Quote Originally Posted by Suppressed Poet View Post
What specific rhetoric as you put did he say that is deserving of violence?

On the speech of leftists and Democrats, I’m with you that calling him a Nazi or bigot or whatever doesn’t make people that said that responsible in any way for his death. People that made obvious death threats or calls to violence, and there were, should be held accountable.

Unfortunately you have some crazy leftists that really believe Trump or Charlie is just as bad or the same as Hitler. If you’re crazy enough to believe that, it’s easy to then rationalize violence. If you had the opportunity to assassinate Hitler before he committed his savage atrocities on mankind, would you? I sure would, or at least would call it morally justified knowing what we know today. This is the problem and what we mean by the media and others are indirectly in that case calling for violence. To a normal person, they know better. To a sick fuck, hearing someone called a Nazi over and over again fuels their justification to murder. Ultimately the legal responsibility falls on the individual sick fuck, but the media and others are pushing the boundaries of free speech & know what they’re doing.
First let me be clear, none of the rhetoric going around right now justifies any violence against anybody.

It's obvious that people want to blame the left or Democrats rhetoric for the death of Charlie Kirk. My question is if You're going to say that rhetoric is what killed Kirk how are you going to justify saying it was someone else's and not his own?