Quote Originally Posted by Solkern View Post
Due process in what? Interpretation of amendment doesn’t require due process.

any constitutional challenges (rather than a statutory challenge based on a “wrongful act”) must be brought under the normal jurisdictional rules that apply to constitutional cases. And in any event, election challenges must move quickly given their nature, the procedures in this case were thorough, and Trump did not identify any particular ways in which he was supposedly denied a fair hearing. (Over at Reason, Ilya Somin argues that depriving someone of public office doesn’t deprive them of life, liberty, or property, and therefore the Due Process Clause doesn’t even apply.)

https://www.cato.org/blog/agree-it-o...iumph-judicial
Guess the party affiliation that makes up all members of the Colorado Supreme Court?

Ok, so no due process. So you’re ok if some judges arbitrarily decide based on their interpretation of the Constitution that so-and-so candidate engaged in an insurrection & block him from a ballot? They are preemptively deciding his guilt or innocence without all the evidence and court procedures.

It’s anti-democratic what they are doing. Putin does this kinda shit. Jinping does this kinda shit. This is America. We don't let the government elites decide for its citizens whom they can vote for.

Come on now…this isn’t the American way of doing things.