Quote Originally Posted by cwolff View Post
I don't think anyone is saying that's the reason for our healthcare mess. The uninsured are a component of cost but it's not breaking us.
Now you're being disingenuous.

Quote Originally Posted by cwolff View Post
And again, ACA is not because the uninsured are driving our country to bankruptcy. You're just projecting here.
Still being disingenuous.

Quote Originally Posted by cwolff View Post
The reason you get pushback on this is probably because the GOP is the party that should be FOR making sure people are insured with private insurers. The Dem's should be pushing socialized medicine.
Ironic isn't it?

Quote Originally Posted by cwolff View Post
What you're describing is what Obama and his mouthpieces have said all along. It's why the individual mandate is important and this has been a stated reason all along. We need as many healthy people paying into this system as possible to balance the effect of insuring the previously uninsurable.
And how was this phrased? Was it phrased by stating that, or was it phrased with fear and hyperbole like my previous broken leg statement? Come on man, you know it's the latter, just stop.

Quote Originally Posted by cwolff View Post
I thought you were the one writing all the posts about how the people ACA is targeting aren't going to pay their deductibles anyway. You've written a lot on here about how ACA sucks because most people go bankrupt for relatively small medical expenses. Can't have it both ways.
A) I never said all people Obamacare is targeting aren't going to pay their bills. B) How is what you just said having it both ways? People (SOME!) still aren't going to pay their bills and people are still going to file for bankruptcy for relatively small medical expenses. How are those two mutually exclusive?