Senior Member
Yeah, I'm a little more concerned with the President of the United States engaging in dictator language by attacking the free press for not covering him the way he wants to AND inspiring violence in others as a result.
Can we at least agree that both of these things are completely inappropriate and unAmerican?
My takeaway is if the police had been notified sooner, they could have caught him BEFORE he felt the need for gun violence was necessary. That's not victim blaming. I also said nothing on the stance the President has taken regarding the press.Originally Posted by Androidpk
Isn't it up to the employer to actually fucking do something BEFORE it hits a level you aren't comfortable with? Not 13 more threats? Where is the accountability on that? Thinking on it, wouldn't you be reaching out to the police yourself? Or do we just need to see where this story develops before we start contacting the authorities?
Senior Member
No and this is why the left lost.
You just don’t get it and you are part of the problem. If you want to investigate collusion all you need to do is look at the media.
Black Mamba
Predictable whataboutism is predictable. Anything to deflect from having to face reality with Trump's dangerous, un-American behavior. You wouldn't act this way if Maxine Waters called Fox News enemies of the US.
Senior Member
BTW - free press does not mean freedom from criticism. Most of the media is left leaning and they should be called out for the propaganda.
Thankfully America is voting against watching these cesspools and sorry excuses for journalism as the ratings indicate.
Black Mamba
Calling journalists enemies of the people isn't just criticism, it's an invitation for violence.
You think a dictator just whines about the press?
I wonder what the press in Germany in the 30's would think about your legit mental retardation.
Predictable pk not willing to hold both sides accountable even though he claims he does
Androidpk: Trump can criticize the press all he wants!!! As long as he does it in a manner of which I approve. Way to continue to hold both sides accountable.
Last edited by Tgo01; 08-30-2018 at 02:29 PM.
No, it's not. You're validating violence to make someone seem worse when they couldn't predict the possibility of violence, regardless of statement.
Senior Member
Here is what it comes down to. The left lost after they were like 99.9999999% confident they would win. The individual who won plays a completely different ballgame than prior right leaning administrations.
As a result, the left is in full assault mode and will do anything to destroy the current administration. The irony here is that it is the left that is being violent and encouraging violence.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
