Pelosi officially announces impeachment inquiry

[Alfster]

What is that quote supposed to prove? No one denies the aid was held up. Have you already forgotten that Obama and Biden literally bragged about holding up aid to Ukraine?

See what I just say "TDS" and move on? Because it's so obvious.

The fact that you're unable to see the difference between the international community stance and a fringe conspiracy theory that a private citizen is pushing is quite sad.

Also - fuck Biden too, investigate that. I don't care.

[Tgo01]

The fact that you're unable to see the difference between the international community stance

Why should the US give a single shit what the "international community stance" is on Ukraine? What does that have to do with US aid to Ukraine?

[Tgo01]

So the next four "witnesses" are "legal scholars" who are going to tell Democrats it's okay to impeachment Trump over this shit?

Is this even real life anymore? They have so little evidence and so many Americans see right through this sham that they now need "legal scholars" to try and convince Americans this is okay?

This is about the dumbest thing I have ever heard. How is anyone still on board with this shit show?

[Tgo01]

So the next four "witnesses" are "legal scholars" who are going to tell Democrats it's okay to impeachment Trump over this shit?

Is this even real life anymore? They have so little evidence and so many Americans see right through this sham that they now need "legal scholars" to try and convince Americans this is okay?

This is about the dumbest thing I have ever heard. How is anyone still on board with this shit show?

One of the so called experts the Democrats have called in said on video that "there are other bad things to fear in the world" and listed ICE agents as one of those things.

If you're still going along with this then you're just a downright bad person.

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

So the next four "witnesses" are "legal scholars" who are going to tell Democrats it's okay to impeachment Trump over this shit?

Is this even real life anymore? They have so little evidence and so many Americans see right through this sham that they now need "legal scholars" to try and convince Americans this is okay?

This is about the dumbest thing I have ever heard. How is anyone still on board with this shit show?

Of course it's heavily loaded with libtards. It's libtards calling them. At least retard repubs got 1 contrary opinion in.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/n...-trump-critics


Noah Feldman, a Harvard Law School professor, to testify in Wednesday’s hearing on the constitutional grounds for impeaching the president. Feldman was among the first people to suggest Trump was trying to bribe Ukrainian government officials into investigating his political rival, former Vice President Joe Biden. Democrats have adopted the term, which Feldman in September said constitutes an impeachable offense.

"What makes Trump’s alleged conduct so terrible is not that he froze aid to Ukraine for a policy purpose. What makes Trump’s alleged conduct outrageous is the appearance that he was doing it for his own personal benefit," Feldman wrote for Bloomberg Opinion.


Stanford Law professor Pamela Karlan, a former Obama administration Justice Department official, is also a witness, Democrats announced Monday. Karlan is among 42 legal scholars who signed a letter before Trump took office urging him to change his views on a number of issues and criticizing his rhetoric.

A third witness, Michael Gerhardt, is a University of North Carolina law school professor who wrote in the Atlantic that the impeachment proceedings are "fully legitimate.”
A fourth witness listed by Democrats, but possibly requested by the GOP, is George Washington University Law School professor Jonathan Turley, who has criticized how Democrats have handled the impeachment process.

[Tgo01]

Of course it's heavily loaded with libtards. It's libtards calling them. At least retard repubs got 1 contrary opinion in.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/n...-trump-critics


Noah Feldman, a Harvard Law School professor, to testify in Wednesday’s hearing on the constitutional grounds for impeaching the president. Feldman was among the first people to suggest Trump was trying to bribe Ukrainian government officials into investigating his political rival, former Vice President Joe Biden. Democrats have adopted the term, which Feldman in September said constitutes an impeachable offense.

"What makes Trump’s alleged conduct so terrible is not that he froze aid to Ukraine for a policy purpose. What makes Trump’s alleged conduct outrageous is the appearance that he was doing it for his own personal benefit," Feldman wrote for Bloomberg Opinion.


Stanford Law professor Pamela Karlan, a former Obama administration Justice Department official, is also a witness, Democrats announced Monday. Karlan is among 42 legal scholars who signed a letter before Trump took office urging him to change his views on a number of issues and criticizing his rhetoric.

A third witness, Michael Gerhardt, is a University of North Carolina law school professor who wrote in the Atlantic that the impeachment proceedings are "fully legitimate.”
A fourth witness listed by Democrats, but possibly requested by the GOP, is George Washington University Law School professor Jonathan Turley, who has criticized how Democrats have handled the impeachment process.

The whole thing is a complete shit show. It's a good thing Democrats have learned to have no shame because they need it to go through with this charade.

[Tgo01]

Apparently Schiff has been mysteriously gathering phone logs of people like Nunes and Giuliani (which is this even legal to do?) and supposedly the two have been calling one another a few times.

I'm seeing this reported all over the news but what I don't see being reported is why this even matters? Who gives a flying fuck if Nunes and Giuliani are calling one another? What is this supposed to prove? Suddenly it's bad if two Americans, neither of which are under any sort of investigation or anything of the sort, are calling each other? Can any brain dead TDS sufferer here spell it out for me?

[Seran]

Because of the illegal activities being conducted by Parnas on behalf of Giuliani. The fact that Nunes also had a hand in this shows not only that he's wrapped up in the Ukranian bribery, but also that he had an impossible conflict of interest, but didn't recuse himself.

[Tgo01]

Because of the illegal activities being conducted by Parnas on behalf of Giuliani. The fact that Nunes also had a hand in this shows not only that he's wrapped up in the Ukranian bribery, but also that he had an impossible conflict of interest, but didn't recuse himself.

You're getting all of that from phone logs? You are quite possibly the biggest TDS sufferer I have ever seen, and I've seen plenty of crazy fuckers out there.

The fact that you don't give a single shit that Schitthead is somehow obtaining call logs of another sitting US congressperson, Trump's personal attorney, AND journalists just proves yet again that you don't care for facts or justice, you just want Trump gone no matter what.

[Parkbandit]

Fuck no. I openly hate Trump - when you have nothing else, just refer to TDS. Just like Trumps defense. If there's no defense, start attacking the person or process. You know, the process of the house that Nunes changed to push subpoenas in 2015.

When you lose all sense of logic and common sense regarding Trump.. you do, indeed, suffer from TDS.

In non-clinical terms.. you start posting like Backlash regarding Trump.

You sir, have a very acute case of it.