Pelosi officially announces impeachment inquiry

[Methais]

LOL. I heard the same thing leading up to the 2016 election. Then again at the Russian collusion hoax. Then again for SCOTUS nominations. Now again for the "impeachment" "hearing".

Boy who cried wolf syndrome is real.

OMG THIS IS REALLY IT THIS TIME FOR SUPER DUPER POOPER SCOOPER REAL UNLIKE THE OTHER 4732048 TIMES IT WAS REALLY IT AND TRUMP WAS ABOUT TO GO DOWN IN FLAMES BUT NOT THIS TIME THIS TIME IT'S FOR REAL OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG (http://forum.gsplayers.com/showthread.php?110469-Russia-Investigation-Heating-Up)

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

The panic is real. After his campaign being sued for unjust enrichment and Schiff's marathon debrief about his alleged crimes, it's understandable the President is acting like a cornered rat.

Be unbiased for a second.

Did you really think Schiff's performance was good? I found it nauseatingly boring and obviously wishful conclusions.

[Methais]

Be unbiased for a second.

Did you really think Schiff's performance was good? I found it nauseatingly boring and obviously wishful conclusions.

He always looks like he just sharted too.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DVRqtfnVQAAyysk.jpg
https://www.rushlimbaugh.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/APP-100219-Schiff-eyes.jpg
https://dcalert.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/schiff.jpeg
https://i.imgur.com/Y4vzUzy.jpg

[Gelston]

The panic is real. After his campaign being sued for unjust enrichment and Schiff's marathon debrief about his alleged crimes, it's understandable the President is acting like a cornered rat.
What panic? I’ve just heard people call it boring. In the end, there will be a vote and Trump will still be your President.

[Alfster]

Yeah I dunno how you can call there being panic.

[Tgo01]

The panic is real. After his campaign being sued for unjust enrichment and Schiff's marathon debrief about his alleged crimes, it's understandable the President is acting like a cornered rat.

Oh yeah so much panic, especially the part where Schiff admitted this whole impeachment sham is because Democrats no longer like Democracy and don’t want to allow the peasants/voters to decide elections anymore and he wants congress to do it from now on.

[Seran]

Be unbiased for a second.

Did you really think Schiff's performance was good? I found it nauseatingly boring and obviously wishful conclusions.

I did, I feel he presented his case dispassionately and didn't come across as a rabid, screaming partisan. He stated the fax, cited historical precedent and made the case.

[Tgo01]

I did, I feel he presented his case dispassionately and didn't come across as a rabid, screaming partisan.

It's time like this I swear you and Back were separated at birth.

If you don't allow witnesses then you are engaging in a cover up!
If you don't remove him from office then the results of the 2020 election won't be valid if he wins! But they'll be totally valid if he loses.

Oh yeah, no partisan antics there!

[Parkbandit]

I did, I feel he presented his case dispassionately and didn't come across as a rabid, screaming partisan. He stated the fax, cited historical precedent and made the case.

https://media.giphy.com/media/32aQyQNf1I97Mnaj75/giphy.gif

At least you admit he didn't state the facts.

[Methais]

I did, I feel he presented his case dispassionately and didn't come across as a rabid, screaming partisan. He stated the fax, cited historical precedent and made the case.

Carfax or not I’ll never buy a vehicle from Adam Schart.

[Gelston]

I did, I feel he presented his case dispassionately and didn't come across as a rabid, screaming partisan. He stated the fax, cited historical precedent and made the case.

And some people think shit smells good. Nadler and him were horrible.

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

I meant to say this the other day, but it's clear the talking points the dems have say to use the word "cheat" instead of QPQ or bribery now.

The argument they are making is he cheated to become president in 2016 (LULZ) and they are in fact predicting the future, that when he wins again, he'll have cheated.

They are also predicting Russia will invade our homeland (LULZ).

These guys are fucking adults, right? I mean, they have some education, correct? It's like a child is telling them what to say.

[Tgo01]

I did, I feel he presented his case dispassionately and didn't come across as a rabid, screaming partisan. He stated the fax, cited historical precedent and made the case.

Nadler called Trump a dictator in the Senate today. Is he too being "dispassionate" and not coming across as a "rabid, screaming partisan"?

[~Rocktar~]

The panic is real. After his campaign being sued for unjust enrichment and Schiff's marathon debrief about his alleged crimes, it's understandable the President is acting like a cornered rat.

I have heard better, more cogent and more coherent arguments from 8 year old kids arguing for extra fries at McDonalds than Schiff and Nadler have put forward.

[Parkbandit]

I meant to say this the other day, but it's clear the talking points the dems have say to use the word "cheat" instead of QPQ or bribery now.

The argument they are making is he cheated to become president in 2016 (LULZ) and they are in fact predicting the future, that when he wins again, he'll have cheated.

They are also predicting Russia will invade our homeland (LULZ).

These guys are fucking adults, right? I mean, they have some education, correct? It's like a child is telling them what to say.

To be fair, they are playing to the strength of their base.

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

Trumps lawyers in two hours decimated 24 hours of lies. Shitt looked like the fool he is, the whole time. Should be good on Monday.

I predict vote by Friday - Maybe the week following, and acquittal when the vote happens. No new witnesses.

[Seran]

Trumps lawyers in two hours decimated 24 hours of lies. Shitt looked like the fool he is, the whole time. Should be good on Monday.

I predict vote by Friday - Maybe the week following, and acquittal when the vote happens. No new witnesses.

If the defense had shit atop the podium, you'd have given the same praise.

[Seran]

Nadler called Trump a dictator in the Senate today. Is he too being "dispassionate" and not coming across as a "rabid, screaming partisan"?

No, dictator is pretty accurate.

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

If the defense had shit atop the podium, you'd have given the same praise.

True story, because the dems have fucking nothing.

[Tgo01]

No, dictator is pretty accurate.

If Trump were a dictator there wouldn't be an impeachment hearing at all.

Do you retards just not know what the words you use mean?

