This always seems like such a weird counterpoint. To say you shouldn't use slurs necessarily implies that you can do otherwise, and if you can't even address that it is a slur after 9 pages, what are we doing here?
Printable View
Why do you still live here then? Since you are living on land stolen from other people, not to mention using their resources to make your life better.
I am seriously surprised you can even live with yourself and haven't done something rash.
I am disgusted with you Back.
God damnit Parkbandit, they DO have thin skin.
...Thin RED skin!
Everyone note. Latrinsorm is afraid of the Federal Godernment. And he wears OJ gloves. And drives a white Bronco.
In that woman's defense.... that guy IS a creepy ass cracker. Plus, he needs to die a thousand times.
Who said it was ok? She caught a lot of flak for that comment.
This is an interesting point. By continuing to live on this stolen land called America, you are part of the problem and not part of the solution. The only way you can help is to leave the country.
Zimmerman is a creepy ass tortilla, not a cracker.
I don't really remember anyone saying anything about it one way or the other. We must all be racist then by omission.
OR... we can admit that we gave the Native Americans a raw deal and treat them with dignity and respect by not using caricatures or derogatory names for our sports teams. Crazy, I know.
And.... proudly displaying a team worth hundreds of millions of dollars, by dignifying said team with a mascot that represents you, honoring a noble sect of humanity like Indians... that's derogatory?
It aint like anyone's saying, "LAWL. We just have that injun face up there to laugh about their addiction to our 'shine. HAH. We're really the Whiteskins, but we'll call ourselves Redskins for the laughs!"
And for the record, yeah we totally screwed the Indians. But guess what, they got screwed by not being ready to defend their world. You had like 60 tribes spread across the entire fucking country, thinking 'we sit here in the middle of what is now Georgia.... EVERYTHING WITHIN GEORGIA LIMITS IS OURS'.......
Rule of war. Don't take what you can't defend. Had they all banded together, they'd have been able to mount a fairly good defense, considering their knowledge of the terrain and use of nature and all that mystical battle mumbo jumbo.
If we hadn't done it, the USA would have been taken over by Asians. Or Russians. Or the FRENCH, god forbid! Think about it. The world wouldn't have just left these people alone.
Do they serve buffalo wings?
No. Mostly Louisiana food. Muffaletas and such.
http://www.urbanspoon.com/cities/285..._photos/246497
The chef is amazing.
Racists. They don't honor the Injuns and their noble buffalo-hunting ways.
Boycott them! You must respect the Indians! Even at the cost of your pleasure! So speaks the prophet of this thread *Not me, that other guy*
"It's my RIGHT as an AMURKAN to be an ignorant, classless piece of shit! I can ignore anything and everything that's happened historically to allow me to be here! FUCK the redskins, they lost! FUCK the niggers, they lost! Don't you dare try to make me feel guilty because I wasn't there! I haven't benefitted not one bit from history! I did it all myself because I'm the best! I'm a fuckin' ISLAND!!!!11"
I fully agree that I am neither of those things. Happily so, in fact. While we're at it, I don't ever recall claiming to be either of those things.
You think rocks can talk, and you call me ignorant?Quote:
The amount of ignorance you display...is as much as a rock could call itself a vegetable.
But seriously...I'm fine with you calling me misguided, but you're going to have to bring something substantial to the table before you can call me ignorant.
I'm sorry I don't fit into what you've been told a Libertarian is, but if you'd like to overcome the brainwash and have a thoughtful discussion about it, I'm all for it.Quote:
...and claim to be a Libertarian...
Merriam-Webster defines Nationalist as "a support of or a believer in Nationalism". They define Nationalism as "a feeling that people have of being loyal to and proud of their country often with the belief that it is better and more important than other countries".Quote:
You are nothing more than a Nationalist.
I'm good with that, since I do actually believe those things. It worries me a bit that you think that's a bad thing. That's something that anyone can feel regardless of political affiliation...to say I'm "nothing more than..." is pretty silly, since they are unrelated.
This looks fun, I wanna try.
FIXEDZ0RZQuote:
Originally Posted by waywardgs
Gangster
http://img2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb2...d/Gangster.jpg
Gangsta
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_WBPO1Pb3CJ...0/wigger+5.jpg
You'd know more about the streets if you hung out wit Atlanteax more often.
Redskins president fires back at Senate.
Quote:
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Redskins President Bruce Allen said in a letter to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid on Saturday that the football team's nickname is "respectful" toward Native Americans.
On Thursday, half the U.S. Senate urged NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell to change the Washington club's name, saying it is a racist slur and it is time to replace it.
The franchise responded by releasing Allen's letter.
"Our use of `Redskins' as the name of our football team for more than 80 years has always been respectful of and shown reverence toward the proud legacy and traditions of Native Americans," he wrote.
The letter references research that "the term Redskins originated as a Native American expression of solidarity." It notes that the team's logo was designed by Native American leaders and cites surveys that Native Americans and Americans as a whole support the name.
Redskins owner Daniel Snyder has refused to change the name, citing tradition, but there has been growing pressure including statements in recent months from President Barack Obama, lawmakers of both parties and civil rights groups. Last month, Reid took to the Senate floor to say Snyder should "do what is morally right" and change the name.
In a letter Thursday, 49 senators mentioned the NBA's quick action recently to ban Los Angeles Clippers owner Donald Sterling for life after he was heard on an audio recording making offensive comments about blacks. They said Goodell should formally push to rename the Redskins.
"We urge you and the National Football League to send the same clear message as the NBA did: that racism and bigotry have no place in professional sports," read the letter, which did not use the word "Redskins."
Sen. Bill Nelson of Florida wrote his own letter saying he doesn't believe that retaining the Redskin name "is appropriate in this day and age."
In a written response Thursday, NFL spokesman Brian McCarthy said "the intent of the team's name has always been to present a strong, positive and respectful image."
Reid and Sen. Maria Cantwell of Washington led the letter-writing effort. All senators on the letter are Democrats. Cantwell spokesman Jared Leopold said Republicans were not asked to participate.
The senators noted that tribal organizations representing more than 2 million Native Americans across the U.S. have said they want the Redskins name dropped.
Despite federal laws protecting their identity, "Every Sunday during football season, the Washington, D.C., football team mocks their culture," they wrote. "The NFL can no longer ignore this and perpetuate the use of this name as anything but what it is: a racial slur."
First you accuse me of not being able to be decent and then you accuse me of being a racist fictional character.
Dude, seriously... the toll for the "high road" you wish you could travel on is something you cannot afford.
Don't bother getting on it... it's obviously not for you.
Archie Bunker's such a perfect comparison....and that shit was 40 years ago.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y0rhuKmC0Cw
I guess in this scenario you're Meathead; a pseudo intellectual who doesn't contribute anything to society while mooching off of his father-in-law, admitted he was a huge hypocrite by refusing to get a vestocomy when his wife was worried they couldn't afford anymore children while at the same time calling men in India irresponsible by refusing to get a vestocomy for the same reason, whose wife eventually ends up leaving him for another man because all Meathead did was talk down to her and treat her like she was stupid and whose only black friend admits he prefers Archie's company over Meathead's because Archie is honest with his feelings and opinions whereas Meathead uses him as a conduit to the black community and to help assuage his own white guilt.
Y'know, your typical liberal :D
So should the Vikings change their name? GOD, that's so mean!
Actually given the Redskins ability to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory, I think there are other names they should call themselves. But I guess that's off topic.
Oh, I thought you were claiming to not be a Libertarian or a Nationalist.
Hey cwolff, let's play a game. How about a caption contest?
http://d1jrw5jterzxwu.cloudfront.net...ppropriate.jpg
.Quote:
One little, two little, three little Indians
Four little, five little, six little Indians
Seven little, eight little, nine little Indians
Ten little Indian boys.
Ten little, nine little, eight little Indians
Seven little, six little, five little Indians
Four little, three little, two little Indians
One little Indian boy.
I find it funny that people call what happened a "war". What happened was Europeans arrived, starved till the Indians helped em out, they had a nice dinner together, and when the Europeans were back on their feet they got on that grind and wrecked house. Genocide is a better word. And now we cram em all onto camps. Awesome stuff for the land of the free. Good work.
It's a shameful part of our history, and people just want to ignore and forget about it because it shakes how we define ourselves as Americans. People call ditching Columbus Day revisionist- it's actually the exact opposite. It's acknowledging what actually happened and realizing that it's not something we should be celebrating.
How do YOU know it isn't racist, wayward?! ARE YOU A VIKING?! ARE YOU?!
ARE YOU?!?!?!
PS: If you are.... I want a hat.
I want one of those dual horned hats that you can turn upside down, fill it with mead, twist the left horn tip, and it becomes a medieval beer bong. YUS!
