Page 5 of 20 FirstFirst ... 3456715 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 191

Thread: AOC is encouraging an insurrection

  1. #41

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by drauz View Post
    So Trump and his team aren't the ones that told these people the election was stolen at first?
    So nobody thought the election was stolen after all the shady shit that went on, until Trump was like "This election was stolen!!!"?

    gg answering my question with a question in order to avoid providing an answer.

    Before you or someone tries to NO U my question to your question, let's put it in context, since it also answers your question to my question before you even asked it, and try this again:

    Do you really think that those same people didn't already believe the election was stolen before Trump said anything at all, and instead they showed up like "Yeah this election was legit, it sucks that Trump lost, but you can't win 'em all, and....WAIT WHAT? IT WAS STOLEN? LET'S FUCKING RIOT NOWWWWWWWWWWW!!!!!!!"?
    Last edited by Methais; 06-25-2022 at 11:24 AM.
    [Private]-GSIV:Nyatherra: "Until this moment i forgot that i changed your name to Biff Muffbanger on Lnet"
    Quote Originally Posted by Back View Post
    I am a retard. I'm disabled. I'm poor. I'm black. I'm gay. I'm transgender. I'm a woman. I'm diagnosed with cancer. I'm a human being.
    Quote Originally Posted by time4fun View Post
    So here's the deal- I am just horrible



  2. #42

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by drauz View Post
    If Arizona wants to spend their money doing that then good luck to them. I wouldn't say the FBI should be involved
    Gee big surprise there! Federal prosecution and federal tax dollars should only be used against MY political opponents! If these dumb red states want to spend their money on MY party well then, GOOD LUCK TO THOSE IDIOTS! LOL!

    Dude. Stop already. I don't know how but you are getting dangerously close to Seran levels of dumb here.

  3. #43

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Parkbandit View Post
    Hasn't even the dumbest of liberals, Rachel Maddow, admitted that Trump's speech didn't incite the mob?

    How are you unable to catch up to at least that point?
    Right, right. Multiple degrees including a doctorate. Dumbest of liberals. It's like we can know what the truth is by turning what you say inside out.
    Make Shattered a $5 stand-alone subscription

  4. #44
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    PWC, VA
    Posts
    9,132
    Blog Entries
    8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tgo01 View Post
    Gee big surprise there! Federal prosecution and federal tax dollars should only be used against MY political opponents! If these dumb red states want to spend their money on MY party well then, GOOD LUCK TO THOSE IDIOTS! LOL!

    Dude. Stop already. I don't know how but you are getting dangerously close to Seran levels of dumb here.
    So you don't understand the difference between state and federal gov't. Thanks for clarifying.
    No, I am not Drauz in game.

  5. #45
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    PWC, VA
    Posts
    9,132
    Blog Entries
    8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Methais View Post
    So nobody thought the election was stolen after all the shady shit that went on, until Trump was like "This election was stolen!!!"?

    gg answering my question with a question in order to avoid providing an answer.

    Before you or someone tries to NO U my question to your question, let's put it in context, since it also answers your question to my question before you even asked it, and try this again:

    Do you really think that those same people didn't already believe the election was stolen before Trump said anything at all, and instead they showed up like "Yeah this election was legit, it sucks that Trump lost, but you can't win 'em all, and....WAIT WHAT? IT WAS STOLEN? LET'S FUCKING RIOT NOWWWWWWWWWWW!!!!!!!"?
    The point I was making is that Jan 6th wasn't the first time he had talked about the election bullshit. Of course the people thought that crap already.

    Your analogy still doesn't hold.

    Also, what "shady shit", be specific.
    Last edited by drauz; 06-25-2022 at 11:35 AM.
    No, I am not Drauz in game.

  6. #46

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by drauz View Post
    So you don't understand the difference between state and federal gov't. Thanks for clarifying.
    Insurrection is a federal crime.

    Engaging in terrorism is a federal crime.

    The two NY lawyers who firebombed a STATE police car (who were later given great plea deals that allowed them to avoid jail, but that's a different story) were charged in federal court for their federal crimes, even though they firebombed a STATE police car on STATE property.

    It's okay to admit you are in way over your head here. No one will think any less of you.
    Last edited by Tgo01; 06-25-2022 at 11:34 AM.

  7. #47
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    PWC, VA
    Posts
    9,132
    Blog Entries
    8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tgo01 View Post
    Insurrection is a federal crime.

    Engaging in terrorism is a federal crime.

    The two NY lawyers who firebombed a STATE police car (who were later given great plea deals that allowed them to avoid jail, but that's a different story) were charged in federal court for their federal crimes, even though they firebombed a STATE police car on STATE property.

    It's okay to admit you are in way over your head here. No one will think any less of you.
    Did the FBI gather the information against the lawyers or did the local government?
    No, I am not Drauz in game.

  8. #48

    Default

    Carlos Maza, a notorious far leftist, had this to say in response to people saying to be peaceful when protesting against the supreme court decision:

    Violence is a legitimate and appropriate response to oppression.
    No ambiguity, nothing up for interpretation, no dog whistle, just flat out suggests people are being "oppressed" because of this decision, and because of that, violence is a "legitimate and appropriate response."

    When is this person going to be arrested for inciting a violent insurrection?

  9. #49
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    PWC, VA
    Posts
    9,132
    Blog Entries
    8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tgo01 View Post
    Carlos Maza, a notorious far leftist, had this to say in response to people saying to be peaceful when protesting against the supreme court decision:



    No ambiguity, nothing up for interpretation, no dog whistle, just flat out suggests people are being "oppressed" because of this decision, and because of that, violence is a "legitimate and appropriate response."

    When is this person going to be arrested for inciting a violent insurrection?
    Since everyone on the left listens and follows his every word, I'm sure once a violent insurrection happens he'll be prosecuted right away.



    Since I know you'll be like "aH sO yOu ObViOsLy CoNdOnE wHaT hE sAiD".

    No, he's a retard like you and should be banned on whatever social media that was posted on because what he is saying is wrong and not helpful in a healthy democracy.
    No, I am not Drauz in game.

  10. #50

    Default

    Uh-oh! I just read that violent insurrectionists at the Arizona state capitol WERE pounding on the windows and trying to break them. Turns out they were just too weak to break glass windows.

    So now even Seran has to agree that far leftists engaged in an insurrection at the Arizona state capitol. That is unless he finds a way to move the goal posts again.
    Last edited by Tgo01; 06-25-2022 at 12:18 PM.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •