Things that made you Facepalm today (Political Version)

[Methais]

Oh I get what you are trying to say, and that’s what YOU think he’s implying, but the point of a veiled threat is, you don’t really know, now do you? I’ll throw your question you asked me earlier right back at you.

This would also mean that no one else except for Trump knows, including the butthurt prosecutor and his rubber stamp Obama judge. But that isn't stopping them from pretending they do, does it?

Who specifically is going to be exposed? Who specifically is he coming after to persecute? Let’s see some names.

Sure. Just off the top of my head that he would be pretty likely to go after, regardless of whether or not he would actually get anywhere with it...

Biden
Garland
Pelosi
Schiff
A bunch of FBI cunts
etc.

...to name just a few. This little tiny list is already several times more names than you've dropped. But you'll attempt to discredit it anyway since I don't have a full list of names of every single person in Washington who is caught up in this shit show that he would be likely to go after if he were re-elected.

Since you aren’t Twitter famous, if you were in court, would you stand up and make a statement “if you come after me, I’ll come after you!”? Of course you wouldn’t, because you know that would be fucking stupid. It was stupid of Trump to say what he said, it would be stupid for anyone to say it.

Good thing he didn't say that in court then, huh?

In before "Posting it on Twitter later on is the same thing!"

Not sure why YOU are having trouble understanding what I am saying.

Oh I totally get what you're saying. The part you're not getting is...

I’ll try again. Hey, Trump was stupid for making a veiled threat right after coming out of court, it would be stupid for anyone to do it”

...I just don't consider that a veiled threat, and most people crying about it can't explain what they think that threat would be, and against who specifically.

It’s not about Trump per se, it’s about you shouldn’t make comments that could be regarded as a threat or witness intimidation or anything like that RIGHT AFTER YOU LEAVE COURT.

You could turn a super vague statement like that into almost anything if you twist it around enough. Which tends to be the exact kind of thing leftists do along with all of the performative pearl clutching for extra dramatic effect.


Tell you what. I'll meet you halfway. If Trump's tweet is a "veiled threat," then so is this retarded shit:

In Trump's court response to the prosecutor's request for a protective order for grand jury material, Trump's attorneys wrote the below, including the photo. Was Biden's tweet a thinly veiled reference by Biden to Trump's indictment, as Trump alleges?

[Solkern]

This would also mean that no one else except for Trump knows, including the butthurt prosecutor and his rubber stamp Obama judge. But that isn't stopping them from pretending they do, does it?





Sure. Just off the top of my head that he would be pretty likely to go after, regardless of whether or not he would actually get anywhere with it...

Biden
Garland
Pelosi
Schiff
A bunch of FBI cunts
etc.

...to name just a few. This little tiny list is already several times more names than you've dropped. But you'll attempt to discredit it anyway since I don't have a full list of names of every single person in Washington who is caught up in this shit show that he would be likely to go after if he were re-elected.



Good thing he didn't say that in court then, huh?

In before "Posting it on Twitter later on is the same thing!"



Oh I totally get what you're saying. The part you're not getting is...



...I just don't consider that a veiled threat, and most people crying about it can't explain what they think that threat would be, and against who specifically.



You could turn a super vague statement like that into almost anything if you twist it around enough. Which tends to be the exact kind of thing leftists do along with all of the performative pearl clutching for extra dramatic effect.


Tell you what. I'll meet you halfway. If Trump's tweet is a "veiled threat," then so is this retarded shit:

Exactly, that’s the point of a veiled threat, no one knows.

Can you show me where he specifically said he’s coming after these people related to that specific tweet?
I asked for a specific list of names that Trump said he was going to come after, not who you think it’s “pretty likely” he’ll come after. Because if I listed names, you would have asked the same from me.

You’re right, Biden’s tweet could be considered a veiled threat, but the big difference? Did Biden just come out of court? No he didn’t. That’s the reason I said his veiled threat was stupid, because you don’t make comments like that right after court.

Methais, let’s imagine you caught someone at work stealing money, he knows someone saw him, but doesn’t know who, and the dude says “If you come after me, I’ll come after you and your family”

Would you take that as a threat?

[Parkbandit]

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

Solkern has got to be the worst person in the world at strawmen arguments.

[Seran]

Solkern has got to be the worst person in the world at strawmen arguments.

Interesting that y'all are so immune to common sense, especially when you completely overlook the impropriety of a defendant trying to influence witnesses in violation of their conditions of release. Your eagerness to chase whataboutisms to help camouflage the sheer criminality of former president cheeto makes me think you have some inkling that no one is above the law.

[Suppressed Poet]

I'm actually leaning towards Vivek Ramaswamy right now. I want DeSantis to remain as Gov in Florida and Tim Scott might be just too nice and honest for the Office.

Although, a Trump nomination will be super entertaining for me.. I just believe it's time to head in a less abrasive direction.

Vivek Ramaswany is sharp as a razor and really outworking everyone else in his campaign. I’ve listened to a few of his town halls and really like what he has to say.

[Solkern]

Solkern has got to be the worst person in the world at strawmen arguments.

Of course, not a single sane person would ever take “if you come after me, I’m coming after you” as a threat. /end sarcasm.

[Parkbandit]

Solkern has got to be the worst person in the world at strawmen arguments.

You would think he would get decent at something he is constantly using.

[Parkbandit]

Vivek Ramaswany is sharp as a razor and really outworking everyone else in his campaign. I’ve listened to a few of his town halls and really like what he has to say.

Only platform idea he has I am not behind is his moving the legal voting age to 25.. even though all you have to do is pass a civics course or work in a sector like the military or first responders to be able to vote at 18. Sounds like a ton of bureaucracy to just keep retards like Seran from voting in an election or two.

[Shaps]

Only platform idea he has I am not behind is his moving the legal voting age to 25.. even though all you have to do is pass a civics course or work in a sector like the military or first responders to be able to vote at 18. Sounds like a ton of bureaucracy to just keep retards like Seran from voting in an election or two.

Would actually be quite easy.

Certain States already - on their driver's licenses - have a marking to denote a person has proven their citizenship, and thus the driver's license reflects that.

The tired old argument that requiring an ID to vote is asinine - as you literally need ID for anything you do in life... hence everyone has an ID (99% - yes I get there are 1 or 2 instances they may not).

Same could just be done for the citizenship test. Take it at the DMV, pass, annotated on your Government ID.

Why people make this stuff overly complicated is absurd... unless you think black and brown people are idiots and can't get their IDs (as the Democrats do - fucking racists).