[~Rocktar~]

If Trump were a dictator there wouldn't be an impeachment hearing at all.

^^ This is correct.


Do you retards just not know what the words you use mean?

No, no they do not.

[Jeril]

If Trump were a dictator there wouldn't be an impeachment hearing at all.

Do you retards just not know what the words you use mean?

If they knew what words meant any more we wouldn't have Trump as president.

[Methais]

No, dictator is pretty accurate.

Name one dictator that’s been impeached.

[TrumpTweets]

Name one dictator that’s been impeached.

Donald J. Trump

[Parkbandit]

Donald J. Trump

https://i.gifer.com/4Buj.gif

[Methais]

Donald J. Trump

Next time you’re asked to speak, don’t forget to log back onto your Seran account. Otherwise sit down and fuck off.

Also, trying to not be BacKKKlash levels of retard wouldn’t hurt.

But since you’re jizz drinking retard self is already here, name one dictator who has been impeached.

Other than “omgtrump” of course. Because you’re a huge mongoloid.

Then tell us more about how it’s possible to even impeach a dictator in a dictatorship.

You may resume your hobby as a gay porn fluffer after.

[Gelston]

Donald J. Trump

How’s them gas prices doing? Guess my post aged extremely well.

[ClydeR]

WASHINGTON — President Trump told his national security adviser in August that he wanted to continue freezing $391 million in security assistance to Ukraine until officials there helped with investigations into Democrats including the Bidens, according to an unpublished manuscript by the former adviser, John R. Bolton.

More... (https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/26/us/politics/trump-bolton-book-ukraine.html)


I'm glad that leaked out. Now that we know what Bolton would say, there's not need to have him as a witness in the trial.

[~Rocktar~]

https://scontent-atl3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/83870352_2779686352125590_8015835814011338752_n.jp g?_nc_cat=111&_nc_ohc=oFyKrAdTvsYAX914yXk&_nc_ht=scontent-atl3-1.xx&oh=b39682a354b5ed3fca34fb3b43fc4458&oe=5E925D45

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

I'm glad that leaked out. Now that we know what Bolton would say, there's not need to have him as a witness in the trial.

Are you certain it was a leak? His book goes on sale this morning.

[ClydeR]

Are you certain it was a leak? His book goes on sale this morning.


Definitely a leak. You can pre-order it from Amazon, but it is not scheduled to be released until March. That schedule could be interrupted if there are security clearance concerns, which are likely if the book makes Trump look bad. The title on the Amazon landing page is "The Room Where It Happened: A White House Memoir." You cannot preview it on Amazon.

That Hamilton song is overused in political parodies. It would have been a clever title three years ago. Here's a parody from 2017 about the Trump tower meeting..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5h56N_uwS7c
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5h56N_uwS7c

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

So you believe his publicist or he wouldn't leak a juicy tidbit like that, the day it goes on sale? Surely you aren't that naive?

Oh wait. I fell into the trap of actually discussing something seriously with ClydeR.

Nevermind. Go start a thread about it somewhere.

[ClydeR]

So you believe his publicist or he wouldn't leak a juicy tidbit like that, the day it goes on sale?



If it was a "leak," to use your word, by Bolton or his publicist, then it was a leak.

[Solkern]

Of course they released something like that to boost sales. Call it whatever you want. Smart move

[Methais]

Definitely a leak. You can pre-order it from Amazon, but it is not scheduled to be released until March. That schedule could be interrupted if there are security clearance concerns, which are likely if the book makes Trump look bad. The title on the Amazon landing page is "The Room Where It Happened: A White House Memoir." You cannot preview it on Amazon.

That Hamilton song is overused in political parodies. It would have been a clever title three years ago. Here's a parody from 2017 about the Trump tower meeting..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5h56N_uwS7c
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5h56N_uwS7c

You’re stupid.

[Parkbandit]

If it was a "leak," to use your word, by Bolton or his publicist, then it was a leak.

You're a sheeple and you don't even realize you're being played.

You should buy the book today.

[Tgo01]

It’s looking like the Democrats are gonna get their wish to drag this shit out forever by getting the witnesses they want because of this stupid Bolton “leak.” And as soon as Bolton doesn’t give them the testimony they want the Democrats will then demand another witness, then another and another.

Have these fucking dumb Republicans learned nothing from Kavanaugh and the past 3 years? Shit the past 3 decades? Why do they insist on “playing fair” against a party that doesn’t give a single shit about fairness.

[Solkern]

It’s looking like the Democrats are gonna get their wish to drag this shit out forever by getting the witnesses they want because of this stupid Bolton “leak.” And as soon as Bolton doesn’t give them the testimony they want the Democrats will then demand another witness, then another and another.

Have these fucking dumb Republicans learned nothing from Kavanaugh and the past 3 years? Shit the past 3 decades? Why do they insist on “playing fair” against a party that doesn’t give a single shit about fairness.


And what happens if Bolton does give the dems what they want?

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

And what happens if Bolton does give the dems what they want?

Nothing.

[Tgo01]

And what happens if Bolton does give the dems what they want?

Democrats will still want to call more witnesses because this isn’t about justice at all, it’s a political hit job aimed at hurting Trump and Senate Republicans during an election year.

Democrats know they ain’t gonna get the numbers to remove Trump based on these bullshit charges, they just want to smear Trump and Senate Republicans by either accusing them of covering up Trump’s “crimes” or accusing them of being cowards for not voting to remove Trump.

And the thing is NO Republican will be safe from their vileness. Even if a Republican votes to give Democrats their witnesses and votes to remove Trump the Democrats will still accuse them of being traitors for not “having the courage” to convince their Republican colleagues to vote to remove.

And why not? The Democrats keep getting away with this shit and the Republicans keep falling for it over and over again.

[Tgo01]

Just look at what those fuckers did to Kavanaugh. Look at what they did to Roy Moore, oh it was somehow kept a secret he was a supposed pedophile all through the primaries but weeks out from the general election they trot out all of these women to accuse him of being a pedophile?

One woman didn’t even accuse him of being a pedophile but said she met him when she was 11 or 12 and they started dating when she was 18 but that was enough for the media to brand him a pedophile in that case.

Shit I remember a few years ago a Republican said some Democrats in Congress were communists and Democrats threw a fit and he was forced to apologize and now Democrats openly brag about being communists. Trump has really shown just how evil the Democratic Party is and I’m kind of pissed I ever fell for their shit.

[Seran]

Democrats will still want to call more witnesses because this isn’t about justice at all, it’s a political hit job aimed at hurting Trump and Senate Republicans during an election year.

Democrats know they ain’t gonna get the numbers to remove Trump based on these bullshit charges, they just want to smear Trump and Senate Republicans by either accusing them of covering up Trump’s “crimes” or accusing them of being cowards for not voting to remove Trump.

And the thing is NO Republican will be safe from their vileness. Even if a Republican votes to give Democrats their witnesses and votes to remove Trump the Democrats will still accuse them of being traitors for not “having the courage” to convince their Republican colleagues to vote to remove.

And why not? The Democrats keep getting away with this shit and the Republicans keep falling for it over and over again.

Clinton was impeached for far more frivolous charges, with barely 30% public support for impeachment. That's a political hit job.

Trump has violated the law, his oath of office and has collaborated with our enemies for personal political and financial gain. That several ambassadors, government officials and now Bolton have or are willing to testify about their direct knowledge of these illegal acts makes what the House of Representatives done an affirmation of the United States Constitution and the continuity of government. More than half of the nation supports impeachment and removal.

Your blind support and denials, your refusal to acknowledge evidence of Trump's lies and misdeeds are the real problem. Put country over party like a real man.

[Risen]

Pretty stirring commentary today concerning the fabric of common law with respect to presidential impeachment proceedings. Definitely worth a review. Doubt that it will be properly summarized.

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

Clinton was impeached for far more frivolous charges, with barely 30% public support for impeachment. That's a political hit job.

You think perjury to a grand jury is frivolous? Wow. Put country over party like a real man.

[Methais]

You think perjury to a grand jury is frivolous? Wow.

Only when it's a democrat doing it.

[Seran]

You think perjury to a grand jury is frivolous? Wow. Put country over party like a real man.

Trump has lied in several depositions, through his attorney's and to the public directly. Trump has perjured himself shamelessly, only he's not cooperating with any Grand Jury. Needless to say, you'll see a perjury article shortly, as witness testimony provided compelling evidence.

Count 2 of Clinton's impeachment, obstruction of justice is effectively mirrored in Trump's obstruction article of impeachment. Just because you don't agree, doesn't change the mind of the rest of us.

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

Trump has lied in several depositions, through his attorney's and to the public directly. Trump has perjured himself shamelessly, only he's not cooperating with any Grand Jury. Needless to say, you'll see a perjury article shortly, as witness testimony provided compelling evidence.

Count 2 of Clinton's impeachment, obstruction of justice is effectively mirrored in Trump's obstruction article of impeachment. Just because you don't agree, doesn't change the mind of the rest of us.

So you think perjury to a grand jury is frivolous if you are a democrat. Gotcha. Put country over party like a real man.

[Methais]

Trump has lied in several depositions, through his attorney's and to the public directly. Trump has perjured himself shamelessly, only he's not cooperating with any Grand Jury. Needless to say, you'll see a perjury article shortly, as witness testimony provided compelling evidence.

Count 2 of Clinton's impeachment, obstruction of justice is effectively mirrored in Trump's obstruction article of impeachment. Just because you don't agree, doesn't change the mind of the rest of us.

You're stupid as fuck.

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

Trump has lied in several depositions

Also, please show me the depositions where he perjured himself since he's been president. You seem to have a handle on it, so I'll just wait for you to post a few.

Until then, your TDS is showing.

[Seran]

Easy enough, Trump's deposition in the Mueller investigation in which he denied having conversations with Roger Stone. Rick Gates easily exposed that lie while covering his own ass.

You'll also note that unlike Clinton, Trump has provided no testimony under oath regarding his Ukranian involvement, yet dozens of statements he's made about his unique idea about truth, have been directly contradicted by the sworn testimony of his staff.

This just in, the President is not immune to investigation. Hence our impeachment for Obstruction of Congress.. Republicans and you conservatives who pretend not to be Republican's have given the President carte blanche when it comes to accountability. That's not what the Constitution entails, something no Republican in office since Reagan has honored.

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

So you still haven't shown me any depositions where Trump perjured himself.


You are just words on a screen man, you say things like "Put country over party like a real man." but you yourself don't follow that philosophy. Only when it suites you. Why should I even entertain your bullshit? Get back in your partisan lane and kowtow to the liberal media.

And tell us again how perjury in a grand jury is frivolous?

[Seran]

Deny deny, attack, obfuscate, deny. This is why you don't get to take off your water wings in the big kids pool.

[Tgo01]

Clinton was impeached for far more frivolous charges

There was credible evidence that Clinton lied under oath, hence the charge of perjury.

There was also credible evidence that Clinton pressured witnesses to lie while under oath in order to match up with the false testimony he had given under oath, hence the charge of obstruction of justice.

Meanwhile Democrats are charging Trump with abuse of power for doing the exact same thing every president has done since we started handing out aid to other countries, and charging him with "obstruction of Congress" because Trump said go to the courts if you want me to participate in your witch hunt and Democrats said "but...but...but that would take too long! It might push this past the 2020 elections and we want to remove you before that!!!!" so they charged him with "obstruction of congress" over that.

Fuck off with your dumb shit.

[Tgo01]

Trump has lied in several depositions, through his attorney's and to the public directly. Trump has perjured himself shamelessly, only he's not cooperating with any Grand Jury.

No Grand Jury has been summoned for him to appear before. Do you even know what's going on with this impeachment sham and the impeachment of Clinton? Or you just faking it?

