Conservatives: You don't actually own your own body because a make-believe God tells me to hate women.Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
Also conservatives: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PwWux5BAczk
Printable View
Conservatives: You don't actually own your own body because a make-believe God tells me to hate women.Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
Also conservatives: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PwWux5BAczk
Is sellstuff1's meltdown the longest in PC history?
Tell me more about WAPO both being a factual, accurate news source and simultaneously fake news.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
No one on the PC, you retarded bad case of Aspergers. Everyone is already aware of what Trump said about it. Pretty sure no one here is claiming that Trump doesn't make stupid statements either.Quote:
Originally Posted by sellstuff1
Stay triggered though for your daily meltdown that's already in progress though. :lol:
What's your opinion on women in America claiming to be oppressed while this kind of stuff still happens in the world though? Being that you are a triggered woman who claims to be oppressed, you should be able to give us an informed answer.
It's his Asperger's.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
Conservatives in 2019:Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
https://i.imgur.com/hkvLLm9.png
This is correct.Quote:
Originally Posted by sellstuff1
Tell me more about how no one here thinks that anything The President of the United States says is on the up and up.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
I think you're confused, Democrats are the ones who voted to kill children at birth.Quote:
Originally Posted by sellstuff1
Sellstuff "this is a fetus, it is not an individual that owns it's own body" http://images.agoramedia.com/wte3.0/....jpg?width=414
Also Sellstuff: "The earth is flat"
Like I said, the only thing you want from babies is that they grow up to hate liberals and become a temporarily embarrassed millionaire like yourself. Other than that, they can rot in the gutter.Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
But this is a great place to feign your pro-life stance, considering the thread title.
Millionaire?Quote:
Originally Posted by sellstuff1
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/b8/a1...e3929fe31f.gif
https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/John_SteinbeckQuote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
You know, because conservatives are generally poor and rural, which means they're uneducated, which means it's easier to convince them to vote against their own interests. Like raising the marginal tax rate on people that earn more than $10,000,000 per year to 70% in order to pay for social programs.
This is correct.Quote:
Originally Posted by sellstuff1
Damn, you triggered him so fucking hard.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
You won.
No. He's taken a few days off to re-hydrate. It wasn't consistent.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
sellstuff1 is a strong independent woman.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
https://i.makeagif.com/media/9-10-2015/P3RSQr.gif
Yet here you are claiming that a newborn child is still a fetus.Quote:
Originally Posted by sellstuff1
explain how it's in my best interest to vote for a party that hates cis white christian males and voted to kill children at birth? How is killing children at birth in anyones best interest?
Sure I'll take the bait.Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_overpopulation
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped..._curve.svg.png
Sad thing is back in 2014 I could comfortably say sellstuff1 is just an obvious troll. But ever since Hillary lost I truly believe people like him exist, just look at the news and people like him in real life are all over it.
Tell me more about WAPO being factually accurate and fake news, on the same day.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
I agree that natures design of the human being has placed us at the top of the food chain, your point?Quote:
Originally Posted by sellstuff1
Here's another question you wont answer. If you hate rich people so much, why does your ideologies existence rely so heavily on rich people?
Remember when everyone here knows that Donald Trump constantly makes retarded statements, yet everyone here will also defend him to death from their keyboards? Funny how that works.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
Oh, so you are that retarded. Got it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
Intelligent Design in 2019.
It's not funny how that works. It's just funny.Quote:
Originally Posted by sellstuff1
You:
https://i.makeagif.com/media/9-10-2015/P3RSQr.gif
Remember when everyone here knows that Donald Trump constantly makes retarded statements, yet everyone here will also defend him to death from their keyboards? Funny how that works.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
Yours words, not mine.
Tell me, Methais, are you also a pro-life believer in intelligent design?
http://i.imgur.com/0yEPL1a.gifQuote:
Originally Posted by sellstuff1
Intelligent Design in 2019.Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
"A fetus out of the womb" ~ sellstuff 2019Quote:
Originally Posted by sellstuff1
https://media.giphy.com/media/amZfgEVrf84Xm/giphy.gif
Feel free to quote the post where I said this while you're having your all day triggered meltdown. Retard.Quote:
Originally Posted by sellstuff1
What's it like to be actual cancer?
Looks like I triggered someone by asking them about their pro-life, intelligent design stance. Maybe you're just embarrassed that this is what your political affiliation for life boils down to - fake pseudoscience and emotional pleas.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_ignorance This is everything you've ever posted.Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
Normally not one for moderation but Kranar needs to put the dude in his place.
