Quote Originally Posted by Warriorbird View Post
The primary one and why I deleted the post is due to it being about a completely different bill than ACA.

There is no "free abortion" care. Private insurance companies love this bill. All decisions about personal healthcare are not made by Federal bureaucrats.

Then he conveniently and in an intellectually bankrupt fashion attempts to portray Constitutional law as having only one interpretation.

Then comes the fact that the "right to privacy" he talks about derives from Griswold v. Connecticut, Roe. v. Wade. and Lawrence v. Texas which are cases he actually wants to see overturned from his other scholarship.
Fair enough. And the rest of it? How about rationing of care? Don't think that'll happen?