Pelosi officially announces impeachment inquiry

[Parkbandit]

By promoting and article which furthers the false narrative that the whistleblower complaint is a political hack job, you're doing exactly that. You're about as objective as Giuliani in that regard.

And you're being as objective as Adam Schiff4Brains at this point.

We got the transcript of the call.. turned out that the whistle blower that received 2nd hand information was at the very least uninformed and incorrect...

BUT ZOMG WE MUST BELIEVE EVERY COMPLAINT BECAUSE ORANGE MAN BAD!!!!!!!!

[Methais]

By promoting and article which furthers the false narrative that the whistleblower complaint is a political hack job, you're doing exactly that. You're about as objective as Giuliani in that regard.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/schiffs...ne-11570143046

This is all the reasons why Schiff screwed himself and his credibility.

"Mr. Schiff on Sept. 13, a Friday night, issued the explosive news that he had been alerted a few days earlier by the intelligence community’s inspector general of an “urgent” yet unspecified whistleblower complaint. But the complaint is dated Aug. 12, and news reports now say the whistleblower interacted with Mr. Schiff’s staff prior to then. So Mr. Schiff knew about the topic of the complaint for more than a month—while the public did not. It is now clear why the intelligence chairman in that month suddenly developed an interest in all things Ukrainian, and began aggressively previewing his impeachment mantra.

On Aug. 23, for instance, Mr. Schiff tweeted that Mr. Trump tried to “get dirt on a political opponent” via personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani’s interaction with the office of the Ukrainian president. On Aug. 28, the chairman tweeted his newfound concern that Mr. Trump was “withholding vital military aid to Ukraine.” And on Sept. 9, Mr. Schiff suddenly announced his committee would launch a full-fledged investigation into whether Mr. Trump was trying to “pressure Ukraine to help the President’s re-election campaign.” All this was priming the public and the media for what was to come—the better to take full advantage of the whistleblower “news.”

Yet even after news broke of the complaint, Mr. Schiff played dumb. On Sept. 17, he flatly (and falsely) stated on MSNBC: “We have not spoken directly with the whistleblower.” Two days later, he thanked the inspector general, Michael Atkinson, without whom “we might not have even known there was a whistleblower complaint.” Really? Mr. Schiff wanted to make it sound as if the Trump administration was muzzling the complainant, when in fact the process was working and Mr. Schiff knew all about it."

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

Man the Taylor texts to Sondland literally look like a trap - and Sondland deftly decimated the trap in his responses.

[Methais]

Man the Taylor texts to Sondland literally look like a trap - and Sondland deftly decimated the trap in his responses.

more details required plzszszszszszszs

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/conte...-b67c3440e283/
https://www.npr.org/2019/10/04/76708...e-quid-pro-quo

In one exchange dated Sept. 9, in a text Taylor sent to Sondland, the career diplomat says: "I think it's crazy to withhold security assistance for help with a political campaign."
Sondland responds: "Bill, I believe you are incorrect about President Trump's intentions. The President has been crystal clear no quid pro quo's of any kind."
Sondland continues, "I suggest we stop the back and forth by text."

"“Bill, I believe you are incorrect about President Trump’s intentions,” Sondland wrote. “The President has been crystal clear no quid pro quo’s of any kind. The President is trying to evaluate whether Ukraine is truly going to adopt the transparency and reforms that President Zelensky promised during his campaign.”Then Trump’s ambassador to the E.U. said that they should “stop the back and forth by text.”
“If you still have concerns,” Sondland added curtly, Taylor should call “S” – which is how people in the department refer to Secretary of State Mike Pompeo – or Lisa Kenna, one of the secretary’s top aides. “Thanks.”"

[Methais]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/conte...-b67c3440e283/
https://www.npr.org/2019/10/04/76708...e-quid-pro-quo

In one exchange dated Sept. 9, in a text Taylor sent to Sondland, the career diplomat says: "I think it's crazy to withhold security assistance for help with a political campaign."
Sondland responds: "Bill, I believe you are incorrect about President Trump's intentions. The President has been crystal clear no quid pro quo's of any kind."
Sondland continues, "I suggest we stop the back and forth by text."

"“Bill, I believe you are incorrect about President Trump’s intentions,” Sondland wrote. “The President has been crystal clear no quid pro quo’s of any kind. The President is trying to evaluate whether Ukraine is truly going to adopt the transparency and reforms that President Zelensky promised during his campaign.”Then Trump’s ambassador to the E.U. said that they should “stop the back and forth by text.”
“If you still have concerns,” Sondland added curtly, Taylor should call “S” – which is how people in the department refer to Secretary of State Mike Pompeo – or Lisa Kenna, one of the secretary’s top aides. “Thanks.”"

In before HE KNEW ABOUT THIS TRAP BEFOREHAND AND WAS COVERING FOR TRUMP WE NEED LOGS OF EVERY TEXT HE'S EVER SENT TO ANYONE IN THE HISTORY OF TEXT MESSAGING OTHERWISE THIS IS PROOF TRUMP IS CORRUPT!!!!!!!!!!111

[ClydeR]

About those ellipses in the transcript..

The call between Trump and Zelensky measured at about 65 words per minute. Transcripts of Trump’s calls have been released in the past. A 24-minute call with then-Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull came in at 133 words per minute, while a 53-minute call with then-Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto, using interpreters, clocked in at 102 words per minute.

More...

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

LOL @ Salon doing WPM analysis. LMFAO

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]