Aww, the little pedophile (who said he ignored me) can't take the heat so he begs mommy to come ground me. That's so fucking precious - almost as precious as that six year old you fucked, pedophile.Quote:
Originally Posted by Astray
For what exactly?Quote:
Originally Posted by Astray
Really?Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
You're fucking terrible at Dark Souls, by the way. Irredeemably bad.Quote:
Originally Posted by Astray
Yeah? He's trolling people that troll so you want kranar to ban him? For being a troll? In that case we'd have to a ban a whole bunch of people.Quote:
Originally Posted by Astray
Is that how you view the guy?Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Look at this little bitch begging for a safe space. Oh well, still appropriate for the thread title.Quote:
Originally Posted by Astray
Keep in mind you're arguing with the person who saw nothing wrong with cyber stalking someone, threatening to get them fired from their job if they didn't start being nice to him on the PC, then threatened to sue Kranar over hurt feelings, of course he's going to side with sellstuff1, he's Androidpk's little protege.Quote:
Originally Posted by Astray
He's the liberal version of methais.Quote:
Originally Posted by Astray
You could always take your own medicine of taking personal responsibility and just put him on ignore.
You still haven't replied to me how WAPO can be both a factual, accurate news source and fake news at the same time. Let me get a glimpse of the mental jungle gym that every conservative needs to live with themselves.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
We're gonna have to respectfully disagree on that.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Oh he is on ignore, I have no problem keeping him there but the constant, psychotic rants are getting old now.
Says the person who thought it was okay to blackmail a high school teacher because he called a racist a racist.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
Agreed, parkbandit is getting a bit long in the tooth.Quote:
Originally Posted by Astray
Androidpk does nothing but lie anymore. Kind of sad. No wonder peam loves him so much.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
AyyyyyyQuote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Look at the little fascist using the bigly kinds of words that his God-Emperor employs. It's so cute watching them slowly radicalize.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
Little bitch whining for a safe space. That's all you are - a tiny, useless little bitch.Quote:
Originally Posted by Astray
Tgo does nothing but lie anymore. Kind of sad. No wonder he loves Trump so much.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
This is a whole new level of "NOU!" Changing just 4 words of a 3 sentence post.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Still waiting for you to explain how the WAPO is both factually accurate reporting and fake news, Dreaven. Or are you not because you can't?Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
You'll be waiting a long time. People have been asking him to provide a source on the SCO being a hoax fabricated by Hillary Clinton for over a year now. And he still won't answer if Trump knows more than the NSA, FBI, CIA, ODNI on topics of national security.Quote:
Originally Posted by sellstuff1
I'm literally just telling you to back up your claims. Sorry that you get so triggered over having to back things up with facts.Quote:
Originally Posted by sellstuff1
I don't give a flying fuck about abortion. Most of the ones who get aborted would have turned out like you, so I see no issue with nipping it in bud. If only your parents had this foresight.
Remember when instead of doing that, you tried to stalk me and get me fired and dox me to Antifa instead?Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Stop being such a loser. It makes you look like a loser. Because you are a loser.
Come on now. Because of that, everybody now knows why you spent so much time in the 00s posting Goatses. You weren't deranged. You're just a Health teacher with a professional curiosity.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/tommy-b...il-no-apology/
Quote:
After being questioned, Bryant stood up and can be heard saying: "The n-word. The n-word. Let's get to the n-word. Hey. Do we have a house n***** in here? Do we? Hey. Would she please stand up?" Bryant said.
Feel better now?Quote:
Originally Posted by drauz
kQuote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
Good boy.Quote:
Originally Posted by drauz
"Everyone should not be voting" and that he and his fellow Republicans care about "the quality" of the votes.
Arizona State Rep. John Kavanaugh
Do you have any context for this one? You're doing this all wrong.Quote:
Originally Posted by drauz
Quote:
Originally Posted by drauz
Not everyone should be voting, you know, like, illegal aliens.Quote:
In an interview on Friday, Kavanagh said his words were taken out of context and defended the measure to stop sending some voters mail-in ballots as a matter of election security. He told The Post that his sentiment about “everybody shouldn’t be voting” was referencing “those fraudulent voters, not less-informed people who have every right to vote.”
There's the context I was hoping for. I can see why drauz left it out.Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
Drauz started to go down hill after attending Simucon. You can't be a part of that clique without being a raging leftist.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
What year was that Simucon?Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
I noticed the difference in him around 2016 when Trump was elected.
Yeah, that doesn't really explain the quality of votes part. Seems like he's just trying to cover for it. I don't think for a second he was talking about fraudulent votes, no one is pushing for fraudulent votes to be counted and it is a non issue but for some reason he's talking about it?Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
Context would be great. Did he say this in a discussion about mail in voting? “Quality” in this context could very well mean he is concerned about fraudulent voting and mail in ballots make fraudulent voting a hell of a lot easier.Quote:
Originally Posted by drauz
I'm thinking it was the summer of 2015 or 2016. I was going to attend but it always coincides with Sturgis and making that decision is pretty much a no brainer.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
.Quote:
“There’s a fundamental difference between Democrats and Republicans,” he told CNN. “Democrats value as many people as possible voting, and they’re willing to risk fraud. Republicans are more concerned about fraud, so we don’t mind putting security measures in that won’t let everybody vote — but everybody shouldn’t be voting … Not everybody wants to vote, and if somebody is uninterested in voting, that probably means that they’re totally uninformed on the issues. Quantity is important, but we have to look at the quality of votes, as well.”
So...he does mention he is worried about fraud in the same sentence he mentions not everyone should be voting.Quote:
Originally Posted by drauz
Although I will agree it's dumb to say people who don't want to vote probably aren't totally informed on the issues. Some people just think both political parties are gigantic jokes and don't want to engage in the system.
A few sentences before and inbetween that is him talking about the uninformed voters. He is talking about people he doesn't want to be voting.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
You "forgot" to include this part:Quote:
Originally Posted by drauz
Is this guy getting roasted for quoting someone else or what am I missing here?Quote:
Tarrant City Council member Tommy Bryant told news outlets his use of the word Monday night reflected something the city's Black mayor, Wayman Newton, had said during an earlier private meeting.
What would be the point?Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
It's just some hearsay.Quote:
The mayor said the video speaks for itself and, in an interview with al.com, denied using the same slur Bryant uttered during the meeting.
We know for a fact though what Bryant did.
Right, because what would be the point of having all the facts/context surrounding it before making a judgement? Just leave those parts out and be like HE SAID THE WORD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! without any other consideration.Quote:
Originally Posted by drauz
Not saying the dude isn't a dumbass, but your context-lite argument isn't exactly stellar either.
Ok, so you either believe one person you don't know or another person you don't know.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
I tend to believe the person who didn't call out for the house n----- in the middle of a gov't meeting, but that's just me.
Not just you. Reasonable human response.Quote:
Originally Posted by drauz
Just so drauz and Bhaalizmo realize: you are defending the Republican mayor who is accused of using the racial slur first against a black woman in a private meeting. But you all seem too eager to defend the man either because you thought he was a Democrat or because he's black. Bhaalizmo for sure is a racist so he's defending the man because he's black, I'm not sure about drauz though.
okQuote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
This is correct.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bhaalizmo
kQuote:
Originally Posted by Bhaalizmo
I'm not defending anyone calling someone a n-----, I am saying the guy making the accusation isn't believable. The guy who called out for the house n----- doesn't have much credibility. It would of course be terrible if the mayor did call her that but I'm not going solely off the word of that guy. If someone comes out and corroborates his story then the whole game changes.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
“The American people deserve to know the truth that Nancy Pelosi bears responsibility as speaker of the House for the tragedy that occurred on Jan. 6,”
~Representative Elise Stefanik, Republican of New York and the party’s No. 3 leader.
The thing I can't quite figure out is if these people say this stuff and actually believe it, or if they're really such horrible people that they would rather try to get an election advantage out of an armed insurrection that was gunning for them than to hold people accountable and help keep this from happening againQuote:
Originally Posted by drauz
The police asked her for additional reinforcements and she refused and rather than allow Republicans who would argue that and call witnesses who would testify to that fact Pelosi refused to allow those Republicans to participate in the commission and instead picked two Never Trump Republicans who would push the narrative Pelosi wants to hear.Quote:
Originally Posted by drauz
Only people like time4fun think this commission is legit.
When you vote for Pelosi, do you step on the shit on the sidewalks or just weave your way about?Quote:
Originally Posted by time4fun
If you are using the phrase "armed insurrection that was gunning for them" to describe the events of 1/6/21 you are most certainly a retard of the highest magnitude.Quote:
Originally Posted by time4fun
Welcome back Andraste.. your rare brand of really stupid and ignorant posts were desperately missing on this forum.
Do you have a source for this? Everything I've seen is that she doesn't have control over the capitol police.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
Because it's not true. Lol. Gym Jordan is just trying to muddy the waters. Yes. The gym Jordan who looks the other way when he hears about sexual assault allegations from those who he is suppose to be coaching.Quote:
Originally Posted by drauz
Republicans blocked the bipartisan bill that would have put many more of them on the committee. Now they're desperately trying to get on said committee to continue to spread false information.
The claim that Pelosi was in charge of Capitol Police on Jan. 6 is FALSE, based on our research. While the House speaker has some ties to Capitol Police oversight, saying Pelosi is “in charge” of the agency isn't accurate. The agency is overseen by a three-member board, none of whom are appointed by Pelosi. Additionally, the Jan. 6 select committee will investigate more than the Capitol Police, and there's no evidence Pelosi herself will be investigated.
Oh tgo, why are you cool with those who cover up sexual assault and lie to the American people. Clearly TGO supports sexual assaults as long as it's man on man.
Sure. Here ya go:Quote:
Originally Posted by drauz
https://www.npr.org/2021/01/11/95554...lled-during-ri
She doesn't have control over capitol police. What she could have done was request assistance from the National Guard.
Quote:
The former chief of U.S. Capitol Police says security officials at the House and Senate rebuffed his early requests to call in the National Guard ahead of a demonstration in support of President Trump that turned into a deadly attack on Congress.