I would NEVER give my address over the Internet! Gawd! You can mail it to my job. They'll totally accept it, in case it's Anthrax.
Hey, anthrax was a good band. What's the problem? You don't want your hat? Why do you hate Scandinavians??
Even if one person is offended, it's worth changing the name. If you like to offend people and cause pain of any sort, then you have some issues.
Love all and live in harmony.
No, this is gangsta rap
http://youtu.be/yf9gulYfUh4
That's easy. A free day off if you work for the government.
They're butthurt we aren't one of their colonies anymore. They're compensating.
I feel your pain, Viking. I am on Salary, so if there's work, I go in. When there's no work, I get to stay home, but that happens about as often as an Indian going to a Redskins game.
Haha...I too am on salary. Cool thing is I'm in the restaurant biz in central Florida...so right about now I'm coasting more often than not. Bad thing is I'm in the restaurant biz in central Florida....come September I'll be working 70 hours a week again.
(my slow weeks are still 50 hours)
But at least I get to take a few weeks off...I'll be at my condo on Indian Rocks Beach from the 7th to the 14th, if anyone is in the area shoot me a message, we'll hit Crabby Bills for some oysters and baseball.
edit: 7th to the 14th of June...and Bill's.
Yes.. he's the authority on racism.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid apologized Saturday following reports he had privately described then-candidate Barack Obama during the presidential campaign as a black candidate who could be successful thanks in part to his “light-skinned” appearance and speaking patterns "with no Negro dialect, unless he wanted to have one."
This is factually incorrect.That's because multi-syllable team names are unwieldy. Of the 92 major sports teams, only 2 go 4+ (49ers and 76ers) and only another 14 reach 3. (Buccaneer is kind of a gray area, you can pronounce it buc-a-ne-ur.) The reason no pro teams are named the Rebels is that the overwhelming majority of pro teams are not in the deep South. Alabama, Mississippi, and South Carolina are shut out entirely. Georgia only generates teams out of Atlanta, Louisiana only out of New Orleans, each of which are culturally distinct.Quote:
Not to mention a team couldn't get away with being called the "Confederates".
Do you think that will go over well?
This is not how a slur is defined.Quote:
It can be if used in a derogatory way, just like Redskin, since it wasn't originally a derogatory name. Just like Negro wasn't either.
I mean.. if your ancestors were attacked by Vikings.. you may not like the name.
According to Merriam Webster it means to perform (a group of two or more notes) legato, and Legato Bluesummers is a mass murderer, so you know... I don't know if your conscience can be clear with that in mind. I just don't know.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yankee
It's a slur. The internet says so. Not that I believe stupid shit like Wiki, but it's right. Just because you don't think Yankee isn't a slur, doesn't mean it isn't. You cracker!
The internet says it's a pejorative when used by Britons. I'm sure there are many slurs in foreign languages, but that does not make them slurs in the one true language.
But I want to point something out really quick: do you (all) notice the lengths you're going to to avoid simply not using the original slur in question? You insist it's not a slur, you insist you have freedom of speech, you whine that other slurs go unpunished... when are you going to grow up and just not use slurs? I've managed it, why can't you? Aren't you better than me?
What redskin? I don't consider it a slur. Neither did the people who used it first, aka the Indians. It wasn't used as a slur till after the civil war. The funny thing is this.. some asshole white person took a word that the Native Americans used themselves to identify themselves, even in treaties with the "whiteman", and used it as a derogatory term. Suddenly that word is taboo.
There are SOOOOOO many words that are like this it isn't funny. Hell, assholes can make just about any word a racial slur.
What the hell is the one true language? Wow, that sounds like a familiar individual that started a couple wars a while back...
Dang it! Well, I kept up my cover for 10 years, I think that's pretty good. JackWhisper guessed it, folks, I'm former President George W. Bush. As you no doubt have also guessed, this makes ClydeR Cheney and Tgo01 Rummy. Think about it. It all adds up.The word was a slur before the team got its name. If other words happen to become slurs after other teams are named, we can address that then.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jarvan
Saw this article today. It's a big enough topic that it should have it's own thread though it fits this thread too which is kind of sad.
The Case for Reparations
This picture below is powerful. Look at the faces of those people. They're just regular citizens. These weren't some outrageous fringe. I bet they were good God-fearing Americans who felt like they were making it in this World through hard work and clean living.
American Exceptionalism is built on crimes against humanity. Now that blacks are catching up whitey's all about being fair and keeping things even. That's why we keep hearing white folks bitching about Affirmative Action and Indian Casinos and how that Football Team has an 80 year tradition! It's a lie and it'll never be right until we can look honestly at our history and the land grab which gave us so much free shit.
http://cdn.theatlantic.com/newsroom/.../ad13b2998.jpg
What's up with this psycho fuck:
Attachment 6550
Ya, he's pleased as punch isn't he. That picture's from 1920 and it was turned into a postcard. Isn't that a nice keepsake? Lynching postcards.
The Redskins started out as the Braves in 1932 and changed their name to Redskins in 1933. The name change was to honor their Native American head coach Lone Star Dietz. Turns out Dietz was a fraud. So the football team appropriated First Nations heritage based on their coach who was appropriating the culture himself. They should be charged with receiving stolen valor.
The one guy who saw the camera. OH SHIT CHEESE!
They probably changed their name because of the Atlanta Braves, but who knows if that team was around playing baseball as that team in the 30s.
Wikipedia does, and they were.
How would you feel if they changed the name from the Redskins to the Rednecks? Would that be considered an offensive slur to where it should be changed to something else?
I think people bitching about everything is offensively stupid, but I'm a misanthrope, so I should just stay inside, shutup, and color.
Clarification: People are too softskinned these days. Need to toughen up. Nancies!
There's no word for white people floating around our culture that's too bad. Redneck and Redskin are not equal. That's the false equivalency Latrin and Obama been talking about.
I don't mean to sound indignant, but it's nobody's right to say 'this isn't offensive' to someone else, about what they feel. It's their right as Americans to be ignorant dumbfucks, and if they're heavily offended by being called a cracker, it's the same thing. Whether you see it as the same or not, is your prerogative, and that's 100% okay!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A2Odr15W8rI
White dads aren't this hilarious.
I'm not actually a southerner. I just live in the south.
I think most rednecks are retarded. But I also don't equate redneck to racist cracker and vice versa, like the cool thing to do these days is.
I'm not sure who is more self hating, you or Blacklash.Quote:
Originally Posted by cwolff
Pretty tight race though.
White guy says, "Hey black guy, you're a nigger!"
*BLACK GUY KICKS WHITE GUY'S ASS AND EVERYONE SAYS IT'S JUSTIFIED*
White guy says, "Hey Native American, you're a redskin!"
*NATIVE AMERICAN KICKS WHITE GUY'S ASS AND EVERYONE SAYS IT'S JUSTIFIED*
Black guy says, "Hey white guy, you're a cracker!"
*WHITE GUY KICKS BLACK GUY'S ASS AND WHITE GUY IS CHARGED WITH A HATE CRIME WHILE BLACK GUY IS HAILED AS A VICTIM AND A HERO*
Native American guy says, "Hey white guy, you're a cracker!"
*WHITE GUY KICKS NATIVE AMERICAN GUY'S ASS AND WHITE GUY IS CHARGED WITH A HATE CRIME WHILE NATIVE AMERICAN GUY IS HAILED AS A VICTIM AND A HERO*
This is the language they use to recruit for white power groups. Maybe Methais is grand shit of white pride turd mountain.
Here's something to keep in mind: White American Men don't get to be victimized. If you're not happy and you haven't done the things or had the success you think you deserve then it's your own god damn fault because you were born with great advantage.
Happy ending for Matt and Laura!
http://www.eharmony.com/dating-advic...att-and-laura/
Doesn't matter. Just being a white american male is a powerful thing. Recognize it.
Look at this talk. He really is a KKK type.
Quote:
There's no word for white people floating around our culture that's too bad. Redneck and Redskin are not equal. That's the false equivalency Latrin and Obama been talking about.
It does matter. A crack baby from a trailer park in Alabama is a crack baby from a trailer park in Alabama. He then goes to shitty public Alabama schools and gets a shitty education. He then doesn't go to college because his grades suck, because again, he is a crack baby from a trailer park in Alabama. Having low prospects for life, he stays a crack baby from a trailer park in Alabama and one day creates more crack babies in a trailer park in Alabama.
This shit transcends race and even the "all powerful" white race isn't immune from it.
I think they probably would both crash and burn.
