I complimented you when you had something intelligent to say/ask, but now I’ve got to tell you this post is incredibly stupid. You don’t understand the distinction between a place of worship having the option to legally restrict firearms on their own property vs the government mandating where a person can legally carry? Try real hard to rub the few remaining brain cells you have together and think on it.
Edit: Seran let me help you… Situation 1) California passes a law saying no two consenting adults may have sexual contact. Situation 2) California passes a law saying that rape is a punishable crime (rape defined as when a person has sexual relations with another person without their consent). You agree #1 is wrongfully oppressive but #2 is absolutely a good normal law? Now apply that same logic to what we’re talking about with carrying a firearm inside a place of worship or someone’s business.