Trump / Biden debate.

[Neveragain]

If you're going to call Obama a hood rat, at least put in the effort to support it like I did with Trump.

Look. It's one thing to be stupid. You can't help your genetics. It's another to be lazy. Stupid AND lazy is a really bad combo. Don't be lazy, too.

Soo...you don't know the difference between a million and a billion?

[Parkbandit]

If he puts ketchup on well done steak I might be inclined to agree. That's a travesty.

To be fair.. if I had to eat well done steak.. I would probably have to put some ketchup on it to give it some moisture.

[Parkbandit]

I suppose we can agree to disagree. Remember, Hitler didn't start out killing millions and making people suffer. It took time to build up to that. If you're comparing the end result of what Hitler was, compared to what Trump is now, well, the story hasn't played out yet, has it? And damn, I sure do hope I'm wrong and we catch it before it gets to that.

You said he's worse than Hitler now though..

Imagine being so brainwashed that you think Trump isn't worse than Hitler.

So what specifically has President Trump done now that is worse than killing 6 million people just because of their religion?

Don't worry.. no one expects anything intelligent to come from your response. You're just lashing out because you are just so upset President Trump is in office..

Poor thing.

[Seran]

The Trump Campaign and the Republican National Committee doubled down for the second day following Tuesday night's debate in a clear effort to scare the Commission on Presidential Debates from implementing microphone control.

Does the RNC or Trump honestly think the American people are dumb enough to elect whomever is the loudest and most disruptive at a debate? Does the RNC honestly believe an appeal to 'fairness' of mutual agreement only applies to allowing the unfettered ability of the President to interrupt Vice President Biden's every answer? Do you think Biden agreed to that in advance?

You don't bring your screaming child to a restaurant, you don't encourage your dog barking incessantly every night despite your neighbors. So why would you re-elect a man who exhibits all the characterists and self control of the petulant child or poorly trained dog.

Appearing on Fox News, Republican National Committee Chairwoman Ronna Romney McDaniel said that the commission should not make any adjustments without the support of both campaigns and that the rules should not be changed “in the middle of the campaign,” after both sides agreed to specific parameters.

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaig...e-debate-rules

[Tgo01]

Does the RNC or Trump honestly think the American people are dumb enough to elect whomever is the loudest and most disruptive at a debate?

You don't bring your screaming child to a restaurant, you don't encourage your dog barking incessantly every night despite your neighbors. So why would you re-elect a man who exhibits all the characterists and self control of the petulant child or poorly trained dog.

So then what's the problem? Clearly if what Trump is doing is bad for him then why not let him continue? This just sounds like an excuse from the Democrats and their media lapdogs to be able to control Trump, which is something they have been clamoring to do since 2015.

Seriously your reaction to this couldn't make less sense even if you tried, and I'm sure you did try to make as little sense as possible.

Yet another example of Democrats just demanding control over people. This should be a dream come true to you. "Everyone sees what a loudmouthed bully Trump is! They don't want to elect someone like that!" Well then continue to allow him to be a loudmouth bully then. Clearly Biden didn't do well at all in that debate and every Democrat knows it, which is why they are either demanding Biden don't do anymore debates or are seeking to control Trump's microphone. I'm sure we can totally trust the moderators to be completely fair when it comes to mic control. Uh-huh. Sure we can.

We might as well have a fact checker on stage with their own microphone to "fact check" Trump after every sentence. I'm sure that's their next demand.

[drauz]

So then what's the problem? Clearly if what Trump is doing is bad for him then why not let him continue? This just sounds like an excuse from the Democrats and their media lapdogs to be able to control Trump, which is something they have been clamoring to do since 2015.

Seriously your reaction to this couldn't make less sense even if you tried, and I'm sure you did try to make as little sense as possible.

Yet another example of Democrats just demanding control over people. This should be a dream come true to you. "Everyone sees what a loudmouthed bully Trump is! They don't want to elect someone like that!" Well then continue to allow him to be a loudmouth bully then. Clearly Biden didn't do well at all in that debate and every Democrat knows it, which is why they are either demanding Biden don't do anymore debates or are seeking to control Trump's microphone. I'm sure we can totally trust the moderators to be completely fair when it comes to mic control. Uh-huh. Sure we can.

We might as well have a fact checker on stage with their own microphone to "fact check" Trump after every sentence. I'm sure that's their next demand.

Did he agree to not interrupt? If he did then this is what happens. Actions have consequences.

[Tgo01]

Did he agree to not interrupt?

I doubt that. People have been interrupting during presidential debates and primary debates for as long as I can remember. It's sort of the thing to do. If the candidates aren't going to be interacting with one another then what's the point? Might as well just do personal interviews. At least that way Trump only has to debate the moderators instead of both the moderators and Biden.

[drauz]

I doubt that. People have been interrupting during presidential debates and primary debates for as long as I can remember. It's sort of the thing to do. If the candidates aren't going to be interacting with one another then what's the point? Might as well just do personal interviews. At least that way Trump only has to debate the moderators instead of both the moderators and Biden.

He could just respond to things that are said, like a normal debate. If they are constantly interrupting each other then it's a shit show.

[Tgo01]

He could just respond to things that are said, like a normal debate.

A "normal debate" always has interruptions and cross talk. Maybe not to the extent of this debate, but it's there. Again why even have a debate if the candidates aren't going to be talking with each other? Just do personal interviews. But that's not gonna happen because like it or not Trump brings the ratings. No one is going to watch a personal interview with just Biden, so the Democrats want to use Trump to bring in the views but want to control what he can and cannot say.

This is just all kinds of dumb.

[drauz]

A "normal debate" always has interruptions and cross talk. Maybe not to the extent of this debate, but it's there. Again why even have a debate if the candidates aren't going to be talking with each other? Just do personal interviews. But that's not gonna happen because like it or not Trump brings the ratings. No one is going to watch a personal interview with just Biden, so the Democrats want to use Trump to bring in the views but want to control what he can and cannot say.

This is just all kinds of dumb.

Cause you can respond to what was just said during your time...