With that said, however, one would have an easier time in school and with the courts.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/21/us...ial-lines.html
http://www.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions...3a0141p-06.pdf
Nationally, sure. I doubt there is a big difference between a school in Alabama that serves a poor community and a school in Harlam that serves a poor community, however. There is a disparity, but I don't think it is based on racial lines. It is based on income and where you live. I'm not saying that there aren't more white people in better situations than other races. I am saying, in response to Cwolff, that just because you are white doesn't mean you can't be victimized or that your color will automatically make you win at things.
That would just be racist.
At least Methais can agree that it's a slur.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
Why do people say this? It's one thing if a white man says he can't catch a break in this world because he's white but it's possible for white men to have a hard time in America. Around 17% of Americans live in poverty; they aren't all minorities.
You're trying to disprove what Methais said yet it sounds like you're proving his point.
"Whites complain about catching a tough break in life? Well that's just tough shit! They are obviously lazy and stupid because they had every advantage in life!"
Now imagine if we just changed the word "whites" to "blacks" and a Republican said it...WOO BOY! Would we be hear "racist" being screamed over and over again.
Oh, definitely. Keep in mind though that 63% of the US population is white with 10% of that in poverty, while blacks make up 12% population and have a poverty rate of almost 30%. It might be true that there are more white Americans living in poverty than blacks, however the poverty rate is much higher among blacks and other demographics.
It's almost as if...you're judging a group of people based solely on the color of their skin.
What's the word for that again? Help me out here...
Explain how pointing out hypocrisy and double standards = complaining about being disadvantaged. And I guess a KKK leader since you brought that up too.Quote:
Complain all you want. Don't complain about being disadvantaged because of your race.
You didn't point out shit. It may be what you feel but that doesn't make it true. Look at this trash you wrote. There's no substance there at all. You're playing this victim card as a the poor persecuted majority and it rings hollow.
Whatever helps you sleep at night under your cozy blanket of white guilt.
I like the part where you dodged the first half of my post.
Let's try this again...
It's almost as if...you're judging a group of people based solely on the color of their skin.
What's the word for that again? Help me out here...
Mehtais says some whites are mistreated by some members of society based on the color of their skin, cwolff comes along and calls all poor white people lazy and stupid and thinks he's proving Methais wrong.
Am I missing something here?
Did you use the words "poor whites are stupid and lazy"? No.
Did you insinuate the hell out of it? Yes.
Are you now engaging in your patented move of back peddling? Yes.
http://img2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb2...cycle_Kick.gif
Alright, let's assume for one minute you're not back peddling again and I just misread what you wrote.
What exactly do you mean by if a white man doesn't have the things he wants or the success he thinks he deserves then it's his own damn fault?
To me you're saying the person is lazy or stupid but I'd love to hear what you really meant.
It could be as innocuous as saying white people's history of being the American government's favored race has overinflated their expectations, thus what a white man thinks he deserves is not actually what he deserves.
I mean that white men have no room to blame their race and gender if life in the U.S.A. doesn't meet their expectations.Quote:
What exactly do you mean by if a white man doesn't have the things he wants or the success he thinks he deserves then it's his own damn fault?
To me you're saying the person is lazy or stupid but I'd love to hear what you really meant.
http://replygif.net/i/1339.gif
Parkbandit, there's your quote.
I don't need anyone else to do that for me!! Er...You and the people you choose to surround yourself with treat minorities equitably. This is not indicative of the national trend. Like I've suggested before, try wearing traditional Muslim attire for a few weeks and see how the gen pop treats you.Quote:
Originally Posted by Thondalar
Well, I guess this is the core of the issue. I could really care less how someone else "treats" me. If they do so in a manner that violates law I am confident in my local law enforcement's ability to handle the situation. In any other way I'm confident in my own ability to handle the situation.
You choose whether or not you let something offend you. That is a choice only you can make. Nobody else is equipped to make that decision for you, the government least of all.
Our horrible educational system is more the problem then anything else.
Cool video about a USMC vet and Ojibwe man who's passing down his traditions. It has some footage from the "walleye wars" which took place in the 1980's. Pretty recent history for the Ojibwe in the North Country. They were only excercising their treaty rights but had to do it in the face of abuse and death threats. When people like Dan Snyder say the natives have more to worry about than the name of a football team he's right.
http://vimeo.com/86737493
Whats wrong with "white guilt"?
Or, more specifically, "guilt" in general?
