
Originally Posted by
time4fun
No one argued if there were no charges, there was no crime.
The argument was you can't assume someone is definitely going to prison and definitely violated the law until the investigation is over. The same standard is true here as well.
But nothing about the argument says "We should ignore all evidence, even when it's staring us straight in the face, and not discuss it." But if you want to pretend it's interpreted that way- I suggest you lead by example and exit this thread.