/2023/05/24/high-school-reschedules-graduation-ceremony-due-only-5-seniors-found-eligible-graduate/

How much of the schools going to remote learning do you think contributed to that? You know, two weeks to flatten the curve.

[Seran]

How much of the schools going to remote learning do you think contributed to that? You know, two weeks to flatten the curve.

Considering students have been back in school for over a year and a lot of Texas counties never went remote at all? None. Great attempt at an excuse for shitty administration of schools in Texas.

[Parkbandit]

Only five our of thirty-three students qualified for graduation, wow. A year spent worrying about school shootings, their parents draining them for blood to keep them young, made up social issues perpetrated by their backwards Texas GOP platform, students evidently had no time to learn and study. I'd say have the Texas Attorneys General investigate, but he's too busy being impeached.

https://www.kolotv.com/2023/05/24/high-school-reschedules-graduation-ceremony-due-only-5-seniors-found-eligible-graduate/

You know what fixes shitty schools and corrupt teacher unions?

School choice.

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

Considering students have been back in school for over a year and a lot of Texas counties never went remote at all? None. Great attempt at an excuse for shitty administration of schools in Texas.

Oh, so you think missing in person education for extended periods of time has no lasting impact. Great attempt to sweep under the rug the policies your President forced on the American people, decimating a generation of children and their future opportunities.

[Parkbandit]

Considering students have been back in school for over a year and a lot of Texas counties never went remote at all? None. Great attempt at an excuse for shitty administration of schools in Texas.

Shitty schools are all over the country.. it's not a Texas issue, it's a country issue.

We just keep throwing good money at the problem... when the problem is a corrupt system by corrupt teacher unions and a Department of "Education" that doesn't give a shit about the actual education of students.

School choice.

[Methais]

Considering students have been back in school for over a year and a lot of Texas counties never went remote at all? None. Great attempt at an excuse for shitty administration of schools in Texas.

So weird how you don't have jack shit to say about Baltimore. Well not really, because your piece-of-shittery is extremely predictable.

But let's try again anyway.

Your thoughts on this?

23 Baltimore schools have zero students proficient in math, per state test results (https://foxbaltimore.com/news/project-baltimore/state-test-results-23-baltimore-schools-have-zero-students-proficient-in-math-jovani-patterson-maryland-comprehensive-assessment-program-maryland-governor-wes-moore)

[Suppressed Poet]

The State of Texas must be pissing in Seran’s Cheerios or something.

[Methais]

The State of Texas must be pissing in Seran’s Cheerios or something.

I doubt it, but only because that's Seran's fetish.

[drumpel]

Shitty schools are all over the country.. it's not a Texas issue, it's a country issue.

We just keep throwing good money at the problem... when the problem is a corrupt system by corrupt teacher unions and a Department of "Education" that doesn't give a shit about the actual education of students.

School choice.

I can agree with that. Had a superintendent in my school district that was arrested by the FBI for embezzling money. Folks can't seem to get enough money that isn't theirs to begin with.

[Seran]

You know what fixes shitty schools and corrupt teacher unions?

School choice.

That's a fine deflection, completely incorrect, but creative. Know why fixes student grades? Students being taught lessons and given ample study time in lieu of being forced to work as indentured servants for their parents. Students failing and pour performance is the symptom of shitty hiring practices and oversized classrooms due to lack of proper management by their school district and lack of supervision of their Texas board of education.

[Parkbandit]

That's a fine deflection, completely incorrect, but creative. Know why fixes student grades? Students being taught lessons and given ample study time in lieu of being forced to work as indentured servants for their parents. Students failing and pour performance is the symptom of shitty hiring practices and oversized classrooms due to lack of proper management by their school district and lack of supervision of their Texas board of education.

I do not "know why fixes students grades."

But can you show me where Texas is forcing students to work? Should be in the law text somewhere.. since you've stated it twice now.

Just show us all where the State of Texas forces 12-14 year olds to work.

Also, "Students failing and pour performance" was just the cherry on your retard sundae post.

Thank you for always entertaining me.. my little Retard Champion.

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

pour performance

Pour performance, is that pouring the whiskey and beers in the gulags they work in? What is a good pour? I'll ask my bartender next time I'm there, and if there is a scale A-F.

I'm sure recent school performance has nothing to do with being shuttered during covid like to contend.

[Seran]

I do not "know why fixes students grades."

But can you show me where Texas is forcing students to work? Should be in the law text somewhere.. since you've stated it twice now.

Just show us all where the State of Texas forces 12-14 year olds to work.