It's not productive. I take issue with the whole "white guilt" concept anyway. Just because I'm white and recognize the problems with equality faced by modern american society doesn't mean I somehow feel guilty or am self-hating. It just means I have empathy and want to see that this country actually lives up to what it claims to be- a place where everyone has a shot, regardless of race, creed, or religion, unhampered by historically institutionalized, systemic inequality. Because in the end, it's a non-zero sum game. The better my neighbor does, the better I do. We all benefit from one another's success.
What's right with "white guilt", particularly involving those who never owned slaves or had anything to do with any of the shit that retards like you think all white people should feel guilty over?
Guilt typically involves feeling that way over something that that person has done. Not something that people who have been dead for decades/centuries that just happened to have the same color skin.Quote:
Or, more specifically, "guilt" in general?
1. the fact or state of having committed an offense, crime, violation, or wrong, especially against moral or penal law; culpability: He admitted his guilt.
2. a feeling of responsibility or remorse for some offense, crime, wrong, etc., whether real or imagined.
3. conduct involving the commission of such crimes, wrongs, etc.: to live a life of guilt.
The only part of any of those definitions that applies to people like you are the last two words of the second definition. Unless you personally actually did something that you believe you should feel guilty over because of the color of your skin, of course.
But please tell us, since you're white, why do you personally feel guilty for being white if you haven't yourself done anything wrong to other races?
If you suffer from white guilt, then you're racist, both because you hate white people because of the color of their skin, and also because you believe that minorities are incapable of having an equal opportunity in life because of the color of their skin unless you and other white people hate themselves in order to level the playing field, because you don't think minorities can do it on their own.
Do you believe that the current generation of Germans should feel guilty over the Holocaust, despite the fact that they weren't even born until decades after it happened? Why or why not?
Do you believe that black people of today should feel black guilt because their African ancestors sold their own people into slavery centuries ago? Why or why not?
Do you believe that Johnny from the Karate Kid was a great 80s villain?
You love using the word "progress". How does any race hating themselves = progress, as opposed to treating all races equally, including their own?
What do you think white people should do to absolve themselves from all this guilt?
I don't know it really an absolve issue as much as an awareness issue... recognition that generations have built an architecture that favors some over others. You can choose to not believe it, or explain it with other opinions, but some people might choose to believe it's not something you just erase because you personally didn't add to the problem. Also guilt does not necessarily equal self hatred. You can feel empathy without hating yourself because it doesn't affect you.
"Racial inequality exists."
"STOP TRYING TO MAKE ME FEEL GUILTY FOR BEING WHITE I DIDNT DO SHIT FUCK YOU!!"
"Uhh.. Calm down a bit, it's ok, no one is blaming you."
I've never felt guilt about being white. But let me break down a few statements for all you people out there saying white people should give back to other people.
Affirmative action: I'm a foreman at my shop. I'm a woodworker. It's nothing glamorous. It's dangerous, and it's not very good pay, but it's honest work. I can't ask for more than that. Now, I've had to hire two guys, out of nine. On the aptitude assessment, they scored lower than one black guy, and one white guy. I didn't know any of the four prior to this. I know all four now because two are hired, and two are on the backlog of hiring. Now. These two people are Korean and Indian *Cherokee, I have been told*. I was told to hire these people because it filled some quota so that the company can't be targeted for restrictive or priority hiring policies. So I'm supposed to deal with two people who, though are both hard workers and are competent, do not know how to work equipment other individuals who tested the same as them, do? Where is that fair? This is a country-wide thing, too. Having QUOTAS for hiring minorities. That's horseshit.
Racism: I'm not racist. I don't care enough TO be racist. I pretty much dislike everyone at the get-go because 95% of the time, people let you down. All you can rely on tends to be yourself. I even despise my own extended family, short of one Aunt. The rest are backwater, white trash, rednecks who are racist as a way of life. My family moved away from them specifically so my brother and I were not exposed to that sort of bigoted viewpoint. When I turned 25, I had my son, he was just an infant, not three months old, I took him to my idiotic family to show him and say 'This is the newest addition.".... My cousin Shane started to say something about this guy at work he got into an argument with. He got the N word off twice before my fist connected with his jaw. Haven't seen my family since. Thank god. So I'm supposed to feel guilty because people in my family I hate are racist? That's horseshit.
