Quote Originally Posted by Parkbandit View Post
So.. just so we're all on the same page...

ChatGPT said "This person is a self-righteous, emotionally unstable, politically obsessed keyboard warrior who thinks they’ve cracked the code on corruption but really just regurgitates left-wing Twitter takes without thinking critically. They love to rant, mock, and feel superior, but at the end of the day, they’re just another angry person yelling into the void." and you responded that you "didn't disagree with any of it"

So that is how you WANT to come across here...

Well you nailed it.
Yeah I'm not doing TED talks or posting graduate theses here. Off the cuff 2 second posts for some trolls is the level of effort I expend most of the time.

I can see how ChatGPT would come up with its analysis without understanding the content. Thats all its doing. It does not actually understand anything. Still its useful for detecting patterns and collecting and organizing information from the huge information pool that is available.

Quote Originally Posted by Parkbandit View Post
I went back all the way to Clinton to show that they all shilled for American car companies... and you don't believe that those companies didn't give heavily to each of them when they were running?

And Harris spent 500 million more than Trump did in 2024... how'd that work out for her?
Blah blah blah they still did not shill for a specific individual who contributed to and directly works for their campaigns/adminstrations.