
Originally Posted by
Thondalar
History bears this out time and time again...how many were homeless after the French Revolution? After the Bolsheviks? Taking from the rich and giving to the poor, as a government model, never has and never will work.
Those examples only work if you think the economy has a linear response to socialism. That is to say: if more socialism is bad, then some socialism must be bad to some lesser degree. It turns out that the economy has a higher order response: none is bad, some is good, more is bad again. This makes sense if you think about it. A living being has almost no linear responses; the story of Goldilocks is not "this porridge is too cold, this porridge is somewhat warmer, this scalding porridge is just right! this bed is too small, this medium bed is better, the biggest bed is best of all!" One beer is good, but as our college students are happy to demonstrate ad nauseum this does not indicate that many beers is even better.
It is pretty easy to put a quantitative figure on how socialist any given era of United States history is: just look at the top income tax bracket. It turns out that a higher top income tax bracket is correlated with higher average increase in GDP and tax receipts, which makes sense if you believe in the Laffer curve.
Hasta pronto, porque la vida no termina aqui...
America, stop pushing. I know what I'm doing.