https://www.politico.eu/article/rudy...laus-iohannis/
Printable View
Erm PK, this is clearly fake news.
Trump drained the swamp. You'd know that if Google weren't manipulating search results to hurt Trump and his freedom fighting followers.
Trump is going to have to get involved, maybe break up Google or even just seize control of the company himself.
Other facepalm-y news:. Daily Caller has created a fact checking org. And it's putting social media companies in an uncomfortable position.
Look at this circle jerk
Trump fired McGahn via a tweet. I'm sure it has nothing to do with the 30 hours of testimony to the OSC and telling Trump not to pardon Manafort.
No shit. I think everyone has finally had enough of these three retards, between the three of them they account for about 90% of the posts to the politics folder these days. I think when they post something the only thought going through their mind is "I sure hope Androidpk/time4fun/cwolff likes this post!"
Maybe I'm just forgetting, but I don't recall Tgo starting a billion threads every time Obama farted or ate a steak in a way he disapproves of or whatever just to cry about the same shit in every thread and labeling everyone who doesn't blindly agree with them a Nazi. Meanwhile idiots like crywolff think people like Roseanne are alt-right Nazis now and if you disagree with him you're also a Nazi.
These 3 idiots though probably have dozens of threads crying about Trump, all of which are just the same ball of fail, and then they tell other people to stay on topic.
It really is hilariously amazing to witness, and their arrogance renders them incapable of understanding why no one bothers to seriously engage them or do much other than troll them, which turns into claims of "I'm being stalked!"
It's like Clark Griswold's one year membership to the Jelly of the Month club, but for every year.
https://i.imgflip.com/2gu0u0.jpg
We account for 90% of political posts in the politics folder. You all add half a dozen troll posts to everything we write so these threads are needlessly long.
Just use your ignore feature and we will never bother you again. You do have options, so don't act as if you're forced to be here.
In his last call he calls the press the enemy of the people.. wonder where he got that from?Quote:
Robert D. Chain, a 68-year-old from California, began calling the Globe the day of the announcement, according to U.S. Attorney Andrew Lelling's office.
Chain continued to call employees of the newspaper, threatening to kill them for more than a week, prosecutors said, placing 14 threatening phone calls to Globe employees.
His communication was reported to Boston police after he threatened to shoot employees in the head "later today, at 4 o'clock" on the day the editorial was published, the U.S. Attorney's office said.
So are we going to skip the part that says the police weren't doing anything until AFTER he threatened to shoot somebody? Why the fuck wouldn't you report the first handful of times he's calling and threatening you? Somebody has to actively be telling your employer that they are going to SHOOT people before the police care?
hwot
Yeah, I'm a little more concerned with the President of the United States engaging in dictator language by attacking the free press for not covering him the way he wants to AND inspiring violence in others as a result.
Can we at least agree that both of these things are completely inappropriate and unAmerican?
My takeaway is if the police had been notified sooner, they could have caught him BEFORE he felt the need for gun violence was necessary. That's not victim blaming. I also said nothing on the stance the President has taken regarding the press.
Isn't it up to the employer to actually fucking do something BEFORE it hits a level you aren't comfortable with? Not 13 more threats? Where is the accountability on that? Thinking on it, wouldn't you be reaching out to the police yourself? Or do we just need to see where this story develops before we start contacting the authorities?
BTW - free press does not mean freedom from criticism. Most of the media is left leaning and they should be called out for the propaganda.
Thankfully America is voting against watching these cesspools and sorry excuses for journalism as the ratings indicate.
Calling journalists enemies of the people isn't just criticism, it's an invitation for violence.
Predictable pk not willing to hold both sides accountable even though he claims he does ;)
Androidpk: Trump can criticize the press all he wants!!! As long as he does it in a manner of which I approve. Way to continue to hold both sides accountable.
Here is what it comes down to. The left lost after they were like 99.9999999% confident they would win. The individual who won plays a completely different ballgame than prior right leaning administrations.
As a result, the left is in full assault mode and will do anything to destroy the current administration. The irony here is that it is the left that is being violent and encouraging violence.
The left is being violent? That's why it's the right that are out murdering people?
You are fixating on a word that literally does not validate violence. You are looking for an excuse for violence to be committed so you can turn and go "See, this was inevitable when you call people your enemy." As if there weren't some form of checks and balances that were enacted immediately because of arbitrary reasoning. In any other substance I'd call it bullshit.
If someone threatens you numerous times and you only act when a gun becomes involved? That's some fucked company you keep.
No idea, Trump only said fake news media is the enemy of the people, not "the press."
Post a clip where Trump specifically says "journalists" are enemies of the people.
Who specifically has been murdering who that you're referring to?
wait, seriously? he's talking about right-wing terrorism.
Since Sept 12, 2001 73% of violent, extremists incidents resulting in death in the US were caused by right-wing extremist groups. That's from the GAO, btw.
When we say that the right has lost its mind- this is what we're talking about.Quote:
Since September 12, 2001, the number of fatalities caused by domestic
violent extremists has ranged from 1 to 49 in a given year. As shown in
figure 2, fatalities resulting from attacks by far right wing violet extremists
have exceeded those caused by radical Islamist violent extremists in 10
of the 15 years, and were the same in 3 of the years since September 12,
2001. Of the 85 violent extremist incidents that resulted in death since
September 12, 2001, far right wing violent extremist groups were
responsible for 62 (73 percent) while radical Islamist violent extremists
were responsible for 23 (27 percent).
Yes, because I hadn't known such a large scope was being directly referenced in such a glib post.
I'm not gonna open a can of worms, I'll let someone else do that. I don't have a motor to the boat I use for fishing so I haven't gone fishing forever and I don't want to let dead worms go and pretend I did something good.Quote:
When we say that the right has lost its mind- this is what we're talking about.
I need to go fishing.
By the way- terrorism is on the rise in the US. 2016 and 2017 were the worst years we've seen since at least 2000. There were 37 right-wing terrorist incidents in 2017 alone. Compare that to 11 for the left-leaning terrorists and 7 tied to Islamic extremists.
Isn't it cute how Democrats start tracking these stats since September 12th, 2001? I wonder why that could be. Oh I wonder WONDER why that could be?
Could it be because if we started tracking just ONE DAY sooner the stats would look like this:
97.2% (3000 people) were killed by Islamist extremists
2.8% (62 people) were killed by far right wing violent extremists
This is of course ignoring the fact that your stats totally ignore violent left wing attacks since 2001, not to mention how your stat clearly ignores some Islamic terrorist attacks such as Pulse nightclub shooting and San Bernardino shooting.
But yes, do go on how the real threat right now is "far right wing violent extremist groups" killing about 3 people a year.
And how Antifa is a domestic terror group full of their buddies. I hear PK is pretty tight with them.
And however many clearly Islamic terror attacks the MSM decided had nothing to do with Islam despite them screaming ALLAHU AKBAR and/or (paraphrased) I WILL KILL YOU ALL IN THE NAME OF ALLAH AND THIS ATTACK IS SPECIFICALLY ISLAMIC!!!!!! and all that just before they start killing people.
And how hispanics are "white" but only when they do something violent.
etc.
EDIT: fuck, forgot to open with ROFL. That's -1 PhD for me. :(
Claiming that the “violent left” is preparing an insurrection designed to grab “illegitimate power,” the Oath Keepers’ president and founder Stewart Rhodes this week announced on their website that his group is organizing training sessions around the United States aimed at helping militiamen and “Patriots” prepare for “lethal force” at far-right events in cities targeted for right-wing protests.
Appearing on Infowars with host Owen Shroyer on Monday, Rhodes explained that Oath Keepers is organizing “Spartan Training Groups” in every state with the aim of bolstering efforts to combat “antifa and the far left.” He spun the effort as part of a larger vision of becoming a national militia that could be called into action by President Trump
You forgot to start with ROFL. No need to worry, I fixed it for you so you won't lose any PhD's.
Being that Antifa is a domestic terror group. I applaud these people's counter-terrorism efforts.
Anyone wanna take bets on who wins those fights if/when they happen? PK?
Can we just take a second and please differentiate between a group of people who write articles and the group of people who kill about 1,000 people (mostly people of color) every year?
Also, can we provide some documentation that BLM is repeatedly referring to the police as the enemy of the people? I'm not saying it hasn't happened, but some documentation would be handy.
Right- the real issue here is the difference between private citizens protesting and calling a group the "enemy of the people" because they've killed 1,000 unarmed people who mostly, suspiciously look like them and a sitting US President calling a constitutionally protected group the "enemy of the people" because they uncover legitimate corruption that he's been trying to hide from the American people.
You don't have to be okay with either of them, but they are NOT analogous.
Also according to Washington Post (one of the most far left leaning organizations to have ever existed), over 52% of the people shot and killed by police so far this year have been white.
Might want to spin another narrative, time4fun, you're really bad at this.
Here, I'll help you out. Here's a BLM protest chant..
"What do we want"
"Dead Cops"
"When do we want them"
"Now"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hqQXmnMr_w8
I'm curious as to where his defenders draw a line with Trump's behavior. Would they be okay if he said Democrats were the enemy of the people? If black people were the enemy of the people? If Muslims were the enemy of the people? I don't know but something tells me they'd be perfectly fine with it and go along with it.
Androidpk: I fully recognize that BLM and Antifa are partly responsible for violence against police officers and dozens of police officers are killed every year. I also blame Trump for a news organization receiving death threats. But I'm far more concerned with death threats than actual cold blooded murders.
This is pk jumping through hoops to appear to want to hold both sides accountable while also trying to maintain his current favor with the other two in the trio of dumbasses.
You're assuming these are unrelated phenomena, but the argument here is that they are not.
They may be unrelated, but you'd need to provide some evidence that they aren't related or weaken some evidence that was presented to suggest they are.
You can't go into a causal argument and then point out that it's a causal argument as though that somehow undermines it.
Do you have any statistics you can show me that says BLM/Antifa are responsible for the deaths of dozens of officers over a periods of multiple years?
And yes, I'm more concerned with Trump's behavior, because he's the fucking POTUS with far reaching powers and influence. That you're okay with his behavior isn't surprising though.
There is no line. They've VERY well aware that what he's doing is un-American and anti-democratic. They've just come to the conclusion that democracy isn't going to get them the world they want because they're increasingly in the minority.
So they're absolutely fine with an authoritarian who is willing to "take on" the institutions they feel victimized by or are powerless over as long as they can convince themselves he's doing it "for them".
And that's how most authoritarians end up in power- democratically elected (approximately, in this case, anyway) before they proceed to dismantle every democratic system or norm that could possibly hold them accountable. And as long as that authoritarian keeps pointing to marginalized groups as the "enemy", it gives their followers the illusion of security.
These people are willing pawns in this game. They're very well aware of what they're doing- they just lack enough education to understand history and enough foresight to consider what this country looks like when these norms and institutions are broken.
You're fixated incorrectly on the word Enemy. It's a bad sentence, yes. The idea of having an enemy is not a good one, now if that enemy is information the implication of censorship isn't far behind. Nobody wants that, I don't believe that Trump was stating (in any way) that the media should be censored or be considered worthy of violence.
Stop fixating on the word and consider the situation of media he believes himself to be in. That's how I looked at it, if that makes sense.
.....
You are far smarter than this.
Stalin, Mao, and the Nazi Party ALL used this phrase in various languages.
This was not accidental terminology, and you know that. You don't accidentally- repeatedly- echo dictators and totalitarians (remember that Trump's ex-wife claimed he kept a book of Hitler's speeches by his bed). And if you somehow magically did, you'd stop as soon as the entire free world pointed out that you were literally borrowing a phrase from the world's most hated dictators.
I stand by my statement that I do not believe calling the media an 'enemy' was a call to violence or to actively seek out censorship. That's my thoughts on this whole thing and I'll dip out at that. I'm not changing any minds and I'm not seeing a reason to continue on if nobody is being convinced either way.
I think you'll be better served by asking you why Trump hates the media so much. In fact- let's take a look at the institutions be despises and attacks the most viciously and frequently:
The FBI (and the rest of the DoJ)
The Free Press (excluding any pro-Trump conservative outlets of course)
Mueller and his team
Congressional Democrats
Jeff Sessions
What do all of these things have in common?
They have the power to hold him accountable. This isn't about who is or isn't being fair to Trump. This is about power.
How did people first find out about the Trump campaign's endless contacts with the Russian government? The FBI
How did American citizens first find out about the Trump campaign's suspicious contacts with the Russian government (including the Trump Tower incident, Michael Flynn's issues, etc)? The press (excluding the pro-Trump conservative outlets of course).
Who is responsible for giving Rosenstein the power to appoint a special prosecutor to investigation the Russia meddling in our campaign? Jeff Sessions.
Who is currently investigating Trump, his family, and his campaign? Mueller's team.
If midterms go badly, who has the power to start their own investigations with public hearings? Congressional Democrats.
A man who is under countless investigations, whose lies and incredibly suspicious behaviors have been repeatedly exposed by the Press, and whose political opponents are asking questions he doesn't want to answer suddenly decides that the press, Democrats, and the entirety of the Department of Justice are ALL corrupt and out to get him.
And you're taking him at his word over it. When did you all lose the ability to think for yourselves? The math here does *not* add up to "Literally everyone and everything that has any power over me is secretly corrupt and out to get me even though I appointed and oversee most of those things".
You know exactly what it adds up to, and it's time you started admitting it to yourselves at least.
Our President..
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Dl2AMi1X4AAnXbU.jpg
Re-read precisely what I said again. Take your time. Read every word.
If you require me to explain it to you, I will.. but if I keep explaining things to you, how do you ever expect to grow as a person?
Now, don't be lazy as usual.. really put forth an effort here.
You're forgetting.Quick search found multiple threads on him bitching about everything from Obama playing golf too much (Trump has almost played more in 2 years than Obama did in 8) to bitching about Obama learning about a story on the news. (Because Trump doesn't fap 10 hours a day to Fox news)
It's a circle jerk on both sides.
How many posts are you going to make bitching about me posting too much? How many times are you cunts going to type my name? If you hate seeing what I write, put me on ignore you dumbshit. It ain't that hard.
California is a frothing shit hole.
Seriously.
Quote:
It’s generally well known that Secretary of Defense James Mattis hates the “Mad Dog” nickname that U.S. Marines affectionately bestowed upon him during the Iraq War, but apparently that didn’t stop his boss from giving him an even crappier new moniker: “Moderate Dog.”
“What the fuck?” you might ask, spitting your Natty Light all over your laptop. What the fuck, indeed. Here’s the scoop, courtesy of DC gossip rag Politico (emphasis ours):
The problem for the White House extends beyond filling the top job at the Justice Department. Trump has for months been mulling the prospect of replacing Defense Secretary Jim Mattis, who is now expected to be dismissed or to resign after the midterm elections, too. Once enamored of the retired Marine general and his nickname, “Mad Dog,” the president bragged to donors, “The guy never loses a battle, never loses.” But Trump has slowly come to realize that Mattis’ political views are more moderate than his sobriquet suggests, and the president has taken to referring to him behind closed doors as “Moderate Dog.”
Good old Moderate Dog Mattis.
EU to give internet firms 1 hour to remove extremist content
https://abcnews.go.com/Technology/wi...ntent-57768368Quote:
European authorities are planning to slap internet companies like Google, Twitter and Facebook with big fines if they don't take down extremist content within one hour.
European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker said in a speech Wednesday that the Commission is proposing the new rules as part of efforts to step up the bloc's security.
He said that removing material within an hour is important because it's "the critical window in which the greatest damage is done."
The EU's executive body said "propaganda that prepares, incites or glorifies acts of terrorism" must be taken offline. Content would be flagged up by national authorities, who would issue removal orders to the internet companies hosting it. Those companies would be given one hour to delete it.
The proposal , which still needs approval from EU lawmakers and member states, would be a departure for the EU, which until now has allowed online companies to a take a voluntary approach to battling extremist content. The one-hour rule was among a series of recommendations the Commission made in March to fight the spread of extremist content online.
Under the proposal, internet companies would have to take measures, including installing automated systems, to prevent content from being re-uploaded after being removed the first time. Companies that fail to comply would face fines of up to 4 percent of their annual global turnover.
For Google, which owns YouTube, that could amount to as much as $4.4 billion, based on parent company Alphabet Inc.'s $110.9 billion in revenue for 2017.
"We share the European Commission's desire to react rapidly to terrorist content and keep violent extremism off our platforms," Google said. "We welcome the focus the Commission is bringing to this and we'll continue to engage closely with them, member states and law enforcement on this crucial issue."
Facebook said "there is no place for terrorism" on the social media platform.
"We've made significant strides finding and removing terrorist propaganda quickly and at scale, but we know we can do more," it said in a statement.
https://media.giphy.com/media/l0Iype...FMrK/giphy.gif
Holy fuck.
Video surfacing of Jordan Hunt assaulting another woman.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TQb1WQNfNd8
Pretty damn lucky he didn't knock her down in front of the oncoming truck.
https://youtu.be/q6RZZf6HMzo
NSFW warning: Contains brief bush
TLDR: Chick shoves yarn in her cunt before knitting, says people tell her how brave she is.
