Climate Change Report

[Keller]

You would make the claim that the 18" of snow in the middle of July in Florida is a result of man made global warming though.

Incorrect. I would say I am not qualified to appraise the relative merits of any reputable scientists work, which has been my position for years.

I would then follow that up with the statement that there will be another ice age, and the sun will expand, so to increase the longevity of our race we should invest in geoengineering to create methods to climate control our atmosphere.

[Jarvan]

This is from the NASA report that you linked.

You know... you are starting to sound like a creationist.

"Just because you can't prove God didn't create man doesn't mean it isn't true."

The funny thing about the "climate change" argument for scientists that Believe in it.... they can use anything to prove their data.

As the above statement shows, NOTHING can disprove what they say. Because when it comes right down to it, they can always spin it to show something else.

We could see near nothing in climate change for 100 years... and yet these same scientists would be all, "well we KNOW it will happen sooner or late, just watch".

It's like end of the Worlders. They only have to be right once.

To bad they never are.

[Warriorbird]

I don't disagree... I just don't believe it's as dire as people who are profiting off this created crisis make it out to be.. while continuing to live their life in direct opposition to what they claim.



lolwut? You don't feel the need to insult me, but because I disagree with you.. you feel the need?

ok.



What gave it away first.. my Atheism or my posting that people who believe the earth is 4000 years old are idiots?

There's a difference between saying you're a particular brand of foolish and saying you're accompanying them to a destination.

Incorrect. I would say I am not qualified to appraise the relative merits of any reputable scientists work, which has been my position for years.

I would then follow that up with the statement that there will be another ice age, and the sun will expand, so to increase the longevity of our race we should invest in geoengineering to create methods to climate control our atmosphere.

You're not allowed to say reasonable things.

[Latrinsorm]

You know... you are starting to sound like a creationist.

"Just because you can't prove God didn't create man doesn't mean it isn't true."

The funny thing about the "climate change" argument for scientists that Believe in it.... they can use anything to prove their data.

As the above statement shows, NOTHING can disprove what they say. Because when it comes right down to it, they can always spin it to show something else.

We could see near nothing in climate change for 100 years... and yet these same scientists would be all, "well we KNOW it will happen sooner or late, just watch".

It's like end of the Worlders. They only have to be right once.

To bad they never are.

The difference is that climate change has been scientifically proven. You and many people disagree, but this is not scientifically relevant.

[Thondalar]

The difference is that climate change has been scientifically proven. You and many people disagree, but this is not scientifically relevant.

The argument isn't whether or not the climate changes...of course it does, and has, many times over the lifetime of our planet.

The question is, exactly how far should mankind go to alter the course of nature?

[cwolff]

The argument isn't whether or not the climate changes...of course it does, and has, many times over the lifetime of our planet.

The question is, exactly how far should mankind go to alter the course of nature?

Isn't it a little late to ask that question? We've already done it and even if every human were to drop dead today, there are changes underway that will continue.

The question today is how the hell do we contain the damage and minimize future damage.

If emissions of greenhouse gases were
stopped, would the climate return
to the conditions of 200 years ago?
No. Even if emissions of greenhouse gases were to suddenly stop, Earth’s surface temperature
would not cool and return to the level in the pre-industrial era for thousands of years.

[Parkbandit]

The argument isn't whether or not the climate changes...of course it does, and has, many times over the lifetime of our planet.

The question is, exactly how far should mankind go to alter the course of nature?

The debate is over! No more criticism! If you criticism, you are a flat earther!

Yes, yes... scientific indeed.

[Warriorbird]

The debate is over! No more criticism! If you criticism, you are a flat earther!

Yes, yes... scientific indeed.

I'd say a better test would be if you believed in the research of the Tobacco Institute or not.

[Latrinsorm]

The argument isn't whether or not the climate changes...of course it does, and has, many times over the lifetime of our planet.

The question is, exactly how far should mankind go to alter the course of nature?

I'm reasonably sure the argument is how far mankind already alters the course of nature.

The debate is over! No more criticism! If you criticism, you are a flat earther!

Yes, yes... scientific indeed.

Criticize all you want, but if your criticisms have already been answered it makes you look pretty silly to keep trotting them out.

[NinjasLeadTheWay]

Discounting the Urban Heat Island effect in IPCC reports alone shows that Climate Models are skewed to fit the narrative. If you put UHIE data back into the datasets and actually go back to when temperatures started being recorded with any validity, say 1840ish, you would see that this entire theory of man-made global warming isn't even a thing. But of course, if I could dumb it down more maybe you'd get it but it would require you to look at the actual data and timeline and reports....and fuck it. Believe whatever you want.