
Originally Posted by
Ashliana
It couldn't be clearer that you don't know anything about this law, or about the law. "Any action voluntarily taken in good faith to restrict access to or availability of material that the provider or user considers to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected.."
Anything that the company finds "objectionable" -- even if it's politically charged or you disagree with their action -- is totally fine. You have absolutely no argument, and you think simply wishing the law were something other than it is will magically transform the law to suit your delusions.
Just because you and the rest of the right-wing apologists support censorship -- government infringement of corporations' free speech rights -- and oppose the free market, have completely made up bullshit regarding a law you haven't read, have no idea how the law works, doesn't make you right. The law is indeed clear, the rules are indeed clear, but sadly, you think your ignorance of how they work somehow matters. Simple as that.