Quote Originally Posted by Parkbandit View Post
True, but isn't that exactly what they did? They came to the conclusion that man is causing the Earth to warm.. then cherry picked the data to support that conclusion and dismissed any data that didn't support the claim. I mean heck, if they didn't prove the conclusion that was the foundation of the grant money they were receiving, they were essentially out of a pretty lucrative job.

All I want to know is this: If man is changing the climate.. do I need more sweaters or more tee shirts? If the debate is over, the science is proven, just tell me what to buy.
If that actually were what happened by all the scientists who investigated global warming ever (which is a hilariously entertaining notion, but let's play along) it still doesn't stop the opposite from being a violation of the scientific method too.

I'm not a scientist but to my understanding all the average Floridian would have to prepare for is an alteration of weather patterns and you already prepare for hurricanes, presumably.