Page 12 of 150 FirstFirst ... 210111213142262112 ... LastLast
Results 111 to 120 of 1491

Thread: Climate Change Report

  1. #111
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    8,035

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by crb View Post
    Here is my beef with the environmental zealots. It is all about money, and pushing forward social and political change they desire. They want scarcity of resources be it energy, oil from Canada, or food for the world through genetic engineering. They want scarcity as a tool to put forward the political change they're after. The various lemming joiners who push the agenda may not realize this, but the people at the top feeding them the bullshit do.

    Personally, I find it offensive when a little brown kid dies because some douche from greenpeace prevents that kid from having access to GMO grain. I find it offensive when people have to endure a lower standard of living, including all the ills that come from that, because some loser doesn't want to give them access to available energy. I also find it offensive that these greedy tools are diverting limited funds from areas where they could be far better used. There is no argument about things like lead or mercury, imagine if all the money we're spending on CO2 (you know, what plants breath), was instead used to work on cleaning up things that actually kill people. Especially when you consider that we were all pushed into using lightbulbs that contain a mercury in pursuit of fewer carbon emissions. Yes, it is a tiny amount, multiple a tiny amount by the billions that have been manufactured. LED adoption can't come fast enough.

    You know what people do when they have a lower standard of living? They cut down forests and use wood for fuel. Living green is a luxury and if you really wanted to get the world to exist with less pollution you'd not push for policies that retard economic growth. People living paycheck to paycheck don't care about dioxins, they don't buy organic produce, they need to be paid to recycle.

    The opportunity cost of fighting this misguided crusade against CO2 is enormous. The only constant in the climatic history of the earth has been change, the earth has warmed and cooled and warmed and cooled repeatedly long before we had SUVs. It is hubris to think we're steering this ship.

    I compost, I donate to save the whales, I walk when I can instead of drive, I recycle probably a couple tons of shit a year, my next house is going to have a pimping solar array and be hugely energy efficient. My #1 favorite hobby is gardening, I've literally hugged trees. So fuck anyone who thinks I don't care about the environment. Modern environmentalism is more about politics than science, or anything found in nature.

    /rant.
    There is a report that says that it costs companies 1.75 TRILLION dollars in profits to cut their CO2 Emissions by 40% as required by new mandates. That's more money lost in the economy then the Federal government receives in income taxes. And while we are cutting our CO2 and costing our economy a shit ton of money... China is expanding it's CO2 usage, and loaning us money.

    makes PERFECT sense.
    This space for sale.

    Quote Originally Posted by Back View Post
    We have to count our blessings that we enjoy freedom of speech without fear of oppression in this county.
    (When you can't answer a question for fear of making you or your savior look bad)

  2. #112
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    8,035

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by waywardgs View Post
    It is hubris to think we can do whatever we want to the planet without ill effect.
    ill effect for who? us or the Environment? Baring someone figuring out a way to literally blow the planet apart so there are no rocks larger then a sky scrapper... the planet will recover. It will kill us off, it will take millions of years maybe, but it will recover. It has before, it will again. To think that we can affect the planet to such a point that it will die is insane.
    This space for sale.

    Quote Originally Posted by Back View Post
    We have to count our blessings that we enjoy freedom of speech without fear of oppression in this county.
    (When you can't answer a question for fear of making you or your savior look bad)

  3. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarvan View Post
    ill effect for who? us or the Environment? Baring someone figuring out a way to literally blow the planet apart so there are no rocks larger then a sky scrapper... the planet will recover. It will kill us off, it will take millions of years maybe, but it will recover. It has before, it will again. To think that we can affect the planet to such a point that it will die is insane.
    For us, don't be daft. Do you want humanity to survive? Sure the planet can be a smoking husk, but what good does that do us?
    Quote Originally Posted by Nachos DLC View Post
    Blame Kranar!


    Protect Net Neutrality!
    https://www.dearfcc.org

  4. #114

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarvan View Post
    There is a report that says that it costs companies 1.75 TRILLION dollars in profits to cut their CO2 Emissions by 40% as required by new mandates.
    Do you have a link to this report? All I can find is one that says it costs $1.75t to satisfy all federal regulations, a lot of which you are certain to support.
    Hasta pronto, porque la vida no termina aqui...
    America, stop pushing. I know what I'm doing.

  5. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Latrinsorm View Post
    Do you have a link to this report? All I can find is one that says it costs $1.75t to satisfy all federal regulations, a lot of which you are certain to support.
    Just imagine how much wealthier those three people could be if they didn't have to comply with those pesky regulations... REVOLT!!! THE GOVERNMENT IS KEEPING THOSE THREE PEOPLE DOWN!!!
    Quote Originally Posted by Nachos DLC View Post
    Blame Kranar!


    Protect Net Neutrality!
    https://www.dearfcc.org

  6. #116

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Candor View Post
    As such, I have problems with extremists on either side of the issue.
    Quote Originally Posted by crb View Post
    Here is my beef with the environmental zealots.
    I wonder about the use of words like extremists and zealots when talking about the environmental movement. Or presenting a sober minded assessment by reconciling both sides of this debate.


  7. #117

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarvan View Post
    Humans do have an impact on the environment.

    Nature, has a way of deals with it. Frankly, you should be more pissed at modern medicine then at fossil fuel usage. There is a reason why most Climate People start looking around 1970.



    World pop has doubled since 1970. Roughly 700% since they started "looking" at climate data from 1880 on.

    So.. want to save the climate? Kill 90% of the worlds population. Climate saved.

    There you go, that is a 100% Valid response. So.. going to do your part?
    If you weren't posting disingenuous nonsense you might indeed have a point.

    Just because a reduced population would be healthier for the planet does not somehow preclude us doing our best to take care of it.

    We are capable of overwhelming nature in a vast number of ways. I hope that you also have a "way of deals with it." but I somehow doubt it.

  8. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Warriorbird View Post
    I hope that you also have a "way of deals with it." but I somehow doubt it.
    Quote Originally Posted by Nachos DLC View Post
    Blame Kranar!


    Protect Net Neutrality!
    https://www.dearfcc.org

  9. #119

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Warriorbird View Post
    Or maybe, just maybe, you're also an extremist.
    You can refute his statements with some of your own, or you can continue to call names.

    Oh, wait, it's WB.

    Nevermind.

  10. #120

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NinjasLeadTheWay View Post
    Solar Panels are next up, they pay for themselves after all. Here is a case we all should be concerned about:

    http://www.orlandosentinel.com/featu...0,2504133.post
    There are simple ways to live off the grid. Living in the middle of a town isn't one of them.
    PC RETARD HALL OF FAME
    Quote Originally Posted by Back The Reigning Retard Champion most consider the GOAT View Post
    3 million more popular votes. I'd say the numbers speak for themselves. Gerrymandering won for Trump.

    Quote Originally Posted by Seran-the 2 time Retard Champion View Post
    Regulating firearms to keep them out of the hands of criminals, the unhinged, etc. meets the first test of the 2nd amendment, 'well-regulated'.

    Quote Originally Posted by SHAFT-Internet Toughguy RL Loser View Post
    You show me a video of me typing that and Ill admit it. (This was the excuse he came up with when he was called out for a really stupid post)

Similar Threads

  1. It's cold, therefore climate change!
    By Tgo01 in forum Politics
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 01-08-2015, 08:19 AM
  2. Don't Try to Stop Climate Change
    By ClydeR in forum Politics
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-11-2013, 05:19 PM
  3. Clinton says Climate change...
    By Daragon in forum Politics
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 08-24-2010, 04:16 PM
  4. Replies: 32
    Last Post: 02-04-2010, 04:02 PM
  5. The Cheney Doctrine and Climate Change
    By ClydeR in forum Politics
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-14-2009, 11:06 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •