More Obamacare fuckups

[Back]

Okay Buck Turgidson. Nice to see you recognize your role.

I thought PB was the general...

[cwolff]

This looks like more good news.

[Parkbandit]

This looks like more good news.

I thought the ACA was supposed to save us money?

[Wrathbringer]

I thought the ACA was supposed to save us money?

Las-promesas-que-no-cumplió-Obama-SPANISH-6.jpg

[Atlanteax]

How is it jumping to 130 billion, from less than 20, good?

[Parkbandit]

How is it jumping to 130 billion, from less than 20, good?

Because it's less than 160 billion.

DUH!

Another shining example of cwolff not having a clue.

[Jarvan]

How is it jumping to 130 billion, from less than 20, good?

Actually, they always knew it would jump. Remember, a lot of the taxes were started back in 2011. Now we are getting into the part where it costs money.

Remember tho when Obama said it wouldn't increase the deficit?

He meant to say that on April 1st of 2009.

[Wrathbringer]

Actually, they always knew it would jump. Remember, a lot of the taxes were started back in 2011. Now we are getting into the part where it costs money.

Remember tho when Obama said it wouldn't increase the deficit?

He meant to say that on April 1st of 2009.

Las-promesas-que-no-cumplió-Obama-SPANISH-6.jpg

[cwolff]

Because it's less than 160 billion.

DUH!

Another shining example of cwolff not having a clue.

The health-care law's expansion of insurance coverage will cost $104 billion less than projected over the next decade, according to revised estimates from nonpartisan budget analysts Monday. Obamacare's lower-than-expected costs will come largely because premiums will be cheaper than previously thought.
Obamacare's coverage provisions in 2014 are expected to cost $5 billion less than the $41 billion the Congressional Budget Office and Joint Committee on Taxation projected earlier in the year. The CBO now expects the federal government to spend about $164 billion less in the next decade on subsidies in Obamacare health insurance marketplaces. The CBO's expected costs of the Affordable Care Act's coverage provisions have declined since it was signed four years ago, as you can see in the below chart.

I thought you were some shit hot business man? Either you're just being critical because you like to troll or you don't understand what you're looking at. Which is it?

[Tgo01]

"It's going to cost less than we originally thought therefore it's saving us money!"

I also like how it specifically just mentions it will cost less in subsidies. Is that because more people are qualifying for Medicaid than they originally thought and the 164 billion they are "saving" in subsidies is going to be spent on Medicaid?