Things that made you laugh today (Political Version)

[Parkbandit]

I realize you might not be aware of this, Trump hasn't been president for two years.

Well, who's fault would it be? He can't blame Biden... certainly can't blame Obama when Biden was VP.

[Methais]

Total lack of surprise when Trump's rollback of rules that would mandate new electronic control braking systems on trains carrying flammable substances results in large derailments and environmental coasters. I'm just glad some of you are aware of Trump being proven culprit in so many scandals.

Feel free to link to anything credible that indicates the train wreck was caused by faulty brakes.

Dumbass simp loser :rofl:

[Methais]

https://i.imgur.com/LHQzuJY.png (https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11759771/Mystery-Bill-Clinton-advisor-dead-gunshot-wound-no-gun.html)

Seems legit.

[Parkbandit]

Feel free to link to anything credible that indicates the train wreck was caused by faulty brakes.

Dumbass simp loser :rofl:

Surveillance video from a home near the crash site recorded "what appears to be a wheel bearing in the final stage of overheat failure moments before the derailment," investigators said this week.

https://www.npr.org/2023/02/16/1157333630/east-palestine-ohio-train-derailment#:~:text=A%20train%20carrying%20hazardou s%20substances,near%20the%20border%20with%20Pennsy lvania.

I even used a favorite source for lefties.

[Parkbandit]

https://i.imgur.com/LHQzuJY.png (https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11759771/Mystery-Bill-Clinton-advisor-dead-gunshot-wound-no-gun.html)

Seems legit.

And no gun was ever recovered? How does one commit suicide with a gunshot to the chest, while tied up.. and can get rid of the gun before he dies?

Only the fucking Clintons...

[Methais]

Surveillance video from a home near the crash site recorded "what appears to be a wheel bearing in the final stage of overheat failure moments before the derailment," investigators said this week.

https://www.npr.org/2023/02/16/1157333630/east-palestine-ohio-train-derailment#:~:text=A%20train%20carrying%20hazardou s%20substances,near%20the%20border%20with%20Pennsy lvania.

I even used a favorite source for lefties.

In before Seran says the wheel bearing overheating was because of faulty brakes.

[Parkbandit]

In before Seran says the wheel bearing overheating was because of faulty brakes.

This is what happens when you hear something but are just tooooooo fucking stupid to question it because "TRRRRRRRRRRRUUUUUUMMMMMMMPPPPPPPP!!!!!!!"

[Seran]

Trump's proudly visiting the derailment site proclaiming his Presidency is why everyone's afraid of drinking the water or allowing their kids to play outside. lol


‘A political stunt’: Trump’s Ohio visit revives questions about his own safety legacy

Donald Trump’s visit to the site of a toxic train derailment in Ohio is offering a political opening to battered Biden administration officials — by calling new attention to the former president’s record of rolling back regulations on both rail safety and hazardous chemicals.

Trump’s administration withdrew an Obama-era proposal to require faster brakes on trains carrying highly flammable materials, ended regular rail safety audits of railroads, and mothballed a pending rule requiring freight trains to have at least two crew members. He also placed a veteran of the chemical industry in charge of the Environmental Protection Agency’s chemical safety office, where she made industry-friendly changes to how the agency studied health risks.

As president, Trump made rescinding regulations a major priority for his agencies, even signing an order requiring them to revoke two rules for every one they enact. At the same time, he said he wanted to “ensure that America has among the very cleanest air and cleanest water on the planet.”

[Seran]

As usual a satirical article on the Onion hits the nail on the head.


EAST PALESTINE, OH—Gathering in front of the toxic decimation unfolding as a result of lax safety standards and lack of governmental oversight, Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine (R) held a press conference Thursday to champion the Norfolk Southern train derailment as a deregulation success story. “Ladies and gentlemen, behold, as the results speak for themselves—deregulation works,” said the native Ohioan to grand applause, before acknowledging the decades of hard work it took on both national and local scales to bypass costly red tape and bureaucracy and turn this forgotten part of his state into a thriving chemical wasteland, itself a testament to throwing caution and concern to the wind in favor of removing guardrails and severely underfunding infrastructure. “So rarely do we get to see such immediate change as a result of dismantling rigorous safeguards and doing away with accountability, but look at this—just yesterday this was an abandoned rural prairie full of nothing but native wildlife. Now, through a bipartisan effort to completely ignore calls to replace the Civil War-era braking systems on most of our great nation’s trains, we transformed this area seemingly overnight. You’ll notice I am tearing up, not only because the toxic fumes are now being violently blown in our direction, but because this is exactly why so many of us get into politics—to elicit tangible change that makes the lives of everyday Americans so much worse.” At press time, DeWine announced he had now begin work on removing Ohio regulations surrounding organ donations so that residents’ now-infected body parts could be easily transplanted into healthy people to infect them as well.

[Methais]

Trump's proudly visiting the derailment site proclaiming his Presidency is why everyone's afraid of drinking the water or allowing their kids to play outside. lol

Fun fact: Brakes had nothing to do with the train derailing.

Feel free to show anything indicating otherwise, greasy retard.

[Parkbandit]

Trump's proudly visiting the derailment site proclaiming his Presidency is why everyone's afraid of drinking the water or allowing their kids to play outside. lol

Cite the source, lazy fuck.

[Methais]

Cite the source, lazy fuck.

Seran's source:

https://i.imgur.com/m4UTj6m.png

[Parkbandit]

https://nypost.com/2023/02/21/muslim-activist-outed-by-mom-as-being-white-as-driven-snow/

Another liberal white chick trying to take jobs away from minorities.

For shame.

[Methais]

https://nypost.com/2023/02/21/muslim-activist-outed-by-mom-as-being-white-as-driven-snow/

Another liberal white chick trying to take jobs away from minorities.

For shame.


https://i.imgur.com/V205nlV.gif

[Parkbandit]

Wait, Seran doesn't think Biden's administration purposefully releasing toxic chemicals and then proceeding to burn said toxic chemicals at the crash site contributed to one of the worst environmental disasters this country has ever seen? Or is he simply unaware Biden's administration did that? Or is he downplaying it? It's hard to tell these days with how utterly fucking stupid he is.

Trump forced Biden to do it somehow.

Because that is the only thing retards like Seran can "understand"

[Methais]

Wait, Seran doesn't think Biden's administration purposefully releasing toxic chemicals and then proceeding to burn said toxic chemicals at the crash site contributed to one of the worst environmental disasters this country has ever seen? Or is he simply unaware Biden's administration did that? Or is he downplaying it? It's hard to tell these days with how utterly fucking stupid he is.

Whatever it is, he's just following the code from the latest NPC patch. He doesn't have any thoughts of his own.

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

So this looks a bit ominous...

https://www.newsweek.com/russian-state-tv-says-us-has-declared-war-after-crimea-comments-1782239

ARussian propagandist has claimed on state TV that the U.S. has declared war on the country following reports of the White House's approval of targeted strikes on Crimea.
In a video uploaded to Twitter (https://www.newsweek.com/topic/twitter) by the account TheKremlinYap on Saturday, Russian journalist Igor Korotchenko claimed the U.S. had crossed a red line by supporting the strikes.

[Methais]

So this looks a bit ominous...

https://www.newsweek.com/russian-state-tv-says-us-has-declared-war-after-crimea-comments-1782239

ARussian propagandist has claimed on state TV that the U.S. has declared war on the country following reports of the White House's approval of targeted strikes on Crimea.
In a video uploaded to Twitter (https://www.newsweek.com/topic/twitter) by the account TheKremlinYap on Saturday, Russian journalist Igor Korotchenko claimed the U.S. had crossed a red line by supporting the strikes.

Remember when they said Trump was gonna cause WW3 though?

Good times. Right Seran?

[Seran]

Wait, Seran doesn't think Biden's administration purposefully releasing toxic chemicals and then proceeding to burn said toxic chemicals at the crash site contributed to one of the worst environmental disasters this country has ever seen? Or is he simply unaware Biden's administration did that? Or is he downplaying it? It's hard to tell these days with how utterly fucking stupid he is.

Uh no on all counts, the governments of Ohio and Pennsylvania gave the direction to do a controlled burn of the vinyl chloride at the request of Norfolk Southern and first responders reporting the explosion risk. Moron.

[Neveragain]

Remember when they said Trump was gonna cause WW3 though?

Good times. Right Seran?

Republican nuclear fallout is icky. Democrat nuclear fallout comes in the form of rainbows.

[~Rocktar~]

https://scontent-atl3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/331493811_821555839591697_8544040797824744193_n.jp g?stp=dst-jpg_p526x296&_nc_cat=105&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=8bfeb9&_nc_ohc=EFRpLfY0EREAX-_Hv46&_nc_ht=scontent-atl3-1.xx&oh=00_AfCdKS03KElqtzVx847tLqmHbJm5woHb9RwK77zIq7_e sw&oe=64000692

[Bhaalizmo]

https://scontent-atl3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/331493811_821555839591697_8544040797824744193_n.jp g?stp=dst-jpg_p526x296&_nc_cat=105&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=8bfeb9&_nc_ohc=EFRpLfY0EREAX-_Hv46&_nc_ht=scontent-atl3-1.xx&oh=00_AfCdKS03KElqtzVx847tLqmHbJm5woHb9RwK77zIq7_e sw&oe=64000692

https://media.giphy.com/media/MJRkrj8EwXfsHcPrMK/giphy.gif

[Solkern]

So this looks a bit ominous...

https://www.newsweek.com/russian-state-tv-says-us-has-declared-war-after-crimea-comments-1782239

ARussian propagandist has claimed on state TV that the U.S. has declared war on the country following reports of the White House's approval of targeted strikes on Crimea.
In a video uploaded to Twitter (https://www.newsweek.com/topic/twitter) by the account TheKremlinYap on Saturday, Russian journalist Igor Korotchenko claimed the U.S. had crossed a red line by supporting the strikes.


Please tell me you don’t believe what a Russian propagandist is saying…

You know only Congress can declare war, that should have been a big red flag on their bullshit.

I remember like 6-7 months ago that same journalist, I believe…said the Russian military has destroyed many American Bradley’s, when they weren’t even in Ukraine.

[Shaps]

Please tell me you don’t believe what a Russian propagandist is saying…

You know only Congress can declare war, that should have been a big red flag on their bullshit.

I remember like 6-7 months ago that same journalist, I believe…said the Russian military has destroyed many American Bradley’s, when they weren’t even in Ukraine.

So just because Congress hasn't "declared war"... we're not at war... okay.

Not sure how your logic works, but when you are supplying all the arms, funding, and intelligence to a Nation to fight their war... it is your war. It's called a proxy war.

Make no mistake... the US is at war based upon the actions this administration has taken. But because the American populous are fucking morons, the majority don't realize it.

[Shaps]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hy89wPlQXrI

We need WW3 to happen, so morons like this can stop with all their hyperventilating about insane ideas that have no basis in logic or reason.

Perfectly fine to be trans-whatever you want to be. Doesn't mean you get to suspend all logic and medical reason when it comes to who can actually have babies.

[Parkbandit]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hy89wPlQXrI

We need WW3 to happen, so morons like this can stop with all their hyperventilating about insane ideas that have no basis in logic or reason.

Perfectly fine to be trans-whatever you want to be. Doesn't mean you get to suspend all logic and medical reason when it comes to who can actually have babies.

World Wars have never stopped stupid people from being stupid.

[Parkbandit]

Please tell me you don’t believe what a Russian propagandist is saying…

You know only Congress can declare war, that should have been a big red flag on their bullshit.

Well, let me tell the vets of the Korea, Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan they never fought in a war.

I'm sure they will be relieved.


I remember like 6-7 months ago that same journalist, I believe…said the Russian military has destroyed many American Bradley’s, when they weren’t even in Ukraine.

Link?

It's not that I don't trust you.. it's more that you probably tried to read it and "finished" it with a complete misunderstanding of what was written.

[Suppressed Poet]

Well, let me tell the vets of the Korea, Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan they never fought in a war.

I'm sure they will be relieved.


Solkern is obviously confused. There is no war in Ukraine. It’s a “special military operation”.

[Parkbandit]

Solkern is obviously confused.

It's not confusion.

It's stupidity.

[Seran]

So just because Congress hasn't "declared war"... we're not at war... okay.

Not sure how your logic works, but when you are supplying all the arms, funding, and intelligence to a Nation to fight their war... it is your war. It's called a proxy war.

Make no mistake... the US is at war based upon the actions this administration has taken. But because the American populous are fucking morons, the majority don't realize it.

What are you to understand about our constitution and their not being a declaration of war? Our country has since it's inception provide monetary and military assistance to other's during their own conflicts without a declaration of war. It's called providing assistance.

You're crying about it, which I'm sure has more for your anti American and pro Putin preferences, but surely you can do a better job understanding the Constitution of your own country.

[Shaps]

What are you to understand about our constitution and their not being a declaration of war? Our country has since it's inception provide monetary and military assistance to other's during their own conflicts without a declaration of war. It's called providing assistance.

You're crying about it, which I'm sure has more for your anti American and pro Putin preferences, but surely you can do a better job understanding the Constitution of your own country.

You... are... a... fucking... moron.

[Parkbandit]

What are you to understand about our constitution and their not being a declaration of war? Our country has since it's inception provide monetary and military assistance to other's during their own conflicts without a declaration of war. It's called providing assistance.

You're crying about it, which I'm sure has more for your anti American and pro Putin preferences, but surely you can do a better job understanding the Constitution of your own country.

"If you don't believe in spending billions of dollars for a war you are not involved in, you are anti-American" -Seran the Retard Champion 2023

[Shaps]

https://www.cfr.org/article/how-much-aid-has-us-sent-ukraine-here-are-six-charts

"At the one year mark of the war, the Biden administration had provided or agreed to provide Ukraine with a long list of defense capabilities, including Abrams battle tanks, anti-aircraft missiles, coastal defense ships, and advanced surveillance and radar systems."

Nope.. not at war at all.

[Parkbandit]

Our country has since it's inception provide monetary and military assistance to other's during their own conflicts without a declaration of war.

This is historically inaccurate.

[Seran]

https://www.cfr.org/article/how-much-aid-has-us-sent-ukraine-here-are-six-charts

"At the one year mark of the war, the Biden administration had provided or agreed to provide Ukraine with a long list of defense capabilities, including Abrams battle tanks, anti-aircraft missiles, coastal defense ships, and advanced surveillance and radar systems."

Nope.. not at war at all.

You're right, America has no active wars with Eastern Europe. I'm glad you finally understand.

[Solkern]

Well, let me tell the vets of the Korea, Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan they never fought in a war.

I'm sure they will be relieved.



Link?

It's not that I don't trust you.. it's more that you probably tried to read it and "finished" it with a complete misunderstanding of what was written.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=qSFZcnVfGlI

There ya go, comes with subtitles.

https://eurasiantimes.com/russia-mocked-for-claiming-to-destroy-4-us-made-bradley-fighting-vehicles-that-are-yet-to-be-delivered-to-ukraine/


There’s a link for you as well.

That journalist, retweeted or did a report about it, I can’t find it though.

[Parkbandit]

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=qSFZcnVfGlI

There ya go, comes with subtitles.

https://eurasiantimes.com/russia-mocked-for-claiming-to-destroy-4-us-made-bradley-fighting-vehicles-that-are-yet-to-be-delivered-to-ukraine/

There’s a link for you as well.

I didn't ask if Russia claimed it took out US tanks, you claimed that this same journalist reported on it.


That journalist, retweeted or did a report about it, I can’t find it though.

https://media2.giphy.com/media/111ebonMs90YLu/200.gif

[Seran]

This moronic child never misses an opportunity to get before a camera. Of course the short bus representative of renewable energy would oppose a wind farm, makes total sense to deprive 100K homes in Norway of clean energy to preserve the rights of ancient reindeer herders on lands that don't belong to them.


Thunberg, indigenous protesters block Norway energy ministry over wind farms


OSLO, Feb 27 (Reuters) - Environmental campaigner Greta Thunberg and dozens of other activists on Monday blocked entrances to Norway's energy ministry, protesting against wind turbines built on land traditionally used by indigenous Sami reindeer herders.

Thunberg, a vocal advocate for the ending the world's reliance on carbon-based power, said the transition to green energy could not come at the expense of indigenous rights.

"Indigenous rights, human rights, must go hand-in-hand with climate protection and climate action. That can't happen at the expense of some people. Then it is not climate justice," Thunberg told Reuters while sitting outside the ministry's main entrance with other demonstrators.

https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/thunberg-other-protesters-block-norway-energy-ministry-over-wind-farms-2023-02-27/

[Parkbandit]

This moronic child never misses an opportunity to get before a camera. Of course the short bus representative of renewable energy would oppose a wind farm, makes total sense to deprive 100K homes in Norway of clean energy to preserve the rights of ancient reindeer herders on lands that don't belong to them.

She's 20 now.. and not considered a child.

She has as much knowledge of the climate crisis as Al Gore or Leonardo DiCaprio.. she's just not making as much money on it as they are.

She needs to step up her private jet game to really get out there and spread the Word.

[Solkern]

I didn't ask if Russia claimed it took out US tanks, you claimed that this same journalist reported on it.



https://media2.giphy.com/media/111ebonMs90YLu/200.gif


The article was on a Russian site, and my guess it might have been taken down after Russia became a laughing stock over their obvious lie. I’ll keep trying to find it.

[~Rocktar~]

This moronic child never misses an opportunity to get before a camera. Of course the short bus representative of renewable energy would oppose a wind farm, makes total sense to deprive 100K homes in Norway of clean energy to preserve the rights of ancient reindeer herders on lands that don't belong to them.

Aren't you part of the same retard team that keeps referring to America as "stolen land?" Hypocrite. And it's far from "clean" energy but the facts and science only apply when you Leftitst want it oo.

[Methais]

https://media.giphy.com/media/MJRkrj8EwXfsHcPrMK/giphy.gif

Which tent is yours?

[Methais]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hy89wPlQXrI

We need WW3 to happen, so morons like this can stop with all their hyperventilating about insane ideas that have no basis in logic or reason.

Perfectly fine to be trans-whatever you want to be. Doesn't mean you get to suspend all logic and medical reason when it comes to who can actually have babies.



https://youtu.be/sFBOQzSk14c

[Methais]

You're right, America has no active wars with Eastern Europe. I'm glad you finally understand.

Add sarcasm to the list of things you're incapable of understanding.

We'll put it right below apostrophes, since you still can't wrap your head around those either.

[Methais]

This moronic child never misses an opportunity to get before a camera. Of course the short bus representative of renewable energy would oppose a wind farm, makes total sense to deprive 100K homes in Norway of clean energy to preserve the rights of ancient reindeer herders on lands that don't belong to them.


Why do you hate indigenous people Seran?

[Shaps]

Why do you hate indigenous people Seran?


He's a Democrat and Leftist. Pretty sure history shows that they hate everyone.

[Suppressed Poet]

https://i.imgflip.com/45exfn.jpg

[Seran]

https://i.imgflip.com/45exfn.jpg

Wow, was that what the QAnon Shaman was trying to say when he was at January 6th Insurrection and 'yodeling' inside the capital rotunda? Between his 40 some odd month sentence for twatting about and his desperate pleas for vegan food, I just thought he was just another dumb right-wing moron acting like an entitled man-child for attention!


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f6xwJbNdEJs

[Seizer]

Wow, was that what the QAnon Shaman was trying to say when he was at January 6th Insurrection and 'yodeling' inside the capital rotunda? Between his 40 some odd month sentence for twatting about and his desperate pleas for vegan food, I just thought he was just another dumb right-wing moron acting like an entitled man-child for attention!


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f6xwJbNdEJs
Can you provide a demonstration of twatting about? I have a good imagination and made my own mental videos, but would like to see what twatting about means to you.

[Methais]

He's a Democrat and Leftist. Pretty sure history shows that they hate everyone.

Especially themselves.

[Methais]

Wow, was that what the QAnon Shaman was trying to say when he was at January 6th Insurrection and 'yodeling' inside the capital rotunda? Between his 40 some odd month sentence for twatting about and his desperate pleas for vegan food, I just thought he was just another dumb right-wing moron acting like an entitled man-child for attention!


https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FZvuiAQXwAIISRs.jpg

[Suppressed Poet]

All those Chicagoans sick of failed leftist policies that contributed to rampant crime (among other things) are actually just sexist and racist. Later Beetlejuice.

https://www.nationalreview.com/news/im-a-black-woman-in-america-chicago-mayor-lori-lightfoot-blames-election-loss-on-racism-sexism/

[Parkbandit]

All those Chicagoans sick of failed leftist policies that contributed to rampant crime (among other things) are actually just sexist and racist. Later Beetlejuice.

https://www.nationalreview.com/news/im-a-black-woman-in-america-chicago-mayor-lori-lightfoot-blames-election-loss-on-racism-sexism/

https://img.ifunny.co/images/59740a2d7853730d3001724a1e9e5fbd33d5c277844d78b665 22f8970f7ca0d5_1.jpg

[Methais]

https://i.imgur.com/GBnrMtT.png

[Methais]

https://i.imgur.com/fxyUuFt.png


These retarded corporations never learn. :lol:

[Parkbandit]

https://i.imgur.com/fxyUuFt.png


These retarded corporations never learn. :lol:

Now THAT is an actual cross dresser.

[Methais]

Now THAT is an actual cross dresser.


Hey Seran, is that dude in that screenshot a cross dresser? Or is that a woman?

Asking for ClydeR.

[Parkbandit]

Hey Seran, is that dude in that screenshot a cross dresser? Or is that a woman?

Asking for ClydeR.

I picture that guy/girl as Seran in rl....

When you do that.. some of his posts actually make sense.

[ClydeR]

https://i.imgur.com/ETa0kaK.png
https://twitter.com/KariLakeWarRoom/status/1632152814192295942

[Seran]

https://i.imgur.com/ETa0kaK.png
https://twitter.com/KariLakeWarRoom/status/1632152814192295942

Lol. The only place she's a Governor is in her imagination and I'd laugh my ass off if Trump named her as his running mate. Look at that the other dumb bitch of a conservative did to McCain's chances at the Presidency. Were it not for Sarah Palin, the only change that would have happened between 2008-2015 would have been the vice president's maxi pads.

[Gelston]

Lol. The only place she's a Governor is in her imagination and I'd laugh my ass off if Trump named her as his running mate. Look at that the other dumb bitch of a conservative did to McCain's chances at the Presidency. Were it not for Sarah Palin, the only change that would have happened between 2008-2015 would have been the vice president's maxi pads.

We get it, you hate women.

[Parkbandit]

We get it, you hate women.

In Seran's defense, women hated him first.

[Methais]

I picture that guy/girl as Seran in rl....

When you do that.. some of his posts actually make sense.

Seran:
https://assets.bwbx.io/images/users/iqjWHBFdfxIU/iPmEFwbLY81M/v0/1200x671.jpg


Lol. The only place she's a Governor is in her imagination and I'd laugh my ass off if Trump named her as his running mate. Look at that the other dumb bitch of a conservative did to McCain's chances at the Presidency. Were it not for Sarah Palin, the only change that would have happened between 2008-2015 would have been the vice president's maxi pads.

Triggered

[Shaps]

https://youtu.be/srouUWOAVVU

**If the stats are correct**

Our politicians are fucking morons and we, as a people, are fucking morons for allowing this insanity.

[Shaps]

https://youtu.be/ikeVHhfXX44

Politicians, am I right?

Not once, not twice, not three times? FOUR times??

Goodness gracious... almost like Joe doesn't care about all those helpless people out there.

[Seran]

Do you ever get tired of promoting nonsense videos from crackpots?

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

Do you ever get tired of promoting nonsense videos from crackpots?

Do you ever get tired of promoting nonsense?

[Methais]

Do you ever get tired of promoting nonsense videos from crackpots?

Are you saying the content of the videos is fake?

Or are you accidentally telling the truth and calling Biden a crackpot?

Stop being a pussy 24/7.

[Shaps]

Do you ever get tired of promoting nonsense videos from crackpots?


https://youtu.be/GVDh3Ew7UG0

Nope.. just like pointing out to you, how batshit insane the Left - and people like you - are. Absolute lemmings.

[Shaps]

https://youtu.be/TItkD3AhnSk

ROFL.. okay this is a pretty funny one.

Biden admitting, that him being President and having all that power, has not changed a damn thing in over a year.

Don't believe me?

Just listen to him tell you himself. ROFL.

[Shaps]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MvoFcdtdGD0

Lol.. this is fucking clown world.

Hilarious.

[~Rocktar~]

https://scontent-atl3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/335506823_185533314200167_8833051016466800055_n.jp g?stp=dst-jpg_p843x403&_nc_cat=100&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=8bfeb9&_nc_ohc=fi_FG8QhKcYAX9jrqXR&_nc_ht=scontent-atl3-1.xx&oh=00_AfAd_9KWYPfk6iYNvNIH-YGWm2bQHNR3bG2IJsFRE4Kt1w&oe=640E8946

[~Rocktar~]

Men beating women at being women:


Biden Admin Gives ‘International Women Of Courage Award’ To A Biological Man

https://www.dailywire.com/news/biden-admin-gives-international-women-of-courage-award-to-a-biological-man

[Parkbandit]

Men beating women at being women:

https://www.dailywire.com/news/biden-admin-gives-international-women-of-courage-award-to-a-biological-man

LOL.

When you first posted that, I thought it was a Babylon Bee article.

[~Rocktar~]

LOL.

When you first posted that, I thought it was a Babylon Bee article.

To be fair, when I first saw it I thought it had to be a Babylon Bee article too.

[Shaps]

"The diplomat has also campaigned to change the name of the National Women’s Conference to the “Plurinational Conference of Women and Lesbian, Cross-Dresser, Transgender, Bisexual, Intersex and Non-Binary Persons.”

ROFL.. this part cracked me up.

Guess women really don't matter anymore.

Pretty soon, they'll be slumming it with us men.

[Shaps]

"For example, for Peace Keepers raising awareness about Menstrual Hygiene Day, language was changed in an informational newsletter to say “women, girls, and others who menstruate.”

ROFL... and this one at the very end...

Swear to god, we're in fucking clown world.

[~Rocktar~]

A somewhat coherent Creepy Joe back in the day.


https://www.facebook.com/reel/1264452954423020/

[Seran]

House Republicans have released information about their budget plan, claiming a cut of $131 a year over the next ten years will somehow save the country over $3 trillion. I'm not sure about their math, but if that party is that ignorant about the budget process it would explain why the deficit shot up so much under the last administration.


5 ways House Republicans' budget plan 'will be a disaster for families,' according to the White House

Two weeks ago, the House Freedom Caucus unveiled its plan to address the debt ceiling through major spending cuts. The plan, called "Shrink Washington, Grow America," would raise the debt ceiling — only if Congress passed legislation that would cut major programs like student-debt relief, rescind unspent COVID-19 funds, and recoup IRS and climate spending.

The Caucus' plan would cap future spending at the 2022 level for ten years, which it said will "cut $131 billion in FY2024 and save roughly $3 trillion over the long term by cutting the wasteful, woke, and weaponized federal bureaucracy."

https://www.businessinsider.com/republican-budget-plan-student-debt-relief-social-security-white-house-2023-3

[Parkbandit]

House Republicans have released information about their budget plan, claiming a cut of $131 a year over the next ten years will somehow save the country over $3 trillion. I'm not sure about their math, but if that party is that ignorant about the budget process it would explain why the deficit shot up so much under the last administration.

https://www.businessinsider.com/republican-budget-plan-student-debt-relief-social-security-white-house-2023-3

Bro.... Your "source" of Business Insider should have given you your first clue that you're wrong and stupid.

Please stop being wrong and stupid in every.single.post.you.ever.make.

Thank you.

[Methais]

House Republicans have released information about their budget plan, claiming a cut of $131 a year over the next ten years will somehow save the country over $3 trillion. I'm not sure about their math, but if that party is that ignorant about the budget process it would explain why the deficit shot up so much under the last administration.



https://www.businessinsider.com/republican-budget-plan-student-debt-relief-social-security-white-house-2023-3

Dude you don't even know how zeroes work.

Let's take a closer look:


claiming a cut of $131 a year over the next ten years will somehow save the country over $3 trillion. I'm not sure about their math...


$131


I'm not sure about their math


I'm not sure

All I know is that if the Biden White House is saying it would be a disaster, then chances are it's anything but. Because much like you, pretty much everything the Biden administration says and does is wrong and stupid, and all you do is mindlessly repeat what they tell you to say, because you're nothing but a retarded NPC.

Don't worry though dude, your welfare checks aren't going to stop showing up. Because that's the only thing you're worried about.


Just make all your posts like this, so they'll actually be factual:


I'm not sure

[Shaps]

https://www.yahoo.com/news/san-francisco-supervisor-hillary-ronen-211803798.html

"San Francisco supervisor Hillary Ronen begs for more police in her district after voting to defund in 2020"

2020 - "I want to make it clear that I believe strongly in defunding the police and reducing the number of officers on our force," Ronen wrote. "For decades we’ve had an imbalance in our city’s budget, with hundreds of millions of dollars going to SFPD to have them do work they are not qualified to do."

2023 - "I've been begging this department to give the Mission what it deserves in terms of police presence all year long," Ronen said. "And I have been told time and time and time and time again there are no officers that we can send to Mission."

ROFL.. fucking morons, who to dumb to realize it will eventually come for them.

Fuck her, and fuck her district. They voted her in, now suffer the consequences.

[~Rocktar~]

https://www.yahoo.com/news/san-francisco-supervisor-hillary-ronen-211803798.html

"San Francisco supervisor Hillary Ronen begs for more police in her district after voting to defund in 2020"

2020 - "I want to make it clear that I believe strongly in defunding the police and reducing the number of officers on our force," Ronen wrote. "For decades we’ve had an imbalance in our city’s budget, with hundreds of millions of dollars going to SFPD to have them do work they are not qualified to do."

2023 - "I've been begging this department to give the Mission what it deserves in terms of police presence all year long," Ronen said. "And I have been told time and time and time and time again there are no officers that we can send to Mission."

ROFL.. fucking morons, who to dumb to realize it will eventually come for them.

Fuck her, and fuck her district. They voted her in, now suffer the consequences.

LULZ

[Shaps]

https://www.yahoo.com/news/michigan-college-set-host-graduation-205504391.html

"Michigan College Set to Host Graduation Services Segregated by Race, Ethnicity, and Sexual Identity"

Statement from the college: "In an email sent to community members that went viral on Twitter, the Michigan college’s Multicultural Affairs Office outlined that the school would be hosting “five unique graduation celebrations designed to honor our diverse graduates.”

Statement also from the college in response to inquiries: "The vast majority of graduating students who participate in these celebrations also choose to participate in our larger Commencement ceremony where degrees are conferred,” the spokesperson added. -

Obviously, there is no segregation going on. You, and yours, are just not allowed... due to your race.

Fucking... morons.

Want to know what those in power at this inclusive school thinks of minorities? Said in the exact same statement:

"These celebrations are an avenue for highlighting the key moment of graduation with the personal community that they hold dear. Celebrations include events for Multicultural Affairs, Lavender (LGBTQIA+), Asian, First-Generation and/or Low-Income, Black, Latinx, and Native communities,”

That's what they think of those communities... They're just poor, helpless people. Fucking racists, without knowing their racists.

So sad to see what we, as a society in America, have let "them" do to us all... instead of just being Americans, we're back to the 1800s where everyone is separated by their immutable characteristics. Fucking pathetic.

And you dipshits that go along with this shit, you're morons too.

[Shaps]

https://www.yahoo.com/news/weapons-whiteness-minneapolis-racial-equity-173255523.html

"“Blacks can utilize Antiblackness and racism against other Blacks,” she wrote, accusing Vetaw and Jenkins of creating “an unsafe and unhealthy work environment for Black people.”

This is what happens when morons are allowed to talk to one another. Thanks social media.

Oh.. and changing definitions randomly to fit a political agenda. I wonder who under 25 these days thinks racism applies to all - regardless of race.

[Shaps]

https://www.yahoo.com/news/robin-diangelo-advises-people-color-195511417.html

"Robin DiAngelo Advises People of Color to ‘Get Away from White People’"

Now just a month ago.. the Dilbert guy said "white people should get away from people of color" and was destroyed.

Now we have a white woman saying the exact same thing, just in a different way, and she's applauded.

ROFL... people are so fucking stupid.

Fucking liberals actually think they are not racist. HAHAHA... and the morons that don't get this, are fucking racist too.

[Seran]

There you go again, getting all worked up over opinion pierces like a Karen being denied an extra shot of pumpkin spice. It's really not that necessary to get triggered by every random thought guy find on the internet.

[Parkbandit]

There you go again, getting all worked up over opinion pierces like a Karen being denied an extra shot of pumpkin spice. It's really not that necessary to get triggered by every random thought guy find on the internet.

Imagine linking Business Insider as a source and then complaining about anyone else's source.

Like how fucking retarded are you?

[Seran]

Imagine linking Business Insider as a source and then complaining about anyone else's source.

Like how fucking retarded are you?

Uh huh.. So just who over at Business Insider owes you money, because your tendency to hate on any organization not ran by Fox is pretty indicative of butt hurt or a bad loan.

[Methais]

Uh huh.. So just who over at Business Insider owes you money, because your tendency to hate on any organization not ran by Fox is pretty indicative of butt hurt or a bad loan.

You love Fox though. It's all you watch. More than everyone else he combined.

[Parkbandit]

Uh huh.. So just who over at Business Insider owes you money, because your tendency to hate on any organization not ran by Fox is pretty indicative of butt hurt or a bad loan.

Imagine being so.fucking.retarded. that you literally are defending Business Insider as a legitimate news organization.

What's next.. "Politifact is unbiased and only deals with facts. I know this because fact is part of it's business name!"

https://media.tenor.com/HsTOoRfprT4AAAAC/you-are-so-stupid-you-so-stupid.gif

[Seran]

Imagine being so.fucking.retarded. that you literally are defending Business Insider as a legitimate news organization.

What's next.. "Politifact is unbiased and only deals with facts. I know this because fact is part of it's business name!"

https://media.tenor.com/HsTOoRfprT4AAAAC/you-are-so-stupid-you-so-stupid.gif

Great non-answer! Let's go with the presumption that you're trying to condition the forum into believing any source you personally don't approve of lacks credibility. Tldr; You are insane.

One of the reasons I browse the full spectrum of new organizations is to see how an objective fact gets spun by subjective analysis. Faux has more spin jockeys than they do journalists, but it's a great way to see just how cacked the far right is.

[Methais]

Great non-answer! Let's go with the presumption that you're trying to condition the forum into believing any source you personally don't approve of lacks credibility. Tldr; You are insane.

One of the reasons I browse the full spectrum of new organizations is to see how an objective fact gets spun by subjective analysis. Faux has more spin jockeys than they do journalists, but it's a great way to see just how cacked the far right is.

Are you aware that everyone here, including other democrats/leftists, think you're a gigantic retard?

Let's see if you also come back with a non-answer, since you're crying about non-answers and all.

Fun fact: Questions are supposed to end with a question mark, not a comma, so technically you never asked a question.


Uh huh.. So just who over at Business Insider owes you money, because your tendency to hate on any organization not ran by Fox is pretty indicative of butt hurt or a bad loan.

[Parkbandit]

Great non-answer! Let's go with the presumption that you're trying to condition the forum into believing any source you personally don't approve of lacks credibility. Tldr; You are insane.

What was your question? Does someone at Business Insider owe me money?

Answer: No.

Also, why would I hate someone who owes me money? That's why I'm in business: To make money.

I get it, that's a completely foreign subject matter for you.. given all you have to do is wait for the next deposit on your EBT card.

Now answer my question: How are you so fucking retarded?


One of the reasons I browse the full spectrum of new organizations is to see how an objective fact gets spun by subjective analysis. Faux has more spin jockeys than they do journalists, but it's a great way to see just how cacked the far right is.

Business Insider is a joke, much like you. No one with an IQ above 12 believes them to be a legitimate news source.

[Seran]

Business Insider is a joke, much like you. No one with an IQ above 12 believes them to be a legitimate news source.

Uh huh, but why is it a joke to you?

https://www.biasly.com/sources/business-insider-bias-rating/

[~Rocktar~]

Uh huh, but why is it a joke to you?

Because it's you and it's Business Insider you are quoting you moron. You are wrong, they are a deeply Leftist tilted group that posts a ridiculous level of fantasy crap, almost as much as you and you trying to use them to back up your so called "point" is laughable.

[Seran]

Texas Republican Pat Fallon had his very own snowflake moment. Love how after he asks, "Is this an insurrection?" the camera pans out to the quiet and orderly hearing chambers. He must have gotten Dreaven's memo.


https://youtu.be/8QmLeL0aAE4

[Methais]

Texas Republican Pat Fallon had his very own snowflake moment. Love how after he asks, "Is this an insurrection?" the camera pans out to the quiet and orderly hearing chambers. He must have gotten Dreaven's memo.


https://youtu.be/8QmLeL0aAE4

Much like with everything else in your life, the point he was making by saying "Is this an insurrection?" sailed right over your retarded soy based head.

Look on the bright side though...nobody ever expects you to understand anything about anything in the first place, so you have that going for you.

Or are you pretending that the people in the back weren't screaming and cursing just before he said that, and hoping that everyone else is just as dumb and gullible as you are?

[Parkbandit]

Uh huh, but why is it a joke to you?

https://www.biasly.com/sources/business-insider-bias-rating/

I thought I was clear on that:


No one with an IQ above 12 believes them to be a legitimate news source.

You wouldn't understand because you didn't meet the threshold.

It's not your fault.

[Parkbandit]

Texas Republican Pat Fallon had his very own snowflake moment. Love how after he asks, "Is this an insurrection?" the camera pans out to the quiet and orderly hearing chambers. He must have gotten Dreaven's memo.


https://youtu.be/8QmLeL0aAE4

https://media0.giphy.com/media/4a8nsvnaosm4YsrDjH/200w.gif?cid=82a1493byf8u7agb44bn5lok5uby6b4txw4x7 31he6qsr4at&rid=200w.gif&ct=g

This girl knows what it feels like to be Seran.

[Suppressed Poet]

Texas Republican Pat Fallon had his very own snowflake moment. Love how after he asks, "Is this an insurrection?" the camera pans out to the quiet and orderly hearing chambers. He must have gotten Dreaven's memo.


https://youtu.be/8QmLeL0aAE4

That’s actually funny as hell. Thank you for sharing.

And Seran because it is Friday & I am in an especially great mood I would like to pay you a compliment. Even though you are the dumbest motherfucker to ever post on the PC, at least you post your retarded nonsense and exchange dialogue with everyone who makes fun of you. You stick with it and don’t just quit or try to silence people. Congrats on having better decorum than most of the progressive Ds in Congress who just throw a temper tantrum when they hear words they don’t like.

[Suppressed Poet]

Texas Republican Pat Fallon had his very own snowflake moment. Love how after he asks, "Is this an insurrection?" the camera pans out to the quiet and orderly hearing chambers. He must have gotten Dreaven's memo.


https://youtu.be/8QmLeL0aAE4

Seran, what is your position on the legality of the ATF changing the definition of a firearm specifically so that arm braced pistols are reclassified as short barreled rifles (and in doing so also requiring literally millions of effected gun owners register their newly redefined SBRs as an NFA regulated item? When did we give the ATF the authority to create new laws?

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

Seran, what is your position on the legality of the ATF changing the definition of a firearm specifically so that arm braced pistols are reclassified as short barreled rifles (and in doing so also requiring literally millions of effected gun owners register their newly redefined SBRs as an NFA regulated item? When did we give the ATF the authority to create new laws?

I heard all those sbr's were lost in many tragic boat accidents.

[Seran]

That’s actually funny as hell. Thank you for sharing.

And Seran because it is Friday & I am in an especially great mood I would like to pay you a compliment. Even though you are the dumbest motherfucker to ever post on the PC, at least you post your retarded nonsense and exchange dialogue with everyone who makes fun of you. You stick with it and don’t just quit or try to silence people. Congrats on having better decorum than most of the progressive Ds in Congress who just throw a temper tantrum when they hear words they don’t like.

Had no clue about the changes, but reading a couple of pieces and the ATF final rule, gotta say I don't particularly care that much.

1) It's a firearm accessory, and while it may be every weak-armed dick swingers dream to one hand a semi-auto, tactically they don't seem like much of a game changer that they need to be regulated as 'adapting' a pistol into a rifle. It's heavy handed.

2) Not entirely sure why the ATF is going after pistol braces after getting their asses handed to them when the Trump admin's ban on bump stocks was overturned. I doubt this ban will stick either.

P.S. Thanks for the back handed compliment. While funny, it was poignant enough your credibility as a hater of all that I post that is liberal, over regulatory, or a reminder that the Republicans are crybabies too, won't suffer.

[Suppressed Poet]

Had no clue about the changes, but reading a couple of pieces and the ATF final rule, gotta say I don't particularly care that much.

1) It's a firearm accessory, and while it may be every weak-armed dick swingers dream to one hand a semi-auto, tactically they don't seem like much of a game changer that they need to be regulated as 'adapting' a pistol into a rifle. It's heavy handed.

2) Not entirely sure why the ATF is going after pistol braces after getting their asses handed to them when the Trump admin's ban on bump stocks was overturned. I doubt this ban will stick either.

P.S. Thanks for the back handed compliment. While funny, it was poignant enough your credibility as a hater of all that I post that is liberal, over regulatory, or a reminder that the Republicans are crybabies too, won't suffer.

Point 1 was complete nonsense.

Point 2 kinda makes sense but I’m surprised hearing your response.

It was indeed a bit backhanded and rude, but not completely malevolent. We may disagree on everything and say rude things to each other at times, but at least you are not one of those unwilling to engage in the exchange of dialogue & ideas. I do mean that as a genuine compliment. Don’t get used to it.

[Gelston]

Had no clue about the changes, but reading a couple of pieces and the ATF final rule, gotta say I don't particularly care that much.

1) It's a firearm accessory, and while it may be every weak-armed dick swingers dream to one hand a semi-auto, tactically they don't seem like much of a game changer that they need to be regulated as 'adapting' a pistol into a rifle. It's heavy handed.

2) Not entirely sure why the ATF is going after pistol braces after getting their asses handed to them when the Trump admin's ban on bump stocks was overturned. I doubt this ban will stick either.

P.S. Thanks for the back handed compliment. While funny, it was poignant enough your credibility as a hater of all that I post that is liberal, over regulatory, or a reminder that the Republicans are crybabies too, won't suffer.

Tell me you know nothing about firearms without telling me you know nothing about firearms.

The most common use of a pistol brace is to get around SBR rules, not to fire shit one handed.

[Methais]

Tell me you know nothing about firearms without telling me you know nothing about firearms.

The most common use of a pistol brace is to get around SBR rules, not to fire shit one handed.

I heard that Seran watched an action movie once, so he’s clearly the expert here.

[Seran]

Tell me you know nothing about firearms without telling me you know nothing about firearms.

The most common use of a pistol brace is to get around SBR rules, not to fire shit one handed.

So to read a bit into your second statement, does that mean you're also against the rule change? Because while I don't necessarily care one way or the other, you didn't share /your/ opinion on the rule change which the topic is about.

[Seran]

Point 1 was complete nonsense.

Point 2 kinda makes sense but I’m surprised hearing your response.

It was indeed a bit backhanded and rude, but not completely malevolent. We may disagree on everything and say rude things to each other at times, but at least you are not one of those unwilling to engage in the exchange of dialogue & ideas. I do mean that as a genuine compliment. Don’t get used to it.

Regulation needs to serve a purpose. When the Courts have slapped your hand over trying to regulate firearm accessories, doing it a second time is kind of dumb. The Supreme Court doesn't have the ATFs back, so the rule change is pointless.

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

Regulation needs to serve a purpose. When the Courts have slapped your hand over trying to regulate firearm accessories, doing it a second time is kind of dumb. The Supreme Court doesn't have the ATFs back, so the rule change is pointless.

It's not about the SC having the ATF's back, it's about the constitution and our rights.

[Suppressed Poet]

Regulation needs to serve a purpose. When the Courts have slapped your hand over trying to regulate firearm accessories, doing it a second time is kind of dumb. The Supreme Court doesn't have the ATFs back, so the rule change is pointless.

It’s also about these bureaucratic alphabet agencies don’t create laws (the job of Congress) and can’t just reinterpret laws (courts interpret laws). There was a recent SCOTUS ruling with the EPA in which they were trying to do the same kind of reinterpretation circle jerk. I can’t remember the case at the moment and too lazy right now to find it.

[Seran]

It's not about the SC having the ATF's back, it's about the constitution and our rights.

Your rights to bear arms as a well regulated militia, yeah I know. Saying that amendment protects your right to use a brace isn't accurate. As SP pointed out, the executive is attempted to stretch existing laws to mean that they're illegally creating a different type of firearm. It's a separation of powers argument.

[Suppressed Poet]

Tell me you know nothing about firearms without telling me you know nothing about firearms.

The most common use of a pistol brace is to get around SBR rules, not to fire shit one handed.

Facts, but we often just tell the anti gunners they were designed for disabled combat veterans enjoy the sport of shooting, which is the very uncommon use case, but still true. A brace is a brace and a stock is a stock.

[Suppressed Poet]

Your rights to bear arms as a well regulated militia, yeah I know. Saying that amendment protects your right to use a brace isn't accurate. As SP pointed out, the executive is attempted to stretch existing laws to mean that they're illegally creating a different type of firearm. It's a separation of powers argument.

Still hung up on that well regulated militia part huh? Read Heller decision. Well regulated means well armed, and militia means we the people. This is further evidenced by reading the constitution in it’s entirety.

[Seran]

Still hung up on that well regulated militia part huh? Read Heller decision. Well regulated means well armed, and militia means we the people. This is further evidenced by reading the constitution in it’s entirety.

"I don't disagree with the conclusion of your post, but let me misinform you over a landmark misinterpretation of the Constitution." So yeah, the Heller ruling didn't establish a right to purchase firearm braces, no matter how you read it, so that decision is irrelevant to firearm accessories.

[Parkbandit]

Regulation needs to serve a purpose. When the Courts have slapped your hand over trying to regulate firearm accessories, doing it a second time is kind of dumb. The Supreme Court doesn't have the ATFs back, so the rule change is pointless.

The Supreme Court shouldn't have the ATF's back.. that is not their role.

The ATF doesn't pass laws.. that's not their role. Their role is to ENFORCE the laws. That's it.

[Gelston]

Regulation needs to serve a purpose. When the Courts have slapped your hand over trying to regulate firearm accessories, doing it a second time is kind of dumb. The Supreme Court doesn't have the ATFs back, so the rule change is pointless.

So, you'd like a Supreme Court that basically just allows the Executive Branch to do whatever it wants?

[Suppressed Poet]

"I don't disagree with the conclusion of your post, but let me misinform you over a landmark misinterpretation of the Constitution." So yeah, the Heller ruling didn't establish a right to purchase firearm braces, no matter how you read it, so that decision is irrelevant to firearm accessories.

It clarified that the 2nd amendment was an individual (not collective) right of the people, and Justice Scalia spoke specifically on those words well-regulated militia. I’m not arguing it’s application in this ATF overreach, but encourage you to read the decision to educate yourself.

[Seran]

So, you'd like a Supreme Court that basically just allows the Executive Branch to do whatever it wants?

Wow you drew the exact opposite of what I said, that's talent. No, the lower courts will overturn the ATFs rule as they did others and the Supreme Court will refuse to overturn or stay such a ruling. Which is appropriate, imo

[Seran]

It clarified that the 2nd amendment was an individual (not collective) right of the people, and Justice Scalia spoke specifically on those words well-regulated militia. I’m not arguing it’s application in this ATF overreach, but encourage you to read the decision to educate yourself.

I understand the decision, have read it, and disagree with it. Just as it overturned decades of precedent in this and other recent major decisions, it's the political decision of an ultra conservative Court. It'll be redecided once the balance is restored.

[Suppressed Poet]

I understand the decision, have read it, and disagree with it. Just as it overturned decades of precedent in this and other recent major decisions, it's the political decision of an ultra conservative Court. It'll be redecided once the balance is restored.

That is fine to disagree with it and have a different opinion. Perhaps one day you could be right that we get a more liberal Supreme Court that overturns that decision, but not today. Today it’s the law of the land. The decision makes clear that our government can’t infringe on people’s individual right to bear arms because of a false legal interpretation of “well-regulated militia” to mean “state controlled military”.

[Seran]

That is fine to disagree with it and have a different opinion. Perhaps one day you could be right that we get a more liberal Supreme Court that overturns that decision, but not today. Today it’s the law of the land. The decision makes clear that our government can’t infringe on people’s individual right to bear arms because of a false legal interpretation of “well-regulated militia” to mean “state controlled military”.

Forget the state and military implications, focus on the total disregard the part of the sentence stating "well regulated." Both sides have an all or nothing approach that are untenable to any sort of bedrock setting legislation.

The District of Columbia interpreted well regulated to mean their "may issue" permitting for hand guns was the path forward to making their streets safer.

The Conservative interpretation, "shall issue" interprets gun rights as inviolate and without reasonable exception it is an inviolable right.

Now, I don't think it's arguable that criminals who use firearms to commit felonies ruin it for everyone else. If the strict interpretation of Heller means every citizen's right is to protect themselves from foreign threats or implicitly the tyrannical rule of domestic rule, then can't we agree that the moment you commit aggravated assault, murder, kidnap, gang-related robberies with a firearm that you should lose that right for a defined period? The second time, perhaps an indefinite period? The third time, summary execution by the very same firearm? If I live in a society where because of the prevalence of firearms, the Conservative expectation is I should also carry a firearm with which to protect myself, then haven't we reached the point of no return? Or the Liberal expectation that crimes committed should bear minimal or no punishments as certain elements of society have no choice but to commit crimes to survive? Either way it's anarchy.

[Suppressed Poet]

Forget the state and military implications, focus on the total disregard the part of the sentence stating "well regulated." Both sides have an all or nothing approach that are untenable to any sort of bedrock setting legislation.

The District of Columbia interpreted well regulated to mean their "may issue" permitting for hand guns was the path forward to making their streets safer.

The Conservative interpretation, "shall issue" interprets gun rights as inviolate and without reasonable exception it is an inviolable right.

Now, I don't think it's arguable that criminals who use firearms to commit felonies ruin it for everyone else. If the strict interpretation of Heller means every citizen's right is to protect themselves from foreign threats or implicitly the tyrannical rule of domestic rule, then can't we agree that the moment you commit aggravated assault, murder, kidnap, gang-related robberies with a firearm that you should lose that right for a defined period? The second time, perhaps an indefinite period? The third time, summary execution by the very same firearm? If I live in a society where because of the prevalence of firearms, the Conservative expectation is I should also carry a firearm with which to protect myself, then haven't we reached the point of no return? Or the Liberal expectation that crimes committed should bear minimal or no punishments as certain elements of society have no choice but to commit crimes to survive? Either way it's anarchy.

I don’t have a total disregard for well-regulated as it is written in the second amendment. It’s the prefatory cause explaining why the founders chose to include it. Well regulated means well armed or in good working order as they meant it.

Convicted felons forfeit certain rights. I do not advocate for criminals to be in legal possession of firearms. In fact, I would love if our federal agencies focused on going after gangbangers and thugs instead of harassing the good people.

You don’t have to own or carry a gun. That is a personal choice and yours to make. I have mine in arms reach (well not at work because I weigh the getting fired if they find out vs threat assessment) 24/7. I’m just trying to keep myself, my family, and those around me safe from death or serious bodily harm. Maybe the police or someone like me might just protect you too.

[Solkern]

Convicted felons forfeit certain rights. I do not advocate for criminals to be in legal possession of firearms. In fact, I would love if our federal agencies focused on going after gangbangers and thugs instead of harassing the hood people.

I’m a little against this, I think it should really depend on the felony, someone with a felony for driving or something, shouldn’t lose their 2nd amendment rights.
Or am I completely wrong and it’s not a blanket ban if you have a felony?

[Suppressed Poet]

I’m a little against this, I think it should really depend on the felony, someone with a felony for driving or something, shouldn’t lose their 2nd amendment rights.
Or am I completely wrong and it’s not a blanket ban if you have a felony?

Yeah I was actually going to say I think there should be something better than what exists today for someone with a felony that is truly reformed and not a career criminal to get their rights back, but the devil is in the details on that one. Also makes the post really long. Anyways…gangbangers and thugs (violent degenerate piece of shit law breaking scumbags of all races / backgrounds / etc. is what I mean by that) need to stay locked up from society & we have been entirely too soft on crime for the last decade+.

