Page 121 of 271 FirstFirst ... 2171111119120121122123131171221 ... LastLast
Results 1,201 to 1,210 of 2709

Thread: Things that made you frown today (Political Version)

  1. #1201
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Louisiana
    Posts
    7,118
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Taernath View Post
    Aren't you a veteran? How do you not know that suppressors don't work like movie silencers?
    I've started to respond to a few of his opinions this morning but it just isn't worth it. I'm honestly starting to believe that it's just a time4fun alt.

  2. #1202

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gelston View Post
    I was about to address this, but I think you're too set into your ignorance for it to matter. Suppressors are already easy to get, have been for a long time. Calling a suppressor a silencer is pure ignorance. The discharge still makes a very loud noise, as the bullet is still breaking the sound barrier. The suppressor doesn't muffle that in any way. The only way to prevent that is to have a subsonic round, which means you are damn near stabbing distance anyways.

    I keep forgetting you are a massive fearmonger and blow everything out of proportions.
    Quote Originally Posted by Taernath View Post
    Aren't you a veteran? How do you not know that suppressors don't work like movie silencers?
    Quote Originally Posted by RichardCranium View Post
    I've started to respond to a few of his opinions this morning but it just isn't worth it. I'm honestly starting to believe that it's just a time4fun alt.
    You guys act so confident but don't know shit. Believe me, I've had this talk for 30+ years about silencing weapons, how to make your own, how to buy them, how effective they are etc... That doesn't change the fact that they're called silencers. They can also be called suppressors and that's become the popular word by people who are trying to sell them, but the two words are at best interchangeable.


    That is unless you're dealing with federal regs and licensing with places like the ATF. In that case the proper word is silencer or muffler even, but not suppressor.


    Firearms Verification
    Gun Control Act Definitions
    Silencer
    18 U.S.C., § 921(A)(24)
    The term “Firearm Silencer” or “Firearm Muffler” means any device for silencing, muffling, or diminishing the report of a portable firearm, including any combination of parts, designed or redesigned, and intended for the use in assembling or fabricating a firearm silencer or firearm muffler, any part intended only for use in such assembly or fabrication.


    This link even has a nice picture of a silencer. How the fuck do none of you know this?

  3. #1203
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Mars
    Posts
    34,597
    Blog Entries
    17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cwolff View Post
    You guys act so confident but don't know shit. Believe me, I've had this talk for 30+ years about silencing weapons, how to make your own, how to buy them, how effective they are etc... That doesn't change the fact that they're called silencers. They can also be called suppressors and that's become the popular word by people who are trying to sell them, but the two words are at best interchangeable.


    That is unless you're dealing with federal regs and licensing with places like the ATF. In that case the proper word is silencer or muffler even, but not suppressor.


    Firearms Verification
    Gun Control Act Definitions
    Silencer
    18 U.S.C., § 921(A)(24)
    The term “Firearm Silencer” or “Firearm Muffler” means any device for silencing, muffling, or diminishing the report of a portable firearm, including any combination of parts, designed or redesigned, and intended for the use in assembling or fabricating a firearm silencer or firearm muffler, any part intended only for use in such assembly or fabrication.


    This link even has a nice picture of a silencer. How the fuck do none of you know this?
    Fine, they are also called silencers. Do you have any other point other than their name? Are you scared of the name? Do you still think they actually make weapons silent? What about all these cops that are getting assassinated by suppressed weapons?
    Last edited by Gelston; 06-10-2018 at 02:33 PM.
    Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

  4. #1204
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    an orbit gone wrong
    Posts
    13,609
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cwolff View Post
    You guys act so confident but don't know shit. Believe me, I've had this talk for 30+ years about silencing weapons, how to make your own, how to buy them, how effective they are etc... That doesn't change the fact that they're called silencers. They can also be called suppressors and that's become the popular word by people who are trying to sell them, but the two words are at best interchangeable.
    So your entire rebuttal to what we're saying is focused on terminology and not actual function? If you want to go around calling magazines "clips", semi-auto rifles "assault rifles", or a barrel shroud a "shoulder thing that goes up", go ahead, you just come off as someone who's incredibly ignorant about guns.
    You had better pay your guild dues before you forget. You are 113 months behind.

  5. #1205

    Default

    Check this out. This article by the ATF uses the term silencer 16 times on this webpage and the term suppressor 0 times.

    Eight Men Indicted for Manufacturing and Dealing AR-15 Type Rifles and Silencers Without a License
    Scores of Unmarked Assault Rifles and Silencers Seized

    SACRAMENTO, Calif. — A federal grand jury returned a 70-count indictment today against eight men, charging them with various firearms offenses involving manufacturing and dealing firearms without a license, United States Attorney Benjamin B. Wagner and ATF Special Agent in Charge Jill A. Snyder announced.

