Things that made you frown today (Political Version)

[Neveragain]

No, it's not 'OK.' Just like J-walking isn't 'ok.'

Neither instance affords me the right to use my car as a battering ram however.

Now it's my turn to ask a ludicrous question that we both know the answer to:

If I happen to buy a tank, can I just run it through the public library because of my right to unrestricted free movement?

You and your comrades argument is "how big of a weapon is acceptable for an act of violence?" not what protected rights are being violated that lead to the acts of violence. Is throwing a rock at someone an acceptable form of response to speech you don't like? Or is a tank the line for which we say that's too extreme of a violent response?

Both sides are guilty of acts of violence. Both sides espouse ideology that is anti-freedom. This woman is not a hero or a victim, she was part of the problem.