Also, "Students failing and pour performance" was just the cherry on your retard sundae post.

Thank you for always entertaining me.. my little Retard Champion.

The whole "by there parents" really escaped your reading comprehension there, didn't it buddy? Texas does enable it though, given the age of compilatory attendance for primary education in that state is one of the lowest in the nation at 14.

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

The whole "by there parents" really escaped your reading comprehension there, didn't it buddy? Texas does enable it though, given the age of compilatory attendance for primary education in that state is one of the lowest in the nation at 14.

Did you mean their? Moron. Government schooling failed you.

[Methais]

That's a fine deflection, completely incorrect, but creative. Know why fixes student grades? Students being taught lessons and given ample study time in lieu of being forced to work as indentured servants for their parents. Students failing and pour performance is the symptom of shitty hiring practices and oversized classrooms due to lack of proper management by their school district and lack of supervision of their Texas board of education.

Setting aside the part where everything in your post is literally made up, what's your excuse then? You've never worked but look how fucking stupid you are.



The whole "by there parents" really escaped your reading comprehension there, didn't it buddy?

You really are the gift that keeps on giving, holy shit :rofl: :rofl:

[Methais]

Pour performance, is that pouring the whiskey and beers in the gulags they work in? What is a good pour? I'll ask my bartender next time I'm there, and if there is a scale A-F.

I'm sure recent school performance has nothing to do with being shuttered during covid like to contend.

It's the pouring of all the beer and whiskey his mom drank while she was knocked up with him.

[Parkbandit]

The whole "by there parents" really escaped your reading comprehension there, didn't it buddy?

I've been working since I was 12-13 .. but it wasn't because my parents forced me to work, it was because I wanted money to buy things.

Not everyone is a lazy piece of shit like you. Some people would rather go out and earn their money.. rather than be a ward of the state on their mother's couch.

[Realk]

If it's a Texas school and it has only 33 or whatever seniors it's in the bum fuck of no where, everywhere in DFW all graduating class sizes are well over 600. Truancy and attendance were a thing when I graduated in high school in 03 I ended up paying like 500$ in fines and my dad paid 500$ in fines(i paid 1000$) in fines for skipping school. It had nothing to do with grades they just needed your ass in the chair for the money.

That being said when they had you grade your peers math or read the person next to you essay in a pass back or right fashion. There were a lot of idiots then too.

[Suppressed Poet]

If it's a Texas school and it has only 33 or whatever seniors it's in the bum fuck of no where, everywhere in DFW all graduating class sizes are well over 600. Truancy and attendance were a thing when I graduated in high school in 03 I ended up paying like 500$ in fines and my dad paid 500$ in fines(i paid 1000$) in fines for skipping school. It had nothing to do with grades they just needed your ass in the chair for the money.

That being said when they had you grade your peers math or read the person next to you essay in a pass back or right fashion. There were a lot of idiots then too.

2002 Bishop Lynch

[Neveragain]

The whole "by there parents" really escaped your reading comprehension there, didn't it buddy? Texas does enable it though, given the age of compilatory attendance for primary education in that state is one of the lowest in the nation at 14.

California leads the pack with the worst graduation rate in the nation.

Also

I fucking hated the labor laws when I was 14, I wanted my own damn money at that age and you couldn't work. Detasseling corn and spraying beans was the only option at 14. It was the first time I ever made $500 of my own cash and I was elated.

[Seran]

California leads the pack with the worst graduation rate in the nation.

Also

I fucking hated the labor laws when I was 14, I wanted my own damn money at that age and you couldn't work. Detasseling corn and spraying beans was the only option at 14. It was the first time I ever made $500 of my own cash and I was elated.

Lol, with that .5% below Texas, quite the achievement. The difference between want to work and forced to work? That is the problem, where kids are forced to support a household and loser parents.

[Parkbandit]

Lol, with that .5% below Texas, quite the achievement. The difference between want to work and forced to work? That is the problem, where kids are forced to support a household and loser parents.

You are blessed to have parents that still care for you and didn't force you to work. They probably knew you weren't ready for the real world and have sheltered you from it.

Of course, your parents are probably the biggest reason why you are now a ward of the state, still living on their couch and being this fucking retarded.

So you take the good with the bad.

[Methais]

Lol, with that .5% below Texas, quite the achievement. The difference between want to work and forced to work? That is the problem, where kids are forced to support a household and loser parents.

Nothing you've posted says shit about anyone being forced to work.

But feel free to quote any lines I may have missed.

You won't, because you're lying like usual.

[Methais]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CFNJvrW8Lzk