Quote Originally Posted by Latrinsorm View Post
It's less about position and more about velocity. Think of it like a car: your distance from a cliff is absolutely relevant, but how fast you're moving towards it is even more so. Right now we're speeding towards the cliff, and all people are saying is we shouldn't do that. If you like, speeding towards a cliff is "incorrect".If so, it should be easy for you to find citations in peer reviewed journals. Do whatever. We'll be dead before we cause a runaway greenhouse scenario, and way more than 1% of our environment will survive what we do do.
Peer review or not, when the psycho left starts bombarding young minds with after school specials about the coming ice age, it's all a broken record.

Your not using science, or logic. Any monkey that points at something and says it's broken, has to have knowledge of what that something looks like in correct working order. How do you know if it's fixed or even broken in the first place if you don't know what it looks like in the right working order?

This is why it's coming off as nonsense to a lot of us. Give us a model of the norm.