Climate Change Report

[Laviticas]

Dude I can't even get one of these climate change robots to give me the correct running climate. I mean if shit is broke, don't you have to know what it looks like when it's in proper working order?

[Jarvan]

Continue not to worry, conspiracy theory-loving conservatives! The hottest May in recorded human history was followed-up by the hottest June in recorded human history, but it's still just a vast liberal conspiracy.


http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/2014/6

Japan's Meteorological Agency also lists April, May and June as the hottest globally recorded months, making the past quarter year the hottest on record.
http://ds.data.jma.go.jp/tcc/tcc/pro...p/jun_wld.html

But no, sir. John "I'm Not a Scientist" Boehner and his political backers want you to know you've got nothing to worry about.

So does this mean when we have the coldest January in human History you will shut your mouth? Nope.. cause that will be blamed on it to.

[Jarvan]

As an aside...

Just remember.... 40 years ago, scientists thought we were causing the Earth to get colder. Now these same scientists say no, it's warmer. What will be next? Them screaming that we are causing the planet to stay the same?

If the entire world suddenly stopped having seasons and had just ONE climate, say a nice 72 degrees with some but not to much rain... The nut jobs that worship "climate change" would suddenly call it climate stagnation, and say man caused that too.

[Dendum]

As an aside...

Just remember.... 40 years ago, scientists thought we were causing the Earth to get colder. Now these same scientists say no, it's warmer. What will be next? Them screaming that we are causing the planet to stay the same?

If the entire world suddenly stopped having seasons and had just ONE climate, say a nice 72 degrees with some but not to much rain... The nut jobs that worship "climate change" would suddenly call it climate stagnation, and say man caused that too.

Not to be...annoyingly critical of climate utopia....but if the entire world had a 72 degree temperature with some but not much rain we would all pretty much be screwed.

[Jarvan]

Not to be...annoyingly critical of climate utopia....but if the entire world had a 72 degree temperature with some but not much rain we would all pretty much be screwed.

Well, yes we would. Just saying it doesn't matter what happens to the Climate, the wackos would blame it on man, and push their agenda.

Of course.. the funny thing about their agenda.. they only know what they don't want. They never have specifics on what they do want.

[Warriorbird]

I just want people to be realistic about this shit. For fuck's sake, I was reading the other day about a giant sinkhole opening up in...I dunno, wasn't the US so who cares? And what was one of the theories people suggested? Global warming was to blame!

Global warming is to blame for everything! Global warming shot my father.

Hottest month in recorded history? Going back to when, exactly? 1880 something? Like we had good instruments back then and we had a reliable way to test ocean temperatures back then? Reminds me of the article I read once that said we are seeing a record number of hurricanes in the entire world and what was to blame? Global warming. Never mind the fact that we have much better technology now than we did 100 years ago and can see more hurricanes in the middle of the ocean, we can see them now therefore it's global warming!

John Christy, a "Distinguished Professor of Atmospheric Science and Director of the Earth System Science Center at the University of Alabama in Huntsville" and "was appointed Alabama's state climatologist in 2000", says "The temperature records cannot be relied on as indicators of global change" because he believes many of these stations have been compromised for various reasons.

Also for once I would love to read a report from a climatologist telling us exactly what we have to do in order to save the world. We're on page 128 of this thread now, has such a report ever been linked to? Instead it's always the same thing "Man bad. Man destroy planet. Man must be stopped." That's it. Where are the specifics? Do we have to reduce carbon emissions by one fourth? By one half? By three fourths? By when? Do we have until the year 2100? 2050? 2020?



You're beyond silly if you think there are no Democrats who believe in creationism.

There's been a series of suggestions of what to do for quite a while. I like geoengineering but it is naturally complex. The risks also include threatening the Earth. The primary proposals are solar radiation management and the reduction of fossil fuels. Most conservatives and myself tend to favor the first, but not having to worry about our oil supply has a powerful lure too. We spend so many resources on it.

There are certainly Democrats who believe in creationism. We know how the percentages swing though. A certain other party maybe kinda succeeded in making it state law in a series of places. You have something of a brain so I understand why you'd be touchy about it.

[Thondalar]

Also for once I would love to read a report from a climatologist telling us exactly what we have to do in order to save the world. We're on page 128 of this thread now, has such a report ever been linked to? Instead it's always the same thing "Man bad. Man destroy planet. Man must be stopped." That's it. Where are the specifics? Do we have to reduce carbon emissions by one fourth? By one half? By three fourths? By when? Do we have until the year 2100? 2050? 2020?

Actually, the report at the beginning of this thread, which everyone is using as the be-all, end-all, states very clearly that the damage is already done, and there's nothing we can do to reverse it.

[Warriorbird]

Actually, the report at the beginning of this thread, which everyone is using as the be-all, end-all, states very clearly that the damage is already done, and there's nothing we can do to reverse it.

Myself and others disagree pretty strongly with the IPCC on that. That's hardly the scientific consensus that the idea that humans can have an effect on climate is.

[Thondalar]

Myself and others disagree pretty strongly with the IPCC on that. That's hardly the scientific consensus that the idea that humans can have an effect on climate is.

What others? Can you link me to someone that has some ideas on how to reverse it? Also, I believe we're well past the "humans can have an affect on climate" part of the conversation, and now we're at the "what exactly is that affect and what exactly should be done about it, if anything" part.

[Methais]

What others? Can you link me to someone that has some ideas on how to reverse it? Also, I believe we're well past the "humans can have an affect on climate" part of the conversation, and now we're at the "what exactly is that affect and what exactly should be done about it, if anything" part.

Just give the government all your money, they'll fix everything.