Printable View
Why are Democrats even harping on about who will pay for the wall? The Democrats in Congress have already moved away from that argument because they realized how dumb they sounded when they said we couldn't afford a wall. The new line you're supposed to repeat is a wall is somehow immoral and just a "vanity" project for Trump.
Ur dumbQuote:
Originally Posted by Back
Surprisingly, political posts tend to get shit on rather quickly on Mah Gemstoners and for the most part don't exist.Quote:
Originally Posted by Taernath
The person in my screenshots is clearly a tolerant individual who only wants the best for everybody.
There seems to be a lot of fucking old people on there too. Who were all middle aged when I started playing GS.Quote:
Originally Posted by Taernath
Fuck. :(
All this stupid shit is why I'm an Asian supremacist.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
https://i.imgur.com/DL29wYK.jpg
What's your opinion on "digital blackface?" Just curious to see if it's so stupid that even you would think it's stupid or not.Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
Yeah I was a member years ago, but left because I figured the less that identifies me as a GS player the better. After pk went full stalkermode I knew it was the right choice.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
For what it's worth, pk probably doesn't know how to use Facebook.Quote:
Originally Posted by Taernath
I'm pretty sure Mr. Cybersecurity Expert found your profile off Mah Gemstoners and googled the rest.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
Probably. But much like with everything else, he's really bad at google too. So bad that he found my super secret hideout in a gym class at some high school in New Orleans.Quote:
Originally Posted by Taernath
I wonder if they ever received a subpoena.
I heard from an anonymous source that he became a cybersecurity expert after he helped his grandma change her wifi password and she was like "I knew you'd know how to do this, you're an expert!" and he was like "Thanks grandma! Yeah! I'm an expert! A cybersecurity expert!"
Then stole $20 out of her purse on his way out the door.
They did but it was in crayola.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
That C+ hangs from a fridge to this day.
Fixed.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
https://i.imgur.com/orwDLTn.pngQuote:
Originally Posted by Astray
:lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by Wrathbringer
Russia is taking Earth's magnetic core. It sounds like something a Batman villain would do. Is it a coincidence that the government shut down at exactly the same time the magnetic core started moving toward Russia? Think about it.
Quote:
But, according to the science journal Nature, something strange is going on deep down below.
It’s causing the magnetic North Pole to “skitter” away from Canada, towards Siberia.
“The magnetic pole is moving so quickly that it has forced the world’s geomagnetism experts into a rare move,” Nature reports.
On January 30 (delayed due to the US Government shutdown), the World Magnetic Model — which governs modern navigation systems — is due to undergo an urgent update.
This model is a vital component of systems ranging from geopositioning systems used to navigate ships through to smartphone trackers and maps.
The current model was expected to be valid until 2020. But the magnetic pole began to shift so quickly that the model had to be fixed — now.
“They realized that it was so inaccurate that it was about to exceed the acceptable (safe) limit for navigational errors,” Nature reports.
More...
A ClydeR post in the facepalm thread is meta as fuck.
https://i.imgur.com/brURWBu.gifQuote:
Originally Posted by ClydeR
https://www.alux.com/wp-content/uplo...ry-article.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Don't AIDs me bro
Old news. The state sucks rocks and worse yet, it's spreading.Quote:
Originally Posted by Astray
Genius marketing. Especially since the people they're virtue signaling to are probably either feminists who don't shave, soy boys who can't grow a beard or at best take a month and a half to grow some patchy peach fuzz, and hippies who can grow beards but still don't shaveQuote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
I'm sure Schick and Dollar Shave Club are quite thankful for all the business Gillette just gave them though.
Here's Jim Gillette:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5FyUb2sN3p4
My Gillette razor has been downgraded to shaving teh bush.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
I'm not surprised this is your take away from this commercial. Obviously your idea of masculinity is being challenged and it makes you uncomfortable. Now, in some ways I don't blame some guys, especially older guys, for having out-dated ideas of what being a man actually is because our culture, being patriarchal, has programmed us with a bias that has us look the other way when men do bad things.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
We could create a topic about this and debate all sorts of things but the bottom line is if that commercial upsets you then you are acting like a child, not a man.
We get it.. you're a beta male. This is something we've known about you from your earliest days on this message board.Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
I'm glad you have accepted it and actually admit you are threatened by men who aren't as in tune with their fee fees as you are.
Chin up, mighty Internet Warrior.. you're the champ.
It's like Back has somehow become a walking, talking, feminist news blog.Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
I think all I took away from the commercial is that they want to sell razor blades.
I could be crazy though.
All that rage that you are feeling is directly connected to the fear that you feel when you think your masculinity is being questioned. Its a sore subject with you that throws you into a tantrum like a child who then tries to lash out call people bad names in an effort to overcompensate for how powerless you actually are. Its not cute, or funny, or adorable. Its pretty sad but when has that ever stopped you.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Try to cheer up old man. At least you have viagra to help you out when you need it.
Those two having a meltdown over that commercial is the least surprising thing ever.Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
It’s ok PK...maybe facial hair will grow for you...someday.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
#hopeandchange
Even with viagra, you still can't get the help you need. Here, maybe try this:Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
https://steemitimages.com/640x0/http...b77d5dd15d.jpg
Please enlighten us with your expertise on masculinity.Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
Because if anyone comes to mind when I hear the word "masculine," it's definitely you.
Remember when you stole from msconstrew and then later on you had such a massive meltdown over your hurt fee fees that you tried (and failed miserably, because you suck at everything and are a loser) to go all stalker lawyer antifa?Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Remember how hearing a woman masturbating traumatized you?
You'll never not be a joke. It's best if you just accept it now.
http://i411.photobucket.com/albums/p...lrob/back3.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by Methais
That Tabor meltdown thread keeps giving and giving...
:lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
https://i.imgur.com/OQBcjVO.jpg
My bad Warriorbird :(
That actually happened more because the Girl Scouts is going to shit. Most of them don't do camping or any of that anymore, and BSA, itself kinda collapsing, saw a means to expand.
I mean...It's not like there's a huge physical difference that would need to be overcome, like you'd experience with say, combining major league sports.
The idea of the scouts is to teach people how to survive, respect the environment, and be self sufficient. No real reason for there to be two separate organizations for it. I never did anything in the boy scouts that any of the girls I knew who'd be interested in that sort of thing would be incapable of. Hell, I grew up working on a farm. Some of the girls I knew were better than me at boy scout shit.
Esquire magazine is having to apologize for their latest magazine cover because it features an offensive image. That offensive image? A young white boy, aged 17, talking about his life experiences.
No, really. This is a thing. The far left lost what was left of their rotting minds because a magazine had the audacity to feature a young white boy who talked about his life experiences.
https://thenypost.files.wordpress.co...y=90&strip=allQuote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
I bet sellstuff1 is triggered as fuck over this.
That's one of the most absurd things to be upset about. Plus, dude lives in Wisconsin. The whitest place on Earth
Breaking: Tgo to cancel Esquire subscription
Also is he wearing a button up over a hoodie? I just don't understand this generation. 👴
:lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by Astray
https://twitter.com/i/status/1095166980376662017
At the anti-wall Beto O'Rourke rally.. because fences and walls don't work!
Classic.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, this month called the new tax policy “an economic civil war that helps red states at the expense of blue states.”
What the mother fuck?
This is because the new tax law does not allow people who live in high tax states to deduct state taxes over $10,000 from their federal income tax...
How the fuck did this even get into the tax code in the first place??
Well we can go ahead and stop saying "Democrats aren't calling for killing newborn babies!"
Senate Democrats blocked a bill that would have required medical care for newborns who survived an abortion.
So we're really past the lie of "My body my choice!" because once the baby is out of your body this argument no longer makes sense.
We can stop saying "Democrats don't want to let newborn babies die! That's just you misunderstanding their argument" because they actually killed this bill in the Senate, much like they want to kill as many babies as possible under the guise of "women's rights."
Democrats really are quickly becoming the party of absolute ghouls. We already have Ocasio-Cortez scaring little kids into believing they are really going to die in 12 years. Remember how before Cortez we laughed at all of the doomsayers who said the world was going to end in X amount of years? Yet here we have someone in the US Congress who is doing just that and there are people on the left and in the media who can't kiss her ass fast enough.
She also has a credit score of 430 but is somehow on the finance committee anyway. :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
Do everyone a favor and promise not to go shooting up a mall or sending anyone any pipe bombs. Ok?Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
I'd hope he'd focus that rage on enemies of America like Pelosi, Schumer, AOC, Adam Schiff, Maxine Waters, etc. rather than on random people. At least do a public service with those kinds of acts, you know?Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
Please don't encourage the lunatics.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wrathbringer
Because I'm sure they're totally reading a forum for a 30 year old text game and all.Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
tgo and rocktar are the most likely ones here to go out and do some crazy shit like thatQuote:
Originally Posted by Back
Says the only person here who's done crazy shit like that.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Dude.. so far, you’re the only one here that got so upset by someone’s words that you creeped on him to try and get him fired.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
I’m sure you are on a watch list somewhere.. especially since your severe case of TDS flared up in 2017.
People don't get put on watch lists for talking about what's on the news. Leave it to you to say the utterly most retarded things possible.
And this is why you're not taken seriously. Your whole rant is based in non facts, but this is pure gold.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
No, she actually said the world is going to end in 12 years. The link was posted here. So you're wrong. Again.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alfster
And the spin half of it you ignored. Cute. You know - the scared children.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wrathbringer
And the spin half of it you ignored. Cute. You know - the scared children.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wrathbringer
The important relevant part you ignored. Cute. You know - the idea that the world is going to end in 12 years. But please, keep defending retardio-cortez like the idiot you prove to be everytime you post.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alfster
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHk8nn0nw18Quote:
Originally Posted by Alfster
Didn't you see his response? He agrees with that part. It's the "scaring children" with it that he disputes. :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
Go look at what ive posted about her, I think she's an idiot.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wrathbringer
Tying what she said to children is retarded, and you know it. Why spin it as such?
Oh. Well in that case, here's the result:Quote:
Originally Posted by Wrathbringer
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sb4ddeF91-I
Saying the world is going to end in 12 years is retarded. It doesn't need to be spun. Now, if you told a child that the world was going to end in 12 years, do you think that would scare them? of course it would. So is it not true? No. You're dumb.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alfster
I agree with you.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wrathbringer
Which is my point. Tgo spins everything. It doesn't always need to be.
:facepalm: I'm done here.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alfster
Wait.. you thought I said you were on a watch list because you posted things that were on the news?Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Maybe you should re-read what I actually posted.
You’re our “special” sociopath.. as evidenced by your miserable life playing out on this message board. I doubt anyone would be surprised if you are on a watch list... and it’s not because you copy/paste stuff here.
She literally told the teenagers who watch her stupidity unfold on her social media that they have to think twice about having children because of man made global warming, er I mean “climate change”.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alfster
And did you see those children on the video of Diane Feinstein? Literally children saying that if she doesn’t vote for the new Green Deal, she’s condemning them.
I didn't see the Feinstein video - will once I get out of work. I'm assuming it's the one Methais posted.
Get over yourself dude, get a hobby that doesn't consist of creeping on people here on the PC for decades on end.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Creeping on people here on the PC (if we're actually considering neg rep and calling out your chronic stupidity and scumbagness as creeping anyway) > creeping on people from the PC irl like you doQuote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Looks like you failed another one. gg
https://i.imgur.com/qiHoN2J.png
It’s like you are going for the title of least amount of self awareness...Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Well, you did it!!
You must have me confused with a Bernie supporter.Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
You didn’t see the video of those kids confronting Feinstein and saying if she didn’t pass the green new deal that the world was going to end in 12 years? Cortez is literally the only person who has said that so I wonder where that girl got that idea from. Hmm........Quote:
Originally Posted by Alfster
Remember that story about the jogger in Colorado who was attacked by a mountain lion and he had to strangle the mountain lion to save his life? Remember how some people were jokingly saying the guy hired the mountain lion to attack him so he could make the news, poking fun at the media's rush to cover the Jussie Smollett story? Well some in the media kind of took that joke seriously.
Look at this headline from NBC:
Mountain lion killed by Colorado jogger was an orphaned kitten
An orphaned kitten!
I'm just surprised they used the word "killed" and not "murdered."
No.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
Yes you do.Quote:
Originally Posted by Taernath
Believe it or not, I have experience with both Colorado AND cougars.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
Three outta four.
https://i.redd.it/t9k4b48uhk201.gifQuote:
Originally Posted by drauz
time4fun should be along shortly to rofl oh honey the fuck out of you and explain in no less than 47 paragraphs why he's right and you're wrong and dumb and inferior
Not many people know this but Michael Jackson provided the voice of a character in a Simpsons episode. He played the character of a white (well yellow) mental patient who thought he was Michael Jackson, but they don't use Michael Jackson's name as the voice of this character in the credits, they use a pseudonym.
There was a documentary released recently where two men claimed Michael Jackson molested them when they were boys and now suddenly in light of this documentary people are taking these allegations against a dead man seriously when hardly anyone cared when Michael Jackson was on trial for molesting kids.
Anyways so now "The Simpsons" creators have decided to pretend this episode never existed. It won't be available on streaming services anymore and any future DVD releases will not feature this episode. Isn't this a bit much for just merely playing the voice of the character in which he isn't even credited as the voice and in which he doesn't even play himself, but rather just someone who thinks he's Michael Jackson?
They are treating Michael Jackson worse than Roman Polanski, someone who was actually convicted of anally raping a 13 year old girl.
That wasn't really rape rape though............................................ ..................Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
House Democrats just passed a measure that defends the practice of illegal aliens voting in local elections.
For years now Democrats have pretended their end goal wasn't to import as many voters as possible so I guess it's a nice change of pace to see them finally admit it. Be adamantly against border security, protect illegal aliens over US citizens to curry favor with this potential voting bloc, then allow them to vote.
Bravo, Democrats. Bravo. Next up: lower the voting age to 12 then continually turn a blind eye to public school teachers indoctrinating children to the Democrat agenda.
https://youtu.be/a0v-_Y-XVwEQuote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
Except the dumb cunt doesn't get that people that came in under the Statue of Liberty were coming in legally.
And then there is this:
https://www.boston.com/news/politics...-voting-age-16Quote:
Ayanna Pressley is introducing legislation to lower the federal voting age
While some cities and states have looked at expanding local voting rights to 16 and 17 year olds, Pressley says they should be able to participate in elections for Congress and the White House.
If you think this is about anything other than power and enslaving another generation to the government welfare plantation then you are either deceiving yourself, stupid or willfully ignorant. Supporting this process is simply evil.
Democrats are already 12 million registered voters ahead of republicans in this country as a whole. Granted, because of how voting works, with the majority of those democrats in large urban areas, their votes don't count as much as republicans spread out over large swathes of the midwest, which is the real bullshit in my opinion.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
That being said, a couple of questions. Where do you think the illegal immigrants in your little rant are coming from specifically? How many do you think there are? What makes you think they are all automatically democrat? Is it mind control or is it because the republican platform does not attract as many voters?
