
Originally Posted by
Suppressed Poet
Still isn’t crystal clear to me your question, but I think I got it… You are asking how does someone obtain a firearm that they legally can’t possess? I don’t engage in illegal activity so I can’t give you specifics, but we have no supply shortage of firearms in this country. If we look at career criminals, they seem to be able to acquire guns without much trouble.
My point however was that if there was an assault weapon ban, that doesn’t deter the crazies that intend to indiscriminately murder people. We already had one, and during that time mass shootings still happened about as frequently as they did preban. The overwhelming majority of gun deaths occur with pistols. If hypothetically you ban certain guns, those sick people will either obtain those guns illegally or just use a gun that you didn’t ban & can use that with great effect to harm others. If hypothetically you banned all guns (ignoring for a moment the legal challenges to that), those sick people with murderous intent will find other means like a bomb, illegal gun, knife (yes mass stabbings are a real problem), whatever. The problem with sick people choosing violence is the sick people. Thinking that an assault weapon ban or whatever measure you think to prevent a criminal from obtaining a weapon is a real solution to solving mass shootings makes about as much sense as gun free zones in school (none). Why? Because a gun free zone sign or an assault weapon ban doesn’t deter some sick fuck to act on their murderous intent.