Quote:
Sund told the Post that House Sergeant-at-Arms Paul Irving was concerned with the "optics" of declaring an emergency ahead of the protests and rejected a National Guard presence.
The House Sergeant-at-Arms sure as shit works with the speaker of the House to ensure the safety of House members. So either the House Sergeant-at-Arms unilaterally decided more security wasn't necessary (highly doubtful), or he consulted with Pelosi who told him to piss off his more security, much like the mayor of DC wanted a light police presence as well.Quote:
Sund says he requested assistance six times ahead of and during the attack on the Capitol. Each of those requests was denied or delayed, he says.
Washington, D.C., Mayor Muriel Bowser also wanted a light police presence at the Capitol.
Lol.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alfster
Are you just quoting a news article now?
Nothing there even comes close to proving your point. I doubt they ask the house about how they want security handled, I would guess they are given itineraries and told to get it done.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
Me: They asked Pelosi for help and she refused.Quote:
Originally Posted by drauz
You: Link it
Me: Here is link showing the former Capitol Police Chief requesting help from the House Sergeant-at-Arms, who works directly with the Speaker of the House to ensure the safety of House members, and said help was refused multiple times.
You: That doesn't prove what you are saying.
https://media4.giphy.com/media/6yRVg...200w.webp&ct=g
Instead of wasting time on the January 6 hooligans, I'd rather the Democrats use their majority to focus on real issues effecting most of the American people. The federal minimum wage hasn't been raised in over 12 years, and millions of people still can't afford healthcare. And climate change which is getting worse every year while they don't do shit to address it. Wildfires in the west are worse than last year, we've got more extreme storms causing damage, and the heat waves are getting worse too. But I don't expect much from any politicians these days. They all do what their rich donors want, not what the people want.
Democrats gonna ride this January 6th dumb shit for as long as they can.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kyulen
It's funny because I was reading an article from some leftist rag (because 99% of them are leftists rags these days so I don't much have choice) and it said something like "As January 6th fades from the memory of most Americans, the House January 6th commission is getting started."
Like...YUP! Thank you for inadvertently telling the truth for once, "news." It's no coincidence this commission is just now getting underway, 6 months after the fact and will somehow stretch until right around, oh I dunno, a few days after the midterms. And if Democrats retain control of the House they will suddenly need a new January 6th commission right around...oh I don't know...let's say January 2024.
You're expecting the same institution that spent decades detonating nuclear devices in the earths atmosphere to fix things.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kyulen
It said the sergeant-at-arms denied it. I just don't think she would have much of a say in how they prepare for events like that.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
Except the sergeant-at-arms literally works with the Speaker of the House to ensure the safety of House members. I'm just finding it totally impossible to believe that the sergeant-at-arms took it upon himself to say no additional security forces were necessary without even discussing it with the Speaker of the House. I'm sure that's the version Pelosi says though, which is why she demanded the resignation of the sergeant-at-arms AND the DC police chief.Quote:
Originally Posted by drauz
Have either of them refuted her version?Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
From the gov't website with his job description:
Seems pretty believable that they are solely in charge of security.Quote:
The Sergeant at Arms reviews and implements all issues relating to the safety and security of Members of Congress and the Capitol complex. The Sergeant at Arms also coordinates extensively with the U.S. Capitol Police and various intelligence agencies to assess threats against Members of Congress and the Capitol complex.
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/...S-V2-3-3-3.pdf
Quote:
the Sergeant–at–Arms shall, ‘‘maintain order under the direction of the Speaker or other presiding officer.’’
Yes. The Capitol Police chief is the one I quoted earlier saying he made several requests and all were denied. My bad earlier I said DC police chief, I meant Capitol Police Chief.Quote:
Originally Posted by drauz
https://media.tenor.com/images/30ae1...9d0a/tenor.gifQuote:
Originally Posted by drauz
That is clearly talking about decorum during a session as it says if you continue reading or if you had provided the full quote.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
Quote:
The primary duty of the Sergeant–at–Arms is to maintain order in the House Chamber. Pursuant to clause 3(a) of rule II, the Sergeant–at–Arms shall, ‘‘maintain order under the direction of the
Speaker or other presiding officer.’’(17) The Speaker may direct the Sergeant–at–Arms to present the mace (the symbol of the authority of the Sergeant–at–Arms) to enforce order in the Chamber.(18) The Sergeant–at–Arms
is tasked with strictly enforcing the rules of decorum
"Those fires are worse than last year = MAN MADE CLIMATE CHANGE IS REAL!" -Kyulen 2021Quote:
Originally Posted by Kyulen
"armed insurrection" :lol: :lol: :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by time4fun
https://i.imgur.com/37wEcvt.jpg
You still have a lot of work to do if you have any hopes of reclaiming your belt.
