Page 9 of 21 FirstFirst ... 789101119 ... LastLast
Results 81 to 90 of 206

Thread: #winning

  1. #81

    Default

    Another portrait of Milley is coming down, he is going to lose his security detail and security clearance, AND the military may even demote him.

    I ain't tired of winning yet!

  2. #82

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tgo01 View Post
    Another portrait of Milley is coming down, he is going to lose his security detail and security clearance, AND the military may even demote him.

    I ain't tired of winning yet!
    Good.

    To be fair, he should be tried for treason.
    PC RETARD HALL OF FAME

    Quote Originally Posted by Seran-the Current Retard Champion View Post
    Besides, Republicans also block abstinence and contraceptives anyway.
    Quote Originally Posted by Seran-the Current Retard Champion View Post
    Regulating firearms to keep them out of the hands of criminals, the unhinged, etc. meets the first test of the 2nd amendment, 'well-regulated'.

    Quote Originally Posted by SHAFT View Post
    You show me a video of me typing that and Ill admit it. (This was the excuse he came up with when he was called out for a really stupid post)
    Quote Originally Posted by Back View Post
    3 million more popular votes. I'd say the numbers speak for themselves. Gerrymandering won for Trump.

  3. #83
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Mars
    Posts
    34,487
    Blog Entries
    17

    Default

    Apparently the Trump administration is planning to rename all the military bases back to their original names, with the SecDef already calling it Fort Bragg again.
    Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

  4. #84

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gelston View Post
    Apparently the Trump administration is planning to rename all the military bases back to their original names, with the SecDef already calling it Fort Bragg again.
    Do you think that would be lawful?

    Congress passed a law in 2020 requiring the name changes. Trump vetoed the law. Bipartisan super majorities in both houses of Congress overrode his veto.

    Trump's veto message from 2020 is below. Just for fun, I also highlighted the part about Trump's insistence that the law he vetoed should have included a repeal of Section 230.

    TO THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES:

    I am returning, without my approval, H.R. 6395, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 (the “Act”). My Administration recognizes the importance of the Act to our national security. Unfortunately, the Act fails to include critical national security measures, includes provisions that fail to respect our veterans and our military’s history, and contradicts efforts by my Administration to put America first in our national security and foreign policy actions. It is a “gift” to China and Russia.

    No one has worked harder, or approved more money for the military, than I have — over $2 trillion. During my 4 years, with the support of many others, we have almost entirely rebuilt the United States military, which was totally depleted when I took office. Your failure to terminate the very dangerous national security risk of Section 230 will make our intelligence virtually impossible to conduct without everyone knowing what we are doing at every step.

    The Act fails even to make any meaningful changes to Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, despite bipartisan calls for repealing that provision. Section 230 facilitates the spread of foreign disinformation online, which is a serious threat to our national security and election integrity. It must be repealed.

    Additionally, the Act includes language that would require the renaming of certain military installations. Over the course of United States history, these locations have taken on significance to the American story and those who have helped write it that far transcends their namesakes. My Administration respects the legacy of the millions of American servicemen and women who have served with honor at these military bases, and who, from these locations, have fought, bled, and died for their country. From these facilities, we have won two World Wars. I have been clear in my opposition to politically motivated attempts like this to wash away history and to dishonor the immense progress our country has fought for in realizing our founding principles.

    The Act also restricts the President’s ability to preserve our Nation’s security by arbitrarily limiting the amount of military construction funds that can be used to respond to a national emergency. In a time when adversaries have the means to directly attack the homeland, the President must be able to safeguard the American people without having to wait for congressional authorization. The Act also contains an amendment that would slow down the rollout of nationwide 5G, especially in rural areas.

    Numerous provisions of the Act directly contradict my Administration’s foreign policy, particularly my efforts to bring our troops home. I oppose endless wars, as does the American public. Over bipartisan objections, however, this Act purports to restrict the President’s ability to withdraw troops from Afghanistan, Germany, and South Korea. Not only is this bad policy, but it is unconstitutional. Article II of the Constitution makes the President the Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States and vests in him the executive power. Therefore, the decision regarding how many troops to deploy and where, including in Afghanistan, Germany, and South Korea, rests with him. The Congress may not arrogate this authority to itself directly or indirectly as purported spending restrictions.

    For all of these reasons, I cannot support this bill. My Administration has taken strong actions to help keep our Nation safe and support our service members. I will not approve this bill, which would put the interests of the Washington, D.C. establishment over those of the American people. It is my duty to return H.R. 6395 to the House of Representatives without my approval.

    DONALD J. TRUMP

    THE WHITE HOUSE,
    December 23, 2020.

    More...

  5. #85
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    yo mama
    Posts
    6,459

    Default

    Former Democrat Senator Bob Mendez just received an 11 year prison sentence.

  6. #86

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Suppressed Poet View Post
    Former Democrat Senator Bob Mendez just received an 11 year prison sentence.
    About time that fucker is thrown in jail. Talk about corruption.

    Surprised Biden didn't pardon him on his way out.

    There's still hope for him though, if he has a very far leftist judge he might just give him probation.

  7. #87

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tgo01 View Post
    Surprised Biden didn't pardon him on his way out.

    There's still hope for him though, if he has a very far leftist judge he might just give him probation.

    I heard Trump is considering pardoning him. For real.

  8. #88
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    yo mama
    Posts
    6,459

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ClydeR View Post
    I heard Trump is considering pardoning him. For real.
    I heard your mother is a cankerous whore with a fat ass that laments bringing you into this world. 4realz.

  9. #89

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Suppressed Poet View Post
    I heard your mother is a cankerous whore with a fat ass that laments bringing you into this world. 4realz.
    How fat are we talking though? Like cottage cheese dimples everywhere fat? Or phat?

    Hey ClydeRetard, does your mom have a fat ass or a phat ass?
    Last edited by Methais; 01-30-2025 at 10:23 AM.
    [Private]-GSIV:Nyatherra: "Until this moment i forgot that i changed your name to Biff Muffbanger on Lnet"
    Quote Originally Posted by Back View Post
    I am a retard. I'm disabled. I'm poor. I'm black. I'm gay. I'm transgender. I'm a woman. I'm diagnosed with cancer. I'm a human being.
    Quote Originally Posted by time4fun View Post
    So here's the deal- I am just horrible



  10. #90
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    yo mama
    Posts
    6,459

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Methais View Post
    How fat are we talking though? Like cottage cheese dimples everywhere fat? Or phat?

    Hey ClydeRetard, does your mom have a fat ass or a phat ass?
    I’m talking body positivity social media influencer type fat not your big booty Latina / Kardashian phat.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •