I think you might have to adjust your TV.. or have an adult help you find Fox News. They already called MaCauliffe. In fact, they called if for MaCauliffe when Cuccinelle was winning by 10K votes.Originally Posted by cwolff
Or do you believe they should watch CNN and when they announce a winner, they should immediately call a winner as well?
Last edited by Parkbandit; 11-05-2013 at 10:15 PM.
PC RETARD HALL OF FAME
Senior Member
from 45 minutes ago:
Virginia governor's race too close to call
The polls are now closed in Virginia, and Fox News can report that Democrat Terry McAulliffe has a slight lead over Republican Ken Cuccinelli, although it is too early to call the race
Fox, NBC Call Virginia Governor's Race for McAuliffe | The Weekly ...
http://www.weeklystandard.com/.../fo...-race-mcauliff...
29 mins ago - Fox, NBC Call Virginia Governor's Race for McAuliffe ... Terry McAuliffe will win his bid for governor Virginia, both Fox News and NBC News are ...
I'm sorry for your loss. My Condolences.
Last edited by cwolff; 11-05-2013 at 10:21 PM.
I live in Florida.. how exactly is that a "loss" for me?
Fox News called the race with 96% of the precincts in and Cuccinelle winning with a 10,000 vote lead. I'm so sorry they didn't call it fast enough for you.. it's obviously caused you so much pain and anguish that you felt the need to come here and complain about it.
Nice try though.. really...
No, really......
PC RETARD HALL OF FAME
Princess Rainbow Kiss Mc'unicorn
Honestly tho, this is why a Third party system, at this time, would never work.
Dems don't run against Dems in the general election. Generally.
This space for sale.
(When you can't answer a question for fear of making you or your savior look bad)
Charlie is befuddled at how wrong you are.
PC RETARD HALL OF FAME
Princess Rainbow Kiss Mc'unicorn
Weren't most of Sarvis's big donors McAuliffe supporters and Donors? They were the ones that wanted him to stay in, to split the republican vote.Charlie is befuddled at how wrong you are.
In modern elections the only one I can think of is Nader. But then again, the 2000 election is pretty unique I think.
This space for sale.
(When you can't answer a question for fear of making you or your savior look bad)
Senior Member
That's what I figured too. That without Sarvis, Cuccinelli wins, but that's not the case according to exit polls. MaCauliffe would have won by less but still same outcome.
Senior Member
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/tonigh...043907551.html
In the last days of his campaign for governor, Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli (R) ran around the state saying his race was a "referendum on Obamacare."
The results are in. Cuccinelli has lost. And Obamacare, therefore, has won.
...Even in an election that the Republican candidate was deeming to be a "referendum on Obamacare," in a state where Obamacare is not popular, against a Democratic nominee whose key career accomplishment is unusual success at influence peddling, the Republican nominee lost.
Senior Member
As Marco Rubio and Ken Cuccinelli himself said, the vote was a referendum on Obamacare. It just shows that Republicans have not been vocal enough in telling people about how it's all death panels, socialism, government takeovers and free money. If only Republicans weren't so polite and timid, then people would know the truth.
Indeed, Mr. Cuccinelli was the first attorney general in the country to sue over the law after it was passed in March 2010, and has gone all in recently on highlighting the botched roll-out and issues with healthcare.gov as a key difference between he and Democrat Terry McAuliffe.
“This is a referendum on Obamacare, and to help us clarify that point, the president is coming tomorrow,” he told a crowd outside of a GOP office in Prince William, drawing scattered boos.
“No, no - no, no; I’m very glad to have him here,” he continued. “I wish he was here today, too. Let’s not let there be any lack of clarity as we close this out for three more days, [four] hours, and three minutes until the polls close. But who’s counting?”
More...
Senior Member
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com...zed/?hpt=hp_t1Documents show first days of Obamacare rollout worse than initially realized
Phone trouble continued into the next week. "Our call center reps can't see their screens," wrote an unnamed consultant on October 7.
According to the war room notes: On day one, October 1, the system mistakenly rejected 90% of Medicaid applicants. The next day, estimates counted 40,000 people in the HealthCare.gov waiting room, while just 100 people had enrolled. By day three, it was clear that insurers were not getting the data for people who had signed up for their plans.
What a clusterfark!! Just *scrap* the whole thing.
Last edited by Atlanteax; 11-06-2013 at 12:11 PM.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote