I think your bias is the main problem. They have a page full of citations for their data, they can't literally force you to click on them.Suppose you've been putting the same gas in your car every time you fill up for 10 years without issue. This time you buy one of those additives that's supposed to clean your engine or whatever, and the engine explodes. If someone said "Hey, you can't rule out that the gas caused that. Gas explodes, doesn't it? Do you think you're infallible or something?", would you find that argument compelling?Originally Posted by Atlanteax
When the model is accurate for the 799,800 previous years, it is fair to conclude that man-made effects are the missing piece in the last 200.