Slavery: I didn't own slaves. You didn't own slaves. You weren't a slave. Your friends weren't slaves. Most of you, if you're of an ethnic minority, even your parents were not slaves. Your grandparents might have caught the tail end of that shit. Sucks, sorry you had that happen to your grandparents. Nothing happened to you. You're trying to mooch off a fucked situation that happened several decades ago because you want to get something out of it. That's so stupid it defies reasoning. People wonder why people aren't treated equal in this country. Because people can't shut the fuck up and just do their job, live their life, and BE equal. No, there's got to be someone pissed off at the world because dumbasses back in the day decided to be dumbasses. We weren't born, you weren't born, shut the hell up. For real. Nobody takes it seriously because wow, it happened a LONG time ago. Bitch about something else. I'm not saying the entire world is equal and forthcoming with their feelings but wow, don't you think it'd be a lot more straightforward if people just worked hard to get their respect instead of demanding they are persecuted to try to get something for nothing off the backs of the troubles of 4+ generations ago? That's horseshit.
All in all, I've got nothing to be guilty about. I'm white. I'm proud. Not of being white, but of being alive, 30 years old, and a father. No matter the color of your skin, do your job, and you, for the MOST part, will be respected for your hard work and work ethics. It's not a perfect suggestion, but it's a damn sight better than everything people spout off about.
White people aren't worth thinking about. Neither are red, black, brown, yellow, orange, green, blue, or purple. The silver people might be, though. GO SILVER PEOPLE!
Not my point at all. I'm not telling you or anyone else what they should feel. My point is pretty straight forward... we all pretty much boil down to a product of our environment. I also had fairly little to do with that environment, it was sort of handed to me at birth... but it benefited me in getting to where I am now. It might not have defined it, but it helped me. That's part of the architecture that was already built in my favor, even if I never directly caused it.
There's no shame or self hatred in feeling empathy for people who didn't get handed that same advantage. Doesn't mean I owe anyone to make it right, but I also don't need to be arrogant about the differences and assume the system had absolutely nothing to do with the results. Just the way I see it.
On the sole basis of being a white person, I get a 5% raise on average. (So do you.) I don't begrudge the people who are on the wrong side of that equation pointing it out. I also don't understand why their doing so is so offensive to you. You don't seem to have anything to gain by tolerance for racism. My best guess is that your sole motivating factor is not wanting to be factually incorrect.
Montessori school gives scholarship to native americans, gets pissed when the native americans explain "you're doing it wrong."
To be fair, I don't believe the school purposely tried to be insensitive and it's a shame that the two parties were unable to figure this out without litigation.
Quote:
Red flags were raised in early November 2012 when they learned the school was planning Thanksgiving classroom activities encouraging students to dance around teepees, dress up as Indians with headbands of multi-colored feathers and give each other “Indian names.”
“Whenever we go back to [the Pine Ridge Reservation] where my wife is from, [the children] are surrounded by ceremonies and dances. They’re taught feathers are sacred and only for ceremony,” said James Oxendine, Lumbee, an information systems officer in the U.S. Navy. “And it was confusing for them to see the school doing it differently and perpetuating stereotypes in this way.”
After receiving a newsletter describing the week of potentially offensive activities, his wife, Jeanne Eagle Bull-Oxendine, Oglala Sioux, decided to try to engage the school in creating a culturally appropriate curriculum.
What followed is in dispute. School officials say they immediately ended the curriculum and have tried to cooperate with the Oxendines.
But the Oxendines say the school resisted ending their Thanksgiving tradition, and told them to keep their kids at home rather than change the curriculum and eventually revoked their daughter’s scholarship to be rid of their complaints.
“They said they were doing these activities to honor us [Native Americans], but then they wanted us to stay home while they were honoring us,” said Eagle Bull-Oxendine.
Read more at http://indiancountrytodaymedianetwor...riculum-152439
Quote:
But now officials from Maria Montessori School in San Diego, which gave scholarships to two of the Oxendines’ children in part because of their Native heritage, have filed a $20,000 defamation lawsuit against the Oxendines, as first reported by Brandon Ecoffey of Native Sun News.
In the lawsuit, the school officials argue the news stories led to negative and “malicious” Internet comments as well as hate mail that purposely injured the school’s reputation and held them to “public contempt and ridicule.”
The officials also claim in the lawsuit that the pre-school curriculum was not racist and historically-based even though it included classroom activities that encouraged students dancing around teepees, dressing up as Indians with headbands and multi-colored feathers and giving each other “nature-based” Indian names.
Read more at http://indiancountrytodaymedianetwor...riculum-155044
Latrin, I don't know where you work, but that's screwed. All my men get paid the same, minus the three on the night shift that get paid 4 bucks extra each. Of those three, they are paid the same. The only differences in their pays is how long they've worked there. They all get pay raises in the exact same amounts. Which I will explain below. I've got a varied ethnic workforce, and they're all hard workers. There are 4 foremen, of which I am one. Our salaries, since all 4 of us are salary, are based purely *PURELY* on how much time you've been with the company. Raises happen with how many paychecks you've gotten. Similar to how grocery chains do raises at 5000/10000/etc at el hours employed/worked. So... while you may experience that inequality, I am happy to say I do not, and am in a comfortable enough economic position to say that's fucked up, and I'd get upset about my men not getting paid appropriately.
The United States of America.Good to know. If you think about it, though, situations like yours (which certainly exist) make the racial disparity even more egregious in the places it does occur so as to reach the average figure of 5%. If all forms of racism (conscious and otherwise) are outnumbered 3 to 1, it means the pay disparity would have to be 20% because (20 + 0 + 0 + 0) / 4 = 5.Quote:
All my men get paid the same, minus the three on the night shift that get paid 4 bucks extra each. Of those three, they are paid the same. The only differences in their pays is how long they've worked there. They all get pay raises in the exact same amounts. Which I will explain below. I've got a varied ethnic workforce, and they're all hard workers. There are 4 foremen, of which I am one. Our salaries, since all 4 of us are salary, are based purely *PURELY* on how much time you've been with the company. Raises happen with how many paychecks you've gotten. Similar to how grocery chains do raises at 5000/10000/etc at el hours employed/worked. So... while you may experience that inequality, I am happy to say I do not, and am in a comfortable enough economic position to say that's fucked up, and I'd get upset about my men not getting paid appropriately.
When I worked in LA, I worked as a chef. Three years. Fun times. We got asked once, as a group, what we wanted to do, financially. We all sat down together, there was several of us, and we decided we should simply take everyone's paycheck, and divide it by the amount of people, so everyone got the same amount. The head chef got paid a bit less, and the baker got paid a bit more. Nobody was pissed about it, because it made sense that everyone was trying to make the business succeed, so we should all share equally in the profits for our hard work.
Whether or not it happens a lot, hey, I don't dispute there are racial disparities in this country. People are assholes. The world happens. People are out to get theirs. Whatever. S'how it goes. But I think that yeah, it happens. But more and more places, as the times change slowly, are becoming more evenhanded to help everyone, instead of one type. Just my 2 cents.
You know what would help make everyone more evenhanded? Education.
Because job interviews usually don't go well when you sound like this unless you're a race hustler:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VD6MTlT2Ye8#t=66
I bet this guy loves the name Redskins.
Quote:
The Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe in Mt. Pleasant, Michigan, is calling for a boycott of Lansing-based firm ACD.net, whose Chief Financial Officer Kirk Shewchuck left a voicemail laced with racial slurs and vulgarities after apparently not hanging up his phone properly.
Quote:
“Hi Don, this is Kirk Shewchuck at ACD.net and we wanted to talk to you about our plans to put so many cell towers you know close to the casino there. I think you called in here earlier, again my name is Kirk at ACD.net and my phone number is …. I’d appreciate a call. Thank you, bye.
We’ll see what happens, those f**king Indians let’s call them red man, I was listening to the radio on the way in this morning and you can’t use red man in the paper because…..You know what the f**k you let’s sic the Sault Tribe on you, let’s get a good old fashioned Indian woo woo woo woo woo woo (laughter) around in Michigan the one they would be leery of are Huron Indians – the Huron Indians wiped out most of the other tribes – the Huron’s were the motorcycle gangs, the rest of them were on horses (laughter) I’m serious, the rest of the Indians here were farmers – it’s pretty cool we should put a tribal elder….on the reservation there – we should call them back – I might go up there and go like this….are you the guy – did you hear about the guy with the cell phone camera who got arrested….and then the police walked up to him and it shut off their signal and they couldn’t radio in….Go up to the reservation and so you don’t want a wireless tower here you know what happens to your cell phone signals (laughter) I’ll turn it back on in a few minutes after you agree to – maybe they would like that – you know they can’t talk on their cell phones at the casino they would spend more time there but maybe the opposite would be true and they keep leaving to check their cell phones…wouldn’t that be cool…and their cell phones….
Read more at http://indiancountrytodaymedianetwor...-acdnet-155133
OH NOES! RACISM EXISTS!!!!!!!!!
No one is really Indigenous of North America, so yeah...