Quote Originally Posted by Suppressed Poet View Post
Any place of business or worship can post proper signage prohibiting the carry of firearms on their property. Why am I not upset? Because it’s the individual choice of the business owner or church. It’s their property and their rules to allow firearms or not. I fail to see what point you are trying to make as that’s clearly not government infringement.

I proactively addressed the existing federal government taxing it too. It hasn’t been challenged in the courts yet, but I find that to be unconstitutional as well. The new Bruen Decision makes the burden on government to any restriction to the 2nd Amendment only legal if it is in the history, text, and tradition at the time of the ratification of the Bill of Rights. You know what didn’t exist back in 1791?: A federal tax on firearms.
Wow that's a lot of wishful thinking on your part, not gonna talk you out of it but I hope your dreams aren't as crushed as it likely will be. There is functionally no distinction between the government restricting firearms of someone puts us to a sign, or the government simply restricts carry in specific areas. In both situations the government is the causal source.