    Joseph Latu, 29, of Elk Grove, is charged with conspiracy to deal firearms without a license, dealing firearms without a license, conspiracy to manufacture and deal firearms without a license, possession of an unregistered short-barreled rifle, possession of an unregistered silencer, possession of an unserialized firearm.

    Algernon Tamasoa, 27, of Sacramento, is charged with conspiracy to deal firearms without a license, dealing firearms without a license, possession of an unserialized firearm, and distribution of MDMA.

    John Ortiz, 43, of Vallejo, and Keith White, 40, of Vallejo, are charged with conspiracy to deal firearms without a license, dealing firearms without a license, and possession of an unserialized firearm.

    Charles Tucker, 29, of Stockton, and Ionel Pascan, 28, of Riverbank, are charged with dealing firearms without a license, conspiracy to manufacture and deal firearms without a license, possession of an unregistered short-barreled rifle, possession of an unregistered silencer, and possession of an unserialized firearm.

    Daniel Bennett, 39, of Stockton, and David Bennett, 27, of Stockton, are charged with conspiracy to manufacture and deal firearms without a license.

    According to court documents, between February 6 and September 28, 2015, on 24 occasions, the defendants, either individually or together, met with an undercover ATF agent and sold him a variety of firearms, including rifles, AR-15 type rifles, AR-15 type short-barreled rifles, revolvers, pistols, and silencers. In all, the sales involved 67 firearms and 38 silencers. Additionally, 71 firearms and 62 silencers were recovered during the arrest of certain defendants and ensuing execution of search warrants. In total, 238 firearms and silencers were recovered. Many of the firearms did not have a serial number or other identification markings and were manufactured from unfinished lower receivers, commonly known as “80 percent” lower receivers or “ghost guns.” None of the silencers had a serial number or other identification marking, as is required for firearms under the law. Further, many of the firearms were short-barreled rifles, which must be registered on the National Firearms Registration and Record. None of the short-barreled rifles sold to the undercover agent were registered to any of the defendants.

  6. #1206

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Taernath View Post
    So your entire rebuttal to what we're saying is focused on terminology and not actual function? If you want to go around calling magazines "clips", semi-auto rifles "assault rifles", or a barrel shroud a "shoulder thing that goes up", go ahead, you just come off as someone who's incredibly ignorant about guns.
    They're called silencers. They have always been called silencer. Suppressor is a recent term and I'd bet my bottom dollar it's use is in vogue today because of industry jargon.

    The bottom line is this: Use either word. Don't be so sanctimonious about it and good luck looking for the ATF Suppressor Application.

  7. #1207
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Mars
    Posts
    34,597
    Blog Entries
    17

    Default

    Fine cwolff. You were right. they can be called silencers too. Whoopty doo.

    You going to address the stuff we've actually been saying about them other than the name?
    Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

  8. #1208
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    Kekistan
    Posts
    10,648
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cwolff View Post
    Check this out. This article by the ATF uses the term silencer 16 times on this webpage and the term suppressor 0 times.
    Is that kind of like informant being a synonym for spy?


    The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. ~ Marcus Aurelius
    “It's a beautiful thing, the destruction of words.”
    ― George Orwell, 1984

    “The urge to shout filthy words at the top of his voice was as strong as ever.”
    ― George Orwell, 1984

  9. #1209
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    A Corporate Republic
    Posts
    12,640

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cwolff View Post
    They're called silencers. They have always been called silencer. Suppressor is a recent term and I'd bet my bottom dollar it's use is in vogue today because of industry jargon.

    The bottom line is this: Use either word. Don't be so sanctimonious about it and good luck looking for the ATF Suppressor Application.
    You're retarded.

  10. #1210
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    an orbit gone wrong
    Posts
    13,609
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gelston View Post
    Fine cwolff. You were right. they can be called silencers too. Whoopty doo.

    You going to address the stuff we've actually been saying about them other than the name?
    BUT WHY WOULD THEY BE CALLED SILENCERS IF THEY DON'T MAKE GUNSHOTS SILENT? - cwolff, probably
    You had better pay your guild dues before you forget. You are 113 months behind.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 19553
    Last Post: 09-18-2025, 10:15 PM
  2. Replies: 6283
    Last Post: 09-10-2025, 11:10 AM
  3. Replies: 8164
    Last Post: 08-15-2025, 02:30 PM
  4. Things that made you frown today (Political version)
    By Warriorbird in forum Politics
    Replies: 185
    Last Post: 08-01-2024, 01:08 PM
  5. Replies: 148
    Last Post: 05-19-2017, 05:43 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •