Climate Change Report

[Warriorbird]

It's bad science, and you know it. When charting a timeline for anything, you start at the beginning, not the end. You can't just pick out the part of the timeline that fits your narrative and dismiss all other related data. It's ludicrous.

What about picking a conclusion first and then dismissing all the other data? Doesn't that violate the scientific method from the start?

And I was responding to a shit stirring shit poster. I want you to contribute something, anything of value on this forum. Ever. Or just shut the hell up. You distract, insult, get on your high horse of vapid so called moral superiority and compassion and shit up threads right and left. You have no point, make no valid argument in recent history, randomly cite stuff that is not germane to the topic being discussed and use all manner of other tactics and techniques to distract, upset, derail and stir shit so that you can claim moral victory when people stop posting due to your crap. You are the king of fallacious arguments. If you don't want called out on your bullshit, stop acting like a shit flinging monkey and contribute something of value.

I was purposefully making fun of someone. If people have already agreed not to make something serious by their actions, why exactly does it matter to you? You certainly don't follow your own rules. Why am I supposed to listen to your value judgement then? Or care?