You're stupid.Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
Whole lot of good it did them in 2016.Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
Oh wow.Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
Where do I think the illegal immigrants are coming from? The vast majority come from Mexico, Central America, and South America.Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
Estimates put illegal aliens at anywhere from 10 million to 20-30+ million. It has to be more than 10 million because that 10 million number was floated around at least a decade ago.
I don't think they are all automatically Democrat but non-whites in this country tend to vote Democrat, although to be fair Hispanics are more diverse in their political leanings as a group than other minorities are.
As far as the "mind control" nonsense, it isn't hard to figure out that if Democrats tell everyone Republicans are white supremacists and hate non-whites, and the media helps them spreads these lies, that non-whites are going to tend to vote against Republicans. Have you not realize lately that Democrats virtue signal more than they actually legislate? And when they do legislate it's typically about expanding abortion "rights" because that's yet something else they can virtue signal about? Why do you think that is?
Dead voters and identity thieves don't count.Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
This is correct.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wrathbringer
Back is the biggest virtue signaler on here, so he's not going to understand what you're saying and will instead respond with some vague hippie virtue signaling bullshit that doesn't actually say anything.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
We have to disagree.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
I think what you are describing is a conspiracy theory. The simple reality is that the priorities of the republican party do not resonate with the majority of people.
I think democrats are doing what they should be doing. Legislating for their constituents.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
No it's the fake cries of racism lobbied against Republicans.Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
How do you explain a city like Detroit, 80%+ black, a mostly black Democrat government for decades, and the city is one of the poorest and crime ridden major cities in the country? What sort of polices are Democrats offering this city that is helping minorities?
Or a wealthy city like Chicago that has been ran by Democrats for decades, where there is a major disparity in wealth between blacks and whites.
Same goes for other large Democrat cities such as San Fransisco, Oakland, Portland, Seattle.
Just explain to me what sort of policies these Democrats provide to minorities other than "Republicans hate the color of your skin!"
You should virtue signal less and think more.
You're really are the biggest sheep ever, seriously. :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
In before he blames Detroit and Chicago on republicans and white supremacy.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
He'll probably blame "white flight" for Detroit.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
If he doesn't, he'll post some hippie "We all just need to come together and figure it out"Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
Which is his way of saying "Everyone needs to do what my party says is best because democrats are life."
Those situations are from unregulated capitalism and racism established throughout the history of the United States. Its the story of our country that no one wants to openly talk about.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
Read Coates article "The Case for Reparations". It explains exactly how the red lining in Chicago happened.
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine...ations/361631/
Untangling that deeply rooted mess requires some serious changes. Changes that people have been opposed to and continue to be opposed to for decades. Changes that people have been trying to make for decades.Quote:
Locked out of the greatest mass-based opportunity for wealth accumulation in American history, African Americans who desired and were able to afford home ownership found themselves consigned to central-city communities where their investments were affected by the “self-fulfilling prophecies” of the FHA appraisers: cut off from sources of new investment[,] their homes and communities deteriorated and lost value in comparison to those homes and communities that FHA appraisers deemed desirable.
You want to blame democrats for failure while fighting to make them fail.
Holy mother of God.Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
I honestly can't tell if you're just trolling anymore.
You're hopeless. Even when Democraps have power in these cities for decades and fail because of unsound policies, somehow it's the conservative's fault. And you wonder why we call you retarded; well, let me clue you in because I know you can't figure it out: it's because you're retarded.Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
You act as if democrats had total control over these places. Are you forgetting how our government works? No one party has all the power. You are quick to blame and never take the responsibility.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wrathbringer
Do I think that conservatives/republicans hold us back? Yes. Its why they are called conservatives. They want things to stay the same or be like the good old days. Well the good old days sucked.
Both parties are to blame for not being able to fix issues that are deeply rooted in our history. Its not from lack of trying to change things.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
https://i.imgflip.com/1c3fkw.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by Methais
Hey Back if it's because of unregulated capitalism then why aren't all cities across the country like Detroit?
Democrats have had an overwhelming majority in those cities for decades. Stop being so fucking disingenuous all the time. Because if it's not that, then you really are that dumb and clueless, which there is no cure for.Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
Its great that you think democrats could wipe away generations of institutional racism in every aspect of society and business with a snap of their fingers. Democrats aren't the only party in this country though. This kind of deep institutionalized racist policy needs major changes that both parties need to be on board with. And remember that there are people out there who are against changing these policies. Crazy, right?Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
If you hadn't noticed, or ignored it, every major city in this country has this issue to some degree or another.
