Quote Originally Posted by Jarvan View Post
Answer me that, why is it Morally right to require me to pay for a woman's birth control, but it is NOT morally right for me to say she just shouldn't be fucking people without a condom? Or better yet, wait till she is ready to have a kid? Isn't she CHOOSING to have unprotected, or hell, protected sex?
I'd actually argue that it's more fiscal than moral, because babies cost more than the pills that prevent them. Why should it be up to the guy for birth control? If I give a fake name at a dive bar to pick up some hoochie, what's the incentive for me to bag it? I'll be out of there, untracable, before the sun comes up. Subsequently, if they're given up, I'm not saying it's causal, but I thought it was well established that a large percentage of kids from foster care end up on the welfare/prison track, which subsequent also just cost additional money. If you disagree with that, then the actual act of giving birth may cost more than the pills.