[~Rocktar~]

https://youtu.be/1dkiIDm4vuE

[~Rocktar~]

Yeah I was actually going to say I think there should be something better than what exists today for someone with a felony that is truly reformed and not a career criminal to get their rights back, but the devil is in the details on that one. Also makes the post really long. Anyways…gangbangers and thugs (violent degenerate piece of shit law breaking scumbags of all races / backgrounds / etc. is what I mean by that) need to stay locked up from society & we have been entirely too soft on crime for the last decade+.

You can petition to have your rights restored. It's a state by state thing so work there to improve it.

[Solkern]

Yeah I was actually going to say I think there should be something better than what exists today for someone with a felony that is truly reformed and not a career criminal to get their rights back, but the devil is in the details on that one. Also makes the post really long. Anyways…gangbangers and thugs (violent degenerate piece of shit law breaking scumbags of all races / backgrounds / etc. is what I mean by that) need to stay locked up from society & we have been entirely too soft on crime for the last decade+.

Do you remember the George Carlin piece about making those 4 states into a prison? I support that idea lol

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5H-NctipBvg
Found it

[Gelston]

I’m a little against this, I think it should really depend on the felony, someone with a felony for driving or something, shouldn’t lose their 2nd amendment rights.
Or am I completely wrong and it’s not a blanket ban if you have a felony?

I've always felt they should create a more distinct third class of crimes, separating violent and non-violent felonies. A felon can be someone that stole two xboxs or someone that raped and murdered someone.

[Solkern]

I've always felt they should create a more distinct third class of crimes, separating violent and non-violent felonies. A felon can be someone that stole two xboxs or someone that raped and murdered someone.

Concur, felony theft is like anything over $250 or something, right?

[Seran]

I've always felt they should create a more distinct third class of crimes, separating violent and non-violent felonies. A felon can be someone that stole two xboxs or someone that raped and murdered someone.

Felony theft, when aided by w firearm is the entire point. Criminals need to find out the hard way that there's no commission of a crime using a firearm that doesn't have some serious fuckin repercussions.

[Methais]

Your rights to bear arms as a well regulated militia, yeah I know. Saying that amendment protects your right to use a brace isn't accurate. As SP pointed out, the executive is attempted to stretch existing laws to mean that they're illegally creating a different type of firearm. It's a separation of powers argument.

You believe that "well regulated milita" = run by the government. There are post from you on here stating as much.

[Gelston]

Felony theft, when aided by w firearm is the entire point. Criminals need to find out the hard way that there's no commission of a crime using a firearm that doesn't have some serious fuckin repercussions.

Except felony theft doesn’t require a firearm. You are speaking if armed robbery, which is a felony regardless of amount stolen.

[Suppressed Poet]

Felony theft, when aided by w firearm is the entire point. Criminals need to find out the hard way that there's no commission of a crime using a firearm that doesn't have some serious fuckin repercussions.

Why just a firearm? If a felony theft occurs aided by a pointy stick, is that really less of a crime? If a person is murdered from being stabbed / strangled / beaten to death / etc., is it any consolation to the grieving family of the victim that at least it wasn’t a firearm?

[Methais]

Why just a firearm? If a felony theft occurs aided by a pointy stick, is that really less of a crime? If a person is murdered from being stabbed / strangled / beaten to death / etc., is it any consolation to the grieving family of the victim that at least it wasn’t a firearm?

I was once robbed by a guy who was armed with a piece of fresh fruit.

If only I'd taken that class about how to defend yourself when being attacked by someone armed with a piece of fresh fruit more seriously, this would have never happened. :(



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nqTFPuiMSk8

[Seran]

Why just a firearm? If a felony theft occurs aided by a pointy stick, is that really less of a crime? If a person is murdered from being stabbed / strangled / beaten to death / etc., is it any consolation to the grieving family of the victim that at least it wasn’t a firearm?

Semantics. A pointy stick isn't going to result in mass murder, nor is a knife going to not be defended against. Meanwhile a firearm can deliver ranged death without a defender being able to seek adequate cover or mount a defense. When you've dreamed up a semi-automatic stick that can deliver the mass deaths as have firearms in the last year, please let us know.

[~Rocktar~]

Semantics. A pointy stick isn't going to result in mass murder, nor is a knife going to not be defended against. Meanwhile a firearm can deliver ranged death without a defender being able to seek adequate cover or mount a defense. When you've dreamed up a semi-automatic stick that can deliver the mass deaths as have firearms in the last year, please let us know.

You are such an ignorant fuck and so full of shit.


10 dead, 15 hospitalized in Canada mass stabbing attacks, police say

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/canada-stabbing-saskatchewan-deaths/

[~Rocktar~]

And more:


As America struggles with gun violence, China faces its own public safety threat: mass stabbings

https://www.cnn.com/2021/06/09/china/china-knife-attacks-mic-intl-hnk/index.html

[~Rocktar~]

Thailand attack: children killed in mass stabbing and shooting at preschool

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/oct/06/thailand-shooting-attack-at-pre-school-centre

[~Rocktar~]

33 Dead, 130 Injured in China Knife-Wielding Spree

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/33-dead-130-injured-china-knife-wielding-spree-n41966

[Suppressed Poet]

Semantics. A pointy stick isn't going to result in mass murder, nor is a knife going to not be defended against. Meanwhile a firearm can deliver ranged death without a defender being able to seek adequate cover or mount a defense. When you've dreamed up a semi-automatic stick that can deliver the mass deaths as have firearms in the last year, please let us know.

A firearm can also allow a 90 pound single mom walking home from a double shift to defend herself from a 200 pound male that is acting on evil intentions to rape and murder her. They are tools.

God created man. Samuel Colt made man equal.

[~Rocktar~]

80 Killed in Truck Attack on Bastille Day Crowd in Nice, France

https://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/france-truck-attack/truck-reportedly-plows-crowd-bastille-day-france-n609621

8 went to prison for this since it was discovered it was a terrorist attack.

PS: Sorry for the spam, only one link per post allowed. There are more, LOTS more if you search for them.

[~Rocktar~]

It's almost as if the weapon isn't the problem but hey, Leftist will never let a tragedy go to waste in their effort to seize control from the "less enlightened" masses they so abhor. Any chance to take away rights in order to "protect the kids" huh Seran?

The person was fucked in the head. They plotted an attack and carried it out and this time the police weren't waiting outside like in Uvaldi, they put on their bad ass pants, went inside and did what real cops do and killed the fucker as fast as they could.

The problem is Seran and the rest of you Leftist pieces of shit, you don't hate guns. You LOVZE guns as long as they are in the hands of your tightly controlled gestapo. You hate guns you can't control and you are too much of a pack of cowards to take personal responsibility for your safety, you want to punish everyone else because YOU don't feel safe and YOU don't feel responsible enough to take care of yourself. Grow up.

[Methais]

The person was fucked in the head. They plotted an attack and carried it out and this time the police weren't waiting outside like in Uvaldi, they put on their bad ass pants, went inside and did what real cops do and killed the fucker as fast as they could.

In before Seran says that those cops are transphobic and should face murder charges and be charged with a hate crime.

[~Rocktar~]

In before Seran says that those cops are transphobic and should face murder charges and be charged with a hate crime.

Have you been taking lessons from the Babylon Bee?

[Seran]

A firearm can also allow a 90 pound single mom walking home from a double shift to defend herself from a 200 pound male that is acting on evil intentions to rape and murder her. They are tools.

God created man. Samuel Colt made man equal.

Also allows disgruntled people that are mow down dozens of innocents in mere moments. The fierce resistance to reasonable gun control seems more an effort to protect gun sales.

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

Also allows disgruntled people that are mow down dozens of innocents in mere moments. The fierce resistance to reasonable gun control seems more an effort to protect gun sales.

You keep jumping the shark with your assumptions. Stop being so stupid.

[Suppressed Poet]

Also allows disgruntled people that are mow down dozens of innocents in mere moments. The fierce resistance to reasonable gun control seems more an effort to protect gun sales.

Sure. Someone can use their car to drive to work, or they can use it to drive through a large crowd. Do we ban cars because some sick asshole used it to mass murder people?

[Parkbandit]

Also allows disgruntled people that are mow down dozens of innocents in mere moments. The fierce resistance to reasonable gun control seems more an effort to protect gun sales.

Banning guns is easy to do. Just get 38 states to agree to it and pass the amendment to the US Constitution.

[Seran]

Sure. Someone can use their car to drive to work, or they can use it to drive through a large crowd. Do we ban cars because some sick asshole used it to mass murder people?

Thousands of instances of gun violence per year support my argument. How many times in the last decade has there been a mass casualty event from a vehicle used a deliberate weapon? 15-20? The problem with your spin is it's predicated on hyperbole.

[Methais]

Thousands of instances of gun violence per year support my argument. How many times in the last decade has there been a mass casualty event from a vehicle used a deliberate weapon? 15-20? The problem with your spin is it's predicated on hyperbole.

I like how you compare just general "gun violence" to "mass casualty event from a vehicle" and think anyone is going to take your retarded arguments seriously.

You suck at everything. It's time for you to acknowledge and accept it.

https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/7164731/post-game.0.gif

[Seran]

We know now the woman had purchased seven guns, all purchased legally. Some of those guns were used to slaughter innocents. Between this woman, Uvalde, and the Crumbley's facilitating the Michigan shooting, when are Republicans going to do something about gun violence?

[Neveragain]

We know now the woman had purchased seven guns, all purchased legally. Some of those guns were used to slaughter innocents. Between this woman, Uvalde, and the Crumbley's facilitating the Michigan shooting, when are Republicans going to do something about gun violence?

As soon as Democrats do something about murdering human beings in the womb.

So, never.

[Suppressed Poet]

Thousands of instances of gun violence per year support my argument. How many times in the last decade has there been a mass casualty event from a vehicle used a deliberate weapon? 15-20? The problem with your spin is it's predicated on hyperbole.

We’ll just end up going in circles because you are incapable of logic, and you go on these kinds of rants repeating the narrative every time there is a mass shooting. So to you I simply say no. I will not support support any infringements on constitutional rights. I will not trade freedom in response to a crisis for a false sense of public safety. Lets find a way to prevent these kind of tragedies without circumventing the constitution & individual liberties.

[~Rocktar~]

We know now the woman had purchased seven guns, all purchased legally. Some of those guns were used to slaughter innocents. Between this woman, Uvalde, and the Crumbley's facilitating the Michigan shooting, when are Republicans going to do something about gun violence?

Well, people like you continue to object to common sense measures like metal detectors in schools, armed officers in every school, firearm safety classes and so on for schools. And then when people get arrested and convicted, you and other dumbasses argue for no cash bail, early release and parole. Simple fact, around 50% of all violent crimes are committed by those that released, parole or escapes. If you deal with gang and drug violence in the 10 most violent cities, where it is notable, the vast majority of which have the most restrictive gun laws in the US, you remove 80+% of the gun violence in the US. But you and other Leftists won't acknowledge it cause that undermines your attempts at control of the masses.

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

1
We know now the woman had purchased seven guns, all purchased legally. Some of those guns were used to slaughter innocents. Between this woman, Uvalde, and the Crumbley's facilitating the Michigan shooting, when are Republicans going to do something about gun violence?

So what gun laws would have prevented this perfectly legal citizen from buying a gun? What gun laws would have prevented this until now, law abiding citizen from killing children?

[Parkbandit]

Thousands of instances of gun violence per year support my argument. How many times in the last decade has there been a mass casualty event from a vehicle used a deliberate weapon? 15-20? The problem with your spin is it's predicated on hyperbole.

Guns have been around for hundreds of years. Why is it only relatively recently that this has become a problem?

[Parkbandit]

We know now the woman had purchased seven guns, all purchased legally. Some of those guns were used to slaughter innocents. Between this woman, Uvalde, and the Crumbley's facilitating the Michigan shooting, when are Republicans going to do something about gun violence?

What new gun laws in your head would have prevented this and the other 2 shootings?

Be specific.

[LOL BRIELUS]

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Tie ownership to people who would be eligible for service. No criminals, mental health clearance(no mentally ill can own), basic citizenship/loyalty test (no radicalists), no drug use.

People who already own can be grandfathered in (no feasible way to just "seize" firearms ex post facto)

Harsher penalties for use in commission of crime and unlawful possession.

Red flag laws but with right to counsel, high burden of proof, short turn around times to ensure due process

SRO/community policing funding

Have to start conversation somewhere and come off hard positions and negotiate a solution my gemstone friends

Probably nothing will happen bc default position of ban assault rifles/infringing my rights will dominate media and talking heads

[Tgo01]

Red flag laws but with right to counsel, high burden of proof, short turn around times to ensure due process

Yes, I'm sure there will totally be "short turn around times" for red flag laws.

[Suppressed Poet]

We know now the woman had purchased seven guns, all purchased legally. Some of those guns were used to slaughter innocents. Between this woman, Uvalde, and the Crumbley's facilitating the Michigan shooting, when are Republicans going to do something about gun violence?

Obviously we need bigger stickers designating schools as gun free zone, or perhaps a ‘glasses for killers’ program so they can read the sign? I don’t know why these things keep happening in places where the intended victims are totally defenseless.

[Suppressed Poet]

Red flag laws means a neighbor reports on someone else to the government, and then the government can seize firearms first without any burden of proof or trial in which the suspected person has an opportunity to answer the charges. I don’t see a way that can be implemented with due process as it wouldn’t be a red flag law any longer.

Our government should not be allowed to simply take someone’s property, without a warrant or being able to answer charges of a crime, simply because someone reported them to authorities. That is some USSR level KGB shit. Can you imagine how often someone like Seran would call the FBI to report on suspicious behavior simply because he doesn’t like them?

[Neveragain]

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Tie ownership to people who would be eligible for service. No criminals, mental health clearance(no mentally ill can own), basic citizenship/loyalty test (no radicalists), no drug use.

People who already own can be grandfathered in (no feasible way to just "seize" firearms ex post facto)

Harsher penalties for use in commission of crime and unlawful possession.

Red flag laws but with right to counsel, high burden of proof, short turn around times to ensure due process

SRO/community policing funding

Have to start conversation somewhere and come off hard positions and negotiate a solution my gemstone friends

Probably nothing will happen bc default position of ban assault rifles/infringing my rights will dominate media and talking heads

"shall not be infringed"

Makes a list of ways to infringe.

"loyalty test"

So, if you were not loyal to King George you couldn't own a weapon?

"Red flag laws but with right to counsel"

Basically, if you're poor you will never own a gun.

There's no conversation that can be had with people that want to disarm you if you don't pledge loyalty.

[Neveragain]

Red flag laws means a neighbor reports on someone else to the government, and then the government can seize firearms first without any burden of proof or trial in which the suspected person has an opportunity to answer the charges. I don’t see a way that can be implemented with due process as it wouldn’t be a red flag law any longer.

Our government should not be allowed to simply take someone’s property, without a warrant or being able to answer charges of a crime, simply because someone reported them to authorities. That is some USSR level KGB shit. Can you imagine how often someone like Seran would call the FBI to report on suspicious behavior simply because he doesn’t like them?

We have already experienced how well this type of law works in the family courts. It's turned into a de facto police force for females against males, innocents be damned.

[Seran]

Obviously we need bigger stickers designating schools as gun free zone, or perhaps a ‘glasses for killers’ program so they can read the sign? I don’t know why these things keep happening in places where the intended victims are totally defenseless.

They're also happening in places where people aren't totally defenseless, as in Uvalde. Armed police officer could have stopped it. The police officers who waited outside for almost an hour could have stopped it. You're trying to equate having guns with protecting everyone else from guns and that is a fallacy. Having a gun /may/ protect you, but it doesn't do anything for those around you. Particularly if you decide to go crazy and shoot up your work or school.

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

They're also happening in places where people aren't totally defenseless, as in Uvalde. Armed police officer could have stopped it. The police officers who waited outside for almost an hour could have stopped it. You're trying to equate having guns with protecting everyone else from guns and that is a fallacy. Having a gun /may/ protect you, but it doesn't do anything for those around you. Particularly if you decide to go crazy and shoot up your work or school.

So we should abandon everything that could hurt a person.

[Neveragain]

They're also happening in places where people aren't totally defenseless, as in Uvalde. Armed police officer could have stopped it. The police officers who waited outside for almost an hour could have stopped it. You're trying to equate having guns with protecting everyone else from guns and that is a fallacy. Having a gun /may/ protect you, but it doesn't do anything for those around you. Particularly if you decide to go crazy and shoot up your work or school.

I have the solution.

All those that want to confiscate guns are the ones that have to confiscate the guns.

https://media2.giphy.com/media/zhMwS2ntbGqbWD2PQz/200w.gif?cid=6c09b952q6uajgztuftz9vfmb774xx11xatyk wyytlcg2afk&rid=200w.gif&ct=g

[Seran]

I have the solution.

All those that want to confiscate guns are the ones that have to confiscate the guns.

The rule of law only applies to people without wealth to overcome it, or the guns to overwhelm it. That really ought to be the slogan of the Republican party.

[Neveragain]

The rule of law only applies to people without wealth to overcome it, or the guns to overwhelm it. That really ought to be the slogan of the Republican party.

The rule of law is the 2nd amendment.

If the wealthy are escaping the justice system, why do you want to disarm the people?

The vast majority of people are not giving up their guns. You and your ilk should come and get them, unarmed and by yourselves.

[~Rocktar~]

They're also happening in places where people aren't totally defenseless, as in Uvalde. Armed police officer could have stopped it. The police officers who waited outside for almost an hour could have stopped it. You're trying to equate having guns with protecting everyone else from guns and that is a fallacy. Having a gun /may/ protect you, but it doesn't do anything for those around you. Particularly if you decide to go crazy and shoot up your work or school.

And your fucking piece of shit Leftist argument for trying to force people to take a vaccine was "If it saves one life, it's worth it." Except in this case, we KNOW firearm ownership saves lives and yet you are arguing against it. Fuck off you ghoulish piece of shit. You couldn't even wait for the bodies to be cold before trying to capitalize on the tragedy.

[Seran]

The rule of law is the 2nd amendment.

If the wealthy are escaping the justice system, why do you want to disarm the people?

The vast majority of people are not giving up their guns. You and your ilk should come and get them, unarmed and by yourselves.

You've been playing role playing games top long if you think the only way to combat a legally immune aristocracy is by being well armed. This is only confirmed by your reinforcing your notion that in system of law, the only way someone should feel compelled to follow it is by direct threat of force.

[Neveragain]

You've been playing role playing games top long if you think the only way to combat a legally immune aristocracy is by being well armed. This is only confirmed by your reinforcing your notion that in system of law, the only way someone should feel compelled to follow it is by direct threat of force.

Not even Jefferson believed all laws should be followed.

Hmm..Seran the dumbass or Thomas Jefferson?

[Suppressed Poet]

They're also happening in places where people aren't totally defenseless, as in Uvalde. Armed police officer could have stopped it. The police officers who waited outside for almost an hour could have stopped it. You're trying to equate having guns with protecting everyone else from guns and that is a fallacy. Having a gun /may/ protect you, but it doesn't do anything for those around you. Particularly if you decide to go crazy and shoot up your work or school.

I say this with genuine humility and sincerely hope I am never faced with such a horrific situation, but if I am armed (as I most often am) and find myself present in an active shooter situation.. I will absolutely use my firearm to protect innocent lives around me from death and/or serious bodily injury. That is a responsibility I have done my best as an ordinary citizen to train for, though I hope such day never comes.

There are tons of other people like me out there except way more badass. An armed society is a safe and polite society. Get rid of the gun free zones as that clearly hasn’t worked. Even better, have a police officer or armed security guard specifically trained in handling such situations in every school in America & watch this problem get solved.

[Seran]

I say this with genuine humility and sincerely hope I am never faced with such a horrific situation, but if I am armed (as I most often am) and find myself present in an active shooter situation.. I will absolutely use my firearm to protect innocent lives around me from death and/or serious bodily injury. That is a responsibility I have done my best as an ordinary citizen to train for, though I hope such day never comes.

There are tons of other people like me out there except way more badass. An armed society is a safe and polite society. Get rid of the gun free zones as that clearly hasn’t worked. Even better, have a police officer or armed security guard specifically trained in handling such situations in every school in America & watch this problem get solved.

Millions of guns in the United States and were not a safe and polite society, nor is a single state free of gun violence in our country.

[Neveragain]

Millions of guns in the United States and were not a safe and polite society, nor is a single state free of gun violence in our country.

It must just be you. People are super polite where I live and damn near every home has a gun in it. I've lived here for nearly 40 years and there has never been a gun problem.

This sounds like a Democrat city problem.

Of course our diversity extends to white people, Mexicans and Vietnamese. We all get along extremely well, super low crime and excellent schools.

[Suppressed Poet]

Millions of guns in the United States and were not a safe and polite society, nor is a single state free of gun violence in our country.

We’re polite where I live. Ever heard or southern hospitality?

No place on earth is exempt from violence. Evil does exist in our world. I think it’s an unrealistic expectation that we would ever get rid of violence completely. Germany recently had a mass shooting incident a few weeks ago, and they have a leftist’s wet dream of gun control.

https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/shooting-germany-kingdom-hall-hamburg-jehovahs-witness/

[Seran]

Apparently the spin is guns aren't the problem, side doors are.


https://youtu.be/vR_RsLONzzs

[Seran]

We’re polite where I live. Ever heard or southern hospitality?

No place on earth is exempt from violence. Evil does exist in our world. I think it’s an unrealistic expectation that we would ever get rid of violence completely. Germany recently had a mass shooting incident a few weeks ago, and they have a leftist’s wet dream of gun control.

https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/shooting-germany-kingdom-hall-hamburg-jehovahs-witness/

Germany has had three mass shootings in the last three years. We have had over a hundred in the last three months so far this year. Gun control obviously works in places like Germany, why can't it work here again?

[Suppressed Poet]

Apparently the spin is guns aren't the problem, side doors are.


https://youtu.be/vR_RsLONzzs

Perhaps you should charge the guns with a crime. Ask them why they did what they did.

[Suppressed Poet]

Germany has had three mass shootings in the last three years. We have had over a hundred in the last three months so far this year. Gun control obviously works in places like Germany, why can't it work here again?

We have a 2nd Amendment so that if someone like Hitler takes over our government we have a fighting chance of doing something about it.

Also…where are you coming up with the US having over 100 mass shootings in the last 3 months, or did you just pull that out of your ass?

[Neveragain]

Germany has had three mass shootings in the last three years. We have had over a hundred in the last three months so far this year. Gun control obviously works in places like Germany, why can't it work here again?

Gun control worked so well in Germany that 6 million Jews got to sleep in ovens.

[Neveragain]

Apparently the spin is guns aren't the problem, side doors are.


https://youtu.be/vR_RsLONzzs

Colbert cares more about his millions being protected by guns than the children he supports being murdered in the womb.

[~Rocktar~]

Gun control worked so well in Germany that 6 million Jews got to sleep in ovens.

11+ million people over all died in camps, not just 6 million Jews. They murdered all the mentally ill, the chronically infirm, all the Romani (Gypsys), other religions and others they didn't like as well as political dissidents. The Jews were just the single largest block.

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

Germany has had three mass shootings in the last three years. We have had over a hundred in the last three months so far this year. Gun control obviously works in places like Germany, why can't it work here again?

Weird. Germany had two in the 3 weeks. Easily verified via google. I'm sure I can find more.

[Suppressed Poet]

Oh I see where you are getting that info on mass shootings…Gun Violence Archives.

So I would say a shooting incident that involves gang bangers shooting each other is way different then say the Nashville school shooting. Here is one incident they count towards that number as an example: https://www.gunviolencearchive.org/sites/default/files/source-screenshots/Chicago%200101%201.png

Tell you what…instead of just banning this or that gun, why don’t you send federal authorities into the ghetto to confiscate guns from actual criminals? If you want that number to go down that seems like a good way to do it. While you are it, perhaps you leftists can actually lock them up this time instead of releasing on no bail bonds for violent crimes. Leave the good law abiding gun owners out of it.

[Neveragain]

11+ million people over all died in camps, not just 6 million Jews. They murdered all the mentally ill, the chronically infirm, all the Romani (Gypsys), other religions and others they didn't like as well as political dissidents. The Jews were just the single largest block.

https://media.tenor.com/wgkPy8pGP6UAAAAd/true-its-true.gif

[lolnerd]

There is no clear answer to this question, as the factors that contributed to Hitler's rise to power were complex and multifaceted. It is important to note that the presence or absence of firearms alone is not likely to have had a significant impact on the rise of Hitler and the Nazi party in Germany.

It's worth noting that there were many Germans who opposed Hitler and the Nazi party, both before and after their rise to power. The factors that allowed Hitler to gain power included a weak and divided political system, economic instability and hardship, the use of propaganda and manipulation, and a range of other factors. It is also important to note that armed resistance against the Nazi regime, while it did occur in some cases, was often met with brutal and overwhelming force by the Nazi government.

In summary, it is difficult to say with certainty whether an armed society could have prevented Hitler's rise to power. The factors that led to the rise of the Nazi party were complex and multifaceted, and the presence or absence of firearms alone is not likely to have had a significant impact on the outcome.

[Suppressed Poet]

There is no clear answer to this question, as the factors that contributed to Hitler's rise to power were complex and multifaceted. It is important to note that the presence or absence of firearms alone is not likely to have had a significant impact on the rise of Hitler and the Nazi party in Germany.

It's worth noting that there were many Germans who opposed Hitler and the Nazi party, both before and after their rise to power. The factors that allowed Hitler to gain power included a weak and divided political system, economic instability and hardship, the use of propaganda and manipulation, and a range of other factors. It is also important to note that armed resistance against the Nazi regime, while it did occur in some cases, was often met with brutal and overwhelming force by the Nazi government.

In summary, it is difficult to say with certainty whether an armed society could have prevented Hitler's rise to power. The factors that led to the rise of the Nazi party were complex and multifaceted, and the presence or absence of firearms alone is not likely to have had a significant impact on the outcome.

If you ask victims of the Holocaust if they would have preferred to have had access to modern firearms in 1935 when the Nuremberg Laws were passed, what do you think they will say? I think the Nazis would find it rather inconvenient to face an armed population when they later started placing their undesirables into cattle carts.

(There is a lot of filmed interviews of survivors that talk about that subject if you would like to explore further.)

[Seran]

Man, what kind of idiots supported the re-election of this woman? At the very least get her some better staff to fact check her Karen moments.


https://youtu.be/MLRaxaTwsYw

[Seran]

And another!


https://youtu.be/XN96Sd-V3SM

[Suppressed Poet]

Man, what kind of idiots supported the re-election of this woman? At the very least get her some better staff to fact check her Karen moments.


https://youtu.be/MLRaxaTwsYw

She is the same kind of idiot as AOC that is just on the other end of the political spectrum & much hotter. The voters are not idiots. You know well enough that the House is a simple red vs blue numbers game. If I lived in AZ I would have gladly voted for her over Frisch.