I usually tell people who talk to me the way you are in that last post to go fuck themselves just on principal. You aren't trying to debate or find solutions. But I feel generous today. You're welcome.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
^Quote:
Originally Posted by MethaisIn before he blames Detroit and Chicago on republicans and white supremacy.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
You're so predictably stupid. Stop being so predictably stupid.
https://scontent.fbtr1-1.fna.fbcdn.n...0e&oe=5CDD8F51
You know you are arguing with Back right?Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
Yes. It just never ceases to amaze me how these people keep getting dumber after years of already getting dumber every day.Quote:
Originally Posted by ~Rocktar~
Well, they smoke weed constantly, eat soy, keep watching CNN and other mainstream media and I am pretty sure places like MotherJones.com, Vox.com, Salon.com and other Leftist "news" outlets where they get news from daily have some kind of brain washing built into them.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
You're retarded.Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
Smoking weed has nothing to do with it, but the rest is correct.Quote:
Originally Posted by ~Rocktar~
https://i.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/...913/excuse.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by ~Rocktar~
fucking pot head brigade popping out
You'll have to excuse Rocktar. He still thinks Reefer Madness is real.Quote:
Originally Posted by Astray
https://media.tenor.com/images/86eb7...7486/tenor.gifQuote:
Originally Posted by Methais
This is correct.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
Literally, Democrats have had total control over places like Detroit.Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
Literally, that is the source of all the problems.
Stop being stupid in every fucking post.
Not true. Not true. And debatable.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Show me a list of Detroit government being all democrat through its entire history. Show me specifically which policies you think democrats have enacted to maintain the conditions the way they are.
Quit fucking around with your blowhard bullshit and show us some facts for a change.
No republican mayor since 1962. City council has been made up of mostly democrats with a smattering of individual republican or independents since 1970. So the last 50 or so years it has been run by democrats almost exclusively.Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_mayors_of_Detroit
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Detroit_City_Council
Do your own research you willfully ignorant bafoon. You'll literally believe anything without checking it out as long as it supports your narrative. When your ignorance is pointed out, you just yell "nuh uh!!!" instead of looking for yourself to see if maybe you're wrong. Typical democrap. You're retarded.Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
Inb4 back "nuh uh!!11 but republicans!!!" What a tool.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashlander
This is correct.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wrathbringer
This is also correct.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wrathbringer
Back, stop being like Walter Peck.
https://youtu.be/cDQk4lGSEJQ
You don't have to have 100% Democrats to be able to pass legislation. You need 51%.Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
Democrats have had a majority AND a Democratic Mayor since 1962.
LITERALLY, Democrats have had total control over places like Detroit.
Almost 60 years of Democrat policies and leadership is what happens to a once prosperous city when you continually vote in Democrats.
LITERALLY, that is the source of all the problems.
STOP BEING SO FUCKING STUPID IN EVERY SINGLE FUCKING POST YOU MAKE.
You did the same thing when I called NeveranoriginalthoughtAgain out on his bullshit. Let these guys do their own work, man!Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashlander
I asked about leadership throughout Detroit's history not just the past 50 years. You can see in your links what leadership was like going back to the 20s. Both parties are to blame for a problem that has existed before and been reinforced since WWII.
Yes, there was one corrupt democratic mayor. But Detroit has faced some major external issues such as population decline and losing a great deal of jobs since WWII. The good news is things have gotten better. Crime has gone down, poverty has gone down, middle class earnings on average are up. They are making progress with infrastructure.
Democrats also "have control" over other very prosperous cities. It would be great to say democrats get all the credit but that would be disingenuous. The credit gets spread around too.
This all started with a conversation I was having with Tgo about how there are 12 million more democrats in this country than republicans. He was so afraid that that meant the republican party was racist, which I never said, that he pulled the "whataboutism" conservative tactic of pointing at Detroit and other cities with deep segregationist divides as some kind of proof of democratic ambivalence to it.
In this case, Tgo is the one who cried racism first. Not me.
So back is saying complete Democrat control for almost 60 years isn't enough time for Democrats to get their shit together and make Detroit prosperous again and help out the black majority population? How much more time do Democrats need to "fix" the mess of Republican control? 80 years? 100 years? 200 years?
I want you to be cognizant of the fact that I did not blame republicans and have always said both parties are to blame. I've also blamed unregulated capitalism and racism. Do not conflate me saying racism to me saying republican. Unless you believe the two are interchangeable.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
How long does it take to fix something so deeply rooted in American history? The first great migration might be one point in time to isolate as when the troubles of blacks in Detroit began, and that was 1916. Housing discrimination continued into well after WWII. At most its been 50 years, with other factors coming into play during those 50 years, to untangle problems that were instituted over 100 years ago.
And things are better in Detroit now than they were 10 years ago.
Oh yeah, I forgot this is the discussion where you're being more retarded than usual and are blaming capitalism and racism for Democrats failing the black community they claim to care about and that we need reparations to fix the mess.Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
Carry on then.
That’s a lot of words just to say, “I know democrats have turned Detroit to shit but I don’t want to admit it.”Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
Just be honest. We already think you’re retarded so it’s not like anyone is going to be surprised.
What? No. You don't need 100 years to fuck up a city.. again, Detroit is a perfect example of this.Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
What? No. Those "major external issues" you mentioned were a product of Democrats being in control. Population and job loss weren't realized since WWII.. it was far later than that. 1960 saw a decline and it went downhill fast after that... which "coincidentally" matches up when Democrats got control of the city. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demogr...ory_of_DetroitQuote:
Yes, there was one corrupt democratic mayor. But Detroit has faced some major external issues such as population decline and losing a great deal of jobs since WWII. The good news is things have gotten better. Crime has gone down, poverty has gone down, middle class earnings on average are up. They are making progress with infrastructure.
Have some examples of how Democrats have pure legislative control over prosperous cities? To quote literally the dumbest human being I've had a conversation with: "Quit fucking around with your blowhard bullshit and show us some facts for a change."Quote:
Democrats also "have control" over other very prosperous cities. It would be great to say democrats get all the credit but that would be disingenuous. The credit gets spread around too.
No, I just happen to think that if you are addicted to some intoxicant or other that you are pretty stupid. In today's world if you don't know something is addictive then you are lying.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
Correct. Lets top repeating ourselves. Good day.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
Do you have some examples of "unregulated capitalism" or did you hear that phrase somewhere and decided it had a nice ring to it?Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
Also, I'm going to give you a quick little math lesson: 2019 - 1962 = 57 years... not "at most it's been 50 years".
And let's see.. what did we accomplish in 50 years?
Put a man on the moon.
Computers.
Internet.
Cellphones.
Are you really saying you can't fuck up a city in 50 years? Really?
Stop.
You are a hopelessly brainwashed retard; a typical democrap. Keep making excuses for your poor policies and failing cities. People like you should be forced to clean the human feces littering SF's streets until you realize your own idiocy. "But both parties are to blame even though mine has been in power in these places for decades!!11" You're just stupid. Plain and simple.Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
Predatory lending practices and red lining of neighborhood home values.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
I know you're upset that there are 12 million more democrats in this country than republicans but its not my fault that democratic policies resonate more with people than republican policies.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wrathbringer
If this is true, it's because more people today are brainwashed retards (like you) who would rather play candy crush than research the "You can have everything for free!!!11" socialist bullshit that fake news channels and celebrities are feeding them. Any amount of research puts the lie to all of that. Also, I notice you're still a willfully ignorant retard and don't care.Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
Do you have a source on that number?Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
So... you have no examples of "UNREGULATED capitalism". Good to know you always fail to deliver.Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
A lot of good that did your party... lololQuote:
I know you're upset that there are 12 million more democrats in this country than republicans but its not my fault that democratic policies resonate more with people than republican policies.
He either doesn't understand the stat he keeps repeating or he is being purposefully misleading.Quote:
Originally Posted by Astray
He is going by the number of registered voters as of 2018, but only 31 states require people to declare their party affiliation when registering to vote. Most notably large Democrat stronghold states such as California, NY, and NJ require party affiliation whereas large Republican stronghold states such as Texas and Georgia do not.
You sound like I give a fuck what you think. Watch your blood pressure. All that REEEEEEE!!!! isn't good for you.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wrathbringer
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/publ...cans_are_aheadQuote:
Originally Posted by Astray
He went ahead and linked to an article that explains what I said perfectly so I guess he just doesn't understand the stat.Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
For your reading pleasure Back.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/scottbe.../#11c4e04c3fbe
Okay.Quote:
To be sure, there are a number of major states that do not register voters by party, such as Texas, Georgia, Washington, and the keystones of the industrial Midwest: Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Ohio, and Wisconsin. If they did register by party, Texas, Georgia, and Indiana would almost certainly add to the Republican total; the industrial states probably less so.
Comparing party registration totals between states at a particular point in time can be a bit misleading, particularly because some may have recently completed a purge of “dead wood” on their rolls while others have not. Often, the trend line over a series of years is more valuable to look at than a one-time registration count.
Keep reading. Also, look at the number of votes per party in this past election. America is decidedly democratic.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
We can find sources that say what we want. My opinion about Detroit is that Detroit's issues go back farther than the 60s, are unique compared to other cities in similar situations, and that both parties have played a role in both the problems and solutions that are making Detroit a better place now than it was.Quote:
Originally Posted by Seizer
I have no dog in this fight, but the California energy crisis was a shitshow of Capitalism Gone Wild.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
And he doubles down on just simply not understanding what he reads. Is there a reason you actively choose not to educate yourself on things you don't want to hear, Back? Or did I just answer my own question?Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
Yes, there is a reason. He's too stupid.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
Bullshit you don't.. Backlash is one of your Party's members.. and you're trying to protect him! LIAR LIAR LIAR!!!!!!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by Taernath
And while I agree with you, it wasn't unregulated. Perhaps not regulated enough.
You literally can’t get addicted to weed. Therefore...Quote:
Originally Posted by ~Rocktar~
...stop lying.Quote:
In today's world if you don't know something is addictive then you are lying.
At least you agree that you’re being more retarded than usual.Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
Here’s Iran from before the 1979 Islamic revolution that put all the women in burkhas and shit.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
https://www.businessinsider.com/iran...ls-in-public-9
1941 - 1979 = 38 years
And that’s ruin an entire country, never mind just a city.
This might be the most retarded Back has been yet.
A little respect for your champion.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
In 1895, the majority of people used horses and carriages. In 1945 we had jet air planes and nuclear bombs.