No, but he did get shit canned though:
https://www.foxnews.com/world/hairst...y-face-charges
Color me shocked that he's a hair stylist.
http://bestanimations.com/Games/Comp...ted-gif-16.gif
I'm a people of color now. As an Asian this is fantastic news!
https://78.media.tumblr.com/7311397d...w666o2_400.gif
New California Law Will Require Kids’ Menus to List Water and Milk as Only Drink Options
Punishable by a $500 fine.
gg idiots :lol:
The fuck, California?
I'd have a young adults menu.
I'd say that my kid identifies as an adult and we're both offended by this kid's menu microaggression.
Screw all that. I'd just have a restaurant in a better state that doesn't try to pull all kinds of stupid bullshit.
Straws are also illegal in Cali. Seems to me like someone got bad service at a restaurant and just wants to kill the industry. Next thing you know, meat cannot be served on a plate for cash.
The straw ban is one of the dumbest things ever. The US already has strict laws and regulations about dumping waste and people are generally good about not littering and throwing shit into the ocean. The US is responsible for very little garbage in the oceans and a very tiny fraction of that is straws.
The main culprits of ocean waste are China, India, and the country of Africa.
California is full of stupid. They also have a law requiring a female be on the board of companies.
I don't think everyone in Africa pollutes our oceans. Just the black people.
We have now gone from "No one should be discriminated against because of their gender" to "Discriminate against men at all costs!"
I just hope a company only has one woman on their board and it's a man who identifies as a woman. I wonder how fast they'll update that law.
since this has gone half sexist, half racist... Fuck any man that needs a damn straw anyways, drink out of the damn cup. Pussy.
If they aren't wearing dresses they are simply men who want to take advantage of gender politics. Clearly. The dress makes the difference.
https://pioneerwoman.files.wordpress.../tootsie21.jpg
Edit to add:
My endorsement of Dustin Hoffman does not constitute an agreement with California's woman on every board law, which is a stupid law. But the fact that it needed to exist in the first place does point out that there's an issue to be addressed. In theory, an average of 50% of board members should be female. If the actual number is low enough to warrant something putting a stupid law into place, there's something the matter.
No. I'm advocating exactly the words I said.
But if that's the argument you're trying to make, then I would argue that in the case of a board member, in at least most boards I've had experience with...physical labor does not seem to be a large part of the job. Most of the pursuits involved are mental, and unless you're claiming that females have less mental capacity than males, then it's really not the same thing, now is it?
Watch this video. Start at 5:27. Also, a puppet is involved so it's up your alley.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N5Us4wcMtl4
Just get Ross Gellar to tell you when you need to pivot, the womens can get that shit up there!
And across 100% of people, theoretically 50% of women should be the best fit for the job given their equal mental capacity. It's not totally cut and dry because you see more women drop out of the pool than men for things like child rearing still, but theoretically speaking, as women are equal in mental capacity to men, they should be the best fit for 50% of those available jobs assuming an equal amount in the workforce in a given field.
If the ratio is something stupidly low, which I don't know if it is or not, and that was the cause for a stupid law to be put into place, then yes, all other things equal, something was wrong to prompt a stupid law.
It's murkier water when you get into fields that are male dominated to start with. STEM fields come to mind. If there are 20% females in a field and 80% male, then logic dictates that 20% of the board would be female, assuming equal mental capacity and drive for the work.
Again, I don't know what the actual ratios were to prompt the stupid law, but historically men have risen higher in most fields. It would not surprise me if the ratio was 90% men to women or worse to prompt the law.
I don't agree with the "quota" implementation of the law, which is why I consider it stupid, but it is an issue that should be addressed in some way. In my opinion that way is an improvement to education, but that's neither here nor there.
I'm sure that sounds great on paper. Most things sound on great on paper, and the reality is typically much different for a number of reasons that "expert studies" are useless for.
Also, straight men in porn should be paid the same amount as women and the pay gap is sexist. Reported.
Yes, on paper is really the only place it makes complete sense, which is why implementing a law like that is stupid, which I said right off, and continued to say in every single post. Nonetheless, a problem does and historically has existed in that area that should be addressed.
You’re all racist and sexist.
Reported to Methais.
Methais reported to Trump.
Trump reported to Anticor.
https://scontent.fbtr1-1.fna.fbcdn.n...dd&oe=5C84E444
This should help catch him.
President Donald Trump says he told the U.S. military mobilizing at the Southwest border that if migrants try to throw rocks at them, the troops should act as though the rocks are “rifles.”
Trump made the comments Thursday in a speech on immigration at the White House. During his comments, he was asked if U.S. troops might fire on migrants:
“It’s the military. I hope there won’t be that,” Trump said. “Anybody throwing stones, rocks, like they did to the Mexican police, where they badly hurt police and soldiers of Mexico ... we will consider that a firearm, because there’s not much difference where you get hit in the face with a rock.”
GG, this fucking braindead despot wannabe telling the troops it's okay to fire on unarmed civilians. How debased can this orange buffoon get??
Stfu pog bitch
Laura Shortridge is a Bitch
I don't remember Cartman as being likable.
The Nigerian army has cited a video of US President Donald Trump, in which he says soldiers should respond with force to migrants throwing stones, to justify opening fire on a Shia group this week. Amnesty International says the soldiers gunned down and killed 45 members of the Shia group.
Only a matter of time until some right wing nutjob does the same in the US. Stochastic terrorism.
Five-term Washington state Rep. Matt Shea has been circulating a manual for holy war in the United States, the Seattle Times reported.
The four-page document, titled “Biblical Basis for War,” goes point-by-point over how a Christian theocratic movement could – and should – exterminate its opposition in a battle to win a hypothetical holy war.
At the outset, Shea’s holy army would issue terms of surrender to its enemies. The demands include “stop all abortions,” “no same-sex marriage,” “no idolatry or occultism,” “no communism,” and “must obey Biblical law.”
If the rest of the country refuses to “yield” to these terms, the document advocates a final solution: “kill all males.
Antifa stirring shit up outside of Tucker Carlson's house.
https://twitter.com/ProducerKen/stat...52617803665409
Dude sounds super duper intimidating. Must be from all the soy enemas.
I thought I had heard it all. Nope.
--------------------------------
(CNN) Lying about your age on dating websites is usually considered a bit of a faux pas. Now a 69-year-old Dutchman wants the courts to make him officially 20 years younger, likening the change to identifying as transgender.
Emile Ratelband has launched a legal bid to change his age by 20 years in order to improve his chances with women on dating applications like Tinder and help with job prospects, according to reports in Dutch media.
"You can change your name. You can change your gender. Why not your age? Nowhere are you so discriminated against as with your age," Dutch paper De Telegraaf quoted Ratelband as saying.
On Monday, he asked a court in his hometown of Arnhem, in the east of the country, for his date of birth to be changed from March 11, 1949 to March 11, 1969.
He told the court that he "suffers" as a 69-year-old and has been feeling "20, 25 years younger" than his official age, according to Dutch newspaper Algemeen Dagblad.
Republicans saying Democrats are trying to cheat and steal the election in Florida by doing the unthinkable thing of :gasp: counting all the votes.
Trump is being accused of being racist because he was a meanie head to three black women reporters.
Which makes sense I guess considering he just recently revoked the press pass of a black woman reporter.
...wait a minute...
He has a long history of demeaning black people. Calling people asking legitimate questions stupid, nasty, loser, racist.. because you're a fucking racist snowflake? Oh but wait, it was Obama that lowered the office of the presidency.. Trump is just dandy.. :jerkit:
It's great you're suddenly concerned about the plight of black people (well black reporters anyways), but if you're going to provide evidence that Trump is racist it's probably not a good idea to claim him being mean to black reporters is proof considered he just revoked the press pass of a white man a few days ago. Or have you already forgotten about what a tool bag Acosta is?
By the way we're all still waiting for those death threats you received.
It's cute that you still try to defend Trump against calls of racism. Oh wait, no it isn't, you're a fucking moronic white supremacist who flips out every time someone points out what a horrible person you are. Tell us again how Obama lowered the office of the presidency.
Let's just cut through all the aggressive flirting you're doing with me right now.
Is Trump being a meanie head to three black female reporters proof he is racist?
If yes how do you figure that considering just a couple of days ago he revoked the press pass of a white man?
It's cute how you keep calling his atrocious acts = to being a "meanie head". Call it for what it is. Trump being a raging piece of shit and you licking his dirty ass and asking for seconds.
sad but true
https://i.imgur.com/k2CWhbU.jpg