Things that made you Facepalm today (Political Version)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Seran

Opting out is simply not using the coverage, no one is putting a gun to their head in order to use services they don't want. Snowflakes are demanding special "Christian friendly" plans.

---

Except you are wrong. They are forcing employers to pay for services they don't agree with. They are literally saying you can't develop, buy and provide to your employees any coverage that does not include the coverages and expenses that they don't agree with. Your lack of understanding of this is not surprising but it has been explained to you dozens of times. so many so that a certifiable moron could have understood and remembered it. In your case, it's simply willful idiocy.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Seran

Opting out is simply not using the coverage, no one is putting a gun to their head in order to use services they don't want. Snowflakes are demanding special "Christian friendly" plans.

---

"If Simutronics forced you to upgrade to Platinum, you can just opt out by not logging into Platinum, even though you're still being forced to pay for it." ~Seran logic

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Seran

Opting out is simply not using the coverage, no one is putting a gun to their head in order to use services they don't want. Snowflakes are demanding special "Christian friendly" plans.

---

Um, they have zero option to opt out. They are asking for the option to opt out. That is what the lawsuit is about. Why do you want to force people to buy products they don't want?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gelston

Um, they have zero option to opt out. They are asking for the option to opt out. That is what the lawsuit is about. Why do you want to force people to buy products they don't want?

---

Like most words in general, Seran doesn't understand what "opt out" means.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ~Rocktar~

Except you are wrong. They are forcing employers to pay for services they don't agree with. They are literally saying you can't develop, buy and provide to your employees any coverage that does not include the coverages and expenses that they don't agree with. Your lack of understanding of this is not surprising but it has been explained to you dozens of times. so many so that a certifiable moron could have understood and remembered it. In your case, it's simply willful idiocy.

---

There is absolutely nothing stopping an employer from creating a cafe plan of their own which self-funds medical expenses on a cash basis. Nor does it stop the employee who wants to be a snowflake conscientious objector from declining health insurance altogether. Multiple options exist for the .01% of idiots who object to section 2713 of the ACA, further to even have standing they must show /damages/ caused by service /they don't utilize/. This is impossible.

These dumb Christians and their Republican backers who keep trying to find dumber and more ridiculous ways to try and overturn the ACA just need to go back to bed and read their Watchtowers and cry about people they hate getting medical treatment.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Seran

There is absolutely nothing stopping an employer from creating a cafe plan of their own which self-funds medical expenses on a cash basis. Nor does it stop the employee who wants to be a snowflake conscientious objector from declining health insurance altogether. Multiple options exist for the .01% of idiots who object to section 2713 of the ACA, further to even have standing they must show /damages/ caused by service /they don't utilize/. This is impossible.

These dumb Christians and their Republican backers who keep trying to find dumber and more ridiculous ways to try and overturn the ACA just need to go back to bed and read their Watchtowers and cry about people they hate getting medical treatment.

---

Yeah, actually there is fucknugget. The only plans that can not carry the mandated coverages once an employer reaches a certain size are grandfathered plans. Self funded plans still have to meet the Federal Laws, they just don't have to abide a lot of local laws. You are simply wrong, again. And as an employer, after a certain size, you don't get to opt out of providing health insurance. And, as has been highlighted over and over is that they are forced to spend their money, as employers, on plans that have benefits that they don't agree with. Gods you are stupid.

PB is right, no one even has a hope in hell of taking your retard crown away.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ~Rocktar~

Yeah, actually there is fucknugget. The only plans that can not carry the mandated coverages once an employer reaches a certain size are grandfathered plans. Self funded plans still have to meet the Federal Laws, they just don't have to abide a lot of local laws. You are simply wrong, again. And as an employer, after a certain size, you don't get to opt out of providing health insurance. And, as has been highlighted over and over is that they are forced to spend their money, as employers, on plans that have benefits that they don't agree with. Gods you are stupid.

PB is right, no one even has a hope in hell of taking your retard crown away.

---

Sounds like they have the choice to stop growing their company and keep it at a small enough size to not have to provide health care.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by drauz

Sounds like they have the choice to stop growing their company and keep it at a small enough size to not have to provide health care.

---

^ lol

That's like saying if you disagree with income tax rates then the solution is to just not have money.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Methais

^ lol

That's like saying if you disagree with income tax rates then the solution is to just not have money.

---

They can just abstain from growing their company. It's super easy.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by drauz

They can just abstain from growing their company. It's super easy.

---

Cutting off one's nose to spite their face is usually leftist tactic.