[Tgo01]

You'll also note that unlike Clinton, Trump has provided no testimony under oath regarding his Ukranian involvement.

Ho. Le. Shit.

You really don't know what's going on do you?

You know Clinton's perjury charge had nothing to do with his impeachment right? This is where you finally Google it and come back and say something dumb to pretend you knew all along.

You're a sad fuck.

"DUHHHH! I know Clinton was impeached for lying before a grand jury and DUHHHH! I know Trump hasn't testified before a Grand Jury so DUHHHH! Clinton at least did thats!!"

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

Deny deny, attack, obfuscate, deny. This is why you don't get to take off your water wings in the big kids pool.

Sorry, I couldn't hear you over your racist posts. Keep trying though.

[Tgo01]

Media: OMG! The House managers are all diverse! Women, POC, old white men, such diversity! Meanwhile Trump's defense team is all white men!!! No diversity!
Non-moronic people: Uh, there is a woman on Trump's defense team.
Media: Yeah but she probably won't even get to talk!!!!!

When it's the woman's turn to talk the same media then doesn't broadcast that part of the trial because she was being mean to the Bidens!

How does anyone still put up with this shit? Just how bad is your TDS? We already know how bad Seran's is.

[Methais]

Deny deny, attack, obfuscate, deny. This is why you don't get to take off your water wings in the big kids pool.

Why do you hate Mexicans?

[Seran]

Ho. Le. Shit.

You really don't know what's going on do you?

You know Clinton's perjury charge had nothing to do with his impeachment right? This is where you finally Google it and come back and say something dumb to pretend you knew all along.

You're a sad fuck.

"DUHHHH! I know Clinton was impeached for lying before a grand jury and DUHHHH! I know Trump hasn't testified before a Grand Jury so DUHHHH! Clinton at least did thats!!"

Maybe you should reach Article I and Article II of H. Res 611, as they are exactly why those two charges of Impeachment were draw against Clinton. I'm curious if you're lying or just ignorant. Either way you're pretty sad.

[Seran]

Sorry, I couldn't hear you over your racist posts. Keep trying though.

That's pretty creepy dude, you must have a lot of experience stalking people. Is that why you've been left so many times?

[Tgo01]

Maybe you should reach Article I and Article II of H. Res 611, as they are exactly why those two charges of Impeachment were draw against Clinton. I'm curious if you're lying or just ignorant. Either way you're pretty sad.

Even with figuring out your bad grammar and spelling errors I still have no idea what your point is.

[Parkbandit]

That's pretty creepy dude, you must have a lot of experience stalking people. Is that why you've been left so many times?

How is quoting your posts on this forum 10 years ago "creepy" and "stalking"? Fuck off with your stupidity.

You were stupid then, you are stupid now.

Stop posting and people will forget how utterly fucking retarded you were back then, are now and will be in the future.

[Methais]

I'm curious if you're lying or just ignorant. Either way I fucking hate Mexicans.

This is correct.

[ClydeR]

Senate Judiciary Chairman Lindsey Graham said Monday he will seek to obtain a copy of the unpublished manuscript from former national security adviser John Bolton, a move that could bring new evidence into President Donald Trump’s impeachment trial.

More... (https://www.politico.com/news/2020/01/27/lindsey-graham-john-bolton-manuscript-106324)


You know what would be funny? If they get a copy of Bolton's manuscript and make it part of the evidence that anybody can read for free on the Senate's website. Then nobody would buy Bolton's book when it is published.

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

How is quoting your posts on this forum 10 years ago "creepy" and "stalking"? Fuck off with your stupidity.

You were stupid then, you are stupid now.

Stop posting and people will forget how utterly fucking retarded you were back then, are now and will be in the future.

Not to mention it's grasping at straws because I've burnt his whole world down. He has no idea of my personal life, because if he did, he'd know how laughable his statement was.

[Methais]

Not to mention it's grasping at straws because I've burnt his whole world down. He has no idea of my personal life, because if he did, he'd know how laughable his statement was.

In before Seran goes on a pk style scrubbing spree.

[Tgo01]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ta7O0e0p-Eo

Damn. Trump's defense team just bent the entire Democratic party over and spanked them hard in just 3 minutes. Honestly if you're still in favor of this impeachment after watching this short 3 minute video then you just might be a partisan hack or have the worst case of TDS imaginable.

[Methais]

Nadler sure was a fat fuck wasn’t he?

[Tgo01]

Nadler sure was a fat fuck wasn’t he?

And he was such a lazy slob that he had to have multiple surgeries to lose weight because he literally refused to even ride the subway because going up one flight of stairs was too much for him.

[Parkbandit]

That video just shows me one thing: We need term limits.

20+ years as a public "servant"?

Fuck you.

[ClydeR]

You can pre-order it from Amazon, but it is not scheduled to be released until March. That schedule could be interrupted if there are security clearance concerns, which are likely if the book makes Trump look bad.



I completely nailed it again!


Washington (CNN)The White House has issued a formal threat to former national security adviser John Bolton to keep him from publishing his book, "The Room Where It Happened: A White House Memoir," sources familiar with the matter tell CNN.

More... (https://www.cnn.com/2020/01/29/politics/donald-trump-john-bolton-white-house-book/index.html)

Trump has classified the information in the book as top secret. It can't be published and can't be discussed in public in the Senate.

[Neveragain]

That's pretty creepy dude, you must have a lot of experience stalking people. Is that why you've been left so many times?

The only thing that's creepy is that you're trying to keep track of an internet rando's relationship status.

You don't find that weird at all?

[Seran]

Trump has classified the information in the book as top secret. It can't be published and can't be discussed in public in the Senate.

Absolutely no surprises here. I'd be curious to see how much of the information was previously deemed classified and how much was retroactively deemed classified to avoid disclosures during impeachment.

[Gelston]

Absolutely no surprises here. I'd be curious to see how much of the information was previously deemed classified and how much was retroactively deemed classified to avoid disclosures during impeachment.

What racist opinions do you have to share with us today?

[Seran]

Dershowitz said: “Every public official that I know believes that his election is in the public interest. And mostly you’re right — your election is in the public interest. And if a president did something that he believes will help him get elected, in the public interest, that cannot be the kind of quid pro quo that results in impeachment.”

There's an interesting equivocation by a Trump attorney, arguing the President can't be held accountable so long as his opinion is that his actions are in the best interest of the country. Where do you draw the line? If the President feels deeding Montana to his children is in the best interest of the United States, should we all just look the other way Mr Dershowitz?

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

Yes. That's exactly what he said.

[Gelston]

There's an interesting equivocation by a Trump attorney, arguing the President can't be held accountable so long as his opinion is that his actions are in the best interest of the country. Where do you draw the line? If the President feels deeding Montana to his children is in the best interest of the United States, should we all just look the other way Mr Dershowitz?

Would you prefer a President not do what he feels is in the best interest of the country?

[Seran]

Another interesting response from a Trump attorney on the question of whether John Bolton should testify. His response goes down in the history books as the biggest waste of oxygen ever.


Jay Sekulow responded, ""So again, to move that into a change in proceeding so to speak, I think it is not correct. The evidence that has already been presented, an accusation that if you get into witnesses, and I'll do this very briefly, if we get down the road on the witness issues, let's be clear, it should not be and I cannot dictate to this body, but it should certainly not be though that the House managers get John Bolton and the President's lawyers get no witness. We would expect if they are getting witnesses, we will get witnesses, and then those witnesses would then, and all of that, just to be clear, changes the nature and scope of the proceedings and they did not ask for it before,"

[Methais]

Another interesting response from a Trump attorney on the question of whether John Bolton should testify. His response goes down in the history books as the biggest waste of oxygen ever.

When are you going to tell us why you hate Mexicans though?

[Tgo01]

Schumer invited Lev Parnas to be his personal guest at the impeachment trial. You know Parnas, that guy who has been charged with several felonies and is facing some serious prison time and is now trying to pin all of the blame on Trump in some sort of desperate move to get a plea deal? Yeah, that guy.

Well police officers had to escort Parnas out of the Senate building during the trial because people with ankle monitors aren't allowed in the Senate gallery.

What the fuck is wrong with Democrats?

If Hitler were brought back to life Democrats would celebrate him if he wrote a book about how much he hated Trump.

[Tgo01]

The scuttlebutt is the Republicans now have the votes to block witnesses. Some of the Republicans people thought might side with the Democrats, like Gardner from Colorado, are apparently some of the loudest saying to not call anymore witnesses because he thinks it will just lead to more Democratic attacks.

Ya think?!

Republicans thinking of siding with Democrats because they think it will help their reelection efforts are crazy because it won't convince any Democrats to vote for you if they were already planning on voting against you, but it sure as shit might cause some Republicans to vote against you or just not vote at all.

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

Schumer invited Lev Parnas to be his personal guest at the impeachment trial.

What the fuck is wrong with Democrats?

I'd have done the same. Epic trolling is epic trolling.

[Seran]

Schumer invited Lev Parnas to be his personal guest at the impeachment trial. You know Parnas, that guy who has been charged with several felonies and is facing some serious prison time and is now trying to pin all of the blame on Trump in some sort of desperate move to get a plea deal? Yeah, that guy.

Well police officers had to escort Parnas out of the Senate building during the trial because people with ankle monitors aren't allowed in the Senate gallery.

What the fuck is wrong with Democrats?

If Hitler were brought back to life Democrats would celebrate him if he wrote a book about how much he hated Trump.

Fake news. This was already retracted as false, Ted Cruz updated his Twitter post clarifying that Parnas showed up to pick up tickets issued by Schumer. There was no police involvement, he wasn't escorted out.

[Seran]

Lying Ted already issued the best non apology ever and the President deleted his retweet of the false information.

[Tgo01]

Fake news. This was already retracted as false, Ted Cruz updated his Twitter post clarifying that Parnas showed up to pick up tickets issued by Schumer. There was no police involvement, he wasn't escorted out.

And he was told he wouldn't be allowed in the senate trial anyways because he's a human piece of shit that Democrats like you love the suck the cock of because he now says bad things about Trump.

Not sure this is the "fake news!" hill you wanna die on but okay.

"FAKE NEWS!!!!!111 He wasn't removed from the senate! He was just told he can't go in the senate due to his ankle bracelet because he's a garbage human being."

You got me, Seran!

[ClydeR]

Nobody has commented on the most interesting thing to happen so far in the trial.

Yesterday we had this..


Chief Justice of the United States John Roberts blocked Kentucky Republican Sen. Rand Paul from posing a question during the Senate impeachment trial Wednesday that would have named the alleged whistleblower at the center of the case, Fox News is told — and Paul may try to force the issue during the question-and-answer session that begins Thursday afternoon.

More... (https://www.foxnews.com/politics/justice-roberts-blocks-sen-paul-from-naming-whistleblower-source-says-and-paul-may-force-the-issue)


A reporter for Roll Call observed that during a break in the trial Wednesday, Paul was fuming.

"I don't want to have to stand up to try and fight for recognition," Paul shouted, according to reporter Niels Lesniewski, who noted that Paul's complaint was "audible from the galleries above the chamber."

"If I have to fight for recognition, I will," Paul said.


And today we got this..


Sen. Rand Paul named the purported intelligence whistleblower Thursday after Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts refused to read his question including the name in the Senate impeachment trial of President Trump.

The conservative Republican left the proceedings to hold an impromptu press conference at which he fingered the person whom right-wing media have named as the CIA operative in the White House who filed a complaint about Trump’s infamous July 25 call to Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky.

Paul read out his conspiratorial question that Roberts twice refused to read inside the chamber, apparently out of the judge’s respect for federal law protecting whistleblowers from retaliation

More... (https://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/ny-rand-paul-whistleblower-john-roberts-ukraine-20200130-uzp2yf2fpzcjvp6ifa2l2koerm-story.html)

[Seran]

Nobody has commented on the most interesting thing to happen so far in the trial.

Yesterday we had this..






And today we got this..

It's a shame this guy's the crazy conservative version of his libertarian father. The attorney of the person Rand Paul named has already publicly called for him to resign.

[Methais]

The attorney of the person Rand Paul named has already publicly called for him to resign.

OH I GUESS HE SURE TOLD HIM THEN!!!


It's a shame this guy's the crazy conservative version of his libertarian father.

It's a shame that you hate Mexicans.

[Methais]

https://scontent.fbtr1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/s960x960/83685916_10215792573515836_6189421183503433728_o.j pg?_nc_cat=108&_nc_ohc=3oAkWh3lVuwAX-q0UQR&_nc_ht=scontent.fbtr1-1.fna&oh=edbe85b2f8d057198749a1a3c09837aa&oe=5E8E6580

https://i.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/facebook/000/019/731/Forty_keks.jpg

[Parkbandit]

https://scontent.fbtr1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/s960x960/83685916_10215792573515836_6189421183503433728_o.j pg?_nc_cat=108&_nc_ohc=3oAkWh3lVuwAX-q0UQR&_nc_ht=scontent.fbtr1-1.fna&oh=edbe85b2f8d057198749a1a3c09837aa&oe=5E8E6580

https://i.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/facebook/000/019/731/Forty_keks.jpg

What a sham this is.

Democrats are just giving Trump another 4 years on a silver platter.

[Methais]

What a sham this is.

Democrats are just giving Trump another 4 years on a silver platter.

Then when they lose they'll say he must have cheated and then open 5832094723 new investigations into that and probably try and impeach him again, which they basically already said they were going to do.

I hope the House gets flipped in November so the left will achieve maximum butthurt.

[Gelston]

Then when they lose they'll say he must have cheated and then open 5832094723 new investigations into that and probably try and impeach him again, which they basically already said they were going to do.

I hope the House gets flipped in November so the left will achieve maximum butthurt.

When he wins again, he gets at least one more Supreme Court pick.

[Tgo01]

Democrat House Impeachment Managers: Soliciting aid from a foreign country to help in your election is illegal! Trump should be in jail!!!!!
A Senator asks: By that standard is what Hillary Clinton did illegal in regards to the Steele dossier?
Democrat House Impeachment Managers: That's different, Hillary Clinton paid for that.

Okay now you Democrats can admit this whole thing is just a sham.

[Parkbandit]

When he wins again, he gets at least one more Supreme Court pick.

https://media2.giphy.com/media/mBpPaYBad75xPwE09e/giphy.gif

[Seran]

Democrat House Impeachment Managers: Soliciting aid from a foreign country to help in your election is illegal! Trump should be in jail!!!!!
A Senator asks: By that standard is what Hillary Clinton did illegal in regards to the Steele dossier?
Democrat House Impeachment Managers: That's different, Hillary Clinton paid for that.

Okay now you Democrats can admit this whole thing is just a sham.

I don't think you understand the difference between opposition research and blackmailing a foreign power in violation of federal law for personal gain. Neither does most of the Senate however, so I guess your intelligence is on par.

[Tgo01]

I don't think you understand the difference between opposition research and blackmailing a foreign power in violation of federal law for personal gain.

Look, fuck nugget who hates Mexicans, apparently you haven't been keeping up with this shit as much as you think you have. Democrats have moved the goal so fast and so far that you still think they are on "OMG! Blackmail! OMG OMG OMG OMG!

No. They are now saying Trump just receiving help from a foreign government was illegal and impeachable.

Zoe Lofgren, one of the impeachment managers, said she was "stunned to hear that now apparently it’s OK for the president to get information from foreign governments in an election. That’s news to me."

Democrat Senator Heinrich said, "I have a hard time even believing they were making that argument" in regards to Trump's defense team saying it was okay to receive information from a foreign government.

Democrat Senator Stabenow said, "It’s so shocking."

Apparently all Trump had to do was just pay for the information and then everything would have been okay. Remember this is what YOUR POLITICAL PARTY is saying. Not my party. YOUR party.

[Tgo01]

Sekulow: And now they're saying, now we need witnesses, (turning towards Schiff) after 31 or 32 times you said you proved every aspect of your case, that's what you said.
Schiff: I did.
Sekulow: He just said he did. Well then I don't think we need any witnesses.

Talk about a mic drop moment. How do the impeachment managers not feel like children trying to have an adult conversation with adults and how do Democrat voters such as Seran not feel sorry for them? Because this is downright embarrassing to watch.

[Seran]

Sekulow: And now they're saying, now we need witnesses, (turning towards Schiff) after 31 or 32 times you said you proved every aspect of your case, that's what you said.
Schiff: I did.
Sekulow: He just said he did. Well then I don't think we need any witnesses.

Talk about a mic drop moment. How do the impeachment managers not feel like children trying to have an adult conversation with adults and how do Democrat voters such as Seran not feel sorry for them? Because this is downright embarrassing to watch.

Yeah, it's pretty amazing all of the evidence dragged up despite all the opposition and obstruction presented by the White House. I totally get why you and Senate Republicans are terrified of the idea of witnesses, especially someone as celebrated at John Bolton stepping up and like everyone else, pointing out Trump is lying. Despite his being the command and thief, he's still a newcomer to the party and he's really choosing the wrong folks to alienate.

[Tgo01]

Yeah, it's pretty amazing all of the evidence dragged up despite all the opposition and obstruction presented by the White House.

All Trump said was let the courts decide. Why do you hate due process and the courts as much as you hate Mexicans? Show us on this doll where the mean courts touched you.


especially someone as celebrated at John Bolton

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Oh wait, you're serious, let me laugh even harder.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHHA

[Seran]

The Judiciary is an entirely separate branch of the federal government. The House enacted their /sole/ constitutional right to investigate and impeach a sitting president. The President, for all that he did managed to land himself a second impeachment charge. I imagine the third, fourth and fifth impeachment charge will follow the same format.

[Tgo01]

The Judiciary is an entirely separate branch of the federal government.

Yes, and when the legislative and executive branches disagree on things who settles it? That's right, the judiciary branch.


The House enacted their /sole/ constitutional right to investigate and impeach a sitting president.

I just want to make sure I am understanding you correctly: you are under the false assumption that because the House has the constitutional right to conduct impeachments that means their power is unlimited when it comes to investigating impeachments?

[~Rocktar~]

The Judiciary is an entirely separate branch of the federal government. The House enacted their /sole/ constitutional right to investigate and impeach a sitting president. The President, for all that he did managed to land himself a second impeachment charge. I imagine the third, fourth and fifth impeachment charge will follow the same format.

And with each new bogus charge brought through a corrupt and entirely politically motivated process, the Democrats will drive a new spike into their political coffin for the next 20 years if not more. They have blown their load and the House will flip, likely heavily back to Conservative control though even some Democrats are already regretting the process and will turn on this sham. The tears of the next 4 years will be so delicious. As someone once said, our cup runnith over.

[Candor]

Allow me to quote from a post I made in this thread on 9/25/2019:


from "The Trump 2020 Election Victory"....published in May 2029...

Chapter 5: The Impeachment

Most political historians agree that the fateful event for the Democratic Party occurred on September 24, 2019 when Nancy Pelosi announced a formal impeachment inquiry against President Trump. Although the resulting impeachment proceedings are now widely understood as one of the greatest political errors in American history, at the time many in the Democratic Party believed it was the best way to ensure their future and to rid themselves of a President that they very much despised...

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

I imagine the third, fourth and fifth impeachment charge will follow the same format.

I'm waiting for the meltdown when they vote no witnesses (probably today) and acquittal.

[Parkbandit]

especially someone as celebrated at John Bolton

You know John Bolton isn't this guy, right?


https://i.ytimg.com/vi/lLz6A9ykasE/maxresdefault.jpg

But it's really this guy:

https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/sh371i-zsr1Ql7OTsbjAMaIDwfQ=/0x0:3356x2443/1200x800/filters:focal(2098x559:2634x1095)/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/66216843/1178121081.jpg.0.jpg

[RichardCranium]

You know John Bolton isn't this guy, right?


https://i.ytimg.com/vi/lLz6A9ykasE/maxresdefault.jpg

But it's really this guy:

https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/sh371i-zsr1Ql7OTsbjAMaIDwfQ=/0x0:3356x2443/1200x800/filters:focal(2098x559:2634x1095)/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/66216843/1178121081.jpg.0.jpg

According to key witnesses, they're both no-talent assclowns.

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

I always liked John Bolton.

[Parkbandit]

I always liked John Bolton.

Liberals have always hated John Bolton... until now...

[Methais]

When he wins again, he gets at least one more Supreme Court pick.

There's probably a pretty good chance that democrats will be playing Weekend at Bernie's with RGB at some point during Trump's second term.

Also, kek:
https://scontent.fbtr1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/83832567_2640654889485743_4362206379113447424_n.jp g?_nc_cat=101&_nc_ohc=0K7qg5nm7vUAX_axV-h&_nc_ht=scontent.fbtr1-1.fna&oh=e6f35e30b07118457eae527c0c55a24d&oe=5ED37D63

[Methais]

I don't think you understand the difference between opposition research and blackmailing a foreign power in violation of federal law for personal gain. Neither does most of the Senate however, so I guess your intelligence is on par.

You don't understand anything because you're stupid.

Except hating Mexicans. You're a pro at that.

[ClydeR]

Here is my faithful summary of Lamar Alexander's statement..

Trump did it.
Trump's behavior was inappropriate.
We have ample proof that he did it. We do not need additional witnesses.
It was not bad enough to remove him from office.
No Republicans voted for the impeachment in the House. Impeachment only works when there is bipartisan support.
The voters can sort it out.


Alexander's full statement is available at https://www.alexander.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/2020/1/alexander-statement-on-impeachment-witness-vote

This is going to be the most controversial paragraph from his statement..


It was inappropriate for the president to ask a foreign leader to investigate his political opponent and to withhold United States aid to encourage that investigation. When elected officials inappropriately interfere with such investigations, it undermines the principle of equal justice under the law. But the Constitution does not give the Senate the power to remove the president from office and ban him from this year’s ballot simply for actions that are inappropriate.

[Methais]

How do the impeachment managers not feel like children trying to have an adult conversation with adults and how do Democrat voters such as Seran not feel sorry for them? Because this is downright embarrassing to watch.

Imagine a bunch of BacKKKlashes and Serans, but in Congress.

[Neveragain]

especially someone as celebrated at John Bolton

I know we break out the fancy china for national John Bolton day.

https://media3.giphy.com/media/l0ExdANi3pXqJs0NO/source.gif

[Methais]

Yeah, it's pretty amazing all of the evidence dragged up despite all the opposition and obstruction presented by the White House. I totally get why you and Senate Republicans are terrified of the idea of witnesses, especially someone as celebrated at John Bolton stepping up and like everyone else, pointing out Trump is lying. Despite his being the command and thief, he's still a newcomer to the party and he's really choosing the wrong folks to alienate.


https://youtu.be/a7WN3XKkCTI

[Methais]

The Judiciary is an entirely separate branch of the federal government. The House enacted their /sole/ constitutional right to investigate and impeach a sitting president. The President, for all that he did managed to land himself a second impeachment charge. I imagine the third, fourth and fifth impeachment charge will follow the same format.

Holy shit and we thought cwolff was a fucking dumbass. :lol:

Grats on making cwolff seem like a reasonable person.

[Methais]

You know John Bolton isn't this guy, right?


https://i.ytimg.com/vi/lLz6A9ykasE/maxresdefault.jpg

But it's really this guy:

https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/sh371i-zsr1Ql7OTsbjAMaIDwfQ=/0x0:3356x2443/1200x800/filters:focal(2098x559:2634x1095)/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/66216843/1178121081.jpg.0.jpg

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/GyB6ffmXsZo/maxresdefault.jpg

[Methais]

I know we break out the fancy china for national John Bolton day.

https://media3.giphy.com/media/l0ExdANi3pXqJs0NO/source.gif

This is one of the most white people gifs I've ever seen. Possibly even whitepeopler than the Snuggie gifs.

https://media2.giphy.com/media/RuB3H2SjYLBFm/giphy.gif
https://media1.giphy.com/media/NFgfxZFfMSylO/giphy.gif

[Tgo01]

Watching the media already lose their minds over the expected vote against more witnesses is one of the best things ever.

Ever notice it’s always on Republicans to “do the right thing” and side with Democrats? Like the default position is always that Democrats are right so whatever they do is good and Republicans better “get on the right side of history.”

[Methais]

Watching the media already lose their minds over the expected vote against more witnesses is one of the best things ever.

Ever notice it’s always on Republicans to “do the right thing” and side with Democrats? Like the default position is always that Democrats are right so whatever they do is good and Republicans better “get on the right side of history.”

That's because republicans are usually too spineless and chicken shit to stand up for anything and let democrats walk all over them in hopes that they'll one day be in the cool kids club, despite the fact that 99% of those tard democrats aren't cool at all.

[ClydeR]

Huge drop in the stock market when the Senate decided not to have witnesses at the trial. I think it's because investors were disappointed that they won't have anything good to watch on teevee once this is over and definitely not because it means Trump will remain in office.

[Stolis]

Yeah I'm sure it had everything to do with that, and not the whole Coronavirus becoming more of a global issue. Oh, and corporate earning reports rolling out.

Yeah no, definitely senate related. You dumb fuck.

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

Yeah I'm sure it had everything to do with that, and not the whole Coronavirus becoming more of a global issue. Oh, and corporate earning reports rolling out.

Yeah no, definitely senate related. You dumb fuck.

He'd have to tune out of CNN to realize there is an epidemic going on. You know, where the Chinese have literally quarantined several cities of approximately 30 MILLION people.

Imagine if that happened in the US. The National Guard rolls out, says hey... you can't leave this city (to 30 million people). Fucking riots in the streets.

But yeah, it's the senate basically arriving at the conclusion we all literally knew they would, because a majority vote won't ever happen. Yeah. That's it.

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

Also, I actually made a little money today, net net. Amazon up 7+% was great. I had a trigger to sell @ 2k, and son of a bitch it blew right past that this morning.

THANKS TRUMP. Even when China threatens global apocalypse, I am making money (paid for new running boards on my truck and about 1K extra in the old trading account). Not a monster gain, but I'll take it.

[Tgo01]

I see Romney of course sided with the Democrats on the witness issue. Is Romney the biggest butthurt loser in the history of politics or what?

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=swawVMDutGs

LOOK HOW SOMBER THEY ARE.

Also, look at Camala's OH NOES face when Schummer shushes her.

[Tgo01]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=swawVMDutGs

LOOK HOW SOMBER THEY ARE.

Also, look at Camala's OH NOES face when Schummer shushes her.

This is a very somber moment for our country. No one WANTS to impeach Trump.

[Parkbandit]

Imagine a bunch of BacKKKlashes and Serans, but in Congress.

I can...

https://images.wsj.net/im-91236?width=620&size=1.5

[Parkbandit]

I see Romney of course sided with the Democrats on the witness issue. Is Romney the biggest butthurt loser in the history of politics or what?

He really is. Looking back, I'm so glad he wasn't elected President.

[Stolis]

He'd have to tune out of CNN to realize there is an epidemic going on. You know, where the Chinese have literally quarantined several cities of approximately 30 MILLION people.

Imagine if that happened in the US. The National Guard rolls out, says hey... you can't leave this city (to 30 million people). Fucking riots in the streets.

But yeah, it's the senate basically arriving at the conclusion we all literally knew they would, because a majority vote won't ever happen. Yeah. That's it.

Just send all the sick to California. Let nature work its course.

Also, nice sell on Amazon. Their earnings report was something stupid. Kinda like Tesla just wreckin shit yesterday.

[Tgo01]

Schumer to Chief Justice John Roberts: Did you know that in 1860 the then chief Justice in the Senate impeachment trial of President Johnson cast tie breaking votes?!
Roberts: Bitch are you for real? Of course I know that shit! He cast tie breaking votes to adjourn! Get this shit out of here!

I may or may not be paraphrasing the exact wording of this conversation.

Again the Democrats come off as little children trying desperately to be taken seriously at the adults table. Going back 160 years for precedent in which the chief justice cast a tie breaking vote to adjourn and using that as evidence that Roberts should cast a tie breaking vote for something that is actually serious and important in this trial?

[Wrathbringer]

Huge drop in the stock market when the Senate decided not to have witnesses at the trial. I think it's because investors were disappointed that they won't have anything good to watch on teevee once this is over and definitely not because it means Trump will remain in office.

You're retarded. Also:

https://i.imgur.com/9l2gdWA.jpg

[Methais]

You're retarded. Also:

https://i.imgur.com/9l2gdWA.jpg

This is correct.

[Back]

Oh hey you found Trump's personal notepad. Cool!

[Methais]

Oh hey you found my personal notepad. Cool! Did you by any chance find my underage porn collection too?

.

[Tgo01]

I'll give Democrats this much, there is one lie Trump told during the 2016 election and it was a pretty big one that still affects me today: he said we would be winning so much that we would get tired of winning.

I ain't tired of winning yet and don't think I'll ever get tired of it.

[Parkbandit]

I'll give Democrats this much, there is one lie Trump told during the 2016 election and it was a pretty big one that still affects me today: he said we would be winning so much that we would get tired of winning.

I ain't tired of winning yet and don't think I'll ever get tired of it.

Why do I think if I look that up on Politifact, they will actually have analyzed it.