Things that made you laugh today (Political Version)

[joeyb]

My bad for expecting you to have the brain power to be able to figure out whch part of your post I was referring to. Next time I'll just quote only the specific words, since even after spelling it out for you multiple times, you still can't wrap your head around it. Even though I did that a few posts later and you still don't get it. Which in all honesty, I should have known better that you would be so confused.

Let's recap:

You: "kamala didn't run on a progressive ticket and didn't lose because of her policies"

Me: You don't think taxing unrealized gains is progressive? If it's not, then what is it?

You: i don't know, but taxing the rich polls well.

Me: I'm talking specifically about taxing unrealized capital gains, which is one of the few things she stated as one of her policies.

You: taxing the rich polls well.

Me: Show me any poll where taxing unrealized gains polled well

You: this is a strawman!!!!! i said taxing the rich polls well!!!

Me: Explains everything again, but in kindergarten terms.

You: i guess thats somewhat progressive

Me: Yet you're saying she didn't run on progressive policies and she didn't lose because of her policies despite her capital gains policy, which is one of the only policies she actually stated, being disastrous for her.

You: i was talking about polling and then you butted in!!!!!! but even if she ran on that, so what? i was talking about polls!!!!!

Me: Here's the specific part of the post I was replying to, which was only about you saying she didn't run on a progressive ticket and nothing to do with the other stuff about polls, which would have been obvious to anyone else, including Seran.

<QUOTES ONLY THE LINE OF THE POST I WAS REPLYING TO, ADDED BOLD AND UNDERLINE AND INCREASED FONT SIZE IN CASE YOU STILL DON'T GET IT>

You: ur stupid and u butted into my conversation that i was having on a public forum!!!!!! but even if she ran on that so what? u butted into my public forum conversation!!!!


Here's the part I honestly thought you would be able to understand and wrap your head around, but again, I blame myself for assuming that you would be able to process something so simple:



You: i still don't understand how quotes work and i was talking about polls [despite the one line you quoted that wasn't poll related]!!!!!!!!!!

But keep telling yourself that Kamala wanting to tax unrealized capital gains was a non-issue that didn't affect how anyone voted. Yes everyone knows that most of her platform was just word salad and that she was even more fake and cringe than Hillary, but of the few policies that she did actually state she wanted to implement, this was the most disastrous, and you either just don't have the mental capacity to wrap your head around it, you still don't understand how public forums work, you're pretending to be really stupid, or you really are that stupid.

I'm not sure which it is, but it's definitely at least one of those.

Oh well, I tried to be nice. You're just too dense.

lol on writing another book. you're a complete fucking idiot and the posts are right there for everyone to read you stupid disingenuous fuck. the whole conversation was literally about polling, and you were also talking about polling.

i'm talking about in the context of 2024. progressive policies are not unpopular - maternity leave, medicare for all, childcare, increasing min wage, abortion, etc are all things that poll very well.

you said what I quoted you said, that she and Walz ran on a progressive ticket, which they obviously didn't. read my post - I never said she lost because of her policies. what I did say is that I think she would have done better.

Unrealized gains? Who does that poll well with?

but taxing the rich polls very well on both sides.

No it doesn't. Maybe if the government didn't piss everything away they take in, it would be more well received. But probably not, because our government has a spending problem, not a revenue probelm.

lol get fucked you fat incel bitch