It's time we revisit Charles Krauthammer's column from one year ago, which is what got a lot of us conservatives started opposing the name of Washington's team. In his usual fashion, he made some really good points. You should read the whole thing, but this is the key point..
And here’s the key point: You would stop not because of the language police. Not because you might incur a Bob Costas harangue. Not because the president would wag a finger. But simply because the word was tainted, freighted with negative connotations with which you would not want to be associated.
Proof? You wouldn’t even use the word in private, where being harassed for political incorrectness is not an issue.
Similarly, regarding the further racial breakdown of Congress, you wouldn’t say: “And by my count, there are two redskins.” It’s inconceivable, because no matter how the word was used 80 years ago, it carries invidious connotations today.
More...
Reply With Quote
Originally Posted by ClydeR
