Things that made you laugh today (Political Version)

[Shaps]

Hey, sorry you're offended if I compare what you are are posting here is the kind of stuff I see on Parler or OAN network. Why so sensitive?

No idea you communist bastard. Always knew you were a Russian sympathizer.

Don't get offended, it's just the type of stuff I see from the Kremlin and China.

Why so sensitive?

[Back]

Edit: Deleted because it wouldn't matter. Whacko.

I didn't have time at the time to respond to your post. I went back to respond and found this instead. Disappoint. I'd rather have responded to your other post.

[Methais]

And you're back to being a jackass. Guess I shouldn't have thought you might actually be open to talking. Suppose name calling is your default setting and you can't help your own mental failings.

Now you know why we just laugh at Backlash instead of trying to actively engage his ultra stupidity.

[~Rocktar~]

And you're back to being a jackass. Guess I shouldn't have thought you might actually be open to talking. Suppose name calling is your default setting and you can't help your own mental failings.

Every now and again, he takes his meds or something and tries to come across as a small bit normal and engage in a conversation, then in a few posts, he is back to his normal being the raving POS Leftist shitbag.

[Parkbandit]

Now you know why we just laugh at Backlash instead of trying to actively engage his ultra stupidity.

This is correct.

You can't reason with someone who is Backlashian stupid.

You're better off reasoning with a rock.

[Back]

No idea you communist bastard. Always knew you were a Russian sympathizer.

Don't get offended, it's just the type of stuff I see from the Kremlin and China.

Why so sensitive?

I think I remember what that post you deleted was about. You were suggesting there be a citizenship test people should pass before they could vote, with some ID of some kind that proved they passed the test? Or something along those lines? Correct me if I'm wrong here.

[Parkbandit]

I think I remember what that post you deleted was about. You were suggesting there be a citizenship test people should pass before they could vote, with some ID of some kind that proved they passed the test? Or something along those lines? Correct me if I'm wrong here.

I didn't see the post, but I'll play the odds.

You're wrong here.

Vegas wishes they had table odds this high.

[Shaps]

I didn't see the post, but I'll play the odds.

You're wrong here.

Vegas wishes they had table odds this high.

He was close to what I wrote.

I used to think a single voter system might be a good idea instead of the electoral college. Then I realized that would be a horrible idea. I said the only discussion I would have that may sway me is the requirement that anyone voting be required to take a civics test (and a hard one) to display their understanding of how our government works and functions. If they pass they recieve a voter ID, and voting must be done in person and present their Voter ID. If you fail the test your are allowed to attempt it again in two years following a refresher course.

I wouldn't like it, I wouldn't want it, but I would listen to and have a discussion regarding it. More safeguards would be required and we all know that safeguards to protect votes is somehow racist for some reason. What reason that is I have no idea, but I am pretty sure people of color are just as smart and capable as the crackers that vote. Extreme Liberal jackasses don't realize how racist they really are.

[Back]

He was close to what I wrote.

I used to think a single voter system might be a good idea instead of the electoral college. Then I realized that would be a horrible idea. I said the only discussion I would have that may sway me is the requirement that anyone voting be required to take a civics test (and a hard one) to display their understanding of how our government works and functions. If they pass they recieve a voter ID, and voting must be done in person and present their Voter ID. If you fail the test your are allowed to attempt it again in two years following a refresher course.

I wouldn't like it, I wouldn't want it, but I would listen to and have a discussion regarding it. More safeguards would be required and we all know that safeguards to protect votes is somehow racist for some reason. What reason that is I have no idea, but I am pretty sure people of color are just as smart and capable as the crackers that vote. Extreme Liberal jackasses don't realize how racist they really are.

Honestly your plan sounds very authoritarian to me. Its basically saying, "if you want a say in how your government is run you must be approved by government standards to be able to have that say". Everyone who lives in America should have a say in how government is run regardless of financial status, race, religion, or politics, and should not be expected to pass some test to have that say.

Outside of that, when you start requiring people pay a fee of one kind or another, a voter ID for example, it disproportionately affects people who live below the line of poverty no matter what race they are. In this country, minorities see higher rates of poverty than whites, with American Indians being the poorest.

[caelric]

when you start requiring people pay a fee of one kind or another, a voter ID for example, .

Hey, dipshit, a voter ID is not a fee. There is no reason not to make it free, but you would still object to it, because it would then cut down on the amount of illegal voters.