Justice for Hire - SCOTUS

[Methais]

I don't need to school your ass another time, in another thread on the same topic. Embryos don't have rights. The faaaar right has put more value on a fertilized ovum than they do on a woman, whom they value little more than an incubator. Go brush up on your civil rights.

Your ever increasing arrogance for how smart you think you are when you're literally the stupidest person to ever post on the PC keeps getting better and better. But only in an entertainment for others way, which is great for us, but bad for you, because you're still wrong and stupid 100% of the time while trying to blow yourself 24/7.

[Suppressed Poet]

How do I explain it.. what the fuck dude, that is in the constitution. Duh.

Your response here confirms our type of government.

Ask yourself this: Where is the establishment of, granted power, and defined authority of our government derived from? The answer is the constitution. That takes care of the first part.

A republic already has representative & democratic elements, but the difference is a republic is not held hostage solely to the majority. There is a reason why we have an electoral college that elects our president vs. a popular vote of the people. There is a reason why each state gets the same number (2) of senators as PB pointed out.

I would tell you to educate yourself but I fear that is a lost cause.

[Seran]

Your response here confirms our type of government.

Ask yourself this: Where is the establishment of, granted power, and defined authority of our government derived from? The answer is the constitution. That takes care of the first part.

A republic already has representative & democratic elements, but the difference is a republic is not held hostage solely to the majority. There is a reason why we have an electoral college that elects our president vs. a popular vote of the people. There is a reason why each state gets the same number (2) of senators as PB pointed out.

I would tell you to educate yourself but I fear that is a lost cause.

And every state gets an apportionment of Representatives according to their population as determined by the Constitutionally mandated census. I don't know why you think that citizens exercising their democratic rights to vote every two, four, and six year intervals for federally elected representatives isn't a Representative Democracy, but you're clearly deluded.

[Parkbandit]

And every state gets an apportionment of Representatives according to their population as determined by the Constitutionally mandated census. I don't know why you think that citizens exercising their democratic rights to vote every two, four, and six year intervals for federally elected representatives isn't a Representative Democracy, but you're clearly deluded.

One half of one branch of government does not make a Representative Democracy.

There is a reason why House members are elected to a 2 year term and Senate enjoy a term that is 3x that.

I get WHY you want to believe it.. so you can use it to change the Senate, SCOTUS and the Electoral College systems.

But, the US is a republic.. and has been since its inception.

Here's the difference:

By definition, a republic is a representative form of government that is ruled according to a charter, or constitution, and a democracy is a government that is ruled according to the will of the majority.

[Suppressed Poet]

And every state gets an apportionment of Representatives according to their population as determined by the Constitutionally mandated census. I don't know why you think that citizens exercising their democratic rights to vote every two, four, and six year intervals for federally elected representatives isn't a Representative Democracy, but you're clearly deluded.

Let me ask you this in that case… Would you define the government of Nazi Germany to be socialist? After all, it’s both in the name of their political party (nationalist socialist) and they did implement many elements of socialism in their mixed economy. Examples of socialist elements include state funded work programs like the Autobahn & nationalization of industries that included media, healthcare, education & childcare, and many more.

[Methais]

And every state gets an apportionment of Representatives according to their population as determined by the Constitutionally mandated census. I don't know why you think that citizens exercising their democratic rights to vote every two, four, and six year intervals for federally elected representatives isn't a Representative Democracy, but you're clearly deluded.

[Parkbandit]

[Suppressed Poet]

This is amazing. I especially appreciate that actual retards are included in this round table alliance.

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

And every state gets an apportionment of Representatives according to their population as determined by the Constitutionally mandated census. I don't know why you think that citizens exercising their democratic rights to vote every two, four, and six year intervals for federally elected representatives isn't a Representative Democracy, but you're clearly deluded.

This is what ChatGPT thinks of your statement.

The statement appears to be a defense of the idea that the United States is a representative democracy. However, there are several issues with the statement:


1. The statement incorrectly suggests that the apportionment of Representatives is solely based on the population of each state. While population is a major factor, the apportionment formula also takes into account the total number of seats in the House of Representatives (currently set at 435) and requires that each state has at least one Representative.


2. The statement implies that voting for federally elected representatives every two, four, and six years is the only way citizens can participate in a representative democracy. While voting is an important part of a representative democracy, citizens can also engage with their elected officials through other means such as writing letters, attending town hall meetings, and participating in protests and demonstrations.


3. The statement is dismissive and insulting, referring to someone as "deluded" for holding a different opinion. This type of language is not productive and can prevent meaningful dialogue and understanding.


Overall, while the statement may be well-intentioned, it oversimplifies the complex workings of a representative democracy and does not foster a respectful and constructive conversation.

[Suppressed Poet]

We better add AI to the round table alliance that agrees Seran is a retard.