[Parkbandit]

She is the same kind of idiot as AOC that is just on the other end of the political spectrum & much hotter. The voters are not idiots. You know well enough that the House is a simple red vs blue numbers game. If I lived in AZ I would have gladly voted for her over Frisch.

If AOC wouldn't let us all know how dumb she is by talking, she is hotter than Boebert.

I will say that I saw a video of AOC when she was talking about the current Restrict Act.. or the bill to ban TikTok and I agree with much of what she was saying.

I would rather the US Congress focus on safeguarding American's personal data vs. just banning TikTok because ZOMGCHINA!

[Methais]

We know now the woman had purchased seven guns, all purchased legally. Some of those guns were used to slaughter innocents. Between this woman, Uvalde, and the Crumbley's facilitating the Michigan shooting, when are Republicans going to do something about trans violence?

Fixed.

[Methais]

They're also happening in places where people aren't totally defenseless, as in Uvalde. Armed police officer could have stopped it. The police officers who waited outside for almost an hour could have stopped it. You're trying to equate having guns with protecting everyone else from guns and that is a fallacy. Having a gun /may/ protect you, but it doesn't do anything for those around you. Particularly if you decide to go crazy and shoot up your work or school.

I agree with you that teachers should be given the option to be armed in case of a shooting where the cops who respond are just as much of a pussy as you are.

Also lol @ you trying so hard to deny that the shooter was a tranny.

Stop being a pedo.

[Methais]

They're also happening in places where people aren't totally defenseless, as in Uvalde. Armed police officer could have stopped it. The police officers who waited outside for almost an hour could have stopped it. You're trying to equate having guns with protecting everyone else from guns and that is a fallacy. Having a gun /may/ protect you, but it doesn't do anything for those around you. Particularly if you decide to go crazy and shoot up your work or school.

gg accidentally admitting that guns are useless if a person isn't firing it.

There goes your entire "guns are the problem" argument.

Way to go dumbass. :rofl:

[Seran]

She is the same kind of idiot as AOC that is just on the other end of the political spectrum & much hotter. The voters are not idiots. You know well enough that the House is a simple red vs blue numbers game. If I lived in AZ I would have gladly voted for her over Frisch.

Best use of the taxpayer's dime of course. That and writing pointless letters to the President about negotiating without presenting a budget plan or trying to intervene in a state legal matter.

[Methais]

Best use of the taxpayer's dime of course. That and writing pointless letters to the President about negotiating without presenting a budget plan or trying to intervene in a state legal matter.

Is this a good use of taxpayer money too?

https://i.imgur.com/01G7hZC.png

[~Rocktar~]

You've been playing role playing games top long if you think the only way to combat a legally immune aristocracy is by being well armed. This is only confirmed by your reinforcing your notion that in system of law, the only way someone should feel compelled to follow it is by direct threat of force.

20 million dead in WWII from Nazis who disarmed the populous.
20 million+ dead in the USSR that disarmed the populous.
50 million+ dead in China after the Communist revolution disarmed the populous.
1.3 to 3 million dead in Cambodia after they disarmed the populous.
664K to 1.5 million dead in Armenia who were disarmed.
80K dead in what is now Namibia as a prelude to the Holocaust. Disarmed populous.
Ongoing slaughter of Aborigines up into the mid 1900s, a disarmed people.
200K "disappeared" in the Guatemalan Civil war from the 60s to the 1996, predominantly disarmed Mayans.
500K to 3 million dead in what is now Bangladesh in 1971, disarmed populous.
150k to 300k in Burundi in 1972, disarmed population.
10K+ in Ethiopia in 1976 to 78. Disarmed people murdered by a police state.
20K+ killed in Zimbabwe in the early 80s under Mugabe, disarmed people.
180K+ Iraqi Kurds under Hussein. Disarmed.
7K Bosnian Muslims killed in 1995 leading to the Bosnian war, or "Madeline Albright's War". Disarmed.
80K dead in Rwanda in 1994, disarmed.
400K in Darfur, mostly disarmed.
Unknown dead in Iraq under Isil. Disarmed.
Uncounted millions of Chinese Uyghurs imprisoned in slave labor camps, rape and forced sterilization of women, murdered, possibly used for body parts trade. Disarmed.
Unknown numbers in Venezuela, also disarmed (for the kids).

This is why intelligent people who are not bent on domination and control of others fight against gun control you mush headed, ghoulish piece of shit.

This doesn't count the millions enslaved by human trafficking, the slavery in Libya where they have active slave markets today and all the rest who can't fight back due to being decent people trying to follow unjust laws and who were legally disarmed.

https://www.cde.state.co.us/cosocialstudies/holocaustandgenocideeducation-timeline

[Parkbandit]

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/qanon-shaman-jacob-chansley-released-early-federal-prison-halfway-house-jan-6/

"QAnon Shaman" Jacob Chansley released early from federal prison, transferred to halfway house

[Seran]

Is this a good use of taxpayer money too?

https://i.imgur.com/01G7hZC.png

What precisely is the relevance of a Facebook screenshot? If you want to have dialogue about an event, try providing information about the event you're referencing.

[Methais]

What precisely is the relevance of a Facebook screenshot? If you want to have dialogue about an event, try providing information about the event you're referencing.

It was a mostly empty parking lot staged to look like she was crying in front of a bunch of "kids in cages," and the fence just ends behind where the photographer is standing. Trump was still in office when this happened, so it's not exactly recent.


Here's another angle:

https://i.imgur.com/1Rq3qsY.png
https://i.imgur.com/vwCFTEw.jpg


But you knew all of this already.

[Methais]

https://i.imgur.com/5TWo0PJ.png

[Bhaalizmo]

What precisely is the relevance of a Facebook screenshot? If you want to have dialogue about an event, try providing information about the event you're referencing.

It's kinda funny for about 2 seconds watching these Rs be scared of her, but it got old about 2 seconds later. Just makes em look like a bunch of weak, scared, woman haters. Always taking shots at her no matter what.

[Parkbandit]

It's kinda funny for about 2 seconds watching these Rs be scared of her, but it got old about 2 seconds later. Just makes em look like a bunch of weak, scared, woman haters. Always taking shots at her no matter what.

"YOU ONLY THINK AOC IS DUMB BECAUSE YOU ARE A MYSOGYNIST!" -Bhaalizmo 2023

Do you believe I know you are dumb because I hate men now?

Fucking retard.

[Bhaalizmo]

"You low IQ. You weetawd." -Parkbandit since forever

I believe you are what you call everyone.

[Parkbandit]

https://media3.giphy.com/media/pvbBQfxHPIPcs/giphy.gif

https://i.imgflip.com/6hgdu.gif

[Bhaalizmo]

"You low IQ. Your weetawd." -Parkbandit

https://i.imgur.com/ABSNHER.png

[Parkbandit]

I love Ashliana! He is my hero and lover!

Fantastic. Maybe keep all that mental illness in your two special threads so in the future, the Doctor doesn't have to search around for reasons to prescribe the lobotomy you so desperately require.

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

What precisely is the relevance of a Facebook screenshot? If you want to have dialogue about an event, try providing information about the event you're referencing.

Do you seriously not know about this incredible bit of acting?

I bet you also don't remember when all of the democrats got dressed up like they were from Africa either.

I guess selective outrage requires 100% of your brain.

[Methais]

It's kinda funny for about 2 seconds watching these Rs be scared of her, but it got old about 2 seconds later. Just makes em look like a bunch of weak, scared, woman haters. Always taking shots at her no matter what.

Because it couldn't possibly be about her crying in a confirmed staged photoshoot at an empty parking lot pretending she's crying in front of a bunch of "kids in cages" for woke points because she's a fraud and only the dumbest of the dumb can't see it.

Or are you finally acknowledging that you're as dumb and gullible as Seran? In which case grats for finally having some sort of self awareness.


Protip: AOC isn't gonna bang you no matter how hard you simp for her. You'll just have to be content with your fap thread and waifu pillows like the incel you'll always be.

But just for laughs, tell us what specifically it is about her that republicans are "so scared of."

[Methais]

https://i.imgur.com/MmtWph1.png (https://twitter.com/catturd2/status/1643281545078161409)

https://twitter.com/catturd2/status/1643281545078161409

^ lololololololololol

"I'm black and I like violence!"


I posted the screenshot at this frame so that Bhaalizmo can add it to his fap collection.

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

Anyone remember when Madonna was moderately pretty?

Yeah, the 80's called and her politics sucked then too.

[~Rocktar~]

Do you seriously not know about this incredible bit of acting?

I bet you also don't remember when all of the democrats got dressed up like they were from Africa either.

I guess selective outrage requires 100% of your brain.

Look, he isn't working with much here. Drinking from a regular cup without spilling it takes 100% of his brain.

[Methais]

Look, he isn't working with much here. Drinking from a regular cup without spilling it takes 100% of his brain.

Seran has a drinking problem.

https://media.tenor.com/Ps62vRo72vsAAAAC/airplane-drinking.gif

[Solkern]

Trump’s lawyer defending the picture Trump posted of himself holding a bat next to Bragg.

Tacopina, who previously acknowledged that Trump's posts about the case were "ill-advised," argued that the post was not meant to constitute a threat from the former president. "That is a picture of him showing off an American-made bat," he said.

[Seran]

Trump’s lawyer defending the picture Trump posted of himself holding a bat next to Bragg.

Tacopina, who previously acknowledged that Trump's posts about the case were "ill-advised," argued that the post was not meant to constitute a threat from the former president. "That is a picture of him showing off an American-made bat," he said.

LOL. I imagine the inclusion of the face portrait of Bragg was totally just a random guy added to the shot for contrast?

[Suppressed Poet]

LOL. I imagine the inclusion of the face portrait of Bragg was totally just a random guy added to the shot for contrast?

You interpreted that as a threat? Are you seriously afraid that Donald Trump, an old wealthy businessman & former President of the United States, is going to strike a NY State district attorney with a baseball bat?

That picture was made to troll people like you, because that is what Trump does.

[Methais]

You interpreted that as a threat? Are you seriously afraid that Donald Trump, an old wealthy businessman & former President of the United States, is going to strike a NY State district attorney with a baseball bat?

That picture was made to troll people like you, because that is what Trump does.

I wonder what Seran thought about Kathy Griffin and her decapitated Trump photo. Surely his logic is consistent and he would have interpreted that as a threat at the time. Right Seran?

https://i.imgur.com/rFnURFT.png

[Parkbandit]

I wonder what Seran thought about Kathy Griffin and her decapitated Trump photo. Surely his logic is consistent and he would have interpreted that as a threat at the time. Right Seran?

https://i.imgur.com/rFnURFT.png

"THAT'S DIFFERENT! SHE'S A WOMAN AND ORANGEMAN BAD!" -Seran 2023

[Wrathbringer]

OMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMG guys! GUYS! It's FINALLY HAPPENING FOR REALS REAL REALS THIS TIME, GUYS! Really though, it's finally happening. He's for really real going down this time! I know he was acquitted in both butthurt impeachment attempts, that the russian collusion was debunked and found to be motivated by butthurt, as well as tit-for-tat and now this stuff that has already been turned down by the DOJ twice, BUT SERIOUSLY GUYS!! THIS IS REALLY REALLY REALLY REALLY IT, I PROMISE!

That said, I would like to stop breaking the record for oldest person inaugurated, so if Trump and Biden were prohibited from running, I'd be ecstatic. Between the two, I'd choose the alert guy with a demonstrated ability to run the economy, though. I see Seran is still retarded. Stem cells, buddy. There's hope for you, yet. Not really, but it's got to be depressing enough already just being you, so, hey, maybe!

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

https://thepostmillennial.com/leonardo-dicaprio-testifies-that-ccp-linked-malaysian-financier-now-a-fugitive-sent-30-million-to-obama-during-2012-campaign?utm_campaign=64483

Leonardo DiCaprio testifies that CCP-linked Malaysian financier, now a fugitive, sent $30 million to Obama during 2012 campaign

[Methais]

OMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMG guys! GUYS! It's FINALLY HAPPENING FOR REALS REAL REALS THIS TIME, GUYS! Really though, it's finally happening. He's for really real going down this time! I know he was acquitted in both butthurt impeachment attempts, that the russian collusion was debunked and found to be motivated by butthurt, as well as tit-for-tat and now this stuff that has already been turned down by the DOJ twice, BUT SERIOUSLY GUYS!! THIS IS REALLY REALLY REALLY REALLY IT, I PROMISE!

That said, I would like to stop breaking the record for oldest person inaugurated, so if Trump and Biden were prohibited from running, I'd be ecstatic. Between the two, I'd choose the alert guy with a demonstrated ability to run the economy, though. I see Seran is still retarded. Stem cells, buddy. There's hope for you, yet. Not really, but it's got to be depressing enough already just being you, so, hey, maybe!

This is correct.


https://i.imgflip.com/6swb6h.jpg



My favorite part about all of this is how the most retarded of the retarded useful idiots, which is people like Seran who struggle with basic things like operating a doorknob and are all around useless sacks of unwashed skin, are completely unaware of the precedent this sets, regardless of what actually happens in court with Trump, and the shitstorm it's going to create on all sides going forward.

All because they think this will soothe their chronic neverending butthurt and are too stupid to see anything beyond that. Which will make their meltdowns that much more glorious after this whole thing falls apart.

[Seran]

You interpreted that as a threat? Are you seriously afraid that Donald Trump, an old wealthy businessman & former President of the United States, is going to strike a NY State district attorney with a baseball bat?

That picture was made to troll people like you, because that is what Trump does.

Are you defending the actions of a person under indictment posting to millions of individuals via social media appearing to hold a baseball bat as an implied threat to an elected government official?

[Seran]

https://thepostmillennial.com/leonardo-dicaprio-testifies-that-ccp-linked-malaysian-financier-now-a-fugitive-sent-30-million-to-obama-during-2012-campaign?utm_campaign=64483

Leonardo DiCaprio testifies that CCP-linked Malaysian financier, now a fugitive, sent $30 million to Obama during 2012 campaign

Wow you're misquoting the fuck out of that article. It pointed out he was sent money purportedly to donate to Obama's campaign or to lobby on behalf of the Chinese Government, but stole it instead.

[Suppressed Poet]

Are you defending the actions of a person under indictment posting to millions of individuals via social media appearing to hold a baseball bat as an implied threat to an elected government official?

I’m saying that photo and post on social media does not constitute an implied threat of assault and it’s meant to get under your skin.

Now if Trump wrote, along with that photo, I’m going to beat you with this bat like you were Joe Pesci in the last scene of Casino…I may agree with you.

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

Are you defending the actions of a person under indictment posting to millions of individuals via social media appearing to hold a baseball bat as an implied threat to an elected government official?

I am, you triggered POS.

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

Wow you're misquoting the fuck out of that article. It pointed out he was sent money purportedly to donate to Obama's campaign or to lobby on behalf of the Chinese Government, but stole it instead.

I didn't misquote shit you dumb ass. It's EXACTLY a copy and paste from the article.

[Methais]

https://thepostmillennial.com/leonardo-dicaprio-testifies-that-ccp-linked-malaysian-financier-now-a-fugitive-sent-30-million-to-obama-during-2012-campaign?utm_campaign=64483

Leonardo DiCaprio testifies that CCP-linked Malaysian financier, now a fugitive, sent $30 million to Obama during 2012 campaign

Wow you're misquoting the fuck out of that article. It pointed out he was sent money purportedly to donate to Obama's campaign or to lobby on behalf of the Chinese Government, but stole it instead.



I didn't misquote shit you dumb ass. It's EXACTLY a copy and paste from the article.


Seran is a bit slow due to his mother drinking heavily while pregnant. Allow me to assist.

https://i.imgur.com/NPN6AXJ.png

[Parkbandit]

"BUT IT FAUX N3WZ AND I WUZ TOLD 2 NO BELIEVE THAT!" - Seran the Retard Champion

[Seran]

I didn't misquote shit you dumb ass. It's EXACTLY a copy and paste from the article.

Further proof you didn't read the article an were headline shopping.

[Seran]

I’m saying that photo and post on social media does not constitute an implied threat of assault and it’s meant to get under your skin.

Now if Trump wrote, along with that photo, I’m going to beat you with this bat like you were Joe Pesci in the last scene of Casino…I may agree with you.

A threat doesn't have to be verbal, nor explicit to be a threat. Effigies, slogans, drawings, etc. have all been held to be implicit threats by lawyers enforcement. Our country didn't give free passes to burning effigies during the Civil rights movement and won't for defendant's using imagery to intimidated government officials.

[Suppressed Poet]

A threat doesn't have to be verbal, nor explicit to be a threat. Effigies, slogans, drawings, etc. have all been held to be implicit threats by lawyers enforcement. Our country didn't give free passes to burning effigies during the Civil rights movement and won't for defendant's using imagery to intimidated government officials.

Maybe the NYPD should arrest Trump for threatening a government official then? Only you would be retarded enough to think they could get a conviction.

[Seran]

Maybe the NYPD should arrest Trump for threatening a government official then? Only you would be retarded enough to think they could get a conviction.

S 195.05 Obstructing governmental administration in the second degree.
A person is guilty of obstructing governmental administration when he
intentionally obstructs, impairs or perverts the administration of law
or other governmental function or prevents or attempts to prevent a
public servant from performing an official function, by means of
intimidation, physical force or interference, or by means of any
independently unlawful act, or by means of interfering, whether or not
physical force is involved, with radio, telephone, television or other
telecommunications systems owned or operated by the state, or a county,
city, town, village, fire district or emergency medical service or by
means of releasing a dangerous animal under circumstances evincing the actor`s intent that the animal obstruct governmental administration.
Obstructing governmental administration is a class A misdemeanor.

[Parkbandit]

S 195.05 Obstructing governmental administration in the second degree.
A person is guilty of obstructing governmental administration when he
intentionally obstructs, impairs or perverts the administration of law
or other governmental function or prevents or attempts to prevent a
public servant from performing an official function, by means of
intimidation, physical force or interference, or by means of any
independently unlawful act, or by means of interfering, whether or not
physical force is involved, with radio, telephone, television or other
telecommunications systems owned or operated by the state, or a county,
city, town, village, fire district or emergency medical service or by
means of releasing a dangerous animal under circumstances evincing the actor`s intent that the animal obstruct governmental administration.
Obstructing governmental administration is a class A misdemeanor.

https://media.tenor.com/BKk0-I2aA78AAAAC/we-got.gif

But somehow, we need to bump it up to a felony. Maybe we could claim that Trump had that bat corked.. which would let him strike Bragg harder.. making it a felony in NY? Maybe throw in a few other charges because you know Orange Man won't just hit Bragg once.. he will probably hit him at least a dozen times... 12 felonies! And let's not forget that having a corked bat playing baseball is a crime and subject to ejection and fines and even suspension! Heck, maybe we could push it to an outright BAN!!!

[Methais]

S 195.05 Obstructing governmental administration in the second degree.
A person is guilty of obstructing governmental administration when he
intentionally obstructs, impairs or perverts the administration of law
or other governmental function or prevents or attempts to prevent a
public servant from performing an official function, by means of
intimidation, physical force or interference, or by means of any
independently unlawful act, or by means of interfering, whether or not
physical force is involved, with radio, telephone, television or other
telecommunications systems owned or operated by the state, or a county,
city, town, village, fire district or emergency medical service or by
means of releasing a dangerous animal under circumstances evincing the actor`s intent that the animal obstruct governmental administration.
Obstructing governmental administration is a class A misdemeanor.


At first I was joking about Seran being an AI bot that's coded to be as monumentally retarded as possible in every way, but I'm starting to wonder more and more every day if that's really the case here.

If Seran is an actual person, his brain seriously needs to be studied.

[Methais]

https://media.tenor.com/BKk0-I2aA78AAAAC/we-got.gif

But somehow, we need to bump it up to a felony. Maybe we could claim that Trump had that bat corked.. which would let him strike Bragg harder.. making it a felony in NY? Maybe throw in a few other charges because you know Orange Man won't just hit Bragg once.. he will probably hit him at least a dozen times... 12 felonies! And let's not forget that having a corked bat playing baseball is a crime and subject to ejection and fines and even suspension! Heck, maybe we could push it to an outright BAN!!!

Don't forget that Bragg is black, so they can make it a HATE CRIME too omg omg!

[Suppressed Poet]

S 195.05 Obstructing governmental administration in the second degree.
A person is guilty of obstructing governmental administration when he
intentionally obstructs, impairs or perverts the administration of law
or other governmental function or prevents or attempts to prevent a
public servant from performing an official function, by means of
intimidation, physical force or interference, or by means of any
independently unlawful act, or by means of interfering, whether or not
physical force is involved, with radio, telephone, television or other
telecommunications systems owned or operated by the state, or a county,
city, town, village, fire district or emergency medical service or by
means of releasing a dangerous animal under circumstances evincing the actor`s intent that the animal obstruct governmental administration.
Obstructing governmental administration is a class A misdemeanor.

Please go into detail explaining to all of us how Trump’s social media post obstructed, impaired, prevented, or attempted to prevent Bragg’s official duties in any way.

You know what I think? I think Trump hurt your feelers…

[Neveragain]

S 195.05 Obstructing governmental administration in the second degree.
A person is guilty of obstructing governmental administration when he
intentionally obstructs, impairs or perverts the administration of law
or other governmental function or prevents or attempts to prevent a
public servant from performing an official function, by means of
intimidation, physical force or interference, or by means of any
independently unlawful act, or by means of interfering, whether or not
physical force is involved, with radio, telephone, television or other
telecommunications systems owned or operated by the state, or a county,
city, town, village, fire district or emergency medical service or by
means of releasing a dangerous animal under circumstances evincing the actor`s intent that the animal obstruct governmental administration.
Obstructing governmental administration is a class A misdemeanor.

You crying over one of the oldest political meme's in American history is really gay.

[Seran]

Please go into detail explaining to all of us how Trump’s social media post obstructed, impaired, prevented, or attempted to prevent Bragg’s official duties in any way.

You know what I think? I think Trump hurt your feelers…

Apparently you overlooked all those death threats that have occured to the New York officials and the security they've had to engage and operations they've curtailed as a result of those threats Trump spurred. But don't worry, it graduates to a felony when that threat results in injury.

[Suppressed Poet]

Apparently you overlooked all those death threats that have occured to the New York officials and the security they've had to engage and operations they've curtailed as a result of those threats Trump spurred. But don't worry, it graduates to a felony when that threat results in injury.

I missed the part where Trump told his supporters to enact violence upon Bragg. Can you point that out to me?

(Telling his supporters to go protest is not a call to violence despite your mental gymnastics to try and make it so.)

[Methais]

I missed the part where Trump told his supporters to enact violence upon Bragg. Can you point that out to me?

(Telling his supporters to go protest is not a call to violence despite your mental gymnastics to try and make it so.)

In before "google it."

[Seran]

Apparently you overlooked all those death threats that have occured to the New York officials and the security they've had to engage and operations they've curtailed as a result of those threats Trump spurred. But don't worry, it graduates to a felony when that threat results in injury.


I missed the part where Trump told his supporters to enact violence upon Bragg. Can you point that out to me?

(Telling his supporters to go protest is not a call to violence despite your mental gymnastics to try and make it so.)

Way to miss the point entirely. Trump posted a picture depicting implied violence against New York State officials involved in his felony indictment who are now receiving death threats. This is okay to you.

Kavanaugh got a threat and team GOP lost it's mind and demanded the DOJ protect it, investigate and prosecute. Which they did. Mind you this is the same DOJ the current leader of the GOP (Trump) is demanding be defunded.

[Methais]

Way to miss the point entirely. Trump posted a picture depicting implied violence against New York State officials involved in his felony indictment who are now receiving death threats. This is okay to you.

Kavanaugh got a threat and team GOP lost it's mind and demanded the DOJ protect it, investigate and prosecute. Which they did. Mind you this is the same DOJ the current leader of the GOP (Trump) is demanding be defunded.

Kavanaugh got more than a "threat" you retard. There was an actual assassination attempt. Just because the dude got busted before he could do anything doesn't make it not an assassination attempt.

Or are you saying that a picture on the internet with a baseball bat is somehow worse than an actual assassination attempt? I only ask because you're legitimately stupid enough to believe that, as your posts are already proving.

Dumbass.


https://i.imgur.com/gzUQ9BQ.png

[Suppressed Poet]

Way to miss the point entirely. Trump posted a picture depicting implied violence against New York State officials involved in his felony indictment who are now receiving death threats. This is okay to you.

Kavanaugh got a threat and team GOP lost it's mind and demanded the DOJ protect it, investigate and prosecute. Which they did. Mind you this is the same DOJ the current leader of the GOP (Trump) is demanding be defunded.

Cry harder boot-licking troll. Trump’s post wasn’t a credible threat, and any person with even half a brain understands that.

Edit: Go after those people that made death threats to Bragg, but Trump didn’t threaten him or make any call to violence. He posted a photo of himself holding a baseball bat…

[Seran]

Cry harder boot-licking troll. Trump’s post wasn’t a credible threat, and any person with even half a brain understands that.

Edit: Go after those people that made death threats to Bragg, but Trump didn’t threaten him or make any call to violence. He posted a photo of himself holding a baseball bat…

A baseball bat over the head of Bragg, yes. The devil is in the details, as is the crime.

[Methais]

A baseball bat over the head of Bragg, yes. The devil is in the details, as is the crime.

Are you saying that Trump's baseball bat photo is worse than the actual assassination attempt on Kavanaugh? You won't answer this, and everyone knows why, but I'm asking anyway.


https://i.imgur.com/SYItVQe.png

[Parkbandit]

Apparently you overlooked all those death threats that have occured to the New York officials and the security they've had to engage and operations they've curtailed as a result of those threats Trump spurred. But don't worry, it graduates to a felony when that threat results in injury.

HAHAHAHAHAHAAHA! I was fucking with you about raising it to a felony somehow.. and you managed to do it!

God damn you are so retarded.

[Parkbandit]

A baseball bat over the head of Bragg, yes. The devil is in the details, as is the crime.

Jesus...

[Suppressed Poet]

A baseball bat over the head of Bragg, yes. The devil is in the details, as is the crime.

You are entitled to your retarded opinion I suppose.

[Realk]

:club::club::bananahit: you are all on warning