Pelosi officially announces impeachment inquiry

[Tgo01]

The funniest part is I thought PB was slightly exaggerating what a creep Keller is. Then Keller comes along and is like "Imma prove I'm not a creep!" and ends up proving that if anything PB was slightly downplaying what a creep Keller is.

Keller: the man who wishes death upon people he disagrees with and stalks the Facebook page of a young woman because he disagreed with her father's politics. This man also thinks he's a good person, a good father, and has the utter audacity to talk about someone else being a bad father.

Keller, you're a horrible piece of shit. If you walk away from the PC learning one thing I hope it is at least that.

[Seizer]

He's fucking weird.

Show us how to bake bread again? I guess baking bread is the win moment life?
I didn't/don't care for your postings or some of the other same politically aligned postings of people during the mid to late 2000's here. My disagreements with you/them never caused me to think "I should hunt down their social media accounts and see what they/friends/family are in your circle." It never crossed my mind that my dislike of your political postings on a forum would include discovering who you are, what your circle looks like, nor how can I humiliate you. You are defining your stereotype here. You are the weird one.

[Solkern]

I think the reason why she’s holding the articles, Is because the republicans are refusing witnesses, or won’t allow trump to stand trial which goes back to Clinton, if trump gets caught lying to Congress, like Clinton was(or was it grand jury?) I don’t remember which, the republicans feel their hands would be tied..
Trump fucked up big IMO, but I feel that he shouldn’t be impeached, let him finish out his term and let the next election decide.

Every fucking politician lies, every single fucking one.

[Tgo01]

I think the reason why she’s holding the articles, Is because the republicans are refusing witnesses

If Pelosi feels her case is too weak then that's her fault and the fault of the Democrats in the House. It's not the Senate's job to do the House's job for them.

or won’t allow trump to stand trial which goes back to Clinton, if trump gets caught lying to Congress, like Clinton was(or was it grand jury?) I don’t remember which, the republicans feel their hands would be tied..

Clinton was impeached for lying to a grand jury and also obstruction of justice. Both of which there was ample evidence of, unlike the Democrats' bogus obstruction of congress bullshit.

Trump fucked up big IMO

No.

[Parkbandit]

TheE was never a good guy, he was a whiny Leftist shill that cried about his inability to swallow his pride and look outside the high paying world of TV corporate law to find work in the real world outside of the top Leftist enclaves. Like the rest of his whiny generation entitlement they all cried because they could not work in their fields and would not move or degrade themselves to find less than the perfect job.

If there are jobs available and you refuse to take them because of pride then you deserve ridicule. Proud people starve.

To be fair, TheE really is a good guy. You might not like him for his naive political views sometimes.. but the guy is one of those guys that walks the talk (unlike Backlash).

He actually joined the Peace Corps and worked in some real shitholes, helping people. Keller is just using him to create a back story of how he's not a certified, full blown creep. Fact is, everyone was making fun of TheE... none more than TheE himself.

I don't want to say anything more because I'm sure Keller is banging away on his keyboard right now, trying to track down my 13 year old neice's Facebook...

[Parkbandit]

I think the reason why she’s holding the articles, Is because the republicans are refusing witnesses, or won’t allow trump to stand trial which goes back to Clinton, if trump gets caught lying to Congress, like Clinton was(or was it grand jury?) I don’t remember which, the republicans feel their hands would be tied..
Trump fucked up big IMO, but I feel that he shouldn’t be impeached, let him finish out his term and let the next election decide.

Every fucking politician lies, every single fucking one.

What?

You clearly don't understand how this process works. Pelosi gained exactly nothing from holding onto the Articles of Impeachment. She has literally nothing to do with the Senate process at all. And if you believe she held onto them to get some sort of assurances.. she didn't. She has no power in the Senate.

Latest conspiracy theory says she held onto them into 2020 (OMG EVEN THOUGH THIS WAS SUCH AN EMERGENCY THAT THEY HAD TO BE VOTED ON RIGHT NOW!!!!!!!) so candidates running for President that are in the Senate (Mostly Sanders, but also Warren) would have to go to Washington to be in attendance and not on the stump in Iowa.

Personally, I don't think she's that smart and just overplayed her hand.

[Solkern]

What?

You clearly don't understand how this process works. Pelosi gained exactly nothing from holding onto the Articles of Impeachment. She has literally nothing to do with the Senate process at all. And if you believe she held onto them to get some sort of assurances.. she didn't. She has no power in the Senate.

Latest conspiracy theory says she held onto them into 2020 (OMG EVEN THOUGH THIS WAS SUCH AN EMERGENCY THAT THEY HAD TO BE VOTED ON RIGHT NOW!!!!!!!) so candidates running for President that are in the Senate (Mostly Sanders, but also Warren) would have to go to Washington to be in attendance and not on the stump in Iowa.

Personally, I don't think she's that smart and just overplayed her hand.

I’m fully aware how it works. She also wants a fair trial in the senate(which she has no control of)(and the the way the house conducted it’s investigation wasn’t very impartial either tbh)(two wrongs also doesn’t make it right) but based on separation of powers, checks and balances... it should be fair... but when multiple senators have already said on record they won’t be impartial, that imo is wrong. Last I checked Congress was separate from the president, not working for him right?
Or does congress now work for the president?
I’m Not agreeing with what Pelosi is doing, or this entire impeachment bullshit, just sharing my thoughts on why she held back giving them to the senate

[Methais]

And let's not even mention that you claim it was the late 2000's that I upset you so much.. that a decade later, you are STILL creeping on my daughter's facebook page in an attempt to get even with me for "making fun of TheE not finding a job?

A DECADE??

Dude.. you really need to get some help. Or a better story.

YOU GOT OWNED SO HARD OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG I HOPE THIS TEACHES YOU TO THINK TWICE BEFORE MESSING WITH KELLER ON THE INTERNET!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111111

[Parkbandit]

I’m fully aware how it works. She also wants a fair trial in the senate(which she has no control of)(and the the way the house conducted it’s investigation wasn’t very impartial either tbh)(two wrongs also doesn’t make it right) but based on separation of powers, checks and balances... it should be fair... but when multiple senators have already said on record they won’t be impartial, that imo is wrong. Last I checked Congress was separate from the president, not working for him right?

Or does congress now work for the president?

I’m Not agreeing with what Pelosi is doing, or this entire impeachment bullshit, just sharing my thoughts on why she held back giving them to the senate

What legitimate reason did she actually hold them back though?

[Methais]

What legitimate reason did she actually hold them back though?

Depending on who you ask, butthurt is a legitimate reason.