Shit, in my own lifetime I've seen some crazy changes. The internet now existing everywhere, everything, including the damn fridge, being computerized, cell phones being every where, flatscreens being all over the walls in bars. I remember when you could bullshit at a bar and no one could fact check you instantly. Ah, the days.
Thanks to Trump no doubt.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
Because psychological addiction isn't a thing? Stop being retarded and crack a book.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
The statement that there are 12 million more registered democrats than republicans is still true regardless. This is from a majority of states 31 plus DC.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
When you take into account the states that don't register voters, sure, some of the big republican states will bring up the number of republicans but they will also bring up the numbers of the democrats. The same for the midwest industrial states.
Look at that and also look at the amount of votes for either party in 2016 and 2018 and there are clearly more democrats than republicans in this country currently. By millions.
Here is another source. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politi...in_U.S._states
At this point in time I think this proves my contention that America is waaaay more democratic than republican.Quote:
As of October 2017, Gallup polling found that 31% of Americans identified as Democrat, 24% identified as Republican, and 42% as Independent.[3]Additionally, polling showed that 46% are either "Democrats or Democratic leaners" and 39% are either "Republicans or Republican leaners" when Independents are asked "do you lean more to the Democratic Party or the Republican Party?"[4]
The statement that there are 12 million more registered Democrats in those 31 states + DC is certainly correct, but this does not mean the numbers would hold up if we included all 50 states. Do you really think states like Texas and Georgia not being included in this figure aren't skewing the results in favor of Democrats?Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
Also note the large number of registered Independents in those states. In some states there are more Independents than both Republicans and Democrats. In reality a lot of people will register as Independent, even though they are really Republican or Democrat, because they don't want people to know they are really a Democrat or Republican. In states like California it would make sense that a Republican would be more willing to hide the fact they are a Republican than it would be for a Democrat to do the same, seeing as how rational people such as Antifa are when they find out someone is a Republican.
lol @ back raving about "There are 12m more democrats in this country than republicans!" when in fact it was just pertaining to those 31 states + dc. What an idiot. You should work for cnn, back. You're good at fake news.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
Then, there will be no more elections won by Republicans in anything.. because Back did the "math"....Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
Its like you only read the first line of my post. The very next line I'm saying the same thing you are. And yes the majority are independent AND the majority of independents lean democrat.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
If the second sentence of your post completely contradicts the the first sentence of your post then why are you making so many contradictory statements? Stop that.Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
You can get psychologically addicted to Gemstone too. What's your point?Quote:
Originally Posted by ~Rocktar~
I'm talking about real addiction as in a chemical addiction like you get from real drugs.
Stop believing in Reefer Madness. Only the most retarded of the retarded still buy into that shit.
This is correct.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
I had a friend who tried pot once. ONCE. 45 minutes later, she was DEAD. Pot overdose.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
True story.
I will shove both my thumbs into your eyes and watch you stumble around before finishing the job.Quote:
Originally Posted by Stumplicker
But how many marijuanas was it? Just one marijuana?Quote:
Originally Posted by Stumplicker
DEATH THREAT! Reporting!Quote:
Originally Posted by Astray
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lX7l93K3WBQQuote:
Originally Posted by Methais
I'll give you a death threat!Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashlander
REPORTED!Quote:
Originally Posted by Astray
Androidpk was right.. you DO give death threats!
No wonder he was afraid for his life.
Aww maaan..he's never gonna shut up about it now.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
How is she not dead?Quote:
Originally Posted by drauz
https://i.imgur.com/jZgkM73.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by Methais
Maybe this will give him something to focus on instead of "ZOMG TRUMP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" for a day or two.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashlander
I'm just here to help.
A group of far left bullies confronted Chelsea Clinton at a vigil, yes at a vigil! To blame HER for the massacre in New Zealand because she dared to have the audacity to condemn Ilhan Omar's anti-semitic shit.
Imagine that. Ilhan Omar makes anti-semitic remarks, Chelsea Clinton condemns those remarks, a mass murderer on the other side of the world shoots up some Mosques, and this is somehow Chelsea Clinton's fault?
I'm not a huge fan of Chelsea Clinton but give me a fucking break!
The left is losing their minds faster than I thought.
The woman who yelled at Chelsea refuses to apologize because she felt morally righteous about her screaming at Chelsea because the vigil had more non-Muslims in attendance than Muslims.
Surprise! The woman in question is a Bernie supporter. When will Bernie personally apologize to Chelsea for the way his supporters treated her? That's how this game works now right?Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
Also things are pretty crazy right now. I've been reading a lot of tweets about this story and so far the vast majority of Democrats are siding with the lunatic who yelled at Chelsea whereas every single Republican is defending Chelsea. I predict within 48 hours Chelsea will apologize for being yelled at, then apologize to Ilhan Omar and promise to never condemn anti-semitism again. Because this is what happens when you get in bed with the far left, you so desperately want to stay in bed with them that you sell your soul to them.
From the lunatic in question:
So she's not just angry that non-Muslims showed up, but that WHITE people up. And the racists (on the far left like Androidpk) is of course siding with the racist.Quote:
the CAUCASITY that chelsea clinton has showing up to a vigil for the 49 muslims massacred in an islamophobic hate crime after STOKING ISLAMOPHOBIA AND RACISM surrounding ilhan omar.... fucking ridiculous.
Wasn't she also white?
The one screaming is a Palestinian brown woman. Her friend who defended her is white.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
Oh, so she is cool because she was with her. BTW, isnt it racist of her to assume caucasians cant be muslims? (Arabs are caucasians btw)Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
Yup. She is shouting some pretty racist and bigoted shit in her rants but she's being defended for some strange reason.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
Look how stupid PK is. Then remind yourself that there are tons of other people out there who are just as stupid if not worse.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
It's pretty amazing. There was a shooting in the Netherlands a few hours ago that killed 3 and wounded more. The guy responsible for the shooting is still at large so police didn't have a suspect yet after the shooting was first reported. The news on Twitter was all abuzz; "Is it another white supremacist shooting?", "All mosques have been closed down due to safety concerns!", "Is Trump to blame?"
Then the police say the guy is from Turkey and I haven't seen a single news story on twitter about it since. Imagine my non shock.
The media before the facts come out:Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
https://i.imgur.com/R5p9G94.gif
The media after the facts come out:
https://media.giphy.com/media/jUwpNzg9IcyrK/giphy.gif
TDS retards like PK after the facts come out:
https://i.imgur.com/R5p9G94.gif
So once it was found out the shooter in the Netherlands was from Turkey a narrative quickly spread that it he wasn't a terrorist, instead it was some sort of family matter because he was supposedly related to the first person he shot.
Now prosecutors are saying they have evidence showing it was terrorism and there is no proof yet that he was related to anyone he shot.
Of course the media is still largely silent on this shooting. Although to be fair the terrorist attack in NZ seems to have largely cycled out of the American headlines as well. I guess they finally realized that only far left fucksticks like Androidpk were buying the narrative that Trump was to blame so they are looking for the next thing to blame Trump for.
I mean, I don't see much to report really. Terrorism or not, it was pretty fucking small scale.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
They certainly were busy reporting when they thought it was another white guy. I haven't even seen them report that officials are now saying they have proof it's terrorism, I had to see some guy on Twitter link to a news article from the Netherlands. I'm not saying they haven't reported on that, just that I haven't seem it on Twitter yet, which is where I get all of my news these days.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
The mainstream media seems to be largely ignoring it on Twitter at least.
Until they figure out a way to blame Trump. Then it becomes large scale.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
Even if the actual shooting was this:
https://i.imgur.com/WRFXYFi.gif
People are being arrested for using incorrect pronouns for trans people. That's fucking retarded.
The world is losing their minds.Quote:
Originally Posted by Astray
It's incredibly alarming that something as simple as using the incorrect pronouns, invokes a police investigation. I mean, there's already a pretty hateful divide being drawn among people these days.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
Shit's just gonna start going. Real soon, man.
This is what happens when you elect soy liberals into office.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
Eh, Britain has never really had Freedom of Speech. One of the reasons our Founding Fathers stuck that shit in the Constitution at the top.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
https://pics.me.me/my-favorite-gende...de-3367972.pngQuote:
Originally Posted by Astray
fuck off bernie sandersQuote:
Originally Posted by Methais
Another Muslim terror attack happened today in Italy that is receiving little to no US media attention.
A school bus driver handcuffed 50 children in his bus and set the bus on fire. Thankfully so far none of the kids have died but are being treated at a hospital.
I'm sure we'll be seeing news outlets report our need to condemn Muslims everywhere for being Muslim. Any minute day...
I knew Barbra Streisand was crazy, but damn!
Quote:
Barbra Streisand says Michael Jackson’s accusers were ‘thrilled to be there’ and his ‘sexual needs were his sexual needs’
Quote:
“His sexual needs were his sexual needs, coming from whatever childhood he has or whatever DNA he has," Streisand told The Times. “You can say ‘molested,' but those children, as you heard say [grown-up Robson and Safechuck], they were thrilled to be there. They both married and they both have children, so it didn’t kill them.”
Holy shit this lady is absolutely insane. Don't get me wrong, I think it's pretty shitty to come out with these allegations now that Michael Jackson is dead and can no longer defend himself, but to really offer up THIS defense of Jackson?Quote:
“I feel bad for the children,” she said. “I feel bad for him. I blame, I guess, the parents, who would allow their children to sleep with him. Why would Michael need these little children dressed like him and in the shoes and the dancing and the hats?”
"His sexual needs were his sexual needs"? So that makes it okay then? A guy can only get off by anally raping a 13 year old girl so that makes Roman Polanski's actions okay? Wait, didn't Streisand also defend that piece of shit too?
So it's in some guy's "DNA" to abuse his power to sexually assault and rape young women so they can get a movie role so we let Harvey Weinstein off too?
In the same breath she says she feels bad for the kids AND Jackson, and then pins the blame entirely on the parents? Sure the parents shouldn't have been so trusting, but Jackson is completely blameless and deserves sympathy? People in Hollywood are weird.