No, you're just simply refusing to believe what your own eyes are reading.
This would be akin to trying to battle domestic violence by making domestic partnerships illegal altogether.
The way this legislation is written is like using an anvil when a screwdriver would do the job.
If this was all just about Super PACs then why does the legislation say Congress will have the power of "prohibiting such entities (corporations) from spending money to influence elections"?
Corporations could always spend money on elections because it was viewed as free speech. Now you're basically cheering Congress along for wanting to violate free speech under the guise of "Sticking it to them Super PACs!"
This is mind boggling on so many levels.
Everyone should be concerned when Congress can decide to silence large segments of our population on a whim but apparently as long as they "promise" they are just doing this to go after Super PACs then it's okay.
Follow the leader, now.
Originally Posted by Tgo01
No, you're just simply refusing to believe what your own eyes are reading.
Reply With Quote
