Israel at War?

[Parkbandit]

She provided a textbook answer on the policies of the institution and the crybullies on the far right are upset she gave a professional response. Woe.

Q:"Is calling for the extermination of Jews against Harvard Policy?"

A:"It depends on how they call for the extermination of Jews"

Whenever someone is calling for the extermination of any group of people based upon religion or sex or skin color... the answer is always "yes" and is not dependent upon anything.

[Seran]

Q:"Is calling for the extermination of Jews against Harvard Policy?"

A:"It depends on how they call for the extermination of Jews"

Whenever someone is calling for the extermination of any group of people based upon religion or sex or skin color... the answer is always "yes" and is not dependent upon anything.

The Congressperson asked whether or not a specific hypothetical event were a violation of Harvard Policy and was given an answer that was specific to the nature of the the hypothetical. Your problem is you're trying to paint the institutions as somehow antisemitic without a lick of evidence and Ms Stefanik pulled a vague hypothetical out of her ass to try to accomplish through virtue signaling what her lack of evidence failed to establish. Ms Gay provided a further statement which she was not allowed to illustrate due to restrictions placed on her testimony by the MAGA led panel.

“Let me be clear: Calls for violence or genocide against the Jewish community, or any religious or ethnic group are vile, they have no place at Harvard, and those who threaten our Jewish students will be held to account,” Gay said.

[Methais]

The Congressperson asked whether or not a specific hypothetical event were a violation of Harvard Policy and was given an answer that was specific to the nature of the the hypothetical. Your problem is you're trying to paint the institutions as somehow antisemitic without a lick of evidence and Ms Stefanik pulled a vague hypothetical out of her ass to try to accomplish through virtue signaling what her lack of evidence failed to establish. Ms Gay provided a further statement which she was not allowed to illustrate due to restrictions placed on her testimony by the MAGA led panel.

^ Imagine being even .00000000000001% this stupid.

[Suppressed Poet]

The Congressperson asked whether or not a specific hypothetical event were a violation of Harvard Policy and was given an answer that was specific to the nature of the the hypothetical. Your problem is you're trying to paint the institutions as somehow antisemitic without a lick of evidence and Ms Stefanik pulled a vague hypothetical out of her ass to try to accomplish through virtue signaling what her lack of evidence failed to establish. Ms Gay provided a further statement which she was not allowed to illustrate due to restrictions placed on her testimony by the MAGA led panel.

In what hypothetical situation, as you put it, is calling for the extermination of Jews not a violation of their code of conduct?

So someone that finds it unacceptable that our higher learning institutions selectively tolerate hate speech is “virtue signaling”? If so, we need more of that.

[Methais]

In what hypothetical situation, as you put it, is calling for the extermination of Jews not a violation of their code of conduct?

So someone that finds it unacceptable that our higher learning institutions selectively tolerate hate speech is “virtue signaling”? If so, we need more of that.

Make a random post a few months from now saying the same thing, but swap out jews for black people or Mexicans or something, and then sit back and watch Seran have a gigantic meltdown.

You could probably do it this afternoon even, because Seran's memory is only good for about 3 minutes. And that's his long term memory.

[Seran]

In what hypothetical situation, as you put it, is calling for the extermination of Jews not a violation of their code of conduct?

So someone that finds it unacceptable that our higher learning institutions selectively tolerate hate speech is “virtue signaling”? If so, we need more of that.

Mayhap you missed the second part of my post that indicated that Ms Gay clarified the 15 second clip being used as your typical dog whistle call to arms by far right pundits. Or maybe you deliberately ignored it because to you, a 15 second clip taken out of hours of testimony is all that matters.

[Parkbandit]

The Congressperson asked whether or not a specific hypothetical event were a violation of Harvard Policy and was given an answer that was specific to the nature of the the hypothetical. Your problem is you're trying to paint the institutions as somehow antisemitic without a lick of evidence and Ms Stefanik pulled a vague hypothetical out of her ass to try to accomplish through virtue signaling what her lack of evidence failed to establish. Ms Gay provided a further statement which she was not allowed to illustrate due to restrictions placed on her testimony by the MAGA led panel.

What? No.

Ms. Stefanik asked if the calling for the extermination of the Jews was against policy. President Gay (god, that should be your name.. except you'll never be President of anything) gave some mealy mouthed "answer" of it depends on how they called for the extermination of Jews..... and was later forced to give an actual answer when she got home and saw how many politicians didn't have her back.

[Parkbandit]

^ Imagine being even .00000000000001% this stupid.

I saw someone today say "Everyone serves a purpose.. your purpose may be to serve as a warning for others, but it's still a purpose"

That literally is the best definition of Seran's purpose I have ever heard.

[Parkbandit]

Mayhap you missed the second part of my post that indicated that Ms Gay clarified the 15 second clip being used as your typical dog whistle call to arms by far right pundits. Or maybe you deliberately ignored it because to you, a 15 second clip taken out of hours of testimony is all that matters.

That "clarification" came two days after her congressional testimony.

Some people just automatically know that calling for the extermination of any group of people, based on their religion/sex/skin color.. is wrong.

It took President Gay and her 2 pals 2 days day to figure it out.

Seran is still trying to figure it out.. almost a week later.

[Suppressed Poet]

Mayhap you missed the second part of my post that indicated that Ms Gay clarified the 15 second clip being used as your typical dog whistle call to arms by far right pundits. Or maybe you deliberately ignored it because to you, a 15 second clip taken out of hours of testimony is all that matters.

Why can’t she just answer the question with a simple yes? It isn’t nuanced.