Read further down.Quote:
Originally Posted by drauz
The Sergeant–at–Arms maintains a close relationship with the Capitol Police,(36) as part of the office’s general security responsibilities. The Sergeant–at–Arms sits on the Capitol Police Board, which oversees the Capitol Police ‘‘to advance coordination between the Capitol Police and the Sergeant–at–Arms . . . in their law enforcement capacities.’’
It isn't just decorum.
You didn't continue reading either, did you?Quote:
Originally Posted by drauz
That was in reference to Tgo's quote, what you posted is much further down and is a different part of their duties. The working with the speaker part is specific to decorum.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
The Speaker of the House can straight up remove the Sergeant at Arms at will. He definitely answers to her.Quote:
Originally Posted by drauz
This whole "ZOMGINSURECTIONCOUPEDETATARMEDINSURRECTION!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!" was staged for the extremely stupid and naïve people of this country to get upset over.
The president of my company can fire me, that doesn't mean I answer directly to them.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
It means you DO answer to them though and if they tell you to do something, you do it.Quote:
Originally Posted by drauz
Also, the Speaker is the ONLY person that can fire the Sergeant at Arms. There isn't anyone in between them.
You do if he says you do, which means you already do and just aren't needed to at this time, if ever.Quote:
Originally Posted by drauz
To further illustrate this point, Speaker Pelosi has, through the Sergeant at Arms, mandated the USCP arrest anyone, other than Congress members, be arrested if they refuse to wear a mask on the House side of the Capitol Building.
I mean I don't directly report to them on all matters.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
The speaker is the only single person that can fire them, the house can as well.
Quote:
The Committee on House Administration exercises oversight of the Office of the Sergeant–at–Arms and provides policy direction.
I was speaking about a singular person. Pelosi is his boss. She nominates him. She puts him in the job. She can singularly fire him.Quote:
Originally Posted by drauz
She also just issued a directive through him to arrest people that refuse to wear a mask on the House side.
Stop being obtuse, he doesn't just work for her under decorum. Every aspect of his job is overseen by her.
That is part of decorum, but you're right this isn't going anywhere. I have serious doubts that every aspect of what he does goes thru her and is ok'd by her. I think that security decisions are likely made by him.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
This really shouldn't even be in question, but Democrats and the media for some reason is putting doubt in everyone's mind.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
The only question is did he inform Pelosi of the police chief's request for more resources, or did he act alone and decided all by himself that more officers/National Guard troops weren't necessary.
I'm willing to bet he at least ran it by Pelosi and has now offered to be her sacrificial lamb and resign and be on his way rather than admit he at the very least ran it by Pelosi. It's not like anyone on the commission will call him in to question him about this under oath or anything.
Not every aspect, just requests for the National Guard because the police chief personally made a request for them because of threats being made on something that only happens once every 4 years and every single member of congress will be there when this all goes down. I have a feeling he at the very least said to Pelosi "Hey the police chief wants the National Guard there but I told him to pound sand."Quote:
Originally Posted by drauz
I didn't say every thing he does has to be okay'd by her. I said she is his boss, and can direct him to do things. I don't know why this is such a difficult concept for you to grasp.Quote:
Originally Posted by drauz
Because I've said what I said in my last post and haven't been arguing that she isn't his technical boss. I have been saying that she likely doesn't have much involvement in how security is handled.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
For some reason you want to prove that she is technically his boss, which I haven't been discussing. So yes she can direct him to do things, we done with this?
No becauseQuote:
Originally Posted by drauz
You said she can only direct him about decorum during a session. I mean, if you want to change your stance now, that is super cool. We both know you just read to the first line you liked and cherrypicked it though.Quote:
Originally Posted by drauz
I never said she micromanages him, although it would 100% be in her power if she so desired. She isn't just "technically" his boss. She has more power over him than the President has over his Cabinet Secretaries.
BTW, it is 100% codified too. § 15.12 Pursuant to clause 3(a) of rule II,(75) the Sergeant–at–Arms maintains order under the direction of the Speaker or other presiding officer and not individual Members.
Trying to defend Nancy Pelosi was your first mistake.Quote:
Originally Posted by drauz
https://media.tenor.com/images/4d06c...807d/tenor.gif
Are you downplaying her role because she is a woman? I bet if the Speaker was a man, you wouldn't be arguing this much.Quote:
Originally Posted by drauz
Fucking sexist.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
I guess if you don't want to read the whole conversation and then accuse me of changing my stance there's not much I can do about that.Quote:
Originally Posted by drauz
Except she has total say, as she is his boss and he has to do what she tells him.Quote:
Originally Posted by drauz
And I've been arguing that I doubt she provides much say in how security is handled.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
Well we just don't know that do we? We do know that she is having anyone, other than Congressmen and staffers directly accompanying said Congressmen, refusing to wear a mask on the House side arrested.Quote:
Originally Posted by drauz
Correct, and that's why I've said "I doubt" and "I think". There's nothing proving one way or the other. I just don't think she gets very involved in most security plans except maybe to be briefed on them.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
When people are walking around without masks:Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
Pelosi to sergeant-at-arms: Arrest them all!!!!
When there is talk of a riot taking place on the day all members of congress will be in the capitol to certify presidential election results and the Capitol police chief requests the National Guard to help keep everyone safe:
Naww! No need to bother the Speaker with such trivial bullshit!
This sounds completely legit.
I mean, if I was her I'd have been heavily involved in security plans/briefings, especially when a massive protest is planned. As Speaker making sure House business can be done is squarely on her. I think this failure rests on her just as much as the Sgt at Arms and the USCP.Quote:
Originally Posted by drauz
So in your opinion Mitch McConnell is equally to blame, since the senate sergeant-at-arms didn't request more help as well?Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
Or is it just the house sergeant at arms that can make those calls?
No, because Mitch McConnell is a turtle.Quote:
Originally Posted by drauz
Better just assume that Pelosi had nothing to do with it then and treat anything else as fiction, right? Because that's kind of what you do.Quote:
Originally Posted by drauz
Treat what else as fiction? Do you mean nothing?Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
https://media2.giphy.com/media/111eb...YLu/200w_d.gifQuote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
I mean you cherry pick something, present it as fact, and then when proven that you're incorrect, you downplay it and/or act all obtuse.Quote:
Originally Posted by drauz
Like you claiming that the "vast majority of murders in Louisiana are in New Orleans," Methais? And then lying about lying, and then lying about lying about lying for weeks?Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
How retarded and lacking in self-awareness can you be? :rofl:
https://media.giphy.com/media/sDOhzJBsFvjMY/giphy.gif
Incoming mental gymnastics from Methais: "iT dOeSn'T cOuNt wHeN i dO iT, mY rEtaRdAtiOn iS pErFoRmAtIvE!"
What did I present as fact that was incorrect?Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
No, that was much worse. But to be fair, it was way more entertaining.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
The rest of your replies, which should start arriving within the next 5 minutes, will be copied to your special thread to contain your cancer.
Sorry you're upset that your hypocritical attempt to criticize someone else blew up in your face, but uhh, best of luck figuring out how the Internet works.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
And pro-tip: The vast majority of murders in Louisiana still aren't in New Orleans. You're just retarded.
https://media.giphy.com/media/UU1bHu...63Jh/giphy.gif
You were off by a whole minute.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
Be better.
:rofl: ... Does it need to be explained to you? Or can you figure it out this time?Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Goddamn you're really fucking stupid.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
It sounded pretty stupid, didn't it?Quote:
Originally Posted by Kyulen
It's literally the case you made.
Because you are retarded.
No one should be surprised you are far left.
It's where your kind congregates.
Yeah. Welcome to why we're all in this politics sub-forum treating ParkBandit, Tg01, Neveragain, Rocktar, and Shaps like punching bags. Because they deserve it, and if we didn't they'd have themselves a clan rally in here.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kyulen
Clan is a Democrat creation.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bhaalizmo
Sorry. That's on you, retard.
The KKK was a southern, white, rural conservative creation... the same people who, in 2021, support Trump.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Sorry. That's on you, retard. Be sure to post in your meltdown thread soon. :)
Yes yes, keep implying people are racist while being a racist, supporting racist policies, electing a racist POTUS all the while claiming some fake moral superiority and objectifying women for over a decade.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bhaalizmo
Best of luck figuring out why the overwhelming hypermajority of Black people want nothing to do with Republicans.Quote:
Originally Posted by ~Rocktar~
Spoiler Alert: It's because your position is divorced from reality.
Because racist fucks like you and the DNC have sold them into economic slavery and slaughtered their unborn by the millions in the worst case of genocide in the modern world all quietly selling the lie that it's to "help" them. Don't worry, when the economic collapse happens, they won't just try and kill white Republicans when they are starving in the inner cities, they will come for you too. Remember it was your iconic POTUS Johnson that said "I will have those niggers voting democratic for the next 200 years." Now fuck off.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
https://twg2a.wordpress.com/2014/05/...ext-200-years/
All these people crying about social warriors really like to throw ists around, far more than the people they complain about.Quote:
Originally Posted by ~Rocktar~
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_-eD2n2dD2Y
All you ever need to know about Joe Biden.
Oh, and he's got street cred from knowing Cornpop.
How dare people be held to their own faux standards. Only Democrats can be racists because they have always been the racists, duh.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alfster
This is correct.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bhaalizmo
Translation: Rocktard's racist infantilization of Black people is his only explanation for why his mental gymnastics don't convince Black people that dEmOcRaTs aRe ThE rEaL rAcIsTs!Quote:
Originally Posted by ~Rocktar~
Best of luck with that performative confusion, gnashing your teeth in fury because bLaCk pEoPlE jUsT dOn'T uNdErStAnd!
:rofl:
1) You're bastardizing that quote. The supposed line is "We have lost the South for a generation" -- because the racist white, conservative south would be turned off by the Civil Rights Act, retard.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rocktard
2) That quote is historical fiction.
3) Right after the passage of the Civil Rights Act, the GOP nominated the notorious Barry Goldwater for president, who opposed the Act, and he subsequently lost in every state except his own and the deep south.
Now fuck off, dipshit.
Best of luck explaining why people of color overwhelming want absolutely nothing to do with Republicans, and in dealing with your mental gymnastics convincing no one. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain Wishing Away The Rural, White Conservative South's History Of Slavery And Racism
Tell us more about this fantasy and your moral high ground Rocktard. It's going really well so far.Quote:
Originally Posted by ~Rocktar~
Most of my post he replied to was me criticizing the Democrats for doing nothing for the working people just like the Republicans, but he ignored that because I mentioned climate change, which they're also not doing shit about. I can't even criticize the Dems from the left without some conservatives on this sub-forum freaking out at me.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bhaalizmo
You can't reason with them here. PB especially, has a limited set of responses / shticks which he will use to respond and attack you with. It's all the same with the alt right club here. There is no reasoning, no logical debate. It's just pushing Republican talking points, regurgitating the same anti-anything that isn't conservative attacks. No amount of effort trying to debate constructively will be rewarded, which is why most of the people who bother to post here don't waste time trying, and just treat PB and crew like punching bags.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kyulen
This is correct.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bhaalizmo
Translation: "REEEEE! Bhaalizmo called us stupid! NOU! NOU! NOU!"Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais' Daily Dose Of Simping For Parkbandit
Yet another spectacular self-parody, Methais. Glad to see I'm not the only one who makes you Big Mad.
Look at this retard believing he is the one punching and not the one getting punched.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bhaalizmo
You are better off going back to your "I SWEAR GUYS, I'M NOT GAY!" thread and posting more pictures of things you'll never have.
Look at this retard believing he is the one punching and not the one getting punched, despite having just humiliated himself with yet another totally unforced error in yet another display of performative tribalism.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit Attempting to Convince Himself In Yet Another Venue That He Isn't Constantly Embarrassing Himself
You are better off going back to your months-long meltdown thread and sending strangers sociopathic, sexually graphic messages full of your trademark impotent rage because you got humiliated in a political discussion.
Wow, it's weird how you always bring gay into not gay conversations.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Something you wanna talk about grandpa?
It's weird how you are always defending yourself about not being gay.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bhaalizmo
Something you wanna draw out in crayons, retard?
Predictable, how you attempt to turn a question about your standard attack into a defense of anything. Anyone with a 1st grade education can see that it's not what you say, but you still assert that it is as if you have power to change things with your misbegotten beliefs. How's that working out?Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
It's almost as if you're barely able to string words together, and don't really understand what most of them mean separately or in combination. Or that you think wishing makes it so. But it doesn't in the real world. That must be disappointing every day I expect.
"It's weird how Bhaalizmo responds to a thing I keep saying!"Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
:rofl:
Another spectacular self-parody, Tardbandit. This is what earned you the Retard Championship. Nobody made you fall flat on your face -- you did that all on your own.
https://media.giphy.com/media/8qDzzyxbcfimY/giphy.gif
This is what happens when normal people are at work busy and our resident Retard Champion is sitting in it's own filth and no one is babysitting him.
It shat all over the place.
I have no one to blame but myself. I built that perfect thread to contain it in and no one used it.
I'll see if I can get taptalk working again and I'll babysit it tomorrow.
Oh, look - you posted your own nonsense in the "dumb things conservatives say" thread, saving us all the trouble, RCT.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
https://i.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/...ngebobmeme.jpg
Best of luck coming to terms with reality, and the fact that nothing you do limits where anyone else posts. Be sure to post a bunch in your record-setting meltdown thread, though. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
He's the only student in the Ashlianus school of NO U.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
https://i.gifer.com/Ksqj.gifQuote:
Originally Posted by Ashlianus simping for Bhaalizmo via more Ashlianusing
Imagine 1) not understanding the difference between mocking his hilarious hypocrisy and lack of self-awareness and a NOU, 2) being so proud of your mistake as to blast it out.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais' Daily Dose Of Simping For Parkbandit
That's Methais for you -- desperate to white knight for RCT.
:rofl:
Democraps...fucked in the head
Republitards...fucked in the head
Liberturdians...fucked in the head
You all suck massive, veiny cock.
Find me someone who stands on issues and can back up his views with prior performance, and I'll vote for em.
http://images4.fanpop.com/image/phot...1-1024-768.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by Elanthil
From the guy whos fetish is to literally own women as slaves....Quote:
Originally Posted by ~Rocktar~
From a guy that thinks supporting a racist POTUS and party line to enslave everyone this is rich. You have no understanding of what you are talking about which is no big surprise to anyone.Quote:
Originally Posted by drauz
Tell me more about the Republican southern strategy please.Quote:
Originally Posted by ~Rocktar~
Remember, that doesn't exist and is a Democratic conspiracy theory... except for the chairman of the RNC apologizing for it in 2005.Quote:
Originally Posted by drauz
Tell me how Johnson didn't say "I'll have those negros voting democrat for 200 years." Or perhaps how the current racist POTUS didn't say "If you don't vote for me, you ain't black."Quote:
Originally Posted by drauz
I'll wait.
Tell me how everyone that ever apologized for something actually did what they apologized for? I'll wait.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
Ooh! Another chance to put the fat, retarded neckbeard in his place! Thanks, Rocktard!Quote:
Originally Posted by ~Rocktar~
1) You're bastardizing that quote. The supposed line is "We have lost the South for a generation" -- because the racist white, conservative south would be turned off by the Civil Rights Act, retard.
2) That quote is historical fiction.
3) Right after the passage of the Civil Rights Act, the GOP nominated the notorious Barry Goldwater for president, who opposed the Act, and he subsequently lost in every state except his own and the deep south.
https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/...40/347/125.jpg
Those are quite the mental gymnastics, Rocktard. Except nothing you said erases the RNC's Southern Strategy, or their subsequent "apology" for it. Better luck next time.Quote:
Originally Posted by ~Rocktar~
I have it on good authority that Ashlianus' parents apologized for bringing him into this world, because they definitely did it. And I believe that they sincerely are sorry.Quote:
Originally Posted by ~Rocktar~
Isn't it hilarious that the only right-wing explanation for the GOP apologizing for the Southern Strategy is "well, sometimes people lie and apologize for things they didn't do," as if establishing GOP leadership as liars would somehow then absolve them of the Southern Strategy?Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
:rofl:
If you were capable of basic reasoning, though, Methais, you wouldn't have spent the last few weeks humiliating yourself with totally unforced errors. And you wouldn't be a Trump apologist, but that's another story.
Did he actually say that? Can you quote anything before or after that or even where said quote happened?Quote:
Originally Posted by ~Rocktar~
Or did you just read that in a conservative rag and blindly believed it?
I'll wait.
One person said they heard him say it, the steward for Air Force One. So maybe he did, maybe he didn't. He has said the N word a lot though.Quote:
Originally Posted by drauz
Not bastardizing anything, sorry to say.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
Nope again, real quote.
Here is some reference to the racist Democrat party and it's history of racist remarks from leaders past and present.
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/the-d...s-two_b_933995
3. Point has nothing to do with the statement. The Democrats are racist through and through, always have been and don't show any signs of changing.
BTW shitbag, not fat, far from retarded but then again you are the champion there so being called retarded by you is kind of a badge of honor and don't have a beard. So, 3 out of three wrong here and 2 fouls and a wiff on the other points you made.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
:rofl: Something isn't a "real quote" by virtue of you asserting so, or the Newsmax hack who wrote that book, and provided zero evidence that LBJ ever actually said that quote.Quote:
Originally Posted by ~Rocktar~
Except for that pesky, little thing called reality where it certainly relates to the centuries of racism that southern, white rural conservatives have shown "through and through, always have been and don't show any signs of changing."Quote:
Originally Posted by ~Rocktar~
https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/...40/347/125.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by ~Rocktar~
You're a foul wiff.Quote:
Originally Posted by ~Rocktar~
https://memegenerator.net/img/instances/28599035.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by Bhaalizmo
“I’m going in with 20 strong men, and I’m going to speak to the school board, and I’m going to give them an option. They can leave or they can be removed. And then after that, we’re going to replace them with nine parents and we’re going to vote down the mask mandates that evening — that evening. This is how you get stuff done. Forget writing your legislator. Forget it! They’re not listening,” Lynch said before saying people would have to take his life before he allowed “criminals” to enforce the mask mandate.
Steve Lynch, the Republican candidate for Northampton County executive
Who?
That shit has always been weird to me. "Well let me just sit here and lose shit tons of money." I mean, I get that insider trading should be illegal, it just seems like a crime that most people would probably commit.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
What information did congress have about the China virus that the general public didn’t know in February that would give them knowledge the stock market was going to shit the bed soon?
That seems like the real story here that no one seems interested in investigating. What did congress know and for how long before they decided to share it with us mere plebs and why didn’t they share it sooner?
If you didn't think the stock market was going to shit the bed from corona, what kind of drugs were you on, or how far up your ass was your head is my question. Myself and people at work had been talking about it before the crash happened. This just seems like a witch hunt to me and yet another waste of tax payer dollars, not that it's anything new.
While I get the point of insider trading being illegal, if someone gets insider info anyway, what are they expected to do? Just sit there and take a huge loss that they know is coming?Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeril
Didn't Congress somewhat recently (under Obama I think) pass some law that made insider trading illegal for members of Congress, as it apparently wasn't illegal before then or something?