US Oil Producers Fail to Produce

[Parkbandit]

Who is directly responsible for our present out of control inflation (still transitory right?…lolz) through unprecedented wasteful government spending / money printing, and as consequence we are seeing “once in a generation” mortgage rates? Oh yeah…it was those donkey asses. The American public is going to have their heyday come November, and everyone knows it.

This is on par with alt-leftists like Seran blaming the "Defund police" on Republicans.

You would have to have major brain damage to believe it.

[~Rocktar~]

are you serious. dinesh d'souza? pragerU? there isn't a big enough lol

As expected.

[Seran]

Who is directly responsible for our present out of control inflation (still transitory right?…lolz) through unprecedented wasteful government spending / money printing, and as consequence we are seeing “once in a generation” mortgage rates? Oh yeah…it was those donkey asses. The American public is going to have their heyday come November, and everyone knows it.

Trump and the Republicans are responsible for out of control deficits.

No one is directly responsible for inflation, though Big Oil and oil speculation by unregulated traders causing oil prices to soar has a large hand in it.

The mortgage rate increases... Have you taken a step back and seen how 30 year fixed rates have gone from 2.5-3.0% to over 5% just from a quarter point increase by the Feds? Tell me how you think that makes sense.

[drauz]

No, they extended the great depression, enslaved the poor to the government economically and created the conditions to drag the economy, drive inflation, created the insane medical inflation and the foundations of the modern welfare/debt system crippling our economy today. But hey, that doesn't fit your victim narrative.

As to the Southern Dixiecrats, well, here you go, again, you are full of shit.

Lets see, they bend the truth by saying one Democrat switched to Republican after the civil rights act.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o...0%E2%80%931969

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_W._Pickering

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iris_Faircloth_Blitch

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_W._Pickering

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strom_Thurmond

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert...na_politician)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Louis_Dickinson

Probably more. Crazy how so many switched in 1964... Almost like something happened around there...

[drumpel]

Not sure I can dumb it down enough for someone with a 3rd grade intellectual level to understand.

Sorry

[~Rocktar~]

Lets see, they bend the truth by saying one Democrat switched to Republican after the civil rights act.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o...0%E2%80%931969

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_W._Pickering

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iris_Faircloth_Blitch

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_W._Pickering

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strom_Thurmond

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert...na_politician)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Louis_Dickinson

Probably more. Crazy how so many switched in 1964... Almost like something happened around there...

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Citing Wikipedia as a real source. Yeah, no.

[drauz]

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Citing Wikipedia as a real source. Yeah, no.

So those people didn't switch parties in 1964, is that your assertion? Wikipedia is good for straight number facts, not as much for things with nuance. Notice how I didn't link a wikipedia article about why they switched, just that they did.

Funny how you're all like, "You're just not going to believe my sources!" but yet your first instinct is to say "I don't believe your sources".

And LOL at your these highly educated people comment earlier, I'll give you the Lady is highly educated in political science, that doesn't make her a history major. Dinesh...he's just a college graduate... Come on... He could have majored in english lit for all we know.

[Seran]

So those people didn't switch parties in 1964, is that your assertion? Wikipedia is good for straight number facts, not as much for things with nuance. Notice how I didn't link a wikipedia article about why they switched, just that they did.

Funny how you're all like, "You're just not going to believe my sources!" but yet your first instinct is to say "I don't believe your sources".

And LOL at your these highly educated people comment earlier, I'll give you the Lady is highly educated in political science, that doesn't make her a history major. Dinesh...he's just a college graduate... Come on... He could have majored in english lit for all we know.

That is sort of the thing for those particular group of trolls. Refute an article, demand sources, provide sources, deny sources. The good news is, other than the four in that troubled little group, there are plenty of folks who understand reason.

[~Rocktar~]

That is sort of the thing for those particular group of trolls. Refute an article, demand sources, provide sources, deny sources. The good news is, other than the four in that troubled little group, there are plenty of folks who understand reason.

You are not one of them so stop pretending you have a clue.

[~Rocktar~]

So those people didn't switch parties in 1964, is that your assertion? Wikipedia is good for straight number facts, not as much for things with nuance. Notice how I didn't link a wikipedia article about why they switched, just that they did.

Funny how you're all like, "You're just not going to believe my sources!" but yet your first instinct is to say "I don't believe your sources".

And LOL at your these highly educated people comment earlier, I'll give you the Lady is highly educated in political science, that doesn't make her a history major. Dinesh...he's just a college graduate... Come on... He could have majored in english lit for all we know.

So, did you really listen to her video? Did you listen to the sources and scope of argument? No. Again, citing Wikipedia in an attempt to refute anything is bad. Displaying your ignorant elitism by dissing on a bachelors' degree of someone that has read hundreds if not thousands of books on the subject and who, in the face of many conflicts with academics over his assertions continues to prove and support them effectively again and again is just stupid.

Want to make any more ad homonym attacks on the sources or try to argue to authority more with unsupported sources outside of the scope of discussion?

You are simply wrong and trying to attack the source and use unrelated information from deeply biased opinion sources does not make you right.

Democrats and Republicans didn't switch sides, the Democrats went father Left into deep Left field and the crazy zone and the Republicans moved into the somewhat more center void. Simple as that and the rest is publicity and media fantasy to try and cover for the Democrat party's adoption of previously radical and destructive policies and positions as well as their history and ongoing racism.