Quote Originally Posted by Tgo01 View Post
No it doesn't.

Here is the relevant part of the law. You do remember there was a law in question here and it wasn't just the supreme court granting personhood rights to embryos that you made up, right?



Notice key words: wrongful act or negligence.

If the parents say hey, we just need the one embryo, you can go ahead and destroy the other embryos, then it is no longer a "wrongful act" or "negligence."

You are just so wildly misinformed about this topic that it is beginning to become one of the modern wonders of the world.

Just because you like to eat shit fed to you by your politicians, doesn't mean I like to eat shit.

Oh yeah, not to mention that destruction of embryos is NOT required in IVF. The parents can choose to donate the embryos. But keep on eating that shit.
You're an idiot. The Alabama Supreme Court decision redefined the definition of a minor child, and does not limit it to purely in the scope of a single law.

The upshot here is that the phrase "minor child" means the same thing in the Wrongful Death of a Minor Act as it does in everyday parlance: "an unborn or recently born" individual member of the human species, from fertilization until the age of majority.
By redefining what is and is not a "minor child" they